V Beckendorf — Page 2 | PubMed Health

PubMedDate not supplied

[Standards, options, and recommendations for radiotherapy of kidney cancer].

CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR), initiated in 1993, is a collaborative project between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary expert group, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis, management and treatment of patients with renal cancer. This review is part of previously published complete guidelines and focuses on the place of radiotherapy in this disease. METHODS: The data was identified by literature search using Medline (up to June 1999) and personal reference lists. The main endpoints considered were survival, risk factors for late effects of radiotherapy, safety and quality of life. RESULTS: The key recommendations are: 1) In localised renal cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy has a limited role: it is not indicated for T1 and T2 tumours and there is no proof of a survival benefit for T3 N1-N2 tumours. Postoperative radiotherapy can be considered in young patients without risk factors for the development of post-radiotherapy complications and without loco-regional invasion (renal capsule, renal pelvis, vena cava, regional lymph nodes); 2) For metastatic tumours, the multidisciplinary team must decide whether palliative radiotherapy is appropriate after consideration of the prognostic factors. An isolated metastasis can be treated by radiosurgery and stereotaxic radiosurgery may be of benefit in the case of one or two cerebral metastasis. The optimal dose for palliative treatment is not known. Radiotherapy followed by immunotherapy can also be considered if the patient has no contraindication to such treatments.

Clinical Protocols↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Radiotherapy of stage T1-T2 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Analysis of the carcinologic results of a multicenter study of 610 patients. Groupe Radiothérapie de la Commission de Coopération Médicale Intercentres (CCMI)].

PURPOSE: Retrospective analysis of the results of radiotherapy in localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Complications were excluded. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six-hundred-and-ten T1-T2 adenocarcinomas of the prostate were treated with continuous courses of external beam radiation therapy in 19 participating Institutes between January 1983 and January 1988. The mean follow-up was 10.4 years; the mean age of patients at the beginning of radiotherapy was 68.5 years. RESULTS: A 10-year, local control had been achieved in 86% of T1-T2 (81.4% for T2). The 5- and 10-year metastatic relapse rates were 25.3% and 30% (29% and 38.1% for T2), respectively. At 10 years, 62.4% of T1-T2 were recurrence-free; overall survival rate was 45.8% and cause-specific survival rate was 70.5%; 29.9% of T1-T2 patients were alive and disease-free. T category (TNM), pathologic grade, pelvic lymph node status, local tumor control, and obstructive ureteral symptoms were correlated with survival. The influence of pelvic nodes radiation, dose, overall treatment time, previous endocrine treatment, and transuretral resection was not significant for disease-free survival (alive and disease-free) and other endpoints. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the French series (1975-1982 and 1983-1988). The results of the literature are comparable to ours. As far as prognostic factors are concerned, this report provides evidence that the explainable variables which influence survival depend on the tumor and patient status.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Tolerance and role of irradiation in the treatment of epithelial cancer of the ovary].

PURPOSE: In a retrospective analysis, our aim was to evaluate the immediate tolerance and the early and late complications of abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy in the Centre Alexis-Vautrin (France). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1st January 1983 to 31st December 1993, 117 patients were treated at Centre Alexis Vautrin in Nancy for epithelial ovarian cancer by abdominal and/or pelvic irradiation after surgery. They were aged from 24 to 85 with a median of 56 years. There were ten patients with stage I (9%), 28 patients with stage II (24%), 60 patients with stage III (61%) and 19 patients with stage IV (16%) disease. Results of surgery were determined as follows: satisfactory with absence of tumoral residuum in 26% cases (30 patients) and with residuum inferior to 20 mm in 46% cases (52 patients; incomplete in 26% cases (31 patients) either because of residuum superior in 20 mm and/or incomplete surgery; and not evaluable in 3% cases (four patients). Seventy-seven patients were sent to the Centre for postoperative treatment (66% patients of the series), 48 of them (62.4%) after non-satisfactory surgery, 29 after satisfactory surgery (37.6%). Chemotherapy was administered to only 104 patients (89% cases), and contained platinum salts and cyclophosphamid for 87% of these patients. Fourteen patients (12%) received a single irradiation dose after surgery: three in stage I, three with poor evaluation of the disease in the initial stage, three with medical contraindications to chemotherapy treatment, six with contraindications due to advanced age (?? Makes 15 ). Histologically, 46% of patients had a serous adenocarcinoma, 9% a mucinous adenocarcinoma, 11% an endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 2% a clear cell adenocarcinoma, 1% an undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, and 31% an epithelial carcinoma without any other indication. The histological grade which was recently introduced was rarely indicated. Complementary radiotherapeutic treatment consisted of pelvic irradiation for 14 patients (12%), abdomino-pelvic irradiation for 63 patients (54%), and total abdominal irradiation with a pelvic boost for 40 patients (34%). RESULTS: The immediate tolerance to irradiation can be considered as globally satisfactory since 9% of the patients (ten cases) had no problems and 64% of the patients developed a minor intolerance easily controlled by symptomatic treatments. There were also digestive complications: nausea, vomiting and diarrhea for 66% of the patients (50 cases); to a lesser extent, 20% of the cases experienced associated digestive and hematological complications (15 patients); 9% isolated hematological troubles such as anemia (seven patients); 4% digestive complications (three patients) and 1% hematological and urinary digestive troubles (one patients). Late irradiation sequelae were evaluated for 89 patients with a follow-up lasting from 4 months to 11 years. Sixty-six patients had no sequelae, eleven patients had minor tolerability problems--mainly digestive for more than half of them. Five patients presented severe complications, including hematological problems such as chronic thrombopenia in two cases, urinary-problems in two other cases, and one patient presented with a case of histologically proven malabsorption. Two patients presented major problems; one case of radic cystitis and one of radic bowel. Two patients died of iatrogenic causes: one of induced leukemia, the other of treatment-induced digestive and renal complications. The overall survival rate was 30% at 5 years and 22% at 10 years. It was 90% at 5 and 10 years for stage I patients, 60% at 5 years and 30% at 10 years for stage II patients, 22% at 5 years and 8% at 10 years for stage III patients, and finally 10% at 5 years for stage IV patients. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of 117 epithelial ovarian cancers, treated over 10 years and which all received pelvic and/or abdominal irradiation, we can conclude that this treatment is globally well tolerated and that it yields a

Adenocarcinoma↗