PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

U Ziemann

Publications and source records attributed to U Ziemann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2008

[Megadolichobasilar anomaly causing acute deafness with vertigo].

Megadolichobasilar anomaly, a dilatant arteriopathy of the basilar artery attributable to chronic arterial hypertension, can cause cranial nerve compression syndromes of the cerebellopontine angle or infarcts of the vertebrobasilar circulation. In this paper, we report on a patient with known megadolichobasilar anomaly and a partially thrombosed fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery, who presented with acute-onset vertigo and subsequent deafness due to thromboembolic occlusion of the labyrinthine artery. Because of the vascular origin of the patient's symptoms, his vertigo disappeared over time while the deafness persisted.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

TMS-assisted neurophysiological profiling of the dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in human motor cortex.

Dopamine plays a broad role in motor control and practice-dependent plasticity. Here we tested, in eight healthy subjects, the effects of the dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline on motor cortical excitability because the state of motor cortex can strongly influence practice-dependent plasticity. Cabergoline enhances practice-dependent plasticity but the mechanisms are unknown. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation for testing of motor cortical excitability. A single dose of 2 mg of cabergoline increased short-interval intracortical inhibition, a measure of excitability of GABA-dependent inhibitory neural circuits, and decreased various excitatory measures (motor evoked potential amplitude and short-interval intracortical facilitation). Other measures of motor cortical (motor threshold, cortical silent period duration), spinal (peripheral silent period duration, F-wave) and neuromuscular excitability (maximum M-wave) remained unchanged. This shift in the balance from excitation to inhibition may assist, by improving the 'signal-to-noise ratio' in motor cortex, in the positive modulating effect of cabergoline on practice-dependent plasticity.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Role of the right dorsal premotor cortex in "physiological" mirror EMG activity.

A distributed cortical network enables the lateralization of intended unimanual movements, i.e., the transformation from a default mirror movement to a unimanual movement. Little is known about the exact functional organization of this "non-mirror transformation" network. Involvement of the right dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC) was suggested because its virtual lesion by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increased the excitability of the left primary motor cortex (M1) during unilateral isometric contraction of a left hand muscle (Cincotta et al., Neurosci Lett 367: 189-93, 2004). However, no behavioural effects were observed in that experimental protocol. Here we tested behaviourally twelve healthy volunteers to find out whether focal disruption of the right dPMC by "off-line" One Hz rTMS (900 pulses, 115% of resting motor threshold) enhances "physiological" mirroring. This was measured by an established protocol (Mayston et al., Ann Neurol 45: 583-94, 1999) that quantifies the mirror increase in the electromyographic (EMG) level in the isometrically contracting abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of one hand during brief phasic contractions performed with the APB of the other hand. Mirroring in the right APB significantly increased after real rTMS of the right dPMC. In contrast, no change in mirroring was seen with sham rTMS of the right dPMC, real rTMS of the right M1, or real rTMS of the left dPMC. These findings strongly support the hypothesis that the right dPMC is part of the non-mirror transformation cortical network.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2006

Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

There is evidence of a strong capacity for functional and structural reorganization in the human motor system. However, past research has focused mainly on complex movement sequences over rather short training durations. In this study we investigated changes in corticospinal excitability associated with longer training of elementary, maximum-speed tapping movements. All participating subjects were consistent right-handers and were trained using either the right (experiment 1) or the left thumb (experiment 2). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to obtain motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the right and the left hand before and after training. As a result of training, a significant increase was observed in tapping speed accompanied by increased MEPs, recorded from the trained APB muscle, following contralateral M1 stimulation. In the case of subdominant-hand training we additionally demonstrate increased MEP amplitudes evoked at the right APB (untrained hand) in the first training week. Enhanced corticospinal excitability associated with practice of elementary movements may constitute a necessary precursor for inducing plastic changes within the motor system. The involvement of the ipsilateral left M1 likely reflects the predominant role of the left M1 in the general control (modification) of simple motor parameters in right-handed subjects.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2005

