PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Banks

Publications and source records attributed to V Banks.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Isolation, characterization, and chondrogenic potential of human bone marrow-derived multipotential stromal cells.

Multipotential bone marrow stromal cells have the ability to differentiate along multiple connective tissue lineages including cartilage. In this study, we developed an efficient and reproducible procedure for the isolation of stromal cells from bone marrow aspirates of normal human donors based on the expression of endoglin, a type III receptor of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) receptor family. We demonstrate that these cells have the ability of multiple lineage differentiation. Stromal cells represented 2-3% of the total mononuclear cells of the marrow. The cells displayed a fibroblastic colony formation in monolayer culture and maintained similar morphology with passage. Expression of cell surface molecules by flow cytometry displayed a stable phenotype with culture expansion. When cocultured with hematopoietic CD34(+) progenitor cells, stromal cells were able to maintain their ability to support hematopoiesis in vitro. Culture expanded stromal cells were placed in a 3-dimensional matrix of alginate beads and cultured in serum-free media in the presence of TGFbeta-3 for chondrogenic lineage progression. Increased expression of type II collagen messenger RNA was observed in the TGFbeta3 treated cultures. Immunohistochemistry performed on sections of alginate beads detected the presence of type II collagen protein. This isolation procedure for stromal cells and the establishment of the alginate culture system for chondrogenic progression will contribute to the understanding of chondrogenesis and cartilage repair.

Bone Marrow Cells↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of two amorphous hydrogels in the debridement of pressure sores.

This study compared the efficacy of two hydrogel dressings in the debridement of necrotic pressure sores. This randomised, controlled, assessor-blind, clinical trial involved 50 patients whose wounds were assessed weekly using computerised wound analysis for four weeks or until debrided. Debridement was identified when there was 80% red granulation tissue present and no sign of necrosis. There were no statistically significant differences in comfort, wound odour, surrounding skin condition or time to debridement between the two groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Costs of dressings in the community.

This study compares the costs of dressings used in the treatment of patients with a variety of wound aetiologies. The two dressings investigated were a hydrocolloid dressing and a hydrocellular dressing. Secondary objectives included a comparison of dressing durability, time to complete healing, ease of wound cleansing and dressing removal. The study was an open prospective single-centre randomised parallel group trial involving 100 patients, treated in the community, who were randomised to the two dressing groups. For all aetiologies except pressure sores, the costs of the hydrocolloid dressing were less than the costs of the hydrocellular dressings. Similar healing rates were observed in the leg ulcer and 'other wound' groups. There were, however, significant differences in the number of healed wounds observed in patients with pressure sores treated with the hydrocellular dressing.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of a new polyurethane foam dressing.

The treatment of moderately to heavily exuding wounds requires a dressing that will remove excess exudate while ensuring optimum conditions at the wound site and preventing maceration of the surrounding skin tissue. This prospective, stratified, randomised clinical trial was designed to assess the performance and safety of a new polyurethane foam dressing compared with a hydrocellular dressing. Both dressings are currently available to community nurses for the treatment of these wound types. Sixty-one patients recruited to the trial. They were grouped according to wound type: 20 leg ulcers, 20 Grade 2 or Grade 3 pressure sores and 21 other wounds that included traumatic, acute and chronic wounds and burns. Patients were randomized to treatment and dressing changes and assessments were undertaken as required. Condition of the wound and surrounding skin, comfort, ease of use and leakage from the dressing were monitored at each assessment. Treatment continued for six weeks or until the wound was lightly exuding (defined as absence of leakage with the dressing remaining in place for more than four days on two consecutive occasions). Photographs and tracings of the wounds were taken weekly. The results showed that the two dressings were similar in performance in that they could remain in place for approximately 2.5 days, irrespective of wound type. There were no statistically significant differences in surrounding skin condition, reduction in wound size, patient comfort or ease of application and removal.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

A study to compare two film dressings used as secondary dressings.

Dressings manufactured from adhesive polymeric films have been used extensively in wound management for about 20 years. This report describes the results of a trial designed to compare the performance of two such dressings, used as secondary dressings, in a multi-centre randomised controlled community study involving 100 patients. Independent analysis of the study data revealed that, after adjusting for other effects, no genuine difference was demonstrated between the dressings in terms of their ability to resist wrinkling or prevent maceration (the primary outcome variable).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds.

A hydropolymer dressing (Tielle) and a hydrocolloid dressing (Granuflex) were compared in a randomised controlled clinical study involving 100 patients with leg ulcers and 99 patients with pressure sores in the community. Statistically significant differences in favour of the hydropolymer dressing were detected for dressing leakage and odour production, but no statistically significant differences were recorded in the number of patients with either leg ulcers or pressure sores who healed in each treatment group.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparing hydrocolloid dressings in management of exuding wounds.

Hydrocolloid dressings have been widely used since the late 1970s. This article compares two hydrocolloid dressings--3M Tegasorb dressing and ConvaTec's Granuflex (E)--and highlights their similarities and differences when used in the clinical situation. Both hydrocolloids were reported to perform favourably by users in most situations. 3M Tegasorb dressing becomes transparent in use and this function was rated highly by users compared to the opaque Granuflex (E). In addition, 3M Tegasorb showed better adherence. One limitation of the study was the small number of patients studied. Weekly assessments yielded 90 data sets in total.

Adult↗