PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

U Peitz

Publications and source records attributed to U Peitz.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Performance of a rapid whole blood test for Helicobacter pylori in primary care: a German multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Serological rapid whole-blood tests for the detection of H. pylori are presently being promoted for use in primary care. We conducted a multi-center study to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Boehringer Mannheim Helicobacter pylori test (BM test), which is identical with the Cortecs Helisal test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A previous diagnosis of H. pylori, a history of peptic ulcer diseases, or proton-pump inhibitor, bismuth or antibiotic use during the preceding month were exclusion criteria. The BM test was performed prior to endoscopy by 7 primary care physicians, 5 practicing gastroenterologists, or a single physician in the university hospital outpatient service. During endoscopy, antral and corpus biopsies were obtained for histology and rapid urease testing (RUT). H. pylori positivity was defined by histology and/or RUT as reference methods. H. pylori IgG-ELISA was performed additionally. RESULTS: Of the 203 patients included, 151 were H. pylori-positive by reference methods (74.4%). The overall accuracy of the BM test was 77.3%. Eight BM tests were indeterminate, and in the other 195 patients the test performed as follows: sensitivity 80.3%, specificity 81.3%, positive predictive value 92.9%, negative predictive value 57.4%. Using IgG-ELISA as reference, the BM test performance was similar. It also did not differ substantially among the three groups of physicians involved. CONCLUSIONS: We found the performance of the BM test to be insufficiently accurate, as both over- and underdiagnosis of H. pylori infection were not infrequent. This test needs to be improved before its use in primary care can be recommended.

Adolescent↗

The European meeting on Helicobacter pylori: therapeutic news from Lisbon.

The current standard of Helicobacter pylori treatment has been confirmed by the studies presented at the Lisbon workshop--that is, one of three one week proton pump inhibitor (PPI) based triple therapies comprising a twice daily standard dose of a PPI in combination with two of the following antimicrobial agents: clarithromycin, amoxycillin, or a nitromidazole. This standard of treatment is also highly efficacious and cost-effective in routine community practice. The current data confirm the equivalence of ranitidine bismuth citrate to PPI, and of azithromycin to clarithromycin. The optimum dose for azithromycin has not yet been defined. There is some evidence that in certain regions treatment for more than one week may be advantageous. The reasons are still not clear. However, microbial resistance may be one important factor, as it has a substantial effect on treatment outcome and the prevalence of resistance varies considerably in different areas. The negative impact of resistance is increased by shortening the treatment time. At present, there is no general necessity to test for resistance before treatment. However, before selection of a second line treatment, testing for resistance is recommended.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

One-week low-dose triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori is sufficient for relief from symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers.

AIM: To test the hypothesis that 1-week low-dose triple therapy for H. pylori is sufficient for relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers. METHODS: Fifty-nine out-patients with duodenal ulcers and positive rapid urease test participated in this randomized, double-blind, two-centre study. All patients were treated for 1 week with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. In a double-blind fashion, patients were then randomly treated for another 3 weeks with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or an identical-looking placebo. Patients were investigated endoscopically before treatment for H. pylori, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. H. pylori infection was assessed by a 13C-urea breath test at the time of enrollment and 4 weeks after cessation of any study medication. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included in the 'all patients treated' analysis of efficacy. The overall H. pylori cure rate was 96% (95% CI = 87-100%), with no difference between the treatment groups. After 2 weeks duodenal ulcer healing was confirmed in 91% (95% CI = 80-100%) of patients treated with omeprazole and in 76% (95% CI = 60-91%) in the placebo group (P = 0.14). After 4 weeks all ulcers had healed. Relief from dyspeptic symptoms and adverse events (13.8 and 16.7%) did not differ between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: One-week low-dose triple therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is a highly effective and well-tolerated approach to the cure of H. pylori infection in patients with a duodenal ulcer. Our data suggest that continuation of antisecretory drug therapy beyond anti-H. pylori therapy is actually excessive regarding relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Efficacy of primed infusions with high dose ranitidine and omeprazole to maintain high intragastric pH in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: In healthy subjects, continuous infusions of high dose ranitidine and omeprazole produce high intragastric pH values. AIM: To test the hypothesis that both drugs also maintain high intragastric pH values in patients with bleeding ulcers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In two parallel studies, 20 patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers and 20 patients with bleeding gastric ulcers were randomly assigned to receive either ranitidine (0.25 mg/kg/hour after a bolus of 50 mg) or omeprazole (8 mg/hour after a bolus of 80 mg) for 24 hours. Intragastric pH was continuously recorded with a glass electrode placed 5 cm below the cardia. RESULTS: Both drugs rapidly raised the intragastric pH above 6. During the second 12 hour period, however, the percentage of time spent below a pH of 6 was 0.15% with omeprazole and 20.1% with ranitidine (p = 0.0015) in patients with duodenal ulcer; in patients with gastric ulcer it was 0.1% with omeprazole and 46.1% with ranitidine (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Primed infusions of omeprazole after a bolus produced consistently high intragastric pH values in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, whereas primed infusions with ranitidine were less effective during the second half of a 24 hour treatment course. This loss of effectiveness may be due to tolerance.

