PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Huff

Publications and source records attributed to V Huff.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Loss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 16q and 1p in Wilms' tumors predicts an adverse outcome.

We have prospectively analyzed Wilms' tumors from 232 patients registered on the National Wilms' Tumor Study for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosomes 11p, 16q, and 1p. These chromosomal aberrations were found in 70 (33%), 35 (17%), and 21 (12%) of the informative cases, respectively. LOH for two of these regions occurred in only 25 cases, and only one tumor harbored LOH at all three sites. There was no statistically significant association between LOH at any of the three regions and either the stage or histological classification of the tumor. Patients with tumor-specific LOH for chromosome 16q had relapse rates 3.3 times higher (P = 0.01) and mortality rates 12 times higher (P < 0.01) than patients without LOH for chromosome 16q. These differences remained when adjusted for histology or for stage. Patients with LOH for chromosome 1p had relapse and mortality rates three times higher than those for patients without LOH for chromosome 1p, but these results were not statistically significant. In contrast, LOH for chromosome 11p had no effect on measures of outcome. These molecular markers may serve to further stratify Wilms' tumor patients into biologically favorable and unfavorable subgroups, allowing continued use of the clinical trial mechanism in the study of Wilms' tumor.

Chromosome Deletion↗
PubMed1994

Transcriptional regulation of the human Wilms' tumor gene (WT1). Cell type-specific enhancer and promiscuous promoter.

The Wilms' tumor gene, WT1, is expressed in few tissues, mainly the developing kidney, genitourinary system, and mesothelium, and in immature hematopoietic cells. To develop an understanding of the role of WT1 in development and tumorigenesis, we have identified transcriptional regulatory elements that function in transient reporter gene constructs transfected into kidney and hematopoietic cell lines. We found three transcription start sites of the WT1 gene and have identified an essential promoter region by deletion analysis. The WT1 promoter is a member of the GC-rich, TATA-less, and CCAAT-less class of polymerase II promoters. Whereas the WT1 promoter is similar to other tumor suppressor gene promoters, the WT1 expression pattern (unlike Rb and p53) is tissue-restricted. The WT1 GC-rich promoter is promiscuous, functioning in all cell lines tested, independent of WT1 expression. This finding suggests that the promoter is not tissue-specific, but that tissue-specific expression of WT1 is modulated by additional regulatory elements. Indeed, we have identified a transcriptional enhancer located 3' of the WT1 gene > 50 kilobases downstream from the promoter. This orientation-independent enhancer increases the basal transcription rate of the WT1 promoter in the human erythroleukemia cell line K562, but not in any of the other cell lines tested.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Structural analysis of the human nov proto-oncogene and expression in Wilms tumor.

We have cloned and sequenced the nov gene (novH) which is the homolog of the chicken nov proto-oncogene overexpressed in avian nephroblastomas. The novH gene is highly conserved and encodes a putative IGF-binding protein similar to that of chicken. We report that relative to autologous normal kidney expression of novH is elevated in Wilms tumors containing predominantly stromal elements and is inversely correlated in these tumors to the expression of WT1. Our results suggest that the regulation of IGFII expression by WT1 and increase of novH in Wilms tumors might be interrelated and represent a key element in tumor development in human.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1993

Wilms tumor genes.

