PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V G Athyros

Publications and source records attributed to V G Athyros.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The effect of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on small dense LDL and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Increased concentration of small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) and activity of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA(2)) are considered as emerging cardiovascular risk factors and are commonly encountered in subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS). OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of this study was the effect of orlistat and fenofibrate, alone or in combination, on Lp-PLA(2) activity and LDL phenotype in overweight and obese patients (body mass index>28 kg/m(2)) with MetS. METHODS: Patients (n=89) were prescribed a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to receive orlistat 120 mg three times daily (O group), micronized fenofibrate 200mg/day (F group) or both (OF group) for 6 months. RESULTS: Significant reductions of sdLDL-C levels were observed in all treatment groups. Groups F and OF experienced a greater reduction in sdLDL-C levels (p<0.05) together with a greater increase in LDL particle diameter (p<0.05) compared with group O. Total plasma Lp-PLA(2) activity significantly decreased in all treatment groups. The reduction of Lp-PLA(2) was more pronounced with OF administration compared with each monotherapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Orlistat and fenofibrate exhibited favorable effects on Lp-PLA(2) activity and LDL phenotype in overweight and obese patients with MetS. Importantly, combination treatment had a more favorable effect on these risk factors.

1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine Esterase↗
PubMed2006

Statins and solid organ transplantation.

Dyslipidaemia is common in solid organ transplant recipients and its presence is associated with chronic rejection and accelerated atherosclerosis, leading to an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). CVD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. It is therefore of interest and clinical value to introduce agents that effectively and safely reduce the incidence of this outcome. In the present review we consider the potential benefits of statin administration in adults who have undergone solid organ (mainly renal, heart and liver) transplantation, as well as in paediatric transplant patients. We also briefly review the effects of combination therapy with ezetimibe and statins in this population. Overall, statins are efficient and safe drugs for the management of dyslipidaemias in transplant populations, and in most trials they had a beneficial effect on long-term survival rates, CVD events and rejection rates. The transplanted population is different from other patient groups, mostly due to concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. Statins, at an appropriate dosage, should be prescribed to dyslipidaemic transplanted patients but they should be closely monitored for adverse effects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Greece: the MetS-Greece Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND: The Third Report (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel (NCEP) highlighted the importance of identifying and treating patients with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and progression to diabetes mellitus. Limited information is available about the prevalence of MetS, as defined by the NCEP ATP III, in Europe, especially in Greece. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of the MetS in Greece, The MetS-Greece Study. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of a representative sample of Greek adults (4153 participants older than 18 years). One group consisting of military personnel (n = 300) and another one from a Greek Muslim Community (n = 300) were used for comparison. In all, 4753 subjects were included in the final analysis. RESULTS: All subjects from the general population were Caucasian men (49%) and women (51%), living in urban (n = 2243, 54%), semi-urban (n = 1038, 25%) and rural (n = 872, 21%) areas. The age-standardized prevalence of the MetS was 23.6%[95% confidence interval (CI): 22.4-25.1%]. This was similar in men (24.2%, 95% CI: 22.3-25.2%) and women (22.8%, 95% CI: 21.4-25.0%) (p = 0.3). The prevalence increased with age in both sexes, 4.8% among participants aged 19-29 years and 43% for participants over 70 years old (p for trend < 0.0001). There was a 14.7-fold increase in odds ratio for having MetS in the age group > 70 years old compared with that of 19-29 years old (p < 0.0001) Most of those with MetS had three components of the syndrome (61%), 29% had four and 10% had all five components. Abdominal obesity (82%) and arterial hypertension (78%) were the most common abnormalities in both sexes. The Greek Muslim Community, on a high-saturated fat diet, had the highest prevalence of the MetS (35.2%, 95% CI: 30.4-40.3%), and the military group, with a high physical activity level and a diet 'close' to Mediterranean, had the lowest (9.4%, 95% CI: 6.2-13.1%). According to the 2001 Census, about 2.3 million Greeks may have the MetS. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the MetS is highly prevalent in the Greek adult population. This may have major implications for the incidence of CVD. Promoting healthy diets, low caloric intake and physical activity must be urgently undertaken.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effect of statins and ACE inhibitors alone and in combination on clinical outcome in patients with coronary heart disease.

