PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V E Steele

Publications and source records attributed to V E Steele.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Detection of differentially expressed genes in methylnitrosourea-induced rat mammary adenocarcinomas.

In this study, altered gene expression in five methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat mammary adenocarcinomas was investigated using a newly developed competitive cDNA library screening assay. In order to detect the differentially expressed cDNA transcripts, three cDNA libraries (rat mammary, rat liver, and rat kidney) with over 18,000 clones were differentially screened with competing normal and neoplastic mammary cDNA probes. Ninety-eight clones indicated by competitive hybridization to be differentially expressed in tumors were verified by dot-blot hybridization analysis. Of these clones, 45 were found to be overexpressed while 53 were underexpressed in tumors. Forty-five of the confirmed clones were further analyzed by single-pass cDNA sequence determination. Four clones showed homology with cytochrome oxidase subunit I, polyoma virus PTA noncoding region, cytoplasmic beta-actin, and mouse secretory protein containing thrombospondin motifs. Further investigation into the potential roles of these identified genes should contribute significantly to our understanding of the molecular mechanism(s) of rat mammary tumorigenesis.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Apoptosis, cell replication, and Western-style diet-induced tumorigenesis in mouse colon.

In this study, feeding Western-style diets (WDs) to mice for a duration of two years without any chemical carcinogen led to the development of gross colonic lesions that were histologically classified as dysplastic crypts and focal hyperplasias with or without atypical nuclei. To better understand early biological events contributing to the development of colonic neoplasia, grossly normal colonic mucosa was investigated; mitotic and apoptotic colonic epithelial cells, atypical mitosis, and atypical nuclei were studied. A significant and transient increase of mitotic activity in the basal and intermediate portions of the colonic crypts was seen in young mice after feeding them the WDs. This was accompanied by diffuse activation of apoptosis of the colonic epithelial cells. In the middle of the rodents' life span, after administration of both the WDs and control diet, the rodents developed a marked depletion of apoptotic epithelial cells in the mid-region of the colonic crypts; this was followed by the expansion of an epithelial cell population containing atypical nuclei, and the emergence of the gross lesions noted above. With this sequence of events, prolonged feeding of WDs to mice produced single-crypt dysplastic lesions and focal hyperplasias indicative of tumorigenesis.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Cytokeratin, lectin, and acidic mucin modulation in differentiating colonic epithelial cells of mice after feeding Western-style diets.

Several studies have recently reported the development of colonic epithelial cell hyperproliferation in rodents following the ingestion of Western-style diets. In this study, additional measurements related to differentiation and maturation of the colonic epithelial cells were made after feeding this type of diet. Two Western-style diets high in fat and phosphate content and low in calcium and vitamin D were fed to C57BL/6J mice for 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Diet A contained American Blend fat as a source of lipids, diet B contained corn oil, and control diet C was a standard AIN-76A semisynthetic diet which is lower in fat content and higher in calcium and vitamin D. Colonic epithelial cells were studied for three biomarkers: cytokeratin catalogue no. 18 (clone LE64) expression, soybean agglutinin carbohydrate lectin binding, and acidic mucins including sialo- and sulfomucins. Feeding of diets A and B revealed that colonic epithelial cells had increased expression of cytokeratin catalogue 18 and SBA carbohydrate lectin binding compared to controls (P = 0.0001 for diet A versus C and diet B versus C). Significant differences were found between diets B and C (P = 0.0001) and diets A and C (P = 0.0001) in total acidic mucins and in the ratio of sialomucin:sulfomucin (P = 0.0001). These findings demonstrate that both functional and structural modifications occurred in colonic epithelial cells under these dietary conditions, and further defined this rodent model for preclinical evaluation of nutritional and chemopreventive interventions.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Exceptional chemopreventive activity of low-dose dehydroepiandrosterone in the rat mammary gland.