Multiple 'WT' genes exist. The WT1 gene at chromosomal band 11p13 has been cloned and is known to be important in the etiology of at least some tumors by virtue of the identification of both germline and somatic mutations in WT patients. Genes at 11p15 and 16q are also involved, either as initiating or tumor progression events. An unlocalized familial predisposition gene is also known to be important etiologically. The identification of several genes that are involved in the etiology or progression of WT, the preferential loss of maternally derived alleles in tumor tissue, and the observed reduction to 11p homozygosity in normal tissue DNA from some patients, all strikingly indicate that a simple, one-locus-'two-hit' genetic model for WT is inadequate. The question is not if this model needs to be modified, but how it should be modified, or if it is even valid enough to be a starting point for understanding the genetics of Wilms tumor. To begin to address this, several questions can be asked. Do all Wilms tumors carry mutations at the WT1 locus? Do both alleles at the WT1 locus need to be inactivated or lost for tumorigenesis? Or, instead, do some WT1 mutations act dominantly? Do patients with bilateral disease carry germline mutations as originally hypothesized, or, as more recently suggested, is bilateral disease the result of early somatic mutations, genomic imprinting, or multifactorial inheritance? Must mutations at an 11p15 locus and/or 11p15 LOH accompany WT1 mutations, or do 11p13 and 11p15 mutations act independently of each other? Have tumors from familial WT cases (who do not carry germline WT1 mutations) sustained somatic mutations at the WT1 locus, the 11p15 locus or the 16q locus? Conversely, do tumors from sporadic WT patients carry somatic mutations at the non-11p familial predisposition gene? Will most tumors be found to carry mutations at the same one or two loci, but differ only with regard to whether the mutations are somatic or germline? Are effects of genomic imprinting layered over, so to speak, a framework of classically mendelian mutations, or in some cases is imprinting the mechanism by which genes are inactivated or their normal function modulated? Although not definitive, there are data that bear on some of these questions. Germline mutations have been observed in patients with bilateral tumors, but may not prove to be a universal feature of bilateral disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Genes, Wilms Tumor↗
PubMed1993

Genetic mosaicism in normal tissues of Wilms' tumour patients.

We describe the partial loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome 11p loci in normal tissues (normal kidney and/or blood) from four of 67 Wilms' tumour patients. Autologous tumour DNA showed complete loss of the same, maternally derived, alleles. These observations indicate that the normal tissues were mosaic for cells heterozygous and homozygous for 11p markers and that tumours subsequently developed from the homozygous cells that had undergone an 11p somatic recombination event. We suggest that LOH for 11p alleles is compatible with normal growth and differentiation and is significant pathologically only when accompanied by other genetic alterations.

Alleles↗
PubMed1992

Nonlinkage of 16q markers to familial predisposition to Wilms' tumor.

Wilms' tumor (WT), a childhood cancer of the kidney, occurs in both familial and sporadic forms. Chromosome 11 genes have been implicated in the etiology of WT, and mutations in a gene at chromosomal band 11p13, WT1, have been identified in a few WT cases. However, 11p13 has been excluded as the site of the predisposition mutation segregating in several large WT families, which implies the existence of a non-11p familial predisposition gene. Recently, loss of heterozygosity for 16q markers located between chromosomal bands 16q13 and 16q22 has been reported in approximately 20% of sporadic Wilms' tumors. To determine if this region of 16q harbors the non-11p familial WT gene, a genetic linkage study of five WT families was undertaken. Using multipoint analyses, we ruled out genetic linkage of familial WT predisposition to 16q.

Chromosome Banding↗
PubMed1992

RNA expression of the WT1 gene in Wilms' tumors in relation to histology.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of accumulating data, the recently isolated WT1 gene is a Wilms' tumor gene and a putative tumor suppressor gene. These findings include expression in developing fetal kidney, intragenic deletions in tumors, and germline mutations in predisposed individuals. Wilms' tumors, which exhibit a broad range of differentiation, are composed of three cell types: blastema, epithelium, and stroma. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between WT1 gene expression and histologic composition in Wilms' tumors in an effort to elucidate how the WT1 gene functions in proliferation of these histologic components. METHODS: We used Northern blot hybridization to study WT1 gene expression by messenger RNA (mRNA) accumulation in 20 tumors of varying histology and in adjacent uninvolved kidney tissue. In two patients, tumors were also compared before and after therapy. RESULTS: Tumors that were predominantly blastemal expressed high amounts of WT1 mRNA, whereas predominantly stromal tumors expressed either low or undetectable amounts. Blastemal tumors that were predominantly poorly differentiated expressed WT1 mRNA at higher levels than those that were more well differentiated. Although we expected that a putative tumor suppressor gene like WT1 would generally be expressed at lower levels in tumor than in normal kidney, this was true only in predominantly stromal cells. One of the two patients studied before and after therapy had a dramatic response to therapy accompanied by a decline in WT1 gene expression and disappearance of blastemal and epithelial elements. CONCLUSIONS: A correlation was observed between WT1 gene expression and histology of the tumors. Level of expression was inversely related to the degree of differentiation in blastemal tumors and in the patient with a dramatic response to therapy. These results, in conjunction with the observation that WT1 mRNA is abundant in normal fetal kidney, suggest that WT1 gene expression is related to kidney development, especially in differentiation of blastemal components. IMPLICATIONS: Further studies to search for alterations of the WT1 gene in tumors and to identify regulatory factors in gene expression will increase understanding of the role of this gene in normal development and tumorigenesis.

Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic↗
PubMed1991

Smallest region of overlap in Wilms tumor deletions uniquely implicates an 11p13 zinc finger gene as the disease locus.

The development of Wilms tumor (WT) has been associated with the inactivation of a "tumor suppressor" locus in human chromosome 11 band p13. Several WTs that exhibit homozygous deletions of an 11p13 candidate WT gene in its entirety have been reported. We report here a partial deletion of the candidate gene which, upon comparison with other documented homozygous deletions, permitted a precise definition of the critical genomic target in Wilms tumor. The smallest region of overlap between these deletions is a 16-kb segment of DNA encompassing the 5' exon(s) of an 11p13 gene coding for a zinc finger protein, together with an associated CpG island. This finding supports the notion that the candidate gene in question corresponds to the 11p13 WT1 Wilms tumor locus.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1991

Evidence for WT1 as a Wilms tumor (WT) gene: intragenic germinal deletion in bilateral WT.

The inactivation of two alleles at a locus on the short arm of chromosome 11 (band 11p13) has been suggested to be critical steps in the development of Wilms tumor (WT), a childhood kidney tumor. Two similar candidate WT cDNA clones (WT33 and LK15) have recently been identified on the basis of both their expression in fetal kidney and their location within the smallest region of overlap of somatic 11p13 deletions in some tumors. These homozygous deletions, however, are large and potentially affect more than one gene. Using a cDNA probe to the candidate gene, we have analyzed DNA from both normal and tumor tissue from WT patients, in an effort to detect rearrangements at this locus. We report here a patient with bilateral WT who is heterozygous for a small (less than 11 kb) germinal deletion within this candidate gene. DNA from both tumors is homozygous for this intragenic deletion allele, which, by RNA-PRC sequence analysis, is predicted to encode a protein truncated by 180 amino acids. These data support the identification of this locus as an 11p13 WT gene (WT1) and provide direct molecular data supporting the two-hit mutational model for WT.

Chromosome Deletion↗
PubMed1990

A panel of restriction fragment length polymorphisms for chromosomal band 11p13.

A panel of seven chromosome 11p13 restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) detected by five DNA probes is described. Two alleles were identified for each polymorphism, and Mendelian segregation of alleles was observed. Allele frequencies range from 0.13/0.87 to 0.44/0.56. This panel of 11p13 RFLPs will be useful for linkage studies investigating the role of 11p13 genes in Wilms' tumor, aniridia, and genitourinary anomalies. Additionally, these RFLPs will be important tools for studying tumor-specific 11p13 alterations in Wilms' tumor and other cancers.

Alleles↗
PubMed1990

Familial renal cell carcinoma: hereditary or coincidental?

