PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

U Metzner

Publications and source records attributed to U Metzner.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Assessment of topical corticosteroid activity using the vasoconstriction assay in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: The aim of the study was to evaluate the vasoconstrictive activity of four new galenic preparations of hydrocortisone and to compare it with concentration-equivalent reference preparations. The study comprised two study phases: the pilot study phase and the main study phase. During open, nonrandomized pilot study, the optimal administration period was tested. The main study was performed in a randomized, double-blind intraindividual comparative design. SUBJECTS: Twenty male and female volunteers with healthy skin who responded to topically applied clobetasol-17-propionate before entering the trial participated in this study. TREATMENT: All subjects received the same treatments. The test preparations new galenic formulation (NGF) hydrocortisone 0.25% cream, NGF hydrocortisone acetate 0.25% cream, NGF hydrocortisone 0.5% cream, and NGF hydrocortisone 1.0% cream were compared with the respective reference preparations Soventol hydrocortisone (hydrocortisone acetate 0.25%), Hydroderm HC 0.5% cream (hydrocortisone 0.5%), Hydrogalen cream (hydrocortisone 1.0%) and placebo (vehicle of test preparations). METHOD: The topical preparations were applied occlusively for 2 h (pilot study) or 24 h (main study) on outlined areas (5 x 5 cm with a distance of 3 cm) of both forearms (4 areas for each). Assessment of vasoconstriction was performed before treatment, and 0.5, 4, 6 and 24 h after treatment (observation period) using a subjective rating scale (OLSEN vasoconstriction score) and measuring the colorimetric parameter a* (redness) by use of the Chroma-Meter (Minolta company, Ahrensburg, Germany). RESULTS: A significant vasoconstriction (positive blanching effect) was measured by use of chromametry for test preparations hydrocortisone 0.25% cream, hydrocortisone 0.5% cream, hydrocortisone 1.0% cream and for the reference preparation Hydrogalen cream compared to placebo 30 min after the end of treatment. In contrast, the reference preparations Soventol hydrocortisone and Hydroderm HC 0.5% did not differ significantly from placebo 30 min after treatment. No statistically significant effect of all formulations was observed 4-24 h after treatment in comparison with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The vasoconstrictive efficacy of test preparations was mostly stronger than the concentration-equivalent reference preparations. This effect was achieved by use of new galenics of test preparations resulting in enhanced skin penetration and improved efficiency. No unwanted side effects were observed during the course of the study despite increased efficacy of the topically applied test preparations.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2002

[Paraneoplastic pityriasis rubra pilaris in metastatic adenocarcinoma without diagnosable primary].

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 75-year-old woman, without a history of severe illness, developed an erythematosquamous skin disease on hands and forearms. After continued spreading of these cutaneous lesions, she was admitted to hospital, presenting with a generalised desquamating erythrodermia and marked pruritus. INVESTIGATIONS: Skin biopsy showed cornocutaneous signs with alternating ortho- and parakeratosis, typical for pityriasis rubra pilaris. Laboratory findings showed a chronic to acute inflammation with leukocytosis, granulocytosis in the differential blood count, raised C-reactive protein in a range from 54.7 to a maximum of 157.2 mg/l and a protein electrophoresis with elevated alpha1- and alpha2-fraction. TREATMENT AND COURSE: The erythrodermia only temporarily receded under systemic therapy with acitretin and prednisolone. The patient developed intermittent septic fever accompanied by reduction or loss of consciousness. The general condition of the patient worsened considerably. Out of a rapidly progressing pleural effusion malignant cells similar to adenocarcinoma were isolated. Because CA15-3 was elevated we conducted an extended search especially for a breast carcinoma, but found only pathologically enlarged axillary, mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes in conventional X-ray, CT, ultrasound and endoscopic procedures. The patient died from paraneoplastic pulmonary embolism. At autopsy, the widespread metastatic dissemination from poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma was confirmed. A necrosis in the right breast containing tumour cell remnants could probably be regarded as the primary neoplasm. Immunohistochemically no definite proof of breast nor gastro-intestinal carcinoma could be found. CONCLUSIONS: This case presents a rare paraneoplastic cutaneous manifestation as pityriasis rubra pilaris triggered by a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The primary neoplasm could not definitely be identified, neither pre nor post mortem.

Acitretin↗
PubMed2002

The atopy patch test -- reproducibility and comparison of different evaluation methods.

BACKGROUND: There is still a lack of standardization of the atopy patch test (APT) in test procedures and evaluation methods. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of APT results and to compare visual evaluation to chromametry and laser Doppler imaging. METHODS: Fifty-two volunteers with atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome (AEDS) were included. The APT was performed on tape-stripped and unstripped test fields on their backs using cat dander, house dust mite and grass pollen allergens from two different suppliers. Responders were re-tested 4-12 weeks later with the same allergens on their forearms. RESULTS: Using Allergopharma allergens, 14 (26.9%) volunteers showed one or more positive reactions. The reproducibility rate was 56.3%. The Erlangen atopy score in APT-positive and negative volunteers was 19 +/- 6 vs 15 +/- 6. The test agreement in volunteers tested with both allergens, from Allergopharma and Stallergènes, was poor. Correlation of the results between the three evaluation methods was significant (P < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The low reproducibility rate of APT results and the poor inter-test-agreement using allergens from different suppliers show that much work remains to make the APT a reliable tool in identifying relevant aeroallergens that lead to flare ups of AEDS. Compared to chromametry and laser Doppler imaging, visual scoring was superior in differentiation between irritative and allergic reactions.

Adolescent↗