Donor age greater than 50 years does not influence midterm results of heart transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to U Livi.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of time course and risk factors for morbidity and mortality may allow better cardiac graft allocation, surveillance timing, and planning of immunosuppressive strategies. METHODS: Six-month morbidity and mortality were retrospectively analyzed in a multiinstitutional series of 645 heart transplant recipients. RESULTS: During a 3432 patient-months follow-up, 87 patients died of infection (n = 11), rejection (n = 11), multiorgan failure (n = 9) and other transplant-related causes (n = 56); six-month survival rate was 86%. Three hundred thirty-seven recipients had 967 treated rejection episodes (2.87 episodes/patient with rejection, lethality 3.2%); 223 major infectious episodes occurred in 162 patients (1.38 episodes/infected patient, lethality 7%). Six-month rejection and infection-free survival rates were 44% and 73%. Total mortality and cause-specific morbidity sharply declined after the first month; 160 patients (25%) had no events during follow-up. At multivariable analysis, significant risk factors for mortality were postoperative acute kidney failure, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, and previous cardiac surgery. Rejection was associated with steroid-free and globulin-free immunosuppression and infection was associated with steroid immunosuppression, cytolytic treatment, venous lines placement greater than 7 days, and mechanical ventilation time. No single or combination of variables was able to discriminate patients with an event-free course. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality have the highest incidence during the early posttransplantation phase. Preoperative variables are of limited value with respect to immunosuppressive treatment in predicting outcome. Infection is far less frequent than rejection but, in view of the higher lethality rate, deserves a vigorous effort for prevention, which is best addressed by appropriate modulation of immunosuppressive strategies.
BACKGROUND: In the absence of clinical evidence of cardiac allograft rejection, it is still poorly defined whether the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation biopsy grade 2 (e.g., focal moderate rejection) should be treated. Aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the evolution of focal moderate rejection, diagnosed during the first postoperative year in patients who had undergone orthotopic heart transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 256 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2 biopsies from 110 orthotopic heart transplantations; 125 episodes occurred within the first 3 months (group 1), 131 later (group 2). For each grade 2 diagnosis, two biopsies, one immediately before and one after, were analyzed and classified as follows: lower (grade 0 or 1), equal (grade 2), or higher (grade 3 or 4). RESULTS: Evolution of grade 2 rejection was to a lower grade in 66% of cases, an equal grade in 16.8%, and a higher grade in 17.2%, with differences between group 1 and 2 (higher: 25% versus 10%, respectively, p = 0.005). Episodes which progressed into higher grades occurred earlier compared with those which persisted or resolved (9.2 +/- 8.6 weeks versus 20.0 +/- 15.6, p < 0.001). Five-year actuarial survival and incidence of graft coronary disease were similar in patients whose conditions progressed and those whose conditions did not. However, left ventricular ejection fraction at 1 and 2 years was lower in patients whose conditions progressed compared with those whose conditions persisted or resolved (56% +/- 4% versus 66% +/- 2%, p = 0.004; 56% +/- 10% versus 64% +/- 8%, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Progression of grade 2 rejection occurred in a minority of cases and did not affect 5-year survival or incidence of coronary disease, but its relationship with long-term cardiac allograft dysfunction warrants further investigation.
Recurrent rejection is an uncommon, severe complication after heart transplantation that is associated with a poor long-term prognosis. Photopheresis (ECP), a new form of extracorporeal photo-chemotherapy used for the treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and several autoimmune diseases, has also been used for prevention and treatment of acute rejection in heart transplant recipients. It seems to induce specific suppression of both cellular and humoral rejection. In this study, we evaluated whether ECP added to standard therapies allowed better control of rejection and reduction of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in patients with repeated rejection episodes. Eight heart transplant recipients (6 men and 2 women, mean age 48 yr), with recurrent rejection were treated with ECP for 6 months. Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) were performed monthly. As a result of treatment, 7 patients on ECP experienced a reduction of the number and severity of rejection episodes. The fraction of EMB negative for rejection increased from 13 to 41%, whereas the fraction of specimens with multifocal and/or diffuse moderate lymphocytes infiltration (grades 3A and 3B) decreased from 41 to 21%. ECP allowed reductions of daily immunosuppressive therapy: prednisone by 44% (16.9 vs. 9.4 mg), cyclosporine by 21% (366 vs. 291 mg), and azathioprine by 29% (137 vs. 97 mg). No major side effects were observed. We conclude that, although the number of patients is small, the use of ECP was safe and associated with improved control of recurrent rejection. This allowed tapering of immunosuppressive drugs, which was particularly useful in two patients with insulin-dependent diabetes and one with sternal wound osteomyelitis.
