PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ulrich M Caroli

Publications and source records attributed to Ulrich M Caroli.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[Experiences with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification of cutaneous melanoma].

A new AJCC/UICC staging classification of malignant melanoma was published in 2001 and has been in use since then. Compared to the TNM classification used for the previous 15 years, the new classification contains fundamental changes. The classification of the primary tumor is now based on newly defined classes for Breslow's tumor thickness (0 - 1.0 mm; 1.01 - 2.0 mm, 2.01 - 4.0 mm; > 4.0 mm). Histopathologically diagnosed ulceration is the second prognostic factor in primary melanoma and its presence leads to upstaging into the next higher T category. Clark level of invasion is now only relevant for tumors up to 1 mm thick; levels IV and V are also reasons for upstaging. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis distinguishes between microscopic metastasis only as detected with sentinel lymph node biopsy and clinically detectable macroscopic metastasis. Additionally, the number of metastatic nodes and the presence of satellite and in-transit metastasis are prognostic factors for classification of regional lymph node metastasis. In distant metastasis, the kind of organ involvement has a role for classification (only skin and lymph nodes vs. lung vs. other organs) and an elevated LDH value leads to upstaging. A critical analysis of data of the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry did not confirm the strong role of histopathological ulceration of the primary tumor in all T- and N-stages. Furthermore, there is an inconsistency of the classification as stage IIC displays a significantly worse prognosis as compared to stage IIIA. In spite of these drawbacks the new staging classification should used particularly in clinical trials in order to make data internationally comparable.

Germany↗

Palliative therapy of disseminated malignant melanoma: a systematic review of 41 randomised clinical trials.

We undertook a systematic review of 41 randomised studies in disseminated melanoma, identified by a comprehensive search. We aimed to investigate rates of response to various treatment modalities and the outcome for the patients. We analysed seven studies that compared polychemotherapy with single-agent dacarbazine, six that compared different chemotherapeutic schedules with each other, five on the addition of tamoxifen to a reference therapy, and six that included non-specific immunostimulators. In 17 studies, the addition of interferon alfa, interleukin 2, or both, to a reference therapy was investigated, including trials with biochemotherapy. Many trials had small sample sizes and did not report a power analysis; not all were analysed by intention to treat. Although some treatment regimens, especially polychemotherapeutic schedules, seem to increase response rates, none of the treatment schedules was proven to prolong overall survival. Patients with disseminated melanoma should be treated with well-tolerated drug regimens, such as single-agent treatments or in combination with interferon alfa. Systemic treatments should preferably be investigated in randomised trials so that the potential benefits of new treatment concepts can be thoroughly examined.

Antineoplastic Agents↗