Adjuvant chemotherapy for adult soft tissue sarcoma: Is there a standard of care?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adolescent↗
Biomedical subjects
V H Bramwell
Publications and source records attributed to V H Bramwell.
A randomised phase II study on neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for 'high-risk' adult soft-tissue sarcoma.
The aim of this study was to examine the strategy, feasibility and outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, with doxorubicin and ifosfamide, in adult patients with 'high-risk' soft-tissue sarcomas. Patients with 'high-risk' soft-tissue sarcomas, defined as tumours > or =8 cm of any grade, or grade II/III tumours <8 cm, or grade II/III locally recurrent tumours, or grade II/III tumours with inadequate surgery performed in the previous 6 weeks and therefore requiring further surgery, were randomised between either surgery alone or three cycles of 3-weekly doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) intravenous (i.v.) bolus and ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) (24 h infusion) before surgery. The type of surgery had to be planned at randomisation. Tumours were to be amenable to surgery by amputation, compartmental resection, wide or marginal excision. If chemotherapy was given, surgery had to be performed within 21 days after the last chemotherapy. Patients received postoperative radiotherapy in cases of marginal surgery, microscopically incomplete resection and no further possibility for surgery, and in cases of surgery because of local recurrence. 150 patients were entered into the study and 134 were eligible, 67 in each arm. The most frequent side-effects of chemotherapy were alopecia, nausea and vomiting (95%), and leucocytopenia (32%). One patient died of neutropenic fever after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy did not interfere with planned surgery and did not affect postoperative wound healing. Limb-salvage was achieved in 88%, amputation was necessary in 12% (all according to the plan at randomisation). The trial was closed after completion of phase II, since accrual was too slow to justify expanding the study into the scheduled phase III study. At a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the 5 year disease-free survival is estimated at 52% for the no chemotherapy and 56% for the chemotherapy arm (standard error: 7%) (P=0.3548). The 5 year overall survival for both arms is 64 and 65%, respectively (standard error 7%) (P=0.2204). Neo-adjuvant-chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide at these doses and with this schedule was feasible and did not compromise subsequent treatment, surgery with or without radiotherapy. Although not powered to draw definitive conclusions on benefit, but with an at least 7 year median follow-up, the results render it less likely that major survival benefits will be achieved with this type of chemotherapy.
Adolescent↗
The functional and clinical roles of osteopontin in cancer and metastasis.
Osteopontin (OPN) is a secreted and integrin-binding protein that has been implicated in a number of pathologies. In this review we will focus on the functional and clinical roles of OPN in cancer and metastasis, with a particular emphasis on breast cancer. While much evidence has suggested that OPN is associated with cancer, its functional contribution to cancer remains poorly understood. Here we will review evidence for mechanisms by which OPN may act to enhance malignancy, including evidence that signaling pathways directly induced by OPN, as well as interactions with growth factor receptor pathways, can combine to activate expression of genes and functions that contribute to metastasis. OPN has been shown to be over-expressed in a variety of human tumors and is present in elevated levels in the blood of some patients with metastatic cancers. We also will discuss recent clinical evidence that suggests that OPN is not only associated with several tumor types, but that levels of OPN in cancer patients' blood or tumors may provide prognostic information.
Animals↗
Pyomyositis after chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Pyomyositis is a rare complication of chemotherapy. A 47-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer, in whom pyomyositis developed after chemotherapy, is described. It was difficult to differentiate between pyomyositis and deep venous thrombosis early in her admission. Pyomyositis should be considered part of the differential diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. This infection, after chemotherapy, usually is considered to be caused by neutropenia or immunodeficiency secondary to the cancer, or both. It is postulated that subclinical myopathy, secondary to the malignancy or drugs used in treating the malignancy, or both, may also predispose to pyomyositis.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Osteosarcomas and other cancers of bone.
The results of several studies suggest that alterations in various cell cycle regulatory genes are involved in the pathogenesis of osteosarcomas. Experiments in animal models provide preliminary data on the feasibility of gene therapy in osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma. Prediction of response to chemotherapy remains a major focus of imaging research. Several clinicopathologic studies have explored the mechanisms underlying multidrug resistance in osteosarcoma patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. HER2/erbB2 expression, linked to poor prognosis, has been proposed as a therapeutic target in osteosarcoma. In clinical studies of osteosarcoma, further data confirm the activity of ifosfamide and carboplatin but provide little support for the use of immunotherapy. A retrospective analysis showed no value for dose intensification of doxorubicin/cisplatin, but the results of a prospective trial should be more informative. Recent evidence confirms that secondary osteosarcomas and malignant fibrous histiocytomas of bone should be treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens, similar to those used for osteosarcomas.
