[The effects of the processing technic on dentinal adhesion].
In this in vitro study, the effect of application techniques on marginal adaptation of thermal cycled class V restorations restored with an actual dentinal adhesive were quantitated using SEM and dye penetration. Under optimal application conditions, excellent results were generated: though a simple bulk insertion technique was used, no difference was found between enamel and dentin margins before and after thermal loading. On the other hand, contamination of the bonding agent with saliva before composite resin insertion dramatically decreased the percentage of "excellent margin" in dentin and in enamel. Similar effects were found after protecting the bonding agent with an insulating gel. No improvement in marginal adaptation was found after reapplication of the bonding agent. The class V inlay did not show better results than the direct filling technique. However, postcured inlays performed better than their non-postcured counterparts. Without etching enamel with a phosphoric acid gel, but by priming its surface, approximately 80% of "excellent margin" were found in enamel before thermal cycling. This percentage decreased significantly after thermal loading. Restorations totally confined to dentin had slightly lower percentages of "excellent margin" than the mixed class V fillings. The results of this study indicated, that by using dentinal adhesives, little changes and deviations from the correct procedure result in significant alterations in marginal adaptation.