PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ute Kettritz

Publications and source records attributed to Ute Kettritz.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Posttransplantation malignancy in a patient presenting with weight loss and changed bowel habits: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in immunosuppressive therapy have significantly improved patient and graft survival following renal transplantation. This is paralleled by an increasing occurrence of posttransplantation malignancy. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on a patient who presented with a history reminding of colon cancer seven years after receiving a kidney transplant. Initial diagnostic imaging seemed to confirm this diagnosis showing a constricting colonic lesion. To our surprise, colonoscopy findings were unremarkable. Review of the imaging studies revealed that the tumor-like picture was caused by the renal graft impressing the intestine. The following search for malignancy in other locations resulted in the diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme of which the patient died several weeks later. CONCLUSION: Follow-up of renal transplant patients must include screening tests directed at tumor detection. Imaging studies and other tests in this patient group should be interpreted by physicians who are familiar with transplant related peculiarities.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Lumpy jaw revisited.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Actinomycosis, Cervicofacial↗
PubMed2004

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.

AIM: We compared radiological assessment with pathological diagnoses in 500 consecutive vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. METHODS: Lesions were biopsied using a 11-gauge mammotome device. Before biopsy, microcalcifications were classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Histopathological and radiological diagnosis were compared. RESULTS: Histopathology revealed 333 (67%) benign lesions. Benign lesions were classified as BI-RADS 3 in 19%, and as suspicious in 35%. 167 lesions (33%) were malignant. Malignant lesions were classified as suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy in 63%. Frequency of malignancy in BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 was 35% and 100%, respectively. In BI-RADS 3 microcalcifications, the malignancy frequency was 19%. The mammographic features with the highest positive predictive value for malignancies were pleomorphic morphology (42%) and a linear or segmental distribution (51%). The microcalcification morphology was not reliably able to predict malignancy. CONCLUSION: In this study, BI-RADS 3 microcalcification lesions had a malignancy rate that is higher than previously reported. Vacuum-assisted biopsy is useful in any indeterminate and suspicious microcalcifications and provides maximum information before any operative intervention.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) can replace surgical biopsy for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. The authors evaluated the accuracy and clinical utility of VAB in a multicenter setting using a strict quality assurance protocol. METHODS: In the current study, VABs were performed successfully for 2874 patients at 5 sites. Benign lesions were verified by follow-up. Surgery was recommended for malignant and borderline lesions. VAB was performed on patients with lesions rated as highly suspicious (6%), intermediate to suspicious (85%), or probably benign (9%). Fifty-eight percent of the lesions were < 10 mm and 70% had microcalcifications. RESULTS: The authors identified 7% of patients with invasive carcinomas, 15% with ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), 5% with atypical ductal hyperplasias (ADH), and 0.6% with lobular carcinomas in situ. The results of the VAB necessitated an upgrade of 24% of patients with ADH to DCIS or DCIS and invasive carcinoma. Twelve percent of patients with DCIS proved to have invasive carcinoma. Seventy-three percent of the patients had benign lesions. Only 1 false-negative result was encountered (negative predictive value, 99.95%). Minor side effects were reported to occur in 1.4% of patients and 0.1% of patients required a subsequent intervention. Scarring relevant for mammography was rare among patients (i.e., 0.3% of patients had relevant scarring). CONCLUSIONS: Quality-assured VAB was found to be highly reliable. VAB effectively identified patients with benign lesions and assisted therapeutic decisions. Most important, only a single case of malignancy was missed. A close interdisciplinary approach assured optimal results.

Biopsy↗