We assessed the 'synergy' of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in reducing vascular events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). The GREek Atorvastatin and CHD Evaluation (GREACE) Study, suggested that aggressive reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol to 2.59 mmol/l (<100 mg/dl) significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in CHD patients, in comparison to undertreated patients. In this post hoc analysis of GREACE the patients (n=1600) were divided into four groups according to long-term treatment: Group A (n=460 statin+ACEI), B (n=420; statin, no ACEI), C (n=371;no statin, on ACEI), and D (n=349; no statin, no ACEI). Analysis of variance was used to assess differences in the relative risk reduction (RRR) in 'all events' (primary end point) between groups. During the 3-year follow-up there were 292 cardiovascular events; 45 (10% of patients) in group A, 61 (14.5%) in group B, 91 in group C (24.5%) and 95 events in group D (27%). The RRR (95% confidence interval (CI) in the primary end point in group A was 31%, (95% CI -48 to -6%, P=0.01) in comparison to group B, 59% (95% CI -72 to -48%, P<0.0001) to group C and 63% (95% CI -74 to -51%, P<0.0001) to group D. There was no significant difference in RRR between groups C and D (9%, CI -27-10%, P=0.1). Other factors (eg the blood pressure) that can influence clinical outcome did not differ significantly between the four treatment groups. In conclusion, the statin+ACEI combination reduces cardiovascular events more than a statin alone and considerably more than an ACEI alone. Aggressive statin use in the absence of an ACEI also substantially reduced cardiovascular events. Treatment with an ACEI in the absence of a statin use reduced clinical events in comparison to patients not treated with an ACEI but not significantly, at least in these small groups of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about statins in the prevention of dyslipidaemia induced renal function decline. The secondary coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention GREACE study suggested that dose titration with atorvastatin (10-80 mg/day, mean dose 24 mg/day) achieves the national cholesterol educational programme treatment goals and significantly reduces morbidity and mortality, compared with usual care. AIMS: To report the effect of statin on renal function compared with untreated dyslipidaemia in both treatment groups. METHODS/RESULTS: All patients had plasma creatinine values within the reference range < 115 micro mol/litre (13 mg/litre). The on study creatinine clearance (CrCl), as estimated (for up to 48 months) by the Cockroft-Gault formula, was compared within and between treatment groups using analysis of variance to assess differences over time. Patients from both groups not treated with statins (704) showed a 5.2% decrease in CrCl (p < 0.0001). Usual care patients on various statins (97) had a 4.9% increase in CrCl (p = 0.003). Structured care patients on atorvastatin (783) had a 12% increase in CrCl (p < 0.0001). This effect was more prominent in the lower two quartiles of baseline CrCl and with higher atorvastatin doses. After adjustment for 25 predictors of all CHD related events, multivariate analysis revealed a hazards ratio of 0.84 (confidence interval 0.73 to 0.95; p = 0.003) with every 5% increase in CrCl. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated dyslipidaemic patients with CHD and normal renal function at baseline, CrCl declines over a period of three years. Statin treatment prevents this decline and significantly improves renal function, potentially offsetting an additional factor associated with CHD risk.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Uric acid levels and vascular disease.

There is evidence showing that serum uric acid (SUA) levels predict the risk for vascular events. For example, up to 29% of the reduction in the primary composite endpoint seen in the LIFE trial (favouring losartan versus atenolol) can be attributed to a fall in SUA levels. We also discuss the findings of the GREACE study (treating to target with atorvastatin versus 'usual' care) in relation to SUA levels. In this brief comment we extend this argument to consider the SUA-lowering effect of other drugs commonly prescribed in patients with vascular disease (e.g. statins, fibrates and antihypertensive agents). A judicious use of drugs (alone or in combination) will result in small reductions in SUA levels. These changes may translate into a substantial reduction in the risk of vascular events. Results retrieved from completed trials together with new prospective findings will support or refute the proposed association between lowering SUA levels and reducing vascular morbidity and mortality.

