PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ulf Darsow

Publications and source records attributed to Ulf Darsow.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Short-term alternating temperature enhances histamine-induced itch: a biphasic stimulus model.

Itch is the major symptom of many allergic or inflammatory skin diseases; yet it is still difficult to measure objectively. Human studies on the physiology and pathophysiology of the itch sensation (e.g. functional magnetic resonance imaging studies) have been hampered by the lack of an efferent and manageable "on-off" stimulus. Here, a short-term temperature-modulated human histamine itch model is presented. In nine healthy right-handed male volunteers (age 29+/-2.6 years), 1% histamine dihydrochloride was used in the skin prick model as standard itch stimulus on the right forearm with subsequent thermal modulation of the target skin area using a Medoc TSA II NeuroSensory Analyzer thermode. Modulation occurred in rapid alternating order from 32 degrees C (neutral) to 25 degrees C (slight cold) and vice versa; each temperature block lasted 20 seconds. Subjective itch ratings were recorded using a computerized visual analog scale (VAS) and - for qualitative assessment - the Eppendorf Itch Questionnaire (EIQ). All subjects reported localized itch sensations without pain; mean VAS itch intensity was 50.6+/-3.5% during the 25 degrees C blocks and 33.8+/-3.9% during the 32 degrees C blocks (P<0.0001). Also, mean EIQ ratings were significantly higher related to the 25 degrees C blocks. In spite of the common knowledge that intensive cold can inhibit itch sensation, a reproducible, significant enhancement of histamine-induced itch by short-term moderate temperature decrease could be shown. This effect might be explained by peripheral and central adaptation processes triggered by alternating afferent activity patterns and might be used - owing to its "on/off" characteristics-in future itch physiology studies such as functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Adult↗

Modulation of atopy patch test and skin prick test by pretreatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream.

BACKGROUND: In a subgroup of patients with atopic eczema (AE), aeroallergens are relevant eliciting factors. The atopy patch test (APT) was proposed as inflammation model for AE. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to investigate the effect of pretreatment with 1% pimecrolimus cream (Elidel) on the APT and skin prick test (SPT). METHODS: In a randomized, controlled, double-blind study, 20 patients with AE and positive SPT and APT screening reaction to house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, cat dander, grass or birch pollen were enrolled (age 20 +/- 11 years, 55% males). For 2 weeks, patients twice daily applied pimecrolimus and vehicle control to marked fields on their backs and forearms. Then, APT was performed (200 index of reactivity/g extracts in petrolatum; Stallergènes, France) on both fields on the back and SPT was performed on the pretreated forearms. RESULTS: Including only patients with different readings (n = 13), stronger APT suppression of at least 1 ETFAD (European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis) grade in the pimecrolimus area versus intraindividual control was observed in 10 of these patients after 48 and 72 h (p < 0.05; 90% CI 50.5-93.4). Including all 20 subjects, the analysis still showed a borderline significance compared with the vehicle (p = 0.0564). SPT with histamine and aeroallergens showed a median 7.5-10% reduction in actively pretreated areas (p = 0.086). Immunohistochemical analysis in 2 patients revealed an induction of interferon-gamma in primecrolimus-pretreated skin. CONCLUSION: APT can be used as a model for AE skin inflammation. It was shown for the first time that pimecrolimus pretreatment has a potential to suppress the development of lesions induced by aeroallergen exposure in patients with AE.

Adult↗

Allergen cleavage by effector cell-derived proteases regulates allergic inflammation.

