PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Casadó

Publications and source records attributed to V Casadó.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Receptor-receptor interactions involving adenosine A1 or dopamine D1 receptors and accessory proteins.

The molecular basis for the known intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors (G protein coupled receptors, GPCR) was postulated to be heteromerization based on receptor subtype specific interactions between different types of homomers of GPCR. Adenosine and dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia have been fundamental to demonstrate the existence of receptor heteromers and the functional consequences of such molecular interactions. The heterodimer is only one type of heteromeric complex and the evidence is equally compatible with the existence of higher order heteromeric complexes, where also adapter proteins such as homer proteins and scaffolding proteins can exist, assisting in the process of linking the GPCR and ion channel receptors together in a receptor mosaic that may have special integrative value and may constitute the molecular basis for learning and memory. Heteromerization of D(2) dopamine and A(2A) adenosine receptors is reviewed by Fuxe in another article in this special issue. Here, heteromerization between D(1) dopamine and A(1) adenosine receptors is reviewed. Heteromers formed by dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors and by adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors also occur in striatal cells and open new perspectives to understand why two receptors with apparently opposite effects are expressed in the same neuron and in the nerve terminals. The role of accessory proteins also capable of interacting with receptor-receptor heteromers in regulating the traffic and the molecular physiology of these receptors is also discussed. Overall, the knowledge of the reason why such complex networks of receptor-receptor and receptor-protein interactions occur in striatal cells is crucial to develop new strategies to combat neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases.

Animals↗

Heterodimeric adenosine receptors: a device to regulate neurotransmitter release.

Since 1990 it has been known that dimers are the basic functional form of nearly all G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and that homo- and heterodimerization may play a key role in correct receptor maturation and trafficking to the plasma membrane. Nevertheless, homo- and heterodimerization of GPCR has become a matter of debate especially in the search for the precise physiological meaning of this phenomenon. This article focuses on how heterodimerization of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors, which are coupled to apparently opposite signalling pathways, allows adenosine to exert a fine-tuning modulation of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission, providing a switch mechanism by which low and high concentrations of adenosine inhibit and stimulate, respectively, glutamate release.

Adenosine↗

Adenosine A2B receptors behave as an alternative anchoring protein for cell surface adenosine deaminase in lymphocytes and cultured cells.

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an enzyme of the purine metabolism that has been largely considered to be cytosolic. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the enzyme appears on the surface of lymphocytes where it interacts with the T-cell activation antigen CD26. ADA also appears on the surface of nonlymphoid cells anchored to adenosine A1 receptors. Here it is demonstrated that cell surface ADA in ADA+/CD26- T lymphocytes anchors to adenosine receptors of the A2B subtype (A2BR). An interaction between A2BR and cell surface ADA has been demonstrated in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells and Jurkat J32 T lymphocytes. This has been proved by coimmunoprecipitation, binding of exogenous ADA to A2BR+ cells, and coimmunolocalization. The specificity of the interaction has also been demonstrated by the lack of interaction with other members of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Binding of ADA to A2BR increases the affinity of the agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine and cAMP production. This effect occurs even when ADA devoid of enzyme activity is used. Therefore, in lymphocytes, cell surface ADA, apart from degrading extracellular adenosine, regulates those actions of adenosine that are mediated via adenosine receptors of the A2B subtype.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Involvement of caveolin in ligand-induced recruitment and internalization of A(1) adenosine receptor and adenosine deaminase in an epithelial cell line.

