PubMed1996
We report our observations with the cell line LW/SO, which was recently derived from the bone marrow of a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Based on the morphological and histochemical examination, the leukemic cells were classified primarily as FAB type M4. However, 2 years later, in relapse, the cells changed their morphology and were hence specified as FAB type M2 (slightly positive for acid phosphatase and Sudan black). The cells established have now been in culture for approximately 11 months and display nearly 100% CD4/5/7/15/25/71/120a,b at varying densities. Some of them spontaneously and reversibly become either CD34 + /38- or CD34 - /38+, yet the majority of the cells remain negative for both. All attempts to separate the cells with a distinct phenotype by limiting dilution or sorting through a flow cytometer failed repeatedly. The subsets, enriched up to 98% (regardless of their primary immunophenotype CD34 - / 38-, CD34 + /38-, or CD34 - /38+), soon displayed a phenotypical constellation similar to that before sorting. The ratio of CD34- to CD34+ seems to be influenced by the cell density: The greater the cell-to-cell contact, the lower the percentage of CD34-expressing cells. Some of the cells apparently differentiate into T-cell phenotype and acquire CD3 and T-cell receptor (TCR) alpha/beta molecules. While the quantity of CD34-expressing cells significantly increased in the presence of dexamethasone (10(-7) M), and some of them additionally acquired CD33 antigen, the percentage of CD3-positive cells was enhanced by adding 1% DMSO in medium. In contrast, cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, G-CSF, GM-CSF, or SCF (c-kit ligand) altered neither the proliferation capacity nor the phenotypical constellation of LW/SO cells (each tested alone). Although normal karyotype was obtained from the bone marrow cells, the LW/SO cells revealed a homogeneous chromosomal composition of 45, X, -X, der(9) inv(9) (p12q13) del(9) (p22?). These data suggested that LW/SO cells might be the leukemic counterpart of putative pre-CD34-positive progenitors. In order to substantiate this assumption, we analyzed the expression of other so-called T-cell markers on CD34+ cells from peripheral blood stem cell aphereses of five patients who later underwent high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent stem cell retransfusion. These data clearly revealed that a considerable amount of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors co-express CD2/4/(5)/(7)/25 at an early stage of differentiation, and support the notion that CD34-negative LW/SO cells with the surface markers CD4/5/7/25 are probably phenotypical representatives of pluripotent stem cell. Hence, not all CD34-negative populations with so-called T-cell surface markers should be considered T-cells; some may constitute the ancestor of CD34 antigen-expressing progenitors.