The key event of allergic inflammation, allergen-induced crosslinking of mast cell-bound IgE antibodies, is accompanied by release of inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and proteases, in particular beta-tryptase. We provide evidence that protease-mediated cleavage of allergens represents a mechanism that regulates allergen-induced mast cell activation. When used in molar ratios as they occur in vivo, purified beta-tryptase cleaved major grass and birch pollen allergens, resulting in defined peptide fragments as mapped by mass spectrometry. Tryptase-cleaved allergens showed reduced IgE reactivity and allergenic activity. The biological relevance is demonstrated by the fact that lysates from activated human mast cells containing tryptase levels as they occur in vivo cleaved allergens. Additionally, protamine, an inhibitor of heparin-dependent effector cell proteases, augmented allergen-induced release of mediators from effector cells. Protease-mediated allergen cleavage may represent an important mechanism for terminating allergen-induced effector cell activation.

Allergens↗

Proceedings of the 4th Georg Rajka International Symposium on Atopic Dermatitis, Arcachon, France, September 15-17, 2005.

The 4th Georg Rajka International Symposium on Atopic Dermatitis presented a comprehensive view of our current understanding and management of atopic dermatitis (AD). These proceedings highlight contributions related to the history of AD doctrines; genetic and epigenetic background; epidemiology; maturation of the immune system; infection and innate-adaptive immunity; epidermal inflammation, including neurogenic inflammation and pruritus; animal models; skin barrier; evidence-based therapy and education programs; prognostic and severity markers; and allergy testing. Several studies in animal models and human subjects point to impaired skin barrier function as a primary defect that facilitates the effect of environmental factors and immune dysregulation found in AD. The new frontier in AD therapy should, in the near future, reflect our better understanding of the skin barrier. The influence of environmental factors on the skin and other epithelial barriers in the perinatal period needs to be better understood to implement appropriate prevention programs.

Animals↗

Association of NOD1 polymorphisms with atopic eczema and related phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Interactions with microbial pathogens are crucial for the maturation of the immune system. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain protein 1 (NOD1) is a cytosolic receptor sensing a muropeptide found mostly in gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycans. NOD1 is located on chromosome 7p14-p15, a region that has been linked with atopy. Recently, polymorphisms of the closely related NOD2 have been associated with atopy-related traits. OBJECTIVES: Within a large population-based cohort of German adults (n = 1417), a case-control population for atopic eczema (n = 454), and a large cohort of parent-offspring trios for atopic eczema (189 trios), we evaluated 11 NOD1 polymorphisms for associations with atopic phenotypes. Methods Subjects were phenotyped by standardized questionnaires and interviews, skin examination, and serum IgE measurements. Genotyping was performed by using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Analyses revealed significant association of one NOD1 haplotype with atopic eczema in the population-based cohort ( P = .004) and the case-control population ( P = .003). Another NOD1 haplotype was associated with decreased total IgE ( P = .008). In addition, significant associations with total serum IgE levels were observed for polymorphisms rs2907748 ( P = .006), rs2907749 ( P = .012), and rs2075822 ( P = .018). These polymorphisms were significantly associated with atopic eczema and asthma in the family-based association analyses ( P = .001-.043). Seven polymorphisms showed significant transmission distortion for total IgE levels ( P values < .0001-.029). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that genetic variants within NOD1 are important determinants of atopy susceptibility.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Atopy patch test--reproducibility and elicitation of itch in different application sites.

We evaluated the reproducibility of atopy patch test reactions and the quality and quantity of itch in 16 patients with atopic eczema and a history of a positive atopy patch test reaction, comparing three different application sites. The allergen was re-applied simultaneously on both forearms and the back. Intensity and quality of pruritus were evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the Eppendorf itch questionnaire, respectively. The atopy patch test reaction was highly reproducible, occurring in 15/16 (94%) patients. Pruritus was reported by 14/16 (88%) patients. There was no significant difference in either the intensity or quality of itch between the two forearms and the back (p>0.05). The mean peak visual analogue scale itch score was comparable across all three test sites (range 28.3-31.9). Regarding quantification of test reactions, a positive reaction was more frequent on the back (94% versus 69% on the arms) and the peak atopy patch test score was higher on the back compared with the arms (right forearm, p=0.0018 and left forearm, p=0.0683). Allergens should preferably be applied on the back for the atopy patch test. However, the atopy patch test can induce atopic itch irrespective of the application site.