Diuretics↗
PubMed2004

The ORLIstat and CArdiovascular risk profile in patients with metabolic syndrome and type 2 DIAbetes (ORLICARDIA) Study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is associated with a marked increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). AIM: To investigate the effect of orlistat plus hypocaloric diet (HCD) vs HCD alone on the cardiovascular risk profile in patients with both MetSyn (National Cholesterol Educational Program--NCEP--Adult Treatment Panel III definition) and type 2 DM. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled study. One hundred and twenty-six patients, free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, were included in the final analysis. Ninety-four (73%) patients were treated with orlistat (360 mg/day) and HCD for a 6-month period, while 34 (27%) were on HCD alone. Analysis of covariance was used to assess differences between the treatment groups over time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Components of the MetSyn criteria assessed were: waist circumference; systolic and diastolic blood pressure; fasting glucose, triglycerides; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) plus body mass index; glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1C); homeostasis model for assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA) index; and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). RESULTS: By protocol, all patients had MetSyn at baseline. After a 6 month treatment period there were significant differences between the orlistat plus HCD vs the HCD-alone groups in body weight (p = 0.0001), waist circumference (p < 0.0001), fasting glucose (p < 0.0001), HbA(1C) (p < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.024), total cholesterol (p < 0.0001), LDL-C (p = 0.034), and HOMA index (p = 0.022), while there were no significant differences in triglycerides and HDL-C. Orlistat was well tolerated. By the end of the study, 65% of the patients on orlistat plus HCD were still meeting the MetSyn criteria and 41% had four to five MetSyn components vs 91% (p < 0.0001) and 53% (p = 0.017), respectively, of those on HCD alone. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat plus HCD favourably modified several cardiovascular risk factors in patients with both MetSyn and type 2 DM. These effects might partly offset the excess cardiovascular risk and improve outcome in this patient population.

Anti-Obesity Agents↗
PubMed2001

Heart rate variability after long-term treatment with atorvastatin in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without coronary artery disease.

Low heart rate variability (HRV) level, indicative of impaired autonomic function, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and is negatively affected by hypercholesterolaemia. In order to test the hypothesis that significant low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol reduction after treatment with a statin will have a beneficial effect on HRV level in hypercholesterolaemic patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD), forty consecutive patients (28 men and 12 women) with a median age of 61, range (17--70) years were studied. Twenty had stable CAD and 20 were free of CAD at baseline. Twenty healthy volunteers, of similar age and gender as the patients, were used as controls. Patients were treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) for 2 years. Changes in lipid parameters and HRV indices were assessed at baseline and 2 years later in all subjects. In both patient subgroups a significant beneficial change in all lipid parameters (more pronounced in the CAD+ subgroup) and a significant beneficial modification in HRV time and frequency domain indices was recorded (more pronounced in the CAD- subgroup), while lipid parameters and HRV indices remained unchanged in the control group. A correlation between LDL concentrations and most of the HRV indices was found at baseline in both patient subgroups, while no such correlation was found between values or their percent changes after hypolipidaemic treatment. These data suggest that treatment with atorvastatin improves autonomic function, as reflected by an increase in HRV level, and this may be a likely mechanism, at least in part, for the reduction in clinical events reported by the landmark survival studies with statins in primary and secondary CAD prevention. Perhaps, if this finding is confirmed by larger studies, HRV level may prove to be a useful tool for risk-stratification and treatment guide in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolaemia, regardless of CAD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Atorvastatin plus pravastatin for the treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia--a pilot study.

The most common side-effect of statins, mainly during dose titration, is liver toxicity, In these cases, sufficient control of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HFH) becomes problematical. In patients with intolerance to resins as well, especially in the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), it is practically impossible to reach the LDL-C treatment goal. This study included seven HFH patients with CAD, who presented with alanine amino transferase levels greater than three times the upper normal limit during dose titration of atorvastatin or simvastatin of from 20 mg/day to 40 mg/day. They could not tolerate concomitant cholestyramine administration, and presented with LDL-C levels significantly higher than the treatment goal (100 mg/dl; 2.6 mmol/l). In these patients, a combination of two statins with different pharmacokinetics (20 mg/day of atorvastatin plus 40mg/day of pravastatin) was administered for a mean period of one year. Efficacy was compared with that of monotherapy with each drug alone and with that of 40 mg of atorvastatin in 13 patients, who could also not tolerate resin co-administration, and that of 40 mg/day of atorvastatin plus 12 g of cholestyramine in 30 patients, with similar pretreatment LDL-C levels. No increase in serum transaminases and no symptom or sign of myopathy was recorded during the administration of the combination of the two statins for a mean period of 12 months. The atorvastatin plus pravastatin regimen was more effective than both monotherapies and equally effective with the 40 mg of atorvastatin and the 40 mg of atorvastatin plus 12 g of cholestyramine regimens in reducing LDL-C (59% vs. 57% and 61%, respectively) and triglyceride levels (31% vs. 32% and 28%, respectively), while it also had a better effect on high density lipoprotein cholesterol (13% vs. 7% and 8%). The data suggest that the atorvastatin-pravastatin combination has a highly beneficial effect on all lipid parameters, without causing hepatotoxicity, in HFH patients with CAD who are sensitive to higher doses of statins in monotherapy. These results require confirmation in larger studies.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