Bone Neoplasms↗
Tamoxifen added to adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal women with early breast cancer: is it standard practice or still a subject for study?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aged↗
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cisplatin in malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone: A European Osteosarcoma Intergroup study.
PURPOSE: Studies involving small case series have suggested that malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone (MFH-B) is a chemosensitive tumor and that chemotherapy may improve survival. In this study, we evaluated clinical and pathologic response rates and survival in a series of patients treated with a consistent chemotherapy regimen of doxorubicin and cisplatin (DOX/DDP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study patients were required to have biopsy-proven MFH-B, no previous chemotherapy, and primary or metastatic measurable disease and to be </= 65 years of age. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 25 mg/m(2)/d days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) by 4-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for six cycles. In patients with operable primary tumors, chemotherapy was planned to start within 42 days of biopsy, with definitive surgery performed after three cycles. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had operable nonmetastatic limb sarcomas, and 23 (56%) completed six chemotherapy cycles. Limb salvage was possible in 33 patients (80%), and 16 (42%) of 38 assessable specimens showed a good pathologic response (>/= 90% necrosis). Median time to progression was 56 months, and the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 72%). Median survival time was 63 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 59% (95% CI, 41% to 77%). Patients with a good pathologic response had longer survival times and times to progression than did those with a poor response. Also treated were two patients with locally recurrent and nine with metastatic disease, and these patients had a median survival time of 17.5 months. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DOX/DDP is beneficial in MFH-B. Good pathologic response rates and survivals are quite comparable with those for osteosarcoma, a related bone tumor for which adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted practice.
Adolescent↗
Expression of genes that contribute to proliferative and metastatic ability in breast cancer resected during various menstrual phases.
BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies show significant improvements in survival among women who had breast cancer resected during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle compared with the follicular phase. We hypothesised that tumour tissue would show cyclical changes in expression of genes whose products might contribute to metastatic potential. METHODS: We studied 32 premenopausal women with operable breast cancer. We assayed hormones to define more accurately the menstrual phase during which surgery was done. We used northern blot analysis of RNA from fresh-frozen tumour specimens to study the patterns of expression of genes for proteolytic enzymes (cysteine proteinase cathepsin L and aspartyl proteinase cathepsin D; matrix metalloproteinases MMP-9 and MMP-2), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases TIMP-1 and TIMP-2, and TP53. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher level of expression of RNA for cathepsin L, MMP-9, and TP53 (p=0.005, 0.03, 0.03, respectively) in tumours that were resected during the follicular and periovulatory phases of the menstrual cycle than at other times in the cycle. A similar but non-significant trend was seen for MMP-2 and cathepsin D. A non-significant trend in the opposite direction was seen for TIMP-1 and TIMP-2. INTERPRETATION: We found that tumour expression of genes that may contribute to proliferative capacity and metastatic potential can change in breast cancer during the course of the menstrual cycle. The finding could provide a molecular explanation for the reports of improved survival in some breast-cancer patients whose tumours were removed during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Larger studies are required to extend our study, assess mechanisms of gene regulation, and verify any relevant influence in long-term survival.
Adult↗
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
PURPOSE: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.
Adult↗
Randomised trial of two regimens of chemotherapy in operable osteosarcoma: a study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.