Chronic exposure of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)R) to A(1)R agonists leads to activation, phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization to intracellular compartments of the receptor. Desensitization and internalization of A(1)R is modulated by adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme that regulates the extracellular concentration of adenosine. ADA interacts with A(1)R on the cell surface of the smooth muscle cell line DDT1 MF-2, and both proteins are internalized following agonist stimulation of the receptor. The mechanism involved in A(1)R and ADA internalization upon agonist exposure is poorly understood in epithelial cells. In this report, we show that A(1)R and ADA interact in LLC-PK(1) epithelial cells. Exposure of LLC-PK(1) cells to A(1)R agonists induces aggregation of A(1)R and ADA on the cell surface and their translocation to intracellular compartments. Biochemical and cell biology assays were used to characterize the intracellular vesicles containing both proteins after agonist treatment. A(1)R and ADA colocalized together with the rafts marker protein caveolin. Filipin, a sterol-binding agent that disrupts rafts (small microdomains of the plasma membrane), was able to inhibit A(1)R internalization. In contrast, acid treatment of the cells, which disrupts internalization via clathrin-coated vesicles, did not inhibit agonist-stimulated A(1)R internalization. We demonstrated that A(1)R agonist N(6)-(R)-phenylisopropyl adenosine promotes the translocation of A(1)R into low-density gradient fractions containing caveolin. Furthermore, a direct interaction of the C-terminal domain of A(1)R with caveolin-1 was demonstrated by pull down experiments. These results indicate that A(1)R and ADA form a stable complex in the cell surface of LLC-PK(1) cells and that agonist-induced internalization of the A(1) adenosine receptor and ADA is mediated by clathrin-independent endocytosis.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors form functionally interacting heteromeric complexes.

The possible molecular basis for the previously described antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)R) and dopamine D(1) receptors (D(1)R) in the brain have been studied in mouse fibroblast Ltk(-) cells cotransfected with human A(1)R and D(1)R cDNAs or with human A(1)R and dopamine D(2) receptor (long-form) (D(2)R) cDNAs and in cortical neurons in culture. A(1)R and D(1)R, but not A(1)R and D(2)R, were found to coimmunoprecipitate in cotransfected fibroblasts. This selective A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization disappeared after pretreatment with the D(1)R agonist, but not after combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists. A high degree of A(1)R and D(1)R colocalization, demonstrated in double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy, was found in both cotransfected fibroblast cells and cortical neurons in culture. On the other hand, a low degree of A(1)R and D(2)R colocalization was observed in cotransfected fibroblasts. Pretreatment with the A(1)R agonist caused coclustering (coaggregation) of A(1)R and D(1)R, which was blocked by combined pretreatment with the D(1)R and A(1)R agonists in both fibroblast cells and in cortical neurons in culture. Combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, but not with either one alone, substantially reduced the D(1)R agonist-induced accumulation of cAMP. The A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization may be one molecular basis for the demonstrated antagonistic modulation of A(1)R of D(1)R receptor signaling in the brain. The persistence of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromerization seems to be essential for the blockade of A(1)R agonist-induced A(1)R/D(1)R coclustering and for the desensitization of the D(1)R agonist-induced cAMP accumulation seen on combined pretreatment with D(1)R and A(1)R agonists, which indicates a potential role of A(1)R/D(1)R heteromers also in desensitization mechanisms and receptor trafficking.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

Evidence for adenosine/dopamine receptor interactions: indications for heteromerization.

Evidence has been obtained for adenosine/dopamine interactions in the central nervous system. There exists an anatomical basis for the existence of functional interactions between adenosine A(1)R and dopamine D(1)R and between adenosine A(2A) and dopamine D(2) receptors in the same neurons. Selective A(1)R agonists affect negatively the high affinity binding of D(1) receptors. Activation of A(2A) receptors leads to a decrease in receptor affinity for dopamine agonists acting on D(2) receptors, specially of the high-affinity state. These interactions have been reproduced in cell lines and found to be of functional significance. Adenosine/dopamine interactions at the behavioral level probably reflect those found at the level of dopamine receptor binding and transduction. All these findings suggest receptor subtype-specific interactions between adenosine and dopamine receptors that may be achieved by molecular interactions (e.g., receptor heterodimerization). At the molecular level adenosine receptors can serve as a model for homomeric and heteromeric protein-protein interactions. A1R forms homodimers in membranes and also form high-order molecular structures containing also heterotrimeric G-proteins and adenosine deaminase. The occurrence of clustering also clearly suggests that G-protein- coupled receptors form high-order molecular structures, in which multimers of the receptors and probably other interacting proteins form functional complexes. In view of the occurrence of homodimers of adenosine and of dopamine receptors it is speculated that heterodimers between these receptors belonging to two different families of G-protein-coupled receptors can be formed. Evidence that A1/D1 can form heterodimers in cotransfected cells and in primary cultures of neurons has in fact been obtained. In the central nervous system direct and indirect receptor-receptor interactions via adaptor proteins participate in neurotransmission and neuromodulation and, for example, in the establishment of high neural functions such as learning and memory.