Effect of quinapril or metoprolol on circadian sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation after acute myocardial infarction.

Abnormal autonomic nervous system impairment in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has a circadian pattern with the greatest manifestation in the morning hours; it probably plays an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiac arrhythmias and acute ischemic syndromes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors improve autonomic function in patients with AMI, but the circadian pattern of this effect has not been studied. Heart rate variability-normalized frequency domain indexes were assessed 5 days (baseline) after the onset of uncomplicated AMI and 30 days after therapy with quinapril (n = 30), metoprolol (n = 30), or placebo (n = 30) with a solid-state digital Holter monitor. Normal subjects (n = 30) were used as controls. Quinapril increased parasympathetic and decreased sympathetic modulation, and improved sympathovagal interactions manifested by an increase in normalized high-frequency power (HFP), and a decrease in normalized low-frequency power (LFP), and their ratio (LFP/HFP) during the entire 24-hour period (p<0.001), with maximal effect on the ratio (p<0.0001) between 02.00 to 04.00 A.M., 08.00 to 11.00 A.M., and 19.00 to 22.00 P.M. (delta% ratio -30%, -32%, and -26%, respectively). Metoprolol increased HFP and decreased LFP and the LFP/HFP ratio mainly between 08.00 A.M. to 12.00 noon, and 19.00 to 22.00 P.M. (delta% ratio -21%, and -12% respectively, p<0.001). Heart rate variability indexes in the placebo group and controls remained unchanged 30 days after the baseline study. In conclusion, quinapril increased parasympathetic, and decreased sympathetic and partially restored sympathovagal interaction in patients with uncomplicated AMI during the entire 24-hour period, with peak effect in the early and late morning and evening hours. Metoprolol had a similar effect during the late morning and evening hours, but at a lower level. These effects may prove beneficial in reducing cardiac arrhythmias and acute ischemic syndromes in past-AMI patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

