Biomedical subjects

Udo Dannlowski

Publications and source records attributed to Udo Dannlowski.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Effects of quetiapine on cognitive functioning in schizophrenia: evidence for the remyelination hypothesis?

Postmortem findings, neuroimaging data, and in-vitro models suggest a decrease in number and density of oligodendrocytes is driving cognitive deficits in schizophrenia (SCZ). Second-generation antipsychotics are discussed to improve oligodendrocyte dysfunction with most conclusive evidence available for quetiapine (QET). We postulate that sustained QET treatment leads to cognitive improvement in SCZ, particularly, in tests with high demands for working memory function. We further hypothesize that these effects are moderated by polygenic factors associated with hippocampus-related brain volumes, general white matter integrity, and/or oligodendroglia-related SCZ risk. Using data of the prospective PsyCourse study, we identified 166 patients with SCZ spectrum disorder receiving QET at one or two consecutive visits plus 166 matched patients without QET. Polygenic scores were calculated for subcortical brain volumes, measures of white matter integrity, and for cell type-specific genetic SCZ risks. QET treatment was consistently associated with improved cognitive function independent of time, specifically, in tests with high, but not with low to medium working memory load. Polygenic analyses did not reveal significant moderation effects. In contrary, low genetic SCZ risk specific for genes related to human oligodendrocyte function was associated with higher cognitive performance independent from QET. While we observed improved cognitive performance under QET in high working memory tests, we did not find evidence that polygenic factors associated with hippocampus-related brain volumes, white matter integrity, or oligodendroglia-related SCZ risk moderate this association. Thus, our tentative findings do not provide evidence for the hypothesis that polygenic estimates of hippocampal remyelination capacities influence the association between QET and cognitive performance in SCZ.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Associations between CRP-related DNA methylation, stress exposure, and depression severity in a longitudinal clinical cohort.

BACKGROUND: Environmental adversity is linked to major depressive disorder (MDD), potentially via sustained low-grade inflammation. However, serum markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) are transient and sensitive to acute states. In contrast, epigenetic signatures of inflammation may provide a more stable trace of how stress becomes biologically embedded and contributes to depression risk over time. METHODS: In a subsample of the Marburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort Study (MACS; N = 579; 320 healthy controls, 259 with MDD), we examined whether early life adversity (ELA; CTQ) and recent life stress (RLS; LEQ) are associated with CRP-related DNA methylation (CRPm) at baseline. We further tested whether CRPm predicts depressive symptom severity (HAMD) at baseline and at two-year follow-up (n = 407). DNA was extracted from whole blood, and CRPm scores were computed using publicly available genome-wide summary statistics. RESULTS: CRPm explained 21.3% of the variance in serum high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP). Higher CRPm was significantly associated with both ELA (b = 0.01, SE = 0.003, p = 0.017) and RLS (b = 0.01, SE = 0.004, p = 0.032), after adjusting for age and sex. CRPm also predicted depressive symptom severity at baseline (b = 0.68, SE = 0.27, p = 0.013) and at follow-up (b = 0.79, SE = 0.25, p = 0.002). These associations remained after controlling for white blood cell-type composition but were attenuated after adjusting for BMI and smoking. In contrast, hsCRP was not associated with adversity or depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that a methylation-based index of chronic inflammation is associated with stress exposure and depressive symptoms over time, in contrast to fluctuating serum hsCRP. The findings are more consistent with an indirect pathway in which environmental adversity is linked to inflammatory biology via stress-related health behaviors, rather than with a model of direct biological embedding.

Humans↗