Adult↗

Effect of curing Helicobacter pylori infection on intragastric acidity during treatment with ranitidine in patients with duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with duodenal ulcer cure of Helicobacter pylori infection resulted in a pronounced decrease in intragastric pH during treatment with omeprazole. AIM: To test the hypothesis that treatment of H pylori adversely affects the pH response to ranitidine. PATIENTS: Eighteen patients with duodenal ulcer who were infected with H pylori were studied. METHODS: Twenty four hour pH recordings were performed during treatment with ranitidine (300 mg) at night before and four to six weeks after cure of H pylori infection. Presence of H pylori was assessed by a rapid urease test, culture, histology, and a 13C urea breath test. Also, the fasting gastrin concentrations were measured before and after treatment for H pylori infection. RESULTS: Cure of H pylori infection resulted in a considerable improvement in both antral and corpus gastritis and a decrease in fasting gastrin concentrations. As a result of the cure the night time intragastric pH during treatment with ranitidine decreased (median pH 6.8 v 5.4; p = 0.007), whereas the acidity during the daytime was not affected. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with duodenal ulcer the intragastric pH during treatment with ranitidine depends on H pylori. However, the loss of effectiveness in altering pH seems to be less pronounced than previously found with omeprazole.

Adult↗

Efficacy of omeprazole one year after cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients.

OBJECTIVE: We have previously shown that, in duodenal ulcer patients, pH control by omeprazole is less pronounced after cure of Helicobacter pylori infection. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that this response to omeprazole persists 1 yr after cure of H. pylori infection. METHODS: In 12 duodenal ulcer patients, intragastric acidity was measured with a glass electrode during treatment with omeprazole (20 mg) once daily before, and 4-6 wk and 1 yr after, cure of H. pylori infection. H. pylori infection was assessed by [13C]urea breath test, culture, histology (Warthin Starry stain), and rapid urease test. RESULTS: Cure of H. pylori infection resulted in a lowered pH during omeprazole treatment. This effect persisted after 1 yr. Median 24-h gastric pH before H. pylori treatment was 5.6; 4-6 wk after cure of the infection it was 2.9 (p = 0.003), and 1 yr after cure of the infection it remained unchanged (pH = 2.5; p = 0.5). Accordingly, twice as much time was spent above pH 3 and pH 4 before H. pylori treatment than 1 or 12 months after cure (percent of time > or = pH 3: 82.7 vs. 49.7 vs. 43.1; percent of time > or = pH 4: 72.7 vs. 38.3 vs. 26.4). CONCLUSION: In duodenal ulcer patients, cure of H. pylori infection resulted in a marked rapid and persistent decrease of the pH increasing effect of omeprazole. Therefore, H. pylori is a determinant of the pH achieved in response to omeprazole treatment in duodenal ulcer patients.

Adult↗

[Helicobacter pylori: pretherapeutic resistance status in Germany (Ruhr area)].