The results of heart transplantation in a consecutive series of 19 end-stage valvular disease patients (15 male, aged 48 +/- 8 years) were analysed retrospectively. The indication for heart transplantation was heart failure due to left and/or right ventricular dysfunction; 16 patients had undergone previous valve surgery, but prosthetic dysfunction was present in only one patient. All patients were in NYHA class IV, 15 were on oral anticoagulants and 5 on i.v. catecholamine support. There were four in-hospital deaths (21%) and one late death (5%), resulting in a 1-year mortality rate slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of patients transplanted for other indications (16%). Mean follow-up of the survivors was 48 +/- 33 months (range 9-95); 5-year actuarial survival was similar to that observed among the other heart transplantation patients (74 +/- 10% vs 77 +/- 3%, P = NS). The incidence of acute rejection and infection was also similar in valvular disease and non-valvular disease patients. Kidney and liver function at 1 year post-heart transplantation was preserved in all cases; cardiac catheterization revealed normal graft function in all patients and the absence of coronary lesions in all but two. In conclusion, in our limited experience morbidity and mortality in patients transplanted for end-stage valvular disease seem to be similar to those of patients undergoing heart transplantation for other etiologies.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been considered a relative contraindication to heart transplantation (HTx) because of possible increased infection rates and worsening DM with prednisone immunosuppression. The introduction of cyclosporine has allowed us to reduce the dosage of oral steroids and to accept DM patients (pts) for HTx. We reviewed the mid-term outcome of our DM pts who had undergone HTx. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 257 HTx recipients, 19 males and 3 females, aged 53 +/- 8 years, were diabetic. Prior to HTx, DM was controlled with insulin in 5, with oral hypoglycemic agents in 7 and with diet in the remaining patients. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and azathioprine; low-dose prednisone was added in 10 patients because of repeated rejections. RESULTS: All patients survived HTx and were followed 2 to 75 (mean 38 +/- 21) months. There were 4 late deaths, with actuarial survival of 84% at 5 years. DM was more difficult to control after HTx (12 patients requiring insulin vs 5 pre-HTx), but comparison of diabetic vs non diabetic patients following HTx showed no significant difference in frequency of rejection or infection during the 1st year (2.6 +/- 1.6 vs 2.1 +/- 1.5; 0.5 +/- 0.4 vs 0.4 +/- 0.3 episode/patient respectively) and in 5-year actuarial survival (84% vs 77%). Renal function is preserved in all DM patients, hypertension has developed in 11/18 (61%); annual post-HTx cardiac catheterisation has shown normal graft function and coronary arteries in all but 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-term results indicate that HTx can be safely performed in diabetic patients; a longer follow-up is required to determine whether DM is no longer a contraindication to HTx.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
From November 1985 to July 1993, 29 out of 241 patients (12%) who underwent heart transplantation (HTx) at our institution had one or more "classical" contraindications to HTx: age > or = 60 years (20 patients); insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (5 patients); irreversible renal failure requiring combined heart-kidney transplantation (2 patients); previous surgery for malignancy (1 patient); familial hypercholesterolemia (1 patient) and active systemic infection (1 patient). The main indication for HTx was ischemic cardiomyopathy (21 patients, 61%). Immunosuppression regimen consisted of Cyclosporine and Azathioprine, oral prednisone being subsequently added in 6 patients because of persistent rejection. There were 2 perioperative deaths and one late death. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 88 months (mean, 28 +/- 20) with an actuarial survival at 5 years of 85 +/- 8%. Annual cardiac catheterization demonstrated normal graft function and coronary arteries in all. No significant differences in survival, incidence of rejection and infection, renal function and duration of hospitalization were found when these patients were compared with those with no contraindications to HTx. In conclusion, HTx can be performed with good early clinical results in selected patients with "classical" contraindications to HTx; longer follow-up, however, is needed to confirm whether extension of the recipient selection criteria justified.