To determine if the chemopreventive activity of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the rat mammary gland can be dissociated from its toxicity, two studies were conducted in which low doses of DHEA were administered alone and in combination with other agents to rats treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Beginning 1 week prior to administration of 35 mg N-methyl-N-nitrosourea per kg body weight, groups of 20 female Sprague-Dawley rates were fed AIN-76A diet supplemented with DHEA alone (800 or 400 mg/kg diet), DHEA + tamoxifen (80 or 40 microgram/kg diet), DHEA + carbenoxolone (3500 or 1750 mg/kg diet), or DHEA + tamoxifen + carbenoxolone. When administered alone at either 800 or 400 mg/kg diet, DHEA reduced mammary cancer incidence from >70% in dietary controls to 0%; mammary cancer incidence from >70% in dietary controls to 0%; mammary cancer incidence in all DHEA combination regimens was also < or = 5%. The dose levels of DHEA used induced no toxicity or alteration in body weight gain. These results indicate that dietary supplementation with low doses of DHEA has chemopreventive efficacy greater than or equal to that of endocrine ablation. This protection may be mediated by the induction of differentiation in the mammary parenchyma.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

New agents for cancer chemoprevention.

Clinical chemoprevention trials of more than 30 agents and agent combinations are now in progress or being planned. The most advanced agents are well known and are in large Phase III chemoprevention intervention trials or epidemiological studies. These drugs include several retinoids [e.g., retinol, retinyl palmitate, all-trans-retinoic acid, and 13-cis-retinoic acid], calcium, Beta carotene, vitamin E, tamoxifen, and finasteride. Other newer agents are currently being evaluated in or being considered for Phase II and early Phase III chemoprevention trials. Prominent in this group are all-trans-N-(4-hydroxy phenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) (alone and in combination with tamoxifen), 2-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (aspirin, piroxicam, sulindac), oltipraz, and dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA). A third group is new agents showing chemopreventive activity in animal models, epidemiological studies, or in pilot clinical intervention studies. They are now in preclinical toxicology testing or Phase I safety and pharmacokinetics trials preparatory to chemoprevention efficacy trials. These agents include S-allyl-l-cysteine, curcumin, DHEA analog 8354 (fluasterone), genistein, ibuprofen, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol, phenethyl isothiocyanate, 9-cis-retinoic acid, sulindac sulfone, tea extracts, ursodiol, vitamin D analogs, and p-xylyl selenocyanate. A new generation of agents and agent combinations will soon enter clinical chemoprevention studies based primarily on promising chemopreventive activity in animal models and in mechanistic studies. Among these agents are more efficacious analogs of known chemopreventive drugs including novel carotenoids (e.g., alpha-carotene and lutein). Also included are safer analogs which retain the chemopreventive efficacy of the parent drug such as vitamin D3 analogs. Other agents of high interest are aromatase inhibitors (e.g., (+)-vorozole), and protease inhibitors (e.g., Bowman-Birk soybean trypsin inhibitor). Combinations are also being considered, such as vitamin E with l-selenomethionine. Analysis of signal transduction pathways is beginning to yield classes of potentially active and selective chemopreventive drugs. Examples are ras isoprenylation and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Use of in vitro assays to predict the efficacy of chemopreventive agents in whole animals.

Five in vitro assays have been applied to screen the efficacy of potential chemopreventive agents. These assays measure a) inhibition of morphological transformation in rat tracheal epithelial (RTE) cells, b) inhibition of anchorage independence in human lung tumor (A427) cells, c) inhibition of hyperplastic alveolar nodule formation in mouse mammary organ cultures (MMOC), d) inhibition of anchorage independence in mouse JB6 epidermal cells, and e) the inhibition of calcium tolerance in human foreskin epithelial cells. The efficacy of many of these same agents in whole animal studies of lung, colon, mammary gland, skin, and urinary bladder carcinogenesis has also been measured. The aim herein is to estimate the positive and negative predictive values of these in vitro assays against whole animal chemopreventive efficacy data using the same chemicals. For three of these assays--using RTE, A427 cells and mouse mammary organ culture (MMOC)-enough data are available to allow the estimate to be made. Such extrapolations of in vitro data to the in vivo situation are difficult at best. There are many dissimilarities between the two assay systems. The in vitro assays use respiratory and mammary epithelial cells, while the in vivo assays use respiratory, mammary, colon, bladder and skin cells. The in vitro assays use the carcinogens benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P) and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA), while the in vivo assays use B(a)P, DMBA, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), N,N'-diethylnitrosamine (DEN), azoxymethane (AOM), and N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosoamine (OH-BBN). There are vast differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in vitro and in vivo, yet it is possible to rapidly screen chemicals in vitro for efficacy at one-tenth the cost and complete tests in weeks instead of months. A positive in vitro assay was defined as a 20% inhibition (compared with control) for the RTE and A427 assays and a 60% inhibition for the MMOC assay at nontoxic concentrations. For in vivo assays, the criterion for a positive result was a statistically significant inhibition of incidence, multiplicity or a significant increase in latency (mean time to first tumor). For an agent to be considered negative in animals, it required negative results in at least two different organ systems and no positive results. Using the battery of three in vitro tests, the positive predictive value for having one, two, or three positive in vitro assays and at least one positive whole animal test was 76%, 80%, and 83% respectively. The negative predictive values for one, two or all three in vitro assays was 25%, 27%, and 50%. From these data it is observed that in vitro assays give valuable positive predictive values and less valuable negative predictive values. The mechanisms of chemoprevention are not well understood. Seven categories of agents were examined for their cancer preventing both in vitro and in vivo: antiinflammatories, antioxidants, arachadonic acid metabolism inhibitors, GSH inducers, GST inducers, ODC inhibitors, and PKC inhibitors. Three or even five in vitro assays cannot be all-inclusive of the many mechanisms of cancer prevention. However, three assays help to predict whole animal efficacy with reasonable positive predictive values. Much work and development remains to be done to rapidly identify new chemopreventive drugs.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Strategy and planning for chemopreventive drug development: clinical development plans II.