BASIC PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVE OF STUDY: The situation of pretherapeutical antimicrobial drug resistance of Helicobacter pylori has therapeutical implications. For this reason the present study was designed to evaluate the frequency of resistance in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 201 H. pylori isolates cultured on the basis of biopsies taken by routine gastroscopies were tested for resistance by E-test. The antibiotics examined were amoxicillin, tetracycline, clarithromycin and metronidazole. For further analysis the last 101 patients were asked for demographical and clinical data that were evaluated for a correlation with metronidazole resistance. RESULTS: Pretherapeutical resistance against amoxicillin and tetracycline was not detected. The rate of drug resistance against clarithromycin came to 3% and against metronidazole to 29%. There was a higher incidence of metronidazole resistance in female patients (Odds ratio 1.71; p = n.s.). Reliable predictors for metronidazole resistance, however, could not be identified. CONCLUSIONS: About 30% of H. pylori isolates are pretherapeutically resistant to metronidazole. Resistance to clarithromycin is still rare, but further monitoring remains necessary to detect changes in the community.

Amoxicillin↗

[Ulcer healing through the elimination of Helicobacter pylori: is a week of therapy enough?].

AIM OF STUDY: To test whether one week's triple therapy with omeprazole and two antibiotics is enough to induce healing of a peptic (gastric and/or duodenal) ulcer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 112 Patients (73 males, 39 females; median age 55 [18-88] years) proven by culture or histology to have an Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection and uncomplicated peptic (gastroduodenal) ulcer. For one week they received omeprazole (20 mg once or twice daily) plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin/metronidazole, clarithromycin/tetracycline, clarithromycin/amoxycillin or amoxycillin/metronidazole) to eradicate H. pylori. No further anti-ulcer treatment was given subsequently. Healing of the ulcer and H. pylori status were checked by the urease test, culture and histology (endoscopic biopsy) 4 weeks later. RESULTS: The 5-week ulcer healing rate was 94.6% (95% confidence interval: 89-98%). Persisting ulcers (n = 6) were associated with either treatment with aspirin or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (n = 3), persistent H. pylori infection (n = 2) or persistent H. pylori infection plus treatment with aspirin (n = 1). The ulcer healing rate was significantly higher in patients with eradicated infection than in those with posttherapy persistence of H. pylori (97.0 vs. 76.9%; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences after 5 weeks between patients with duodenal and those with gastric ulcer (97.4 vs. 89.3%). CONCLUSIONS: One-week effective eradication treatment is adequate to induce healing of H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers. Anti-ulcer treatment after eradication of H. pylori should be considered only if the patient is receiving treatment with ulcerogenic drugs or continues to have symptoms.

Adolescent↗

One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 1-week triple therapy regimens for Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: In two consecutive series, 120 patients with proven H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease or functional dyspepsia were treated with either omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OAC; n = 60) or with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. over 1 week (OAM; n = 60). H. pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test, culture and histology before and 4 weeks after cessation of the eradication therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication succeeded in 53 out of 60 patients by omeprazole-amoxycillin-clarithromycin (OAC) (88%; 95% CI 77-95%) and in 47 out of 60 patients by omeprazole-amoxycillin-metronidazole (OAM) (78%; 95% CI 66-88%) (P = 0.22). Nine patients of each group available for follow-up reported adverse events (15.0 and 15.5%, respectively) without necessity of discontinuation of the study medications. Serious adverse events were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Simple and convenient 1-week triple therapies consisting of omeprazole, amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole are sufficiently effective in eradicating H. pylori infection.

Adolescent↗

Helicobacter pylori augments the pH-increasing effect of omeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Omeprazole is less effective in healthy subjects than in patients with duodenal ulcers. The aim of this study was to determine whether Helicobacter pylori augments the pH-increasing effect of omeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcers. METHODS: In 16 patients with duodenal ulcers, baseline intragastric acidity was measured before and 4-6 weeks after the cure of H. pylori infection. In 17 patients with duodenal ulcers, 24-hour pH metry was performed during treatment with 20 mg omeprazole once daily before as well as after eradication of H. pylori. Intragastric acidity was measured using a glass electrode placed 5 cm below the cardia. H. pylori infection was assessed by [13C] urea breath test, culture, histology, and rapid urease test. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication resulted in marked decrease of the pH-increasing effect of omeprazole (24-hour median gastric pH, 5.5 vs. 3.0; P<0.002) that was most pronounced during nighttime (median gastric pH, 6.4 vs. 2.1; P=0.001). On the other hand, baseline intragastric pH remained unchanged after eradication (median gastric pH, 1.0 vs. 1.1; P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with duodenal ulcers treated with omeprazole, intragastric pH depends significantly on the presence or absence of H. pylori, whereas baseline pH remained unchanged after H. pylori eradication.