Chronic shortage of donor organs for heart transplantation led us to extend donor age limits. To verify the effectiveness of such a policy we have compared the results of heart transplantation in 45 patients with donors more than 40 years of age (group 1) with those of 72 patients older than 50 years of age who had heart transplantation with younger donors (group 2) between November 1985 and December 1992. The two groups were comparable in terms of mean recipient age, recipient and donor sex, and indication for heart transplantation. Mean donor age was 46 +/- 4 years (range 41 to 59 years) in group 1 and 23 +/- 7 years (range 8 to 39 years) in group 2 (p < 0.001). In group 1 cerebrovascular accidents were more common as the cause of donor death (60% versus 16%, p = 0.001), and no difference was found in ischemic time (144 +/- 47 minutes versus 140 +/- 48 minutes, p = not significant). There were 6 early (< 30 days) deaths in group 1 (13%) and 10 in group 2 (14%; p = not significant). Fatal acute graft failure was more prevalent, but not significantly so, in group 1 (10% versus 5.5%, p = not significant). Mean follow-up was 29 +/- 20 months (range 3 to 78 months) in group 1 and 30 +/- 20 months (range 3 to 80 months) in group 2 (p = not significant). At 5 years actuarial survival was 80% +/- 6% in both groups with comparable graft performance at echocardiographic and hemodynamic control studies. A significant difference was found in freedom from any type of coronary artery abnormality between group 1 (49% +/- 13%) and group 2 (77% +/- 8%) at 5 years (p < 0.05); however, freedom from coronary stenotic lesions only was similar. Major conduction disturbances have occurred more frequently in patients of group 1 (37% versus 12%; p = 0.003) without any difference in the need for permanent pacing. Donors older than 40 years of age can be accepted for heart transplantation with early and long-term results comparable with those obtained with younger donors. The impact of a higher incidence of coronary abnormalities on late performance of older grafts must be assessed at longer follow-up. Our results indicate that, because of the current organ shortage, extension of donor age limits is justified, even up to the sixth decade of life in selected cases.
The results of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) via the femoral vein in heterotopic heart transplant recipients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those obtained using the right internal jugular vein approach. A total of 139 EMB were performed in 8 patients using the femoral (35) or the jugular (104) approach. Twenty three (64.7%) of the procedures performed via the femoral vein were part of the yearly hemodynamic and coronary artery study, and 12 (35.3%) constituted a routine postoperative evaluation of the myocardium rejection state in patients with imperviousness of the right internal jugular vein. Comparing the results obtained with the femoral approach, we observed a higher overall success rate (94.3 vs 88.5%, NS) and obtained more samples that were useful for histologic evaluation (95.5 vs 85.9%, NS); with the jugular procedure, the fragments were significatively larger in diameter (1.28 +/- 0.55 vs 1.61 +/- 0.85 mm, mean +/- SD) and in area (1.49 +/- 1.16 vs 2.28 +/- 2.24 mm2, mean +/- SD). No cardiac or local complications were noted when the femoral approach was used, while two attempts to perform biopsy via the jugular vein resulted in obstruction of this vessel. Our data suggest that the femoral venous approach for endomyocardial biopsy in heterotopic heart transplant recipients is a valid alternative to the more commonly used routes.
To evaluate heart rate variability (expressed as the standard deviation of RR intervals) within 5 years of follow-up, we studied 20 patients (14 males, 6 females, mean age 44 +/- 12 years) who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation. Six measurements were taken: one in the first 3 weeks after transplantation, and the others once annually, for 5 years. Twenty healthy subjects (mean age 44 +/- 7 years) constituted the control group. Heart rate variability increased significantly in the first 3 years of follow-up (7.2 +/- 1 vs. 11.1 +/- 4, p < 0.001; 11.1 +/- 4 vs. 15.2 +/- 4, p < 0.01; 15.2 +/- 4 vs. 18.9 +/- 5, p < 0.05); in the following years this trend slackened and values did not reach a statistically significant difference (18.9 +/- 5 vs. 21.4 +/- 5; 21.4 +/- 5 vs. 22.5 +/- 5). The mean standard deviation was invariably greater in the control group (63.6 +/- 12). These findings show that sinus rhythm variability in the denervated heart progressively increased over 5 years of follow-up. The absence of presynaptic uptake, which is responsible for adrenergic hypersensitivity to circulating catecholamines and intrinsic cardiac reflexes, does not appear to cause this phenomenon, since these mechanisms are not able to evolve in time after cardiac transplantation. Therefore, an enhanced beta-adrenergic receptors density or affinity to circulating catecholamines or a limited sympathetic reinnervation may be the more probable underlying mechanism.
