PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

U Dickson

Publications and source records attributed to U Dickson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Remifentanil vs fentanyl/morphine for pain and stress control during pediatric cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is a short acting, potent synthetic opioid that does not accumulate after infusion or repeated bolus doses. It may be rapidly titrated to the requirements of individual patients. Titrated infusion of remifentanil may be able to provide potent analgesia required for pediatric cardiac surgery and obtund the stress response in theater whilst not having the persistent respiratory depression and sedation seen with longer acting opioids. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized to receive a titrated infusion of remifentanil (0-1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or a standard dose of fentanyl (30 microg x kg(-1)) prebypass plus morphine (1 mg x kg(-1)) on rewarming. Blood samples for glucose and cortisol were taken at regular intervals from induction through bypass and into the first 24 h of postoperative intensive care. In addition to biochemical indicators of the stress response we recorded baseline hemodynamic parameters and any acute physiological events. RESULTS: Ten patients received morphine, seven received remifentanil. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in cortisol measurements, mean arterial pressure or heart rate recordings. In the last time period the remifentanil group had a larger rise in blood glucose concentration (baseline 3.9, rise 3 mmol x l(-1)) than the fentanyl/morphine group (baseline 4.2 rise 1.9 mmol x l(-1)), CI -4.3 to -0.2. CONCLUSIONS: The only significant difference was in glucose in the postbypass time periods. Although statistically significant, this difference is insufficient evidence of increased stress in the remifentanil group. The results show that in the patients studied there was no clinically important difference between the two techniques.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed2002

The addition of antiemetics to the morphine solution in patient controlled analgesia syringes used by children after an appendicectomy does not reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

BACKGROUND: We studied the effect of intraoperative ondansetron 0.1 mg x kg(-1) or droperidol 0.01 mg.kg-1, followed by the same dose of the antiemetic agent added to the morphine solution during patient controlled analgesia (PCA) on the incidence of nausea and vomiting in children following an appendicectomy. METHODS: Sixty children, aged 5-13 years, were recruited and randomly allocated to receive no prophylactic antiemetic, the control group (group C), ondansetron (group O) or droperidol (group D). The PCA pump was programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 20 microg x kg(-1) of morphine.with a 5-min lockout period and a background infusion of 4 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1). RESULTS: Postoperatively, the three groups were compared for nausea, vomiting and sedation scores for 24 h. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 33% for group C, 44% for group O and 41% for group D. There was no increase in sedation scores in the droperidol group. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to show any significant benefit from the prophylactic administration of ondansetron or droperidol to children using morphine PCA devices following appendicectomy in the doses we employed.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗
PubMed2001

Anaesthesia for insertion of bone-anchored hearing aids in children: a 7-year audit.

Forty-three children, aged 23 months to 14 years, received 102 anaesthetics for insertion of bone-anchored hearing aids, each lasting approximately 30-60 min. Forty of the children had a recognised syndrome involving the head and neck, including Goldenhar's and Treacher Collin's syndrome. The incidence of congenital heart disease was 19%. Pre-existing conditions, anaesthetic technique, grade of intubation, complications and discharge were audited. Sixteen of the patients were classified as Grade 3 or 4 intubations. Over the 7 years, laryngeal mask airway usage increased for airway maintenance rather than tracheal intubation, as did the use of propofol for induction rather than inhalational methods. Intra-operative complications (5.9%) were related to the airway, and postoperative ones (17.6%) mainly to nausea and vomiting. Surgery was performed as a day case in 71% of the patients despite some long-distance travel.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Histamine challenge in young children using computerized lung sounds analysis.

The use of the histamine challenge test (HCT) for the diagnosis of asthma has so far been limited to older children who can perform spirometry consistently. Recently, wheeze detection by tracheal auscultation with analog recording into a tape recorder has been utilized in young children in place of spirometry. Wheezing can also be identified using computerized lung sounds analysis (LSA) by a typical pattern on spectral analysis. Our aim was to develop a practical computerized system in which the response to histamine could be identified in an objective manner and documented on hard copy. Lung sounds were recorded with a Hewlett-Packard HP 21050A contact sensor placed over the right upper anterior chest. Sounds were amplified, band-filtered (50 to 2,000 Hz), and digitized at a sampling rate of 5.5 kHz into a Macintosh SE computer, and spectral LSA was performed. To validate our method, six older children (ages 9 to 16 years) with mild or moderate asthma underwent HCT. The identification of typical wheezing pattern (discrete, high-amplitude power peaks) on LSA was compared to 20 percent fall in FEV1 (PC20) and symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness). In five children, the histamine concentration required to produce the characteristic wheezing pattern on LSA was half that required to produce a 20 percent fall in FEV1. In the sixth patient, wheezing on LSA and PC20 occurred at the same histamine concentration. To determine the technique's applicability to young children, we then studied six young asthmatic children (age 2 to 5 years). All children showed the wheezing pattern at a histamine concentration of 25 percent or 50 percent (one or two steps prior) to that producing symptoms (cough, wheeze, chest tightness) or wheezing on tracheal auscultation. Six age- and sex-matched nonasthmatic children (control subjects) did not show this pattern on LSA and had no symptoms or tracheal wheeze with HCT. We describe a sensitive method enabling application of HCT to young children who are unable to perform spirometry. This method is as sensitive as, and often more sensitive than, conventional PC20 with spirometry or tracheal auscultation.

Adolescent↗