Physiology of modulation of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency suprathreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Many studies show consistently that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with a frequency of 1 Hz and an intensity above the resting motor threshold (RMT) performed for several minutes over the primary motor cortex (M1) leads to a depression of cortical excitability. Furthermore, most studies concur on a facilitation of the non-stimulated contralateral M1. Little is known, however, about the physiological mechanisms underlying these effects. In 11 healthy volunteers, we stimulated the left M1 for 15 min with 1 Hz-rTMS of 115% RMT. Before, immediately after, and 30 min after the rTMS train, we examined short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI; interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2 and 4 ms), intracortical facilitation (ICF; ISI 10 ms), and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF; ISI 1.5 ms) with established paired-pulse protocols. Mean unconditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes and RMT were also measured. Two sessions were run at least 1 week apart, in one excitability of the stimulated M1 was tested, in the other one excitability of the non-stimulated M1. rTMS led to the expected reduction of MEP amplitude of the stimulated M1, which was significant only immediately after the rTMS train. rTMS increased MEP amplitude of the non-stimulated M1, which lasted for at least 30 min. RMT, SICI, ICF and SICF did not show any significant change in either M1, except for a long lasting increase of SICF in the non-stimulated M1. In conclusion, the MEP increase in the non-stimulated M1 lasted longer than the MEP decrease in the stimulated M1. Only the long-lasting MEP increase was associated with a specific change in intracortical excitability (increase in SICF). Modulation of motor cortical inhibition did not play a role in explaining the rTMS induced changes in MEP amplitude.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Physical interactions between induced electrical fields can have substantial effects on neuronal excitation during simultaneous TMS of two brain areas.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the interactions between simultaneous or nearly simultaneous focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex hand area (M1hand) of both hemispheres. METHODS: In 7 healthy subjects, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and cortical silent period (CSP) duration were elicited in the right hand by bihemispheric focal TMS of M1hand (8-shaped coils, monophasic current waveform, stimulus intensity 120% above motor threshold, TMS of right M1hand preceding TMS of left M1hand by 0-1000 micros), or by unilateral TMS of left M1hand alone. A dipole probe was used to measure the physical interactions between the two stimulating coils. RESULTS: Bihemispheric TMS markedly decreased MEP and CSP at intervals of 0 and 50 micros compared to unilateral TMS, whereas both measures increased at the interval of 150 micros. The dipole probe experiments showed that the physical interactions between the electrical fields of the two coils entirely explained the MEP and CSP findings, but only under the assumption that excitation of M1hand is not point-focal but extends over several centimetres. CONCLUSIONS: First, simultaneous focal TMS of distant brain sites may result in marked 'distortion' of brain excitation through physical interaction between the induced electrical fields. Second, these findings support the notion that excitation of human M1hand is relatively non-focal, even if a 'focal' stimulating coil and low stimulus intensity are used. SIGNIFICANCE: Potentially marked physical interaction between induced electrical fields must be taken into account when testing or disrupting distant brain sites with simultaneous focal TMS.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Slowing fastest finger movements of the dominant hand with low-frequency rTMS of the hand area of the primary motor cortex.

Neuroimaging studies suggest that the primary hand motor area and the cerebellum play a pivotal role in the control of finger tapping, but their differential contribution in this task is unknown. We used therefore repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in its virtual lesion mode (1 Hz, 10 min, 90% of motor threshold) to study the effects of transient disruption of the right lateral cerebellum (CB), the left primary hand motor area (M1), and the right brachial plexus (PL, control site) on various finger tapping tasks (paced finger tapping task: PFT; tapping with maximum speed: TAPMAX, and tapping with convenient speed: TAPCON) in healthy right-handed subjects. RTMS of the left M1 slowed finger tapping speed of the right hand in the TAPMAX task. This effect eliminated the right hand superiority in the TAPMAX task. In addition, rTMS of the left M1 resulted in slower tapping speeds for both hands during TAPCON. There were no other effects of rTMS on tapping speed or tapping variability. Findings indicate that M1 is essential for generating fastest finger movements.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Vasogenic edema in Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis: a serial MRI study.

The authors report serial MRI of a patient with Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis (BBE), disclosing caudal migration of an initial upper midbrain lesion. High apparent diffusion coefficient values imply a vasogenic rather than cytotoxic edema as the cause of the hyperintense signal changes on T2-weighted images.

Brain Edema↗
PubMed2003

Cortical correlates of neuromotor development in healthy children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between acquisition of fine motor skills in childhood and development of the motor cortex. METHODS: We measured finger tapping speed and mirror movements in 43 healthy right-handed subjects (6-26 years of age). While recording surface electromyographic activity from right and left first dorsal interosseus, we delivered focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand areas of each motor cortex. We measured motor evoked potential (MEP) threshold, and ipsilateral (iSP) and contralateral (CSP) silent periods. RESULTS: As children got older, finger speeds got faster, MEP threshold decreased, iSP duration increased and latency decreased. Finger tapping speed got faster as motor thresholds and iSP latency decreased, but was unrelated to CSP duration. In all subjects right hemisphere MEP thresholds were higher than those on the left and duration of right hemisphere CSP was longer than that on the left. Children under 10 years of age had higher left hand mirror movement scores, and fewer left hemisphere iSPs which were of longer duration. CONCLUSIONS: Maturation of finger tapping skills is closely related to developmental changes in the motor threshold and iSP latency. Studies are warranted to explore the relationship between these measures and other neuromotor skills in children with motor disorders. SIGNIFICANCE: TMS can provide important insights into certain functional aspects of neurodevelopment in children.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Bilateral motor cortex output with intended unimanual contraction in congenital mirror movements.