This is the second publication of Clinical Development Plans from the National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Chemoprevention Branch and Agent Development Committee. The Clinical Development Plans summarize the status of promising chemopreventive agents regarding evidence for safety and chemopreventive efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. They also contain the strategy for further development of these drugs, addressing pharmacodynamics, drug effect measurements, intermediate biomarkers for monitoring efficacy, toxicity, supply and formulation, regulatory approval, and proposed clinical trials. Sixteen new Clinical Development Plans are presented here: curcumin, dehydroepiandrosterone, folic acid, genistein, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol, phenethyl isothiocyanate, 9-cis-retinoic acid, 13-cis-retinoic acid, l-selenomethionine and 1, 4-phenylenebis(methylene)selenocyanate, sulindac sulfone, tea, ursodiol, vitamin A, and (+)-vorozole. The objective of publishing these plans is to stimulate interest and thinking among the scientific community on the prospects for developing these and future generations of chemopreventive drugs.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Comparative activity of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-all-trans-retinamide and alpha-difluoromethylornithine as inhibitors of lymphoma induction in PIM transgenic mice.

The activities of the retinoid, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-all-trans-retinamide (4-HPR) and the polyamine synthesis inhibitor, alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), as inhibitors of lymphoma induction in PIM transgenic mice were evaluated. Lymphoma was induced in male PIM mice by a single intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) per kg body weight. Continuous dietary administration of 4-HPR (391, 196 or 98 mg/kg diet) or DFMO (1000, 500 or 250 mg/kg diet) was initiated immediately after ENU administration, and was continued until the end of the study at 35 weeks. At 20 weeks post-ENU, the high dose of 4-HPR reduced both lymphoma incidence and associated mortality. However, the protection conferred by 4-HPR represented a delay rather than an inhibition of neoplastic development, since both lymphoma incidence and mortality at study termination were similar in dietary controls and all groups treated with 4-HPR. DFMO had no effect on lymphoma incidence, latency or mortality at any point in the study. These results suggest that 4-HPR or other retinoids may be effective in the prevention of lymphoma induction, whereas inhibition of polyamine biosynthesis does not appear to present a useful mechanistic target for the chemoprevention of lymphoid neoplasia. The PIM transgenic mouse provides a useful in vivo model for the rapid evaluation of chemopreventive agents.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Piroxicam-induced regression of azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci and prevention of colon cancer in rats.

Piroxicam has been shown to prevent azoxymethane (AOM)-induced aberrant crypt foci and colon cancer in rats. In this communication we evaluate whether piroxicam can also cause regression of precancerous lesions identified as aberrant crypt foci, thus preventing the occurrence of cancer. Male Fischer-344 rats were administered 0.125 g/kg piroxicam in their diet starting either 1 week prior to or 12 weeks after a single subcutaneous injection of AOM (30 mg/kg body wt). The yield of aberrant crypt foci and of colon adenomas and adenocarcinomas was determined at 5, 12, 27 and 37 weeks after administering the AOM respectively. When piroxicam was administered starting 1 week prior to AOM the yield of aberrant crypt foci at the three initial time points was reduced. When the administration of piroxicam was delayed until 12 weeks after AOM the yield of aberrant crypt foci was reduced from 53.8 +/- 8.1 foci/colon at 12 weeks to 11.1 +/- 2.0 at 27 weeks. At 37 weeks after administering AOM the yield of colon tumors was 0.59 +/- 0.11 tumors/animal, while in rats administered piroxicam beginning either 1 week prior to or 12 weeks after AOM the yield was similarly reduced to 0.14 +/- 0.07 and 0.17 +/- 0.07 tumors/animal respectively. Thus piroxicam was demonstrated not only to prevent, but also to cause regression of aberrant crypt foci, both of which were associated with the prevention of colon tumors.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Effects of the phytochemicals, curcumin and quercetin, upon azoxymethane-induced colon cancer and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary cancer in rats.