Animals↗

The heat shock cognate protein hsc73 assembles with A(1) adenosine receptors to form functional modules in the cell membrane.

A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)Rs) are G protein-coupled heptaspanning receptors that interact at the outer face of the plasma membrane with cell surface ecto-adenosine deaminase (ecto-ADA). By affinity chromatography the heat shock cognate protein hsc73 was identified as a cytosolic component able to interact with the third intracellular loop of the receptor. As demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance, purified A(1)Rs interact specifically with hsc73 with a dissociation constant in the nanomolar range (0.5 +/- 0.1 nM). The interaction between hsc73 and A(1)R led to a marked reduction in the binding of the ligands and prevented activation of G proteins, as deduced from (35)S-labeled guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding assays. Interestingly this effect was stronger than that exerted by guanine nucleotide analogs, which uncouple receptors from G proteins, and was completely prevented by ADA. As assessed by immunoprecipitation a high percentage of A(1)Rs in cell lysates are coupled to hsc73. A relatively high level of colocalization between A(1)R and hsc73 was detected in DDT(1)MF-2 cells by means of confocal microscopy, and no similar results were obtained for other G protein-coupled receptors. Colocalization between hsc73 and A(1)R was detected in specific regions of rat cerebellum and in the body of cortical neurons but not in dendrites or synapses. Remarkably, agonist-induced receptor internalization leads to the endocytosis of A(1)Rs by two qualitatively different vesicle types, one in which A(1)R and hsc73 colocalize and another in which hsc73 is absent. These results open the interesting possibility that signaling via G protein-coupled receptors may be regulated by heat shock proteins.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Cell surface adenosine deaminase: much more than an ectoenzyme.

During the last 10 years, adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme considered to be cytosolic, has been found on the cell surface of many cells, therefore it can be considered an ectoenzyme. EctoADA, which seems to be identical to intracellular ADA and has a globular structure, does not interact with membranes but with membrane proteins. Two of these cell surface receptors for ectoADA have been identified: CD26 and A1 adenosine receptors (A1R). Apart from degradation of extracellular adenosine another functional role of ectoADA has been assigned. EctoADA is able to transmit signals when interacting with either CD26 or A1R. In this way, it acts as a co-stimulatory molecule which facilitates a variety of specific signalling events in different cell types. The heterogeneous distribution of the enzyme in the nervous system indicates that ectoADA may be a neuroregulatory molecule. On the other hand, ectoADA might act as a bridge between two different cells thus raising the possibility that it may be important for the development of the nervous system.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

The cluster-arranged cooperative model: a model that accounts for the kinetics of binding to A1 adenosine receptors.