Adult↗

Long-term consequences of Helicobacter pylori eradication: clinical aspects.

Helicobacter pylori is probably the most important factor in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease in the absence of other precipitating factors, such as the intake of ulcerogenic drugs. Clinical studies have shown convincingly that eradication of H. pylori dramatically alters the long-term natural history of this chronic relapsing disorder, and that ulcer recurrences following eradication are rare. Available evidence also suggests that figures for H. pylori reinfection are low in adults in developed countries following eradication. In addition, H. pylori eradication may prevent peptic ulcer bleeding or rebleeding. Curing H. pylori infection significantly increases the quality of life of patients with duodenal ulcer disease and is, to date, the most cost-effective treatment in the long-term management of this disease. Ulcer patients presenting with recurrent dyspeptic symptoms after apparently successful eradication of H. pylori should be checked for ulcer and H. pylori recurrence, as well as for reflux oesophagitis, which has been shown to occur in about 9% of patients with duodenal ulcer disease and previously cured of H. pylori infection. We would also argue that H. pylori infection in young patients with dyspepsia should be treated, although this issue will remain controversial until well-designed, placebo-controlled studies establish the real benefits of eradication therapy in the long-term treatment of this disease.

Adult↗

Omeprazole/amoxicillin versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: two-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study.

The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy and dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients and to evaluate the long-term clinical course of ulcer disease. Forty duodenal ulcer patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled into the study and randomly treated with either triple therapy consisting of bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole and tetracycline plus ranitidine or with dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxicillin. Patients were investigated clinically and endoscopically including assessment of H. pylori infection by means or rapid urease test, culture, histology and urea breath testing 4 weeks after cessation of eradication therapy, in 1-year intervals and when dyspeptic symptoms recurred. One patient of each group was lost during follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured by triple therapy in 84.2% and by dual therapy in 78.9% (p = 1.00). During follow-up, all patients with cure of H. pylori infection (n = 31) remained in stable remission with respect to duodenal ulcer disease, while 6 out of 7 patients persistently infected with H. pylori developed an ulcer relapse (p < 0.001). One patient with cured infection had had an episode of dyspeptic symptoms requiring pharmacotherapy and in another 3 patients mild refluxesophagitis without necessity of medical treatment had been detected on the occasion of a scheduled endoscopy. In the short-term, cure of the infection resulted in a marked reduction of the degree of antral gastritis and in a loss of activity in all but one patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

[Short-term triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole in eradication of Helicobacter pylori].

In a prospective study, thirty consecutive patients presenting with either H.pylori positive (histology and/or culture) ulcer disease (n = 17; acute ulcer: n = 11) or functional dyspepsia (n = 13) were treated over one week with pantoprazole 40 mg bd, clarithromycin 250 mg bd and metronidazole 400 mg bd. Four weeks after discontinuation of the study medication H.pylori eradication was assessed by means of an urease test, culture and histology. One patient had to be withdrawn from the study after one day because of a concomitant infectious disease requiring long-term antibiotic treatment. Another patient refused the final follow-up endoscopy. 28 patients completed the study without contravening the protocol. H.pylori infection was eradicated in 24 out of 28 patients (eradication rate: 86%; 95%-confidence interval: 57%-96%). Cure of bacterial infection was more frequently obtained in ulcer patients as compared to patients suffering from functional dyspepsia (94% vs 75%; p = 0.28). In 2 patients, treatment failure was associated with pretherapeutic resistance of H. pylori to either clarithromycin or metronidazole. Without antiulcer treatment beyond eradication therapy, ulcer healing was endoscopically confirmed after 5 weeks in 9 out of 10 patients available for follow-up (healing rate: 90%; 95%-confidence interval: 56%-100%). Seven patients reported mild adverse events that did not lead to discontinuation of the study medication (rate: 23%; 95%-confidence interval: 10%-42%). After cure of the infection, histology demonstrated a statistically highly significant improvement (p < 0.001) of both grade and activity of antrum and body gastritis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

[Bleeding peptic ulcers--how can recurrent bleeding be prevented?].