Curcumin and quercetin were evaluated in rats for their ability to modulate the carcinogenic activity of azoxymethane (AOM) in the colon and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) in the mammary gland. In the AOM-induced colon cancer model, male Fischer 344 rats at 8 weeks of age started to receive either curcumin (8 and 16 g/kg) or quercetin (16.8 and 33.6 g/kg) in the diet and 1 week later, were administered AOM (30 mg/kg body wt.) by subcutaneous injection. The animals continued to receive the two agents in the diet until sacrificed 45 weeks later. Curcumin mediated a dose-dependent inhibition of the incidence and multiplicity of adenomas from 47% and 0.58 +/- 0.12 adenomas/rat in the AOM-treated control group to 19% and 0.22 +/- 0.08 and 0.06% and 0.08 +/- 0.06 adenomas/rat for the low and high dose groups, respectively. A low yield of adenocarcinomas (0.06 +/- 0.04 adenocarcinomas/rat) was induced by AOM which was not significantly altered by curcumin. Treatment with quercetin caused a dose-dependent increase in the yield of AOM-induced tumors in the colon from 0.06 +/- 0.04 adenocarcinoma/rat to 0.64 +/- 0.12 and 1.14 +/- 0.17 for the low and high dose groups, respectively. In the DMBA-induced mammary cancer model, curcumin or quercetin was administered at either 10 or 20 g/kg diet, beginning 7 days prior to DMBA and continually throughout the remainder of the experiment. Neither curcumin nor quercetin significantly altered the incidence of animals with tumors or the tumor multiplicity, while the high concentration of both agents significantly increased tumor latency. These results demonstrate different responses to these agents in the two models. While curcumin was highly effective as a chemopreventive agent in the colon model, it was only weakly effective in the mammary model. In contrast, quercetin which was also only weakly effective in the mammary model, caused a dose-dependent enhancement of tumors induced by AOM in the colon model.

9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene↗
PubMed1996

Differential activity of aspirin, ketoprofen and sulindac as cancer chemopreventive agents in the mouse urinary bladder.

In vivo studies were conducted to compare the activity of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as inhibitors of urinary bladder carcinogenesis induced in B6D2F1 (BDF) mice by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (OH-BBN). Mice received continuous dietary exposure to non-toxic doses of aspirin, sulindac or ketoprofen beginning 1 week prior to the first of eight weekly doses of 7.5 mg OH-BBN; studies were terminated at 24 weeks after the first carcinogen dose. Both dose levels of sulindac (200 and 400 mg/kg diet) and both dose levels of ketoprofen (40 and 80 mg/kg diet) reduced the incidence of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder by >70% from that seen in dietary controls. The high dose of sulindac conferred the greatest protection against bladder cancer induction. In contrast, when administered at 400 and 800 mg/kg diet aspirin was inactive as a chemopreventive agent in the OH-BBN/BDF bladder cancer model. The significant potency of sulindac and ketoprofen as inhibitors of urinary bladder carcinogenesis, when considered with their history of safe human use, suggests that these agents merit further study as drugs for cancer chemoprevention in this target tissue.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as potential cancer chemopreventives.