Between January 1987 and September 1991, 112 operative survivors of heart transplantation were initially immunosuppressed with cyclosporin A and azathioprine without prednisone. Eighty-eight patients (79%) remained on a regimen of double therapy for a mean follow-up of 25 +/- 15 months (range, 1 to 54 months), whereas 24 patients (21%) had oral prednisone, 5 mg/day, added to maintenance therapy for persistent or repeated rejection. There were 5 early deaths (4%) because of acute rejection (4 patients) or infection (1 patient). Only 1 patient died late after heart transplantation of chronic rejection. Actuarial survival was 95% +/- 2% and 94% +/- 3% at 12 and 48 months, respectively. Mean rate of acute rejection was 1.7 +/- 1.0 episodes per patient, with a 5% +/- 2% freedom from rejection at 48 months. Ten patients (9%) required in-hospital treatment for infection; the actuarial freedom from infectious episodes was 85% +/- 4% at 48 months. Actuarial freedom from hypertension was 43% +/- 7% at 48 months. At annual catheterization, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.64 +/- 0.08 and 0.62 +/- 0.05 at 1 year and 4 years, respectively, with evidence of coronary lesions in 9 patients (8%). In conclusion, steroid-free immunosuppression after heart transplantation is associated with a high incidence of acute rejection. However, the excellent medium-term survival and the low incidence of both infection and chronic rejection seem to justify a wider use of such treatment.
Severe left ventricular failure in ischemic heart disease may contraindicate conservative surgical procedures. To redefine therapeutic indications, the clinical and angiographic data of 143 patients (137 men and 6 women) with ischemic heart disease and a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30 who were seen by us between June 1985 and December 1990 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to therapy: medical only, 72 (group 1); myocardial revascularization, 20 (group 2); and heart transplantation, 51 (group 3). Clinical status was poorer in group 3, with congestive heart failure as predominant symptom; angina was more frequent in group 2. No difference was noted in hemodynamic variables. Four early deaths (20.0%) occurred in group 2 and 7 (13.7%) in group 3. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 64 months (mean, 22 +/- 19 months), with an actuarial survival of 28% +/- 9%, 80% +/- 8% and 82% +/- 5% at 5 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Even though postoperative New York Heart Association class was better in group 3 (1.0 versus 2.3 in group 2; p < 0.01), the difference in survival was not significant. Although in patients with ischemic heart disease and low left ventricular ejection fraction heart transplantation offers the best clinical results, considering the donor shortage, we conclude that myocardial revascularization may still be performed with good midterm results.
Photopheresis (ECP) is a new therapy for oncological and autoimmune diseases consisting in the reinfusion of 3-9 x 10(9) leukocytes, taken from the patient by leukapheresis, and treated in an extracorporeal system with 8-methoxypsoralen and ultraviolet light A. Nine patients affected by T cell immunomediated diseases (2 scleroderma, 1 chronic GVHD, 1 polyarteritis, 1 rheumatoid arthritis and 4 heart transplant patients with numerous episodes of acute rejection) were treated with ECP. Photopheresis was performed on 2 consecutive days every 3-4 weeks. All patients affected by autoimmune diseases experienced an improvement during treatment with ECP. In 2 of the 4 patients with heart transplant, rejection was reversed by photopheresis. No major side effects were observed during the treatment. In conclusion ECP is a safe and well tolerated therapy. Although the number of patients is small, ECP seems to be an effective modality in many diseases.
Successful orthotopic heart transplantation was performed in a 38-day-old child with a fetal echocardiographic diagnosis of a left ventricular mass and in a 40-year-old woman with cardiac murmur since childhood and an echocardiographic diagnosis of asymmetric septal hypertrophy. Pathologic examination of the removed hearts, consisting of gross, histologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural studies, led to the final diagnosis of cardiac fibroma. Both patients were alive and in good condition at 35 and 28 months, respectively, after operation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.