Bleeding is the most frequent complication of peptic ulcer disease. Patients with a previous ulcer hemorrhage have a high risk for future bleeding episodes. Therefore, treatment aiming at ulcer prophylaxis is mandatory. Helicobacter pylori infection, acid/pepsin and intake of Aspirin or NSAIDs are the main causal factors involved in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease. Ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be cured by gastric acid suppression (e.g. omeprazole) and prevented by withdrawal of the ulcerogenic substances or co-medication with omeprazole or misoprostol. Acid and Helicobacter pylori are necessary, albeit by themselves not sufficient factors in the causal web of the formerly idiopathic, gastritis-associated peptic ulcer disease of the stomach and the duodenum. Maintenance therapy with antisecretory drugs results in a marked decrease of ulcer recurrences and probably further ulcer complications after an index bleeding, but a definite cure of the ulcer disease is not feasible in the majority of patients. The proportion of patients remaining in remission is dependent on the degree of gastric acid suppression. Therefore, potent antisecretory drugs such as the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole should be used if a physician decides to initiate a long-term maintenance therapy. Several studies have demonstrated beyond doubt that cure of Helicobacter pylori eradication resulted in a stable remission of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease. In addition, a true reinfection after apparent eradication of the bacteria has been rarely observed in adults.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combined Modality Therapy↗

[Hepatocellular carcinoma following intravenous thorium X therapy].

Twelve years after receiving radiation therapy with thorium X (280 microCi) for long-standing Bechterew's disease (ankylosing spondylitis) a 52-year-old man was found, by ultrasonography and computed tomography, to have a round mass, 11 x 12 cm, in the left lobe of the liver. Laparoscopy discovered coarse, discoloured nodes on the surface of the right and left lobes of the liver which histologically showed hepatocellular carcinoma. There were no known risk factor for liver carcinoma (like cirrhosis, positive hepatitis B serology, alcohol abuse, haemochromatosis or alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency). As exploratory laparotomy found the tumour to be inoperable, 15 chemotherapeutic embolizations were performed. An abdominal wall metastasis was resected after 17 months. At the time of this report, 20 months after the diagnosis was first made, the patient is in a poor general condition. Internal radiotherapy with thorium X was used, all else having failed, in the treatment of severe ankylosing spondylitis. Although it is not possible to prove a direct causal relationship between the thorium X radiation and development of a liver carcinoma, the coincidence is remarkable.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

[24-hour gastric pH profile with 2 x 20 mg and 2 x 40 mg omeprazole in patients with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastroduodenal ulcer disease].

Fifty patients suffering from Helicobacter pylori associated duodenal (n = 25) or gastric ulcer disease (n = 25) were randomly treated with either omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (n = 25) or 40 mg b.i.d. (n = 25). From day 8 to 9, a 24-hour gastric pH measurement was performed in all patients. Patients with duodenal ulcer disease treated with 40 mg or 80 mg omeprazole demonstrated similar gastric pH patterns without statistically significant differences with regard to the mean (5.10 versus 5.17, p = 0.6439) and median pH (5.35 versus 5.30, p = 0.8277) as well as to the percent of time spent below distinctive pH thresholds. Patients suffering from gastric ulcer disease respond somewhat better to the higher omeprazole dose as compared to the 40 mg omeprazole regimen reaching statistical significance (mean pH: 5.04 versus 5.74, p = 0.0124; median pH: 5.30 versus 5.95, p = 0.0114; %-time spent below pH 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). In conclusion, there was virtually no (duodenal ulcer) or only a slight (gastric ulcer), probably clinically irrelevant, benefit to doubling the omeprazole dose (20 mg b.i.d. vs. 40 mg b.i.d.) with regard to the 24-hour gastric pH patterns.

Adult↗