BACKGROUND: A previous trial by the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) suggested that a short intensive chemotherapy regimen with doxorubicin and cisplatin might produce survival of operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma similar to that obtained with complex and longer-duration drug regimens based on the widely used T10 multi-drug protocol. We undertook a randomised multicentre trial to compare these two approaches. METHODS: 407 patients with operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma were randomly assigned the two-drug regimen (six cycles [18 weeks] of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or a multi-drug regimen (preoperatively vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, and doxorubicin; postoperatively bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin; this protocol took 44 weeks). Surgery was scheduled for week 9 for the two-drug group and week 7 for the multi-drug group. Analyses of survival and progression-free survival were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Of 407 randomised patients, 391 were eligible and have been followed up for at least 4 years (median 5-6 years). Toxic effects were qualitatively similar with the two regimens. However, 188 (94%) of 199 patients completed the six cycles of two-drug treatment, whereas only 97 (51%) of 192 completed 18 or more of the 20 cycles of the multi-drug regimen. The proportion showing a good histopathological response (> 90% tumour necrosis) to preoperative chemotherapy was about 29% with both regimens and was strongly predictive of survival. Overall survival was 65% at 3 years and 55% at 5 years in both groups (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.69-1.27]). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 44% in both groups (hazard ratio 1.01 [0.77-1.33]). INTERPRETATION: We found no difference in survival between the two-drug and multi-drug regimens in operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma. The two-drug regimen is shorter in duration and better tolerated, and is therefore the preferred treatment. However, 5-year survival is still unsatisfactory and new approaches to treatment, such as dose intensification, are needed to improve results.
Adolescent↗
Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?
PURPOSE: Review articles are an important source of summary information for practising clinicians to assist them in remaining current with the rapidly expanding medical literature. Consequently it is essential that these be of the highest quality. In this study we evaluate, according to published criteria, the methodological quality of review articles (R) including meta-analysis (MA) appearing in a major cancer journal, Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO), 1983-1995. METHODS: A hand-search of JCO was performed, from the first issue January 1983 through December 1995, to identify R, defined as publications that describe and comment on studies relevant to a specific topic or clinical intervention. Only those dealing with aspects of treatment of human cancer were considered further. Methodological quality was first assessed using 8 criteria proposed by Mulrow, rated independently by two medical oncologists as: specified, unclear or not specified. MA, including studies of dose intensity, were further analyzed according to 23 more detailed criteria proposed by Sacks et al. and rated as adequate, partial or no/unknown compliance. RESULTS: Of 176 review articles, 122 dealt with aspects of treatment of cancer. Compliance with four of Mulrow's eight criteria was generally good, in that 99% clearly stated a purpose, all attempted qualitative synthesis of data. 95% presented a summary and 76% considered future directions. However, in the 106 qualitative reviews (QR), authors rarely gave information on methods of data identification (11.3%), data selection (10.4%) and assessment of validity (8.4%). Structured abstracts seemed to improve the focus and clarity of QR and there was a minor improvement in deficient areas in the later time cohort (1990-1995). Based on 'adequate' compliance with each of the 23 criteria identified by Sacks et al., six dose intensity studies scored 7-12, seven literature data MA scored 10-15 and three individual patient data MA scored 16-18. The highest scores were in the sections relating to prospective design, combinability and statistical analysis. Factors relating to control of bias, sensitivity analysis and application of results were addressed less consistently. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of MA, the majority of authors contributing reviews to a major cancer journal, JCO, did not use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information. Initiatives such as the Cochrane Collaboration Cancer Network can support and educate clinicians who wish to perform systematic reviews, but quality of reviews would also improve if author, editors and readers systematically applied any of the sets of criteria now available in the literature.
Humans↗
Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy added to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with node-positive estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer: a report of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Breast Cancer Site Group.
PURPOSE AND METHODS: By the mid 1980s, tamoxifen alone was considered standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive breast cancer. From 1984 through 1990, 705 eligible postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER- or PgR-positive breast cancer were randomized to a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) study that compared tamoxifen 30 mg by mouth daily for 2 years (TAM) versus TAM plus chemotherapy with all-intravenous cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 given every 21 days for eight cycles (CMF). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, or distant recurrence-free survival between the two treatment arms. However, there was significantly greater severe toxicity, which included leukopenia (P < .0001), nausea and vomiting (P < .0001), and thromboembolic events (P < .0001), as well as significantly more mild or greater toxicity, which included thrombocytopenia (P = .04), anemia (P = .02), infection (P = .0004), mucositis (P = .0001), diarrhea (P = .0001), and neurologic toxicity (P = .006), in women who received TAM plus CMF. CONCLUSION: The addition of CMF to TAM adds no benefit and considerable toxicity in this group of women.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
The role of chemotherapy in the management of non-metastatic operable extremity osteosarcoma.