To explain the equilibrium binding and binding kinetics of ligands to membrane receptors, a number of models have been proposed, none of which is able to adequately describe the experimental findings, in particular the apparent negative cooperativity of ligand binding. In this paper, a new model, the cluster-arranged cooperative model, is presented whose main characteristic is that it explains the existence of negative cooperativity in the binding of ligands to the receptor molecule. The model is based on our findings of agonist binding to A1 adenosine receptors and of ligand-induced clustering of these receptors on the cell surface. The model assumes the existence of two conformational forms of the receptor in an equilibrium which depends on the concentration of the ligand. In this way, negative cooperativity is explained by the transmission of the information between receptor molecules through the structure of the membrane. The model is able to predict the thermodynamic binding and binding kinetics of [3H]-(R)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine to A1 adenosine receptors in the presence and absence of guanylyl imidodiphosphate. In the presence of the guanine nucleotide analogue, the linear Scatchard plots obtained for [3H]-(R)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine binding are explained by the disappearance of cooperativity, thus suggesting that G proteins are important for the existence of negative cooperativity in ligand binding. Among other predictions, the model justifies early events in homologous desensitization since high ligand concentrations would lead to the saturation of the receptor in a low-affinity conformation that does not signal. Our model can likely explain the behavior of a number of heptaspanning and tyrosine-kinase receptors exhibiting complex binding kinetics.

Animals↗

Adenosine deaminase interacts with A1 adenosine receptors in pig brain cortical membranes.

Adenosine deaminase is an enzyme of purine metabolism that has largely been considered to be cytosolic. A few years ago, adenosine deaminase was reported to appear on the surface of cells. Recently, it has been demonstrated that adenosine deaminase interacts with a type II membrane protein known as either CD26 or dipeptidylpeptidase IV. In this study, by immunoprecipitation and affinity chromatography it is shown that adenosine deaminase and A1 adenosine receptors interact in pig brain cortical membranes. This is the first report in brain demonstrating an interaction between a degradative ectoenzyme and the receptor whose ligand is the enzyme substrate. By means of this interaction adenosine deaminase leads to the appearance of the high-affinity site of the receptor, which corresponds to the receptor-G protein complex. Thus, it seems that adenosine deaminase is necessary for coupling A1 adenosine receptors to heterotrimeric G proteins.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

Immunological identification of A1 adenosine receptors in brain cortex.

The A1 adenosine receptor from pig brain cortex has been identified by means of two antipeptide antibodies against two domains of the receptor molecule: PC/10 antiserum was raised against a part of the third intracellular loop, and PC/20 antiserum was raised against a part of the second extracellular loop. PC/10 antibody was able to recognize a 39-kDa band that corresponded to the A1 receptor, as demonstrated by immunoblotting and by immunoprecipitation of the molecule cross-linked to [125I](R)-2-azido-N2-p-hydroxy(phenylisopropyl)adenosine. Besides the 39-kDa band, PC/20 also recognized a 74-kDa form that does not seem to correspond to a receptor-G protein complex. The occurrence of the two bands was detected and analyzed in samples from different species and tissues showing a heterogeneous distribution of both. The 74-kDa form can be converted into the 39-kDa form by treatment with agonists or antagonists of A1 adenosine receptors. These results suggest that A1 adenosine receptor can occur in dimers and that the dimer-monomer conversion might be regulated by adenosine as the physiological ligand. Since the 74-kDa aggregates were not recognized by PC/10, it is likely that part of the third intracellular loop participates in the protein-protein interaction.

Animals↗

A1 adenosine receptors can occur manifesting two kinetic components of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-[3H]dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) binding.

The results described in this paper show, for the first time, that A1 adenosine receptors can have two kinetic components for the binding of the antagonist [3H]DPCPX. At low ionic strength (< or = 42 mmol/l), dissociation of [3H]DPCPX bound to A1 receptors fitted better to a two kinetic components model than to a one kinetic component model. The kinetic constants were consistent with comparable Kd values for the two components of the antagonist binding, and therefore these two components cannot be distinguished by saturation isotherm analysis.

Animals↗

Role of histidine residues in agonist and antagonist binding sites of A1 adenosine receptor.