Among the most important targets for chemopreventive intervention and drug development are deregulated signal transduction pathways, and protein tyrosine kinases are key components of these pathways. Loss of tyrosine kinase regulatory mechanisms has been implicated in neoplastic growth; indeed, many oncogenes code for either receptor or cellular tyrosine kinases. Because of its deregulation in many cancers (bladder, breast, cervix, colon, esophagus, head and neck, lung, and prostate), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been selected as a potential target for chemoprevention. Because growth factor networks are redundant, selective inhibition of signaling pathways activated in precancerous and cancerous cells should be possible. Requirements for specific EGFR inhibitors include specificity for EGFR, high potency, activity in intact cells, and activity in vivo. Inhibition of autophosphorylation is preferred, because it should result in total blockade of the signaling pathway. Inhibitors that compete with substrate rather than at the ATP-binding site are also preferable, because they are not as likely to inhibit other ATP-using cellular enzymes. Several classes of specific EGFR inhibitors have been synthesized recently, including structures such as benzylidene malononitriles, dianilinophthalimides, quinazolines, pyrimidines, [(alkylamino)methyl]-acrylophenones, enollactones, dihydroxybenzylaminosalicylates, 2-thioindoles, aminoflavones, and tyrosine analogue-containing peptides. A possible testing strategy for the development of these and other EGFR inhibitors as chemopreventive agents includes the following steps: (a) determine EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity in vitro; (b) evaluate EGFR specificity and selectivity (relative to other tyrosine kinases and other protein kinases); (c) determine inhibition of EGFR-mediated effects in intact cells; (d) determine inhibition of EGFR-mediated effects in vivo (e.g., in nude mouse tumor xenografts); and (e) determine chemopreventive efficacy in vivo (e.g., in the hamster buccal pouch or mouse or rat bladder).

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Strategies for identification and clinical evaluation of promising chemopreventive agents.

Strategies for chemopreventative drug development are based on the use of well-characterized agents, intermediate biomarkers correlating to cancer incidence, and suitable cohorts for efficacy studies. Since chemoprevention is applied over the long-term, chemopreventive drugs must have low toxicity. Strategies for enhancing chemopreventive drug efficacy and minimizing toxicity include combinations of drugs with complementary mechanisms and/or synergistic activity; coadministration of drugs to counter the toxicity of the chemopreventive agents; and pursuit of related compounds that retain efficacy with reduced side effects. Because of its slow development, cancer is not a feasible end point for clinical evaluation of chemoprevention, and so intermediate biomarkers that can serve as surrogate end points are crucial. Particularly important biomarkers are the morphometric and cytometric changes defining intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN). Cohorts for chemoprevention trials should have high incidences of the cancer or intermediate biomarker(s) under study within the trial duration.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Mechanistic considerations in the evaluation of chemopreventive data.

Possible chemopreventive mechanisms include carcinogen-blocking activities, antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activities and antiproliferation/antiprogression activities. Carcinogen-blocking activities encompass inhibition of carcinogen uptake, inhibition of carcinogen formation or activation, deactivation or detoxification of carcinogens, prevention of carcinogen binding to DNA, and enhancement of the level or fidelity of DNA repair. Antioxidant/anti-inflammatory activities include scavenging of reactive electrophiles and oxygen radicals, and inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism. Antiproliferation/antiprogression activities comprise modulation of signal transduction, modulation of hormonal and growth factor activity, inhibition of aberrant oncogene activity, inhibition of polyamine metabolism, induction of terminal differentiation, restoration of immune responses, enhancement of intercellular communication, restoration of tumour suppressor function, induction of apoptosis, telomerase inhibition, correction of DNA methylation imbalances, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of basement membrane degradation, and activation of antimetastasis genes. In evaluating the potential efficacy of chemopreventive agents several mechanistic parameters are weighed: (1) the number of chemoprevention-related pharmacological activities, (2) the impact of the agent on likely carcinogenesis pathways to the targeted cancer, (3) pharmacodynamics, and (4) specificity for chemopreventive activity compared with interference with normal cellular function. Mechanistic data are important throughout the development process for chemopreventive drugs, and they are particularly important in the earlier phases of identifying promising candidate agents and characterizing efficacy. In vitro mechanistic assays are a first step in evaluating chemopreventive potential. Mechanistic considerations are also useful in defining animal efficacy models and in interpreting the results of assays in these models. Mechanistic data are also applied in designing short-term Phase II clinical chemoprevention trials that use reductions in intermediate biomarkers of cancer rather than cancer incidence as end points. The basis for identifying and evaluating these biomarkers is in understanding carcinogenesis and chemopreventive mechanisms.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.

