Biomedical subjects

V D Chamizo

Publications and source records attributed to V D Chamizo.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a swimming-pool navigation task.

In each of 3 experiments, rats were preexposed to the 4 distinct landmarks surrounding a circular pool before being trained to find a submerged platform located in a fixed position in the pool. When preexposure was to pairs of adjacent landmarks, it consistently retarded subsequent learning (a latent inhibition effect). When preexposure was to 1 landmark at a time, then, provided the 4 landmarks all contained a salient feature in common, preexposure facilitated subsequent learning (a perceptual learning effect). The results provide little support for the notion of a cognitive map and are quite consistent with an associative analysis.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Blocking in the spatial domain.

An initial series of experiments with rats in a swimming pool established that they could find a hidden platform the location of which was defined in terms of 3 or 4 landmarks and that, when trained with all 4, any subset of 3 (or even, after a sufficient number of swimming trials, 2) landmarks was sufficient to produce accurate performance. When only one landmark was present during testing, however, performance fell to chance. Two additional experiments demonstrated a significant blocking effect: If rats were first trained to locate the platform with 3 landmarks, they did not learn to use a 4th landmark added to their initial set of 3.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Effects of pre-exposure to the same or different pattern of extra-maze cues on subsequent extra-maze discrimination.

In two experiments, rats learned a spatial discrimination between maze arms defined by their relationship to a variety of extra-maze cues. Prior exposure to the actual arms between which animals were required to discriminate tended to retard subsequent learning (by comparison with a control group either given no pre-exposure to the extra-maze cues or exposed only to arms pointing in the opposite direction), whereas prior exposure to arms intermediate between those used in discrimination training tended to facilitate subsequent learning. These results are consistent with the suggestion that pre-exposure will facilitate discrimination learning when it reduces the associability of features or elements common to the stimuli between which animals are required to discriminate, more than it reduces the associability of the features or elements unique to each.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Role of context in perceptual learning in maze discriminations.

Three experiments with rats in a maze examined the effects of pre-exposure to the relevant discriminative stimuli (rubber- and sandpaper-covered maze arms) or the extra-maze context (the maze was surrounded either by black curtains or by variety of extra-maze landmarks) on the learning of a discrimination between rubber and sandpaper arms. In Experiment 1, pre-exposure to the extra-maze context facilitated subsequent discrimination learning. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that pre-exposure to rubber and sandpaper arms facilitated subsequent discrimination learning only when these cues were presented in the same context during pre-exposure and discriminative training. Taken together, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that a major cause of perceptual learning is the latent inhibition of stimuli or features common to the two discriminative stimuli, and that such latent inhibition may be disrupted by a radical change of context.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Reciprocal overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues.

In three experiments, rats learned a maze discrimination where the location of food was defined either by reference to extra-maze cues alone, or by both extra- and intra-maze cues. Experiment 1 confirmed earlier results in showing that the presence of intra-maze cues failed to overshadow learning about extra-maze cues, in spite of the former's apparently greater salience. Experiment 2, however, suggested that this result was an artefactual consequence of differences between groups in the proportion of reinforced and unreinforced trials during the course of discriminative training. In Experiment 3, the discrimination was taught by a series of reinforced and unreinforced placement trials, and a significant overshadowing effect was observed. Intra-maze and extra-maze cues seem to compete for association with reinforcement in exactly the same way as any other cues.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Perceptual learning in maze discriminations.

In Experiment 1, rats were trained on a discrimination between rubber- and sandpaper-covered arms of a maze after one group had been pre-exposed to these intra-maze cues. Pre-exposure facilitated subsequent discrimination learning, unless the discrimination was made easier by adding further discriminative stimuli, when it now significantly retarded learning. In Experiment 2, rats were trained on an extra-maze spatial discrimination, again after one group, but not another, had been pre-exposed to the extra-maze landmarks. Here too, pre-exposure facilitated subsequent discrimination learning, unless the discrimination was made substantially easier by arranging that the two arms between which rats had to choose were always separated by 135 degrees. The results of both experiments can be explained by supposing that perceptual learning depends on the presence of features common to S+ and S-.

Animals↗