The familial clustering of some cancers may be related to genetic factors, shared carcinogenic exposure among relatives or chance association. In cases of familial renal cell carcinoma identifying those persons at risk for renal tumors is difficult. There have been 28 family aggregates of renal carcinoma reported since 1961 but an abnormality in the constitutional karyotype has been demonstrated in the members of only 1 of these families. Since 1980 we have identified 5 more families in which a total of 12 relatives had renal cell carcinoma. However, peripheral blood karyotypes obtained from the 7 patients and 5 unaffected relatives whom we studied showed no significant abnormalities. With current laboratory techniques it is not possible to differentiate reliably familial renal tumors occurring by chance from those hereditary tumors posing a threat to remaining relatives. Therefore, in families with multiple cases of renal cell carcinoma we recommend that screening be conducted as has been suggested for families with von Hippel-Lindau's disease, with an initial renal ultrasound for family members at age 30 years and repeat examinations every 2 to 3 years.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Parental origin of de novo constitutional deletions of chromosomal band 11p13.

One-half of all cases of Wilms tumor (WT), a childhood kidney tumor, show loss of heterozygosity at chromosomal band 11p13 loci, suggesting that mutation of one allele and subsequent mutation or loss of the homologous allele are important events in the development of these tumors. The previously reported nonrandom loss of maternal alleles in these tumors implied that the primary mutation occurred on the paternally derived chromosome and that it was "unmasked" by loss of the normal maternal allele. This, in turn, suggests that the paternally derived allele is more mutable than the maternal one. To investigate whether germinal mutations are seen with equal frequency in maternally versus paternally inherited chromosomes, we determined the parental origin of the de novo germinal 11p13 deletions in eight children by typing lymphocyte DNA from these children and from their parents for 11p13 RFLPs. In seven of the eight cases, the de novo deletion was of paternal origin. The one case of maternal origin was unremarkable in terms of the size or extent of the 11p13 deletion, and the child did develop WT. Transmission of 11p13 deletions by both maternal and paternal carriers of balanced translocations has been reported, although maternal inheritance predominates. These data, in addition to the general preponderance of paternally derived, de novo mutations at other loci, suggest that the increased frequency of paternal deletions we observed is due to an increased germinal mutation rate in males.

Alleles↗
PubMed1988

Lack of linkage of familial Wilms' tumour to chromosomal band 11p13.

Wilms' tumour (WT), a paediatric renal neoplasm, affect approximately 1 in 10,000 children. One or both kidneys can be affected and 5-10% of tumours are bilateral. Most tumours occur sporadically; however, around 1% of the cases are familial, with siblings or cousins most often being affected. Familial cases are more frequently bilateral, and familial and bilateral tumours are diagnosed at an earlier age. On the basis of these observations, it was proposed that the development of WT requires two mutations. In most sporadic unilateral WT, both are somatic; in familial and bilateral tumours the first is thought to be germinal. Cytogenetic and molecular studies have demonstrated germinal mutations in WT/aniridia patients and somatic mutations in sporadic WT at chromosomal band 11p13. To investigate whether familial predisposition to WT is due to a germinal 11p13 mutation, we studied a WT family with seen DNA markers that span the 11p13 region. We found that familial WT predisposition was not genetically linked to any of the 11p13 markers. This suggests that the gene involved in familial WT predisposition is outside 11p13 and is distinct from the gene involved in tumorigensis and in WT predisposition in WT/aniridia 11p13-deletion patients.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11↗
PubMed1988

The carboxy-terminal 41 amino acids of herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein B are not essential for production of infectious virus particles.

Glycoprotein B (gB) is a virally encoded protein that is found in the envelope of herpes simplex virus type 1 and membranes of cells infected with herpes simplex virus type 1. It is essential for the production of infectious virus particles. An amber mutation was introduced into the gB gene by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis at the codon for amino acid 863 of the protein. Virus carrying this mutation should synthesize gB molecules lacking the last 41 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain. Immunoprecipitation of infected cell extracts demonstrated the synthesis of appropriately truncated gB molecules. Characterization of the mutant virus indicated that the loss of the carboxy-terminal 41 amino acids has little effect on gB function.

Amino Acids↗