The influence of pH on the equilibrium dissociation constant and on kinetic association and dissociation constants was studied for adenosine receptor agonist L-N6-[adenine-2,8-3H, ethyl-2-3H]phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]R-PIA) and antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-[3H]-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX). Two ionizable groups, of pK 7.0 and pK 7.4, are involved in the [3H]R-PIA associations with high- and low-affinity states of the receptor, and another group, of pK 6.0, is involved in the association with the low-affinity state. No ionizable group is involved in the dissociation process for the high-affinity state, whereas two ionizable groups, of pK 6.0 and 6.5, are involved in the low-affinity state. For [3H]DPCPX, three ionizable groups (pK 6.0, 7.4, and 8.0) are involved in the association process and only one group, (pK 6.0), is involved in the dissociation step. The apparent pK values obtained agree with histidine residues. We thus studied the effect of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP), which reacts irreversibly with histidine residues, on agonist and antagonist binding to A1 adenosine receptors from pig brain cortical membranes. DEP treatment of membrane reduced the affinity (KD) and the total binding (R) of the agonist and the antagonist. Membrane preincubation with unlabeled ligand (R-PIA or DPCPX) prevented the effect of DEP modification observed when the same ligand, but with label, is added to the same membranes, but did not prevent the DEP modification on different, labeled ligand.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Thermodynamic analysis of agonist and antagonist binding to membrane-bound and solubilized A1 adenosine receptors.

The thermodynamic properties of the agonist [Adenine-2,8-3H, ethyl-2(3)-H]-N6-phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]R-PIA) and the antagonist 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-[3H]dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) binding to membrane-bound and 3-3[-(choloamidopropyl)-dimethylammoniol-1-propanesulfonate/ digitonin- solubilized A1 adenosine receptors from pig brain cortex were evaluated. Rate constants for [3H]R-PIA and [3H]DPCPX association (k+1) and dissociation (k-1) processes to this receptor subtype were measured from association-dissociation experiments at six different temperatures. The values for equilibrium association constant (KA = 1/KD) were derived from rate constant values (k+1/k-1). The antagonist binding to membrane-bound receptors, the agonist binding to fast kinetic component membrane-bound receptors and the agonist binding to soluble receptors showed a linear temperature-dependence of the standard free-energy change. The first two processes are enthalpy- and entropy-driven, and the third process is enthalpy-driven with entropy working against it. On the other hand, a curvilinear temperature-dependence appears in the agonist binding to slow kinetic component membrane-bound receptors and in the antagonist binding to soluble receptors, but analyzing the semireactions (association-dissociation) involved in each case reveals that the thermodynamic behavior is very different. The thermodynamic similarities and differences are discussed in terms of receptor--G protein interaction.

Animals↗

Optimal association-saturation procedure for estimating association and dissociation rate parameters in receptor studies. Application to solubilized A1 adenosine receptors.

A method of obtaining estimates of the maximum binding and association and dissociation rate constants for a receptor-ligand interaction is described. This new procedure, the association-saturation method, is based on an exact mathematical equation which defines the model without simplifications. The method proposed is readily applicable to any system consisting of one ligand and one receptor. With only four determinations, each involving one ligand concentration and an association time, it is possible to determine the number of specific binding sites, the dissociation and association rate constants and the equilibrium dissociation constant with accuracy. No dissociation curve is required, and only one point of the association curve for each ligand concentration is necessary. In addition to the higher confidence in the estimates of the parameter values obtained, this method leads to important savings in radiolabelled compounds and experimental time. The results were compared with those obtained with standard association-dissociation curves and saturation isotherms. The optimum number of replicates of each experimental point to obtain reliable estimates of different parameters is discussed on the basis of simulation studies. The performance of the procedure is analysed by means of association-saturation experiments with the agonist [adenine-2,8-3H,ethyl-2-3H]N6-phenylisopropyladenosine and solubilized A1 adenosine receptors from pig brain cortex.

Animals↗

Modulation of adenosine agonist [3H]N6-(R)-phenylisopropyladenosine binding to pig brain cortical membranes by changes of membrane fluidity and of medium physicochemical characteristics.

