PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Allen

Publications and source records attributed to V Allen.

41 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

A plant for Sam.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.

Four specialised air mattresses had interface pressure measured under six body sites prone to pressure sores in 10 subjects, supine and sitting. The mattresses were the Clinirest (SSI) and FirstStep (KCI) continuous airflow mattress overlays, and Airwave (Pegasus) and Nimbus (Huntleigh) alternating pressure air mattresses. On the mattress overlays, average supine interface pressures were 2.33 kPa (scapula), 4.15 kPa (elbow), 1.94 kPa (sacrum) and 2.79 kPa (buttock), although they were higher at the occiput (7.97 kPa) and heel (11.7 kPa). The alternating pressure air mattresses had an average minimum interface pressure close to zero for three sites, rising to 4.28 kPa under the heel. Average maximum interface pressures were 8.61 kPa (occiput), 5.21 kPa (scapula), 4.90 (elbow), 4.85 kPa (sacrum), 4.61 kPa (buttock) and 13.2 kPa (heel). No accepted scientific method exists for comparing the two types of mattress. Our data suggest a clinical benefit at the occiput and heel (supine) in using an alternating pressure air mattress and a benefit in using a continuous airflow mattress overlay at other sites.

Air Pressure↗

Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design.

Pressures were measured on 10 subjects, supine and sitting, under six anatomical sites prone to bed sores on three different mattresses. Studied were the Clinifloat and Therarest specialist replacement mattresses, and a standard hospital mattress. Mean supine pressures were less than 5 kPa under four sites. Average supine buttock pressure was 2.93 kPa. Occiput and heel pressures were much higher than under other sites, being on average 2.6 and 4.5 times greater respectively than the mean buttock pressure. On sitting up, buttock pressure increased by a factor of 1.7 on average, to a level higher than the accepted capillary closing pressure. Measurements were consistent with mattress design, specific features of which can significantly affect pressure under certain sites.

Beds↗

An investigation of interface pressures in low air loss beds.

Prospective randomised trials indicate that the low air loss bed is a successful method of treatment for pressure sores. To study the properties of these beds interface pressures were measured in two different low air loss beds. Ten healthy volunteers had eight readings at six different body sites taken supine and sitting. Occipital and heel pressures for both products exceeded 4.7 kPa, the accepted capillary closing pressure, while pressures at other sites were below this. These findings suggest that pressure relief alone is not the sole reason for the clinical acceptance of low air loss beds in the treatment of pressure sores.

Beds↗