Adolescent↗

Seasonality in symptom severity influenced by temperature or grass pollen: results of a panel study in children with eczema.

Although seasonal variations are well known in many patients with eczema, no systematic population-based panel study evaluating seasonality and quantifying the influence of factors like climate and pollen on symptom variations has been conducted so far. Thirty-nine children with eczema, who had been identified in 1996 in a cross-sectional study on 1673 6-y-olds in Augsburg (Germany), participated in the study. Between March and September 1999, they daily recorded itch, extent, and possibly triggering factors on quantitative scales. Daily temperature, humidity, radiation, and pollen concentration were measured. Mixed linear models, taking the time series structure and confounding into account, were used for analysis. Seasonal patterns were significantly different between children: twenty-one had symptoms mainly in winter. They were affected by changes in outdoor temperature: itch was reduced by 22% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16%-27%) and extent by 65% (CI: 54%-72%) per 15 degrees C temperature increase. Eighteen children exhibited more symptoms in summer and especially during days with high grass-pollen exposure when itch was 16% higher (CI: 8%-24%) and extent 19% (CI: 2%-39%). This effect was stronger for children sensitized against pollen. Consideration of the individual type of eczema may help to arrange appropriate preventive and therapeutic measures.

Allergens↗

Lessons from atopy patch testing in atopic dermatitis.

The exposure of atopic eczema (AE) patients to their relevant protein allergens (eg, from house dust mite, cat dander, grass pollen, or food allergens) can trigger an exacerbation or maintain the disease. Diagnostic procedures are needed to specify allergen avoidance recommendations for the individual patient. Skin prick tests and specific serum IgE tests might be helpful in pointing out potential trigger factors, but relevance needs to be confirmed (eg, with food provocation tests). The atopy patch test (APT) involves the epicutaneous application of intact protein allergens in a diagnostic patch test setting with an evaluation of the induced eczematous skin lesions after 24 to 72 hours. The APT targets the cellular component of AE and helps round out the AE test spectrum. As a number of apparently minor test modifications greatly influence the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the APT, the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) has developed a standardized APT technique. It consists of purified allergen preparations in petrolatum, applied in 12-mm diameter Finn chambers mounted on Scanpor tape to non-irritated, non-abraded, or tape-stripped skin of the upper back. The APT is read at 48 and 72 hours according to the test criteria and reading key of the ETFAD for appearance of erythema, and number and distribution pattern of the papules. In contrast with skin prick tests, the APT might even detect a relevant sensitization in the absence of specific IgE. Many studies have been undertaken to objectify the sensitivity and specificity of the APT to show its diagnostic use in clinical practice.

Advisory Committees↗

Idiopathic anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis represents the maximal variant of an immediate-type allergic reaction involving the whole organism with manifestations in different organ systems. IgE-mediated mast cell and basophil activation is the major pathomechanism; however, immune complex and pseudo-allergic reactions also may lead to the same symptomatology. The most common elicitors are drugs, additives, occupational substances, animal venoms, aeroallergens, and contact urticariogens but also physical factors (cold, heat, ultraviolet light, exercise). When no eliciting factors can be detected, the term "idiopathic anaphylaxis" is used. The diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis is, therefore, a diagnosis of exclusion and may be made only after careful allergy history taking and diagnosis involving in vitro tests. Possible mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of idiopathic anaphylaxis include undetected diseases (eg, mastocytosis occulta), concomitant anaphylaxis-enhancing medication (b-blockers), secretion of histamine-releasing factor from T lymphocytes, autoantibodies against IgE or IgE receptors, and angiotensin II deficiency. One of the many differential diagnoses of anaphylaxis may have been overlooked. The treatment of idiopathic anaphylaxis follows the rules of antianaphylactic therapy.

Anaphylaxis↗