PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V Lorusso

Publications and source records attributed to V Lorusso.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Phase II study of vinorelbine with protracted fluorouracil infusion as a second- or third-line approach for advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and activity of vinorelbine in association with protracted infusional fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer who were previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients were entered onto the study. Forty-three patients experienced treatment failure or relapse after anthracycline-based, first-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 29 experienced treatment failure or relapse after first- and second-line approaches; 11 patients experienced progressive disease within 6 months of completion of adjuvant anthracycline therapy. Sites of involvement were as follows: liver involvement, 42 patients (50.6%); lung 24 (28.9%); bone, 49 (59.0%); and skin/lymph nodes, 21 (25.3%). Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) administered on days 1 and 15 every 28 days and fluorouracil 200 mg/m(2)/d given continuously over a 24-hour period. RESULTS: Toxicity was recorded for 441 cycles. The scheme was well tolerated: grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting occurred in 13 patients (15.6%), grade 1/2 diarrhea in nine (10.8%), and grade 2/3 stomatitis in six (7.2%). Three patients (3.6%) experienced grade 3/4 leukopenia and four (4.8%) experienced grade 2/3 anemia. Grade 2/3 neurologic toxicity was observed in three cases (3.6%), and grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome was observed in three (3.6%). The median relative dose-intensity was 92% and 100% for vinorelbine and fluorouracil, respectively. Six patients (7.2%) attained a complete clinical response and 45 (54.2%) attained a partial response, for an overall response rate of 61.4% (95% confidence interval, 50.9% to 71.9%). Twenty-one patients (25.3%) obtained disease stabilization, and 11 (13.3%) experienced disease progression. Median time to progression in responding patients was 15 months; median overall survival of the entire population was 22 months. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine associated with protracted infusional fluorouracil is an active and manageable scheme in advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines. The response obtained is durable.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of the nuclear encoded 18-kDa (IP) subunit of respiratory complex I and activation of the complex in serum-starved mouse fibroblast cultures.

A study is presented on the in vivo effect of elevated cAMP levels induced by cholera toxin on the phosphorylation of subunits of the mitochondrial respiratory complexes and their activities in Balb/c 3T3 mouse fibroblast cultures. Treatment of serum-starved fibroblasts with cholera toxin promoted serine phosphorylation in the 18-kDa subunit of complex I. Phosphorylation of the 18-kDa subunit, in response to cholera toxin treatment of fibroblasts, was accompanied by a 2-3-fold enhancement of the rotenone-sensitive endogenous respiration of fibroblasts, of the rotenone-sensitive NADH oxidase, and of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase activity of complex I. Direct exposure of fibroblasts to dibutyryl cAMP resulted in an equally potent stimulation of the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase activity. Stimulation of complex I activity and respiration with NAD-linked substrates were also observed upon short incubation of isolated fibroblast mitoplasts with dibutyryl cAMP and ATP, which also promoted phosphorylation of the 18-kDa subunit. These observations document an extension of cAMP-mediated intracellular signal transduction to the regulation of cellular respiration.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed2000