The natural history of recently diagnosed autonomic neuropathy over a period of 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) have an increased cardiovascular mortality rate compared with normals or diabetic patients without DAN. Indices of standard cardiovascular autonomic function tests and heart rate variability (HRV) are reliable markers of the presence and severity of DAN. OBJECTIVE: The present prospective study investigated the natural history of values of HRV indices and cardiovascular reflex tests in patients with recently diagnosed asymptomatic DAN, over a period of 2 years, at 3 month intervals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive patients (nine men and 21 women), of median age 51 (range 25-65) years, eight with type 1 and 22 with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, were included in the study, at the time that the presence of DAN was confirmed, as this was established if at least two of cardiovascular autonomic function tests became abnormal. The expiration/inspiration (E/I) ratio. S.D. and mean circular resultant of R-R intervals, the Valsalva index, the 30:15 ratio, and the blood pressure response to standing as well as normalised spectral power indices of HRV were used. RESULTS: All measured indices, except the Valsalva index, deteriorated in all 30 patients during the 2 year follow-up. Most of HRV indices values deteriorated significantly in comparison to baseline at month 12, while the values of cardiovascular reflex tests displayed significant deterioration, in comparison to baseline, between months 15 and 21. Fourteen patients developed symptoms of DAN during the 2 year period. Patients with better glycemic control exhibited deterioration of DAN markers at the same time period with those with poor glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the progression of DAN is significant during the 2 years subsequent to its discovery. This was defined by the deterioration of the mean values of HRV indices and standard cardiovascular autonomic function tests, and by the development of autonomic symptoms in some patients. HRV indices are the earlier markers of DAN deterioration.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Long-term effect of converting enzyme inhibition on circadian sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation in patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: Autonomic nervous system function in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), especially those with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN), displays an abnormal circadian pattern compared to normal subjects; this probably plays an important role in the onset of acute cardiovascular syndromes, which display a similar pattern of occurrence with a blunted late morning peak, and an increase of episodes during the night, in comparison to non-diabetic subjects. This study was undertaken to investigate the effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, quinapril, on the circadian pattern of heart rate variability (HRV), a reliable index of sympathovagal interactions, in patients with definite DAN. METHODS & RESULTS: Normalised HRV frequency domain indices [high frequency power (HFP), reflecting vagal tone, low frequency power (LFP), reflecting both vagal and sympathetic (predominantly) modulation, and their ratio (LFP/HFP), indicative of sympathovagal balance] were assessed in 60 patients with DAN at baseline and one year after therapy with quinapril (n = 30), or placebo (n = 30) on a 24-hour 2-channel electrocardiogram with a solid state Holter monitor. Normal subjects (n = 30) and patients with DM without DAN (n = 30), were used as controls. The baseline circadian variation of fractional normalised power in DAN patients was abolished, with pronounced dominance of LFP over HFP during the whole 24-hour period. After one year of treatment, quinapril increased HFP, decreased LFP and improved their ratio, in the morning (07.00 a.m. to 15.00 p.m.) and night (23.00 p.m. to 07.00 a.m.) time intervals, with maximal effect in the night time interval (HFP = 20%, LFP = -8%, LFP/HFP = -31%; for all comparisons p < 0.05 vs baseline values and p < 0.001 vs one year of placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Quinapril increased HFP and decreased LFP as well as their ratio, all indicative of sympathetic predominance reduction, in patients with DAN at time intervals these indices were most adversely affected (morning and night). Since autonomic function is an important contributor in the pathogenesis of acute coronary events, malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, improvement of indices related to autonomic function in DAN patients in these time intervals may prove beneficial in clinical practice.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Safety and efficacy of long-term statin-fibrate combinations in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia.

No monotherapy is able to tackle effectively all atherogenic features of familial combined hyperlipidemia: high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), and plasma fibrinogen, as well as low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The present study investigated the safety and efficacy of combined pravastotin or simvastatin with gemfibrozil or ciprofibrate treatment on total cholesterol, LDL, TG, plasma fibrinogen, and apoproteins B and A-I in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia, with or without coronary artery disease. From the initial 420 patients included in the study, 389 (294 men and 95 women, mean age 51 years [range 30 to 65]) completed the study. These patients were followed for a mean period of 29 months (1 year [n = 107], 2 years [n = 102], 3 years [n = 95], and 4 years [n = 85]). Patients given a hypolipidemic diet were randomly assigned to pravastatin + gemfibrozil (n = 135, 20 and 1,200 mg/day, respectively), simvastatin + gemfibrozil (n = 130, 20 and 1,200 mg), or simvastotin + ciprofibrate (n = 124, 20 and 100 mg). Lipid parameters, apoproteins B and A-I, and plasma fibrinogen were assessed every 3 months. Physical and laboratory investigations for adverse effects were performed every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter. No patient exhibited myopathy or rhabdomyolysis. Five patients (1.3%) were withdrawn from the study because of high transaminases (more than threefold the upper normal limit). Five nonfatal coronary artery disease events were recorded. All 3 combination treatments were more effective in normalizing lipid profile than any monotherapy in the past. Simvastatin + ciprofibrate was more effective than pravastatin + gemfibrozil in reducing LDL, TG, and plasma fibrinogen levels. Simvastatin + gemfibrozil increased HDL levels more than the other 2. The apoprotein B decrease was analogous to the LDL reduction by all combinations, whereas apoprotein A-I was increased more with simvastatin + gemfibrozil. The data suggest that the statin-fibrate combinations used in the study are safe and have a favorable effect on all major coronary artery disease risk factors in patients with refractory familial combined hyperlipidemia with or without coronary artery disease. Early detection of the rare drug-induced reversible hepatotoxicity calls for close monitoring of patients.

Adult↗