In congenital mirror movements (MM), it is unclear whether the "mirror" motor cortex (M1) produces output during intended unimanual movements. In two patients with MM, the cortical silent period (CSP) was abnormally short after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of either M1, but simultaneous bilateral TMS led to significant CSP lengthening. Thus, it is likely that the shortened CSP after unilateral TMS is caused by output from the nonstimulated M1, suggesting that both M1 produce output with intended unimanual movements in patients with MM.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Congenital hemiparesis: different functional reorganization of somatosensory and motor pathways.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reorganization of somatosensory and motor cortex in congenital brain injury. METHODS: We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in a 41 year old man with severe congenital right hemiparesis but only mild proprioceptive impairment. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed a large porencephalic cavitation in the left hemisphere mainly involving the frontal and parietal lobes. RESULTS: TMS showed fast-conducting projections from the undamaged primary motor cortex to both hands, whereas MEPs were not elicited from the damaged hemisphere. Left median nerve stimulation evoked normal short-latency SEPs in the contralateral undamaged somatosensory cortex. Right median nerve stimulation did not evoke any SEP in the contralateral damaged hemisphere, but a middle-latency SEP (positive-negative-positive, 39-44-48 ms) in the ipsilateral undamaged hemisphere, with a fronto-central scalp distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that somatosensory function of the affected arm is preserved, most likely through slow-conducting non-lemniscal connections between the affected arm and ipsilateral non-primary somatosensory cortex. In contrast, motor function was poor despite fast-conducting ipsilateral cortico-motoneuronal output from the primary motor cortex of the undamaged hemisphere to the affected arm. This suggests that different forms of reorganization operate in congenital brain injury and that fast-conducting connections between primary cortex areas and ipsilateral spinal cord are not sufficient for preservation or recovery of function.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Mechanisms underlying human motor system plasticity.

There has been increased interest in the ability of the adult human nervous system to reorganize and adapt to environmental changes throughout life. This ability has been termed "plasticity." Plastic changes in the cerebral cortex have been studied: (a) as modifications of sensory or motor cortical representation of specific body parts (cortical maps, body representation level); and (b) as changes in the efficacy of existing synapses or generation of new synapses (neuronal or synaptic level). In this review, we describe paradigms used to study mechanisms of plasticity in the intact human motor system, the functional relevance of such plasticity, and possible ways to modulate it.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning.

Recent studies suggest that the human primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in motor learning, but the nature of that involvement is not clear. Here, learning-related changes in M1 excitability were studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) while na subjects practiced either a ballistic or a ramp pinch task to the 0.5-Hz beat of a metronome. Subjects rapidly learned to optimize ballistic contractions as indicated by a significant increase in peak pinch acceleration and peak force after the 60-min practice epoch. The increase in force and acceleration was associated with an increase in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in a muscle involved in the training (flexor policis brevis) but not in a muscle unrelated to the task (abductor digiti minimi). MEPs returned to their baseline amplitude after subjects had acquired the new skill, whereas no practice-induced changes in MEP amplitude were observed after subjects had overlearned the task, or after practicing slow ramp pinches. Since the changes in MEP amplitude were observed only after TMS of M1 but not after direct stimulation of the corticospinal tract, these findings indicate task- and effector-specific involvement of human M1 in rapid motor learning.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation during unimanual motor tasks: further evidence for motor dominance.

OBJECTIVES: To test to which extent the increase in ipsilateral motor cortex excitability during unimanual motor tasks shows hemispheric asymmetry. METHODS: Six right-handed healthy subjects performed one of several motor tasks of different complexity (including rest) with one hand (task hand) while the other hand (non-task hand) was relaxed. Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to the motor cortex ipsilateral to the task hand and the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) in the non-task hand was measured. In one session, the task hand was the right hand, in the other session it was the left hand. The effects of motor task and side of the task hand were analyzed. Spinal motoneuron excitability was assessed using F-wave measurements. RESULTS: Motor tasks, in particular complex finger sequences, resulted in an increase in MEP amplitude in the non-task hand. This increase was significantly less when the right hand rather than the left hand was the task hand. This difference was seen only in muscles homologous to primary task muscles. The asymmetry could not be explained by changes in F-wave amplitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation either supports the idea that, in right handers, the left motor cortex is more active in ipsilateral hand movements, or alternatively, that the left motor cortex exerts more effective inhibitory control over the right motor cortex than vice versa. We suggest that hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral motor cortex activation is one property of motor dominance of the left motor cortex.

Adult↗