Biweekly irinotecan or raltitrexed plus 6S-leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase II-III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomised trial was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including 6S-leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil (LFA-5-FU), combined with either irinotecan (CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU) or raltitrexed (Tomudex) (TOM + LFA-5-FU), in advanced colorectal cancer patients, and to make a preliminary comparison of both these experimental regimens with a biweekly administration of LFA-5-FU modulated by methotrexate (MTX + LFA-5-FU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-nine patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously untreated for the metastatic disease (34 of them previously exposed to adjuvant 5-FU) were randomly allocated to receive: CPT-11, 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 850 mg/m2 s i.v. bolus (arm A); TOM, 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 1050 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm B); or MTX, 750 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, followed on day 2 by LFA, 250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion and 5-FU, 800 mg/m2 i.v. bolus (arm C). Courses were repeated every two weeks in all arms of the trial. Response rate (RR) was evaluated after every four courses. The sample size was defined to have an 80% power to detect a 35% RR for each experimental treatment, and to show a difference of at least 4% in RR with the standard treatment if the true difference is 15% or more. RESULTS: The RRs were: 34% (95% confidence interval (95%, CI): 21%-48%) in arm A, including 3 complete responses (CRs) and 15 partial responses (PRs), 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%) in arm B, including 2 CRs and 11 PRs, and 24% (95% CI: 14%-38%), with 2 CRs and 11 PRs, in arm C. After a median follow-up time of 62 (range 18-108) weeks, the median time to progression was 38, 25, and 27 weeks for arm A, B, and C, respectively. With 94 patients still alive, the one-year probability of survival was 61%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhoea affected 46% and 16%, respectively, of patients treated with CPT-11 + LFA 5-FU. Median relative dose intensity over eight cycles (DI8) was 78% for CPT-11 and 82% for 5-FU. Severe toxicities of TOM + LFA-5-FU were neutropenia (16%) and diarrhoea (16%), but median relative DI8 was 93% for TOM, and 82% for 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 + LFA-5-FU compares favorably in term of activity and toxicity with other combination regimens including CPT-11 and continuous infusional 5-FU. The hypothesis of a RR 15% higher than the MTX + LFA-5-FU treatment can not be ruled out after this interim analysis. The TOM + LFA 5-FU regimen showed a RR and a toxicity profile very close to the MTX + LFA 5-FU combination, and dose not deserve further evaluation in advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a new liposomal liver-specific contrast agent for CT: results of clinical testing in nonpatient volunteers.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of BR21, a liposome-encapsulated iomeprol formulation, in nonpatient volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study in 30 adult, male nonpatient volunteers, randomized to receive a single intravenous bolus (2 mL/s) of BR21 (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mL/kg, four volunteers per dose level) or matched volumes of placebo (0.9% saline, 10 volunteers). The safety controls performed consisted of preand postdose complete physical examinations, measurement of vital signs, electrocardiographic controls, clinical laboratory investigations (hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis), and monitoring of adverse events. The safety controls and monitoring of subjects for adverse events continued up to 7 days after the dose. For pharmacokinetic analysis, the determination of total iomeprol content was performed by a high-performance liquid chromatography assay procedure in blood, urine, and fecal samples collected before the dose and serially after the dose, up to 120 hours. RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred throughout the study. All nonserious adverse events were minor and mild in intensity and rapidly resolved without treatment. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed among the various doses of BR21 and between BR21 and placebo. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiographic parameters, or clinical laboratory findings. Iomeprol blood level decay can be described by a three-exponential function, consistent with a distribution phase (range, t1/2 0.12-0.21 hours), a fast elimination phase (range, t1/2 1.2-1.5 hours), and a slow elimination phase from a deep compartment (range, t1/2 3.3-4.5 hours). There was an apparent linearity in the relation between the area under the curve and the dose. Urinary elimination of unchanged iomeprol accounted for 89% to 90% of injected dose within 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: BR21 appeared to be safe and well tolerated in nonpatient subjects. Its pharmacokinetic profile was compatible with nonspecific distribution into the extracellular fluid space and specific distribution into a deep compartment.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

High efficacy of paclitaxel and doxorubicin as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer: a phase I-II study.

The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel (TAX) in combination with doxorubicin (ADM). To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of this combination, TAX was administered in escalating doses of 30 mg/m2, starting from 120 mg/m2, by 1 hour continuous infusion, per group of three patients; ADM was administered at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m2, 24 hours before administering TAX (phase 1). The combination was recycled every 3 weeks. In phase II, TAX was administered at the MTD defined in phase I. Thirty-six women were enrolled. The MTD of TAX was 220 mg/m2. Objective responses were observed in 28/34 (82%) assessable patients. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months and overall survival 27.8 months. The main clinical toxicity was neutropenia (grade III-IV) of short duration (94%). Two patients developed cardiac toxicity. The combination TAX+ADM is very effective in advanced breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) improves survival and quality of life (QoL) among elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC aged >/= 70 years with advanced disease were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1,200 mg/m(2) + V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned based on the first 60 patients per arm. RESULTS: In May 1999, the survival data were analyzed of 120 eligible patients (V group = 60; G + V group = 60) who had been randomized from June 1997 to February 1999. Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease, and 71 had stage IV. At a median potential follow-up of 14 months (range, 3 to 22 months), 93 patients had died (G + V group = 41; V group = 52). In the G + V group, median survival time was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30%; these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V group. According to multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G + V arm compared with the V arm was 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0. 29 to 0.79; P <.01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The overall response rates were 22% and 15% in the G + V and V groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with NSCLC, G + V treatment is associated with significantly better survival than is V alone.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine when combined with a fixed dose of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate in a phase II trial the activity of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were treated with vinorelbine at fixed dose of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously and gemcitabine at increasing dose levels from 800 to 1,500 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In phase I, dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the dosage of 1,500 mg/m(2) gemcitabine, with three of five patients developing grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In phase II, with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m(2), 19 (36%) of 52 assessable patients responded. Objective response was observed in 11 (39%) of 28 patients with stage IIIB disease and in eight (33%) of 24 patients with stage IV. The median time to progression was 29 weeks (range, 2 to 41 weeks; 35 weeks and 16 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively), and median survival was 54 weeks (range, 2 to 84+ weeks; 63 weeks and 42 weeks for stages IIIB and IV, respectively). One-year survival was 64% for patients with stage IIIB disease and 29% for those with stage IV. Clinical benefit response was observed in 29 (59%) of 49 assessable patients. Grade 4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon (6% and 8% of cases, respectively); however, grade 3/4 leukothrombocytopenia occurred more frequently in patients aged more than 70 years (52% and 24%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine is effective and tolerable in the treatment of NSCLC, thus deserving randomized trials with cisplatin combination regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: interim analysis of a phase III trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In our previous phase II study, the cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a median survival time (MST) of approximately 1 year in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present study was aimed at comparing the MST of patients treated with this triplet regimen with the MSTs of patients receiving cisplatin and vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin and gemcitabine (PG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 1997, patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, an age of < or = 70 years, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 1 were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (arm A); cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (arm B); or cisplatin 120 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2)/wk (arm C). According to the two-stage design for phase III trials, an interim analysis was planned when the first 60 patients per arm were assessable for survival. RESULTS: The survival data of 180 NSCLC patients (stage IIIB, 76 patients; stage IV, 104 patients) were analyzed in April 1999. Overall, 128 patients had died (PGV, n = 33; PG, n = 42; and PV, n = 53). The MST of patients in the PGV, PG, and PV arms was 51, 42, and 35 weeks, respectively, and the corresponding 1-year projected survival rates were 45%, 40%, and 34%, respectively. When only patients with stage IV disease were considered, an even stronger difference was seen between PGV (MST = 47 weeks) and both PG (34 weeks) and PV (27 weeks). At multivariate Cox analysis, the estimate hazard of death for patients receiving PGV compared with those receiving PV was 0.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.77; P <.01). The response rates were 47% in the PGV arm, 30% in the PG arm, 25% in the PV arm. Both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were not substantially worse in patients who received the PGV regimen. CONCLUSION: The PGV regimen is associated with a substantial survival gain (MST > 3 months longer) when compared with the PV combination. Because this difference in survival met one of the early stopping rules, the accrual in the PV arm has been stopped (null hypothesis rejected). Enrollment still continues in the PGV and PG arm to ascertain whether the PGV regimen can also produce a significantly longer survival than that obtained with the PG regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Interim analysis of a phase III trial comparing cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine vs. either cisplatin and gemcitabine or cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