The binding of [3H]N6-(R)-phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]R-PIA) to pig brain cortical membranes was investigated as a function of membrane fluidity and of the physicochemical characteristics of the medium. The two affinity states of the A1 adenosine receptor behave differently in the experiments performed. Increases (up to 6.7 poises) or reduction (up to 1.3 poises) in membrane microviscosity did not lead to significant variation of equilibrium parameter values except for a slight modification of the low-affinity Kd value at 1.3 poises. Addition of cholesterol to raise the microviscosity up to 9.0 poises led to a marked decrease of binding to the high-affinity state without modifying the Kd. Furthermore, the Kd value for the low-affinity state rose markedly. Addition of sucrose, which modifies the conductance, viscosity and density of the aqueous medium, did not lead to significant changes when used at a concentration of 0.25 M, either in isolation or in radioligand binding assay medium. The presence of 0.32 M sucrose in the isolation medium led to a 30% fall in the total binding without affecting the distribution and Kd values for either affinity state very much. However, the presence of greater than or equal to 0.32 M sucrose in the binding assay medium produced the disappearance of the low-affinity states and the appearance of high-affinity states; only one affinity state was found to have a somewhat increased Kd value. On the other hand, increases of the medium conductance did not lead to the disappearance of the low-affinity state although some decrease of the binding was observed at high Tris concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

The distribution of A1 adenosine receptor and 5'-nucleotidase in pig brain cortex subcellular fractions.

Pig brain cerebral cortex was subfractionated by isopycnic centrifugation in sucrose gradients. In each subfraction the content of the agonist [3H]R-PIA binding, the activity of adenosine metabolizing enzymes (5'-nucleotidase and adenosine deaminase) and the activity of membrane marker enzymes were determined. The fractions were also examined by electron microscope. In general, the results suggest a widespread distribution of A1 adenosine receptors in membranes from different origins. Marker enzyme profile characterization indicated an enrichment of A1 adenosine receptor in pre-synaptic membranes isolated from the crude synaptosomal fraction (P2B subfraction) as well as in membranes of glial origin such as myelin. The receptor is also present in the endoplasmic reticulum and in membranes isolated from the microsomal fraction that seem to have a post-synaptic origin (P3B). In subfractions having a high content of adenosine receptor the equilibrium binding parameters were obtained as well as the proportion of high- to low-affinity sites. From the values of the equilibrium constants it was not possible to find differences between the receptor in the different subfractions. Analysis of the affinity state distribution showed a diminished percentage of high-affinity sites in fraction P3A, which can be accounted by the existence of myelin membranes; in contrast the percentage of high-affinity states was higher in P2 and P3B, indicating that in these fractions the receptor is present in synaptosomal membranes. The close correlation shown between the enzyme 5'-nucleotidase specific activity and the specific ligand binding distributions led us to postulate an important role for the enzyme in the regulation of adenosine action in pig brain cortex.

5'-Nucleotidase↗

The adenosine receptors present on the plasma membrane of chromaffin cells are of the A2b subtype.

The adenosine receptors in the plasma membrane of chromaffin cells from bovine adrenal medulla were characterized. The presence of A1 receptors was discounted owing to the absence of R-[3H]phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA) and [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]-DPCPX) binding. The binding of the specific A2a ligand CGS-21680 was low. In contrast, the binding of 5'-(N-[3H]-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([3H]NECA) was relatively high (1.7 pmol/mg of protein at a ligand concentration up to 90 nM). This binding did not correspond to non-adenosine receptor NECA binding sites because the specific [3H]-NECA binding was similar when unlabeled adenosine, NECA, or R-PIA was used to measure the nonspecific binding. The rank order of potency of different ligands for the displacement of specific [3H]NECA binding was DPCPX greater than NECA greater than chloroadenosine greater than R-PIA greater than theophylline = CGS-21680. These results indicate that the receptors present on the plasma membrane of chromaffin cells are exclusively of the A2b subtype.

2-Chloroadenosine↗