Quantifiable, well-characterized cancer risk factors demonstrate the need for chemoprevention and define cohorts for chemopreventive intervention. For chemoprevention, the important cancer risk factors are those that can be measured quantitatively in the subject at risk. These factors, called risk biomarkers, can be used to identify cohorts for chemoprevention. Those modulated by chemopreventive agents may also be used as endpoints in chemoprevention studies. Generally, the risk biomarkers fit into categories based on those previously defined by Hulka: 1) carcinogen exposure, 2) carcinogen exposure/effect, 3) genetic predisposition, 4) intermediate biomarkers of cancer, and 5) previous cancers. Besides their use in characterizing cohorts for chemoprevention trials, some risk biomarkers can be modulated by chemopreventive agents. These biomarkers may be suitable surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence in chemoprevention intervention trials. The criteria for risk biomarkers defining cohorts and serving as endpoints are the same, except that those defining cohorts are not necessarily modulated by chemopreventive agents. A primary criterion is that the biomarkers fit expected biological mechanisms of early carcinogenesis-i.e., differential expression in normal and high-risk tissue, on or closely linked to the causal pathway for the cancer, and short latency compared with cancer. They must occur in sufficient number to allow their biological and statistical evaluation. Further, the biomarkers should be assayed reliably and quantitatively, measured easily, and correlated to cancer incidence. Particularly important for cancer risk screening in normal subjects is the ability to use noninvasive techniques that are highly specific, sensitive, and quantitative. Since carcinogenesis is a multipath process, single biomarkers are difficult to correlate to cancer, as they may appear on only one or a few of the many possible causal pathways. As shown in colorectal carcinogenesis, the risks associated with the presence of biomarkers may be additive or synergistic. That is, the accumulation of genetic lesions is the more important determinant of colorectal cancer compared with the presence of any single lesion. Thus, batteries of biomarker abnormalities, particularly those representing the range of carcinogenesis pathways, may prove more useful than single biomarkers both in characterizing cohorts at risk and defining modulatable risks. Risk biomarkers are already being integrated into many chemoprevention intervention trials. One example is the phase II trial of oltipraz inhibition of carcinogen-DNA adducts in a Chinese population exposed to aflatoxin B1. Also, urine samples from subjects in this trial will be screened for the effect of oltipraz on urinary mutagens. A second example is a chemoprevention protocol developed for patients at high risk for breast cancer; the cohort is defined both by hereditary risk and the presence of biomarker abnormalities. Modulation of the biomarker abnormalities is a proposed endpoint. Also, dysplastic lesions, such as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, oral leukoplakia and colorectal adenomas, have been used to define high-risk cohorts and as potential modulatable surrogate endpoints in chemoprevention trials.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Aberrant crypts as a biomarker for colon cancer: evaluation of potential chemopreventive agents in the rat.

We assessed the effects of 41 potential chemopreventive agents in the F344 rat using the inhibition of carcinogen-induced aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the colon as the measure of efficacy. ACF were induced by the carcinogen azoxymethane in F344 rats by two sequential weekly injections at a dose of 15 mg/kg. Two weeks after the last azoxymethane injection, animals were evaluated for the number of aberrant crypts detected in methylene blue-stained whole mounts of rat colon. The 41 agents were derived from a priority listing that was based on reports of chemopreventive activity in the literature and/or efficacy data from in vitro models of carcinogenesis. The list of agents included representative examples of phytochemicals, vitamins, minerals, inhibitors of proliferation, inducers of Phase 1 and Phase 2 metabolism systems, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and differentiation agents. Eighteen agents were positive in the assay, significantly reducing the incidence of ACF at least in one of two doses tested. As a chemical class, the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which included ibuprofen, ketoprofen, piroxicam, and indomethacin, were most active; other less potent agents were arginine, butylated hydroxyanisole, curcumin, diallyl sulfide, difluoromethylornithine, 18 beta-glycyrrhetinic acid, indole-3-carbinol, oltipraz, purpurin, rutin, and the sodium salts of butyrate, selenite, and thiosulfate. Twenty-three agents did not inhibit ACF; included among these were several agents that promoted the development of ACF at one or both doses tested: benzyl isothiocyanate,calcium glucarate, catechin, dihydroepiandosterone, fluocinolone acetonide,folic acid, levamisole, 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid, nordihydroguiaretic acid, potassium glucarate, propyl gallate, beta-sitosterol, sodium cromolyn, sodium molybdate, and sulfasalazine. The aberrant crypt assay demonstrates reasonable specificity and sensitivity in predicting which agents are likely to prevent colon cancer.

Animals↗