Original articles published between 1991-1996 were selected according to specified criteria, and reviewed to provide answers to nine important questions about the role of chemotherapy in the management of non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma: (1) Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival? (2) Are the results of the Rosen T10 protocol reproducible in different settings? (3) Is chemotherapy with two of the most active drugs (DOX/DDP) an effective adjuvant treatment, and comparable to other multiagent regimens? (4) Does histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlate with reduced local recurrence and/or improved survival? (5) Does a change of chemotherapy for patients whose tumors show a poor histological response to chemotherapy improve survival? (6) Does chemotherapy given before surgery (neoadjuvant) improve survival? (7) Are certain drugs, or their method of administration (route, duration, total dose, dose intensity, pharmacokinetics) important in determining outcomes? (8) Can new agents such as Ifosfamide be incorporated into intensive multi-agent chemotherapy, and does this improve pathological response and/or survival? (9) Can dose intensity of treatment be increased with G-CSF? The brief answers to questions 1-3 and 7-9 are "Yes"; question 4 "Yes, but may be changing"; and questions 5, 6 "Not proven," and these are expanded in the text. Future directions for treatment of osteosarcoma are covered under the headings identification of new agents, dose intensification, circumvention of drug resistance, immunotherapy, and insulin-like growth factor.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
Osteosarcoma and other tumors of bone.
Steady progress in the delineation of prognostic factors and the identification of genetic alterations and of potential mechanisms of oncogenesis mark the contributions to the literature on osteosarcoma for the past year. A new cytokine and chemotherapy combination has shown promise, and additional work on chemotherapy regimens containing ifosfamide will undoubtedly stimulate interest in a new generation of randomized clinical trials that will be essential for further refinement of therapy for osteosarcoma.
Bone Neoplasms↗
High-dose continuous venous infusion of interleukin-2: influence of dose and infusion rate on tumoricidal function and lymphocyte subsets.
Previous clinical studies have demonstrated a dose-response relationship between enhancement of certain immune parameters and interleukin-2 (IL-2) dose in trials with low dosages of the cytokine. This has not been demonstrated for high-dose (greater than 18 x 10(6) IU/m2 per day) IL-2. We completed phase II trials of sustained administration of indomethacin and ranitidine with IL-2 given as a continuous infusion over 5 days for three courses. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells, both fresh and cultured in vitro with IL-2 or IL-2 and indomethacin, were tested for tumoricidal function against K562 and Daudi targets; these results were then correlated with actual delivered dose and mean infusion rate per course. Similar correlations were calculated between delivered dose or infusion rate and absolute and proportional counts of lymphocyte subsets as determined by flow cytometry. No enhancement of in vitro tumoricidal function with either increasing delivered dose or increasing infusion rate was seen. No consistent pattern of correlation was found between the absolute counts of lymphocyte subsets after each course of IL-2 with delivered dose or infusion rate. The percent rise in absolute counts of selected T- and NK-cell subsets at the end of course 1 compared with baseline values correlated positively with infusion rate; however, a similar correlated between the infusion rate and an increase in lymphocyte tumoricidal function was lacking. Little evidence was found for improved tumoricidal function of mononuclear cells or consistent enhancement of lymphocyte subset counts in patients able to tolerate doses of IL-2 beyond 18 x 10(6) IU/m2 per day in a 5-day continuous infusion schedule.
Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
The role of chemotherapy in osteogenic sarcoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bone Neoplasms↗
Phase II study of topotecan (NSC 609 699) in patients with recurrent or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
BACKGROUND: New drugs are needed for treatment of unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Topotecan, a semisynthetic derivative of the alkaloid, camptothecin, exerts its cytotoxic effect through inhibition of topoisomerase I. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma entered this phase II study of topotecan, administered at 1.5 mg/m2/day IV x 5 days every 3 weeks. All had measurable disease and none had received previous chemotherapy. RESULTS: There were 3 partial responses (10.3%; 95% CI 2.2-27.4%) in 29 evaluable patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients, and there was a 17% incidence of infection/neutropenic fever leading to one toxic death. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan, in this dose and schedule, has low activity in adult soft tissue sarcoma.
Adolescent↗
Adjuvant chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas.
Despite considerable interest in this subject and the completion of a number of randomized trials, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive local treatment for patients with soft tissue sarcomas remains problematic. This article reviews randomized clinical trials completed and published to date, and explores new strategies for future studies.
Antineoplastic Agents↗