In a previous phase II randomized study, a cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine (PGV) regimen produced a 50-week median survival time (MST) in advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The present trial was planned to randomly compare the outcome of patients treated with this new triplet regimen with those of patients receiving either cisplatin plus vinorelbine (PV) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) doublet combinations. One hundred eighty patients with stage IIIB (76) or IV (104) disease, aged <or= 70 years, and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) <or= 1, were randomly allocated to receive: cisplatin, 50 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 plus vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 (PGV) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; cisplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 (PG) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; cisplatin, 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29 plus vinorelbine, 30 mg/m2/week (PV). At the planned interim analysis, the MST of patients in the PGV, PG, and PV arms was 51, 42, and 35 weeks, respectively. The hazard of death (Cox analysis) for patients receiving PGV compared with those receiving PV was 0.35 (95% confidence index [CI], 0.16-0.77, P = 0.0058). The response rate was 47% in the PGV arm, 30% in the PG arm, and 25% in the PV arm. Severe neutropenia (75% vs. 45%), and vomiting (50% vs. 15%) significantly affected more patients in the PV than in the PGV arm. Since the difference in survival met early stopping rules, accrual to the PV arm was suspended. Enrollment still continues in the PGV and PG arms to ascertain whether the triplet regimen has a more significant effect on survival than that produced with the PG regimen.

Clinical Trial↗
PubMed2000

CEOP-B/VIMB vs. promace-CytaBOM in the treatment of intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: A randomised multicenter study of Southern Italy Cooperative Group.

From January 1992 to December 1995, 129 patients with previously untreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomised in a phase III multicenter trial to receive CEOP-B/VIMB or ProMACE-CytaBOM. Eligibility criteria included intermediate or high grade lymphoma (follicular large cell, diffuse small cleaved-cell, diffuse mixed, diffuse large-cell and immunoblastic) with an Ann Arbor stage II bulky, III or IV. All patients entered into the study were considered evaluable according to intent to treat analysis. At a median follow-up of 60 months there were no significant differences between the treatment response rates [82% (60%CR) for CEOP-B/VIMB vs. 81% (69% CR) for ProMACE-CytaBOM]. Conversely, with regard to disease-free survival, a significant difference was observed between the two treatment arms (42% for CEOP-B/VIMB vs. 24% for ProMACE-CytaBOM at 5 years; p=0.046). However, this difference did not translate in a significant difference in overall survival (45% vs. 39% at 5 years). Moreover, when response rates and outcome were analysed for different prognostic subgroups according to International Prognostic Index, no significant differences were observed between the treatment groups. It is important to note that neither regimen was able to improve outcome of poor risk patients who fared badly with both treatments (median survival 9 and 8 months respectively). Toxicity was also similar in both treatments with grade 3-4 leukopenia observed in 39% and 47% of cases and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 24% and 27% of cases respectively. In conclusion, in this study CEOP-B/VIMB was not superior to ProMACE-CytaBOM in aggressive lymphomas and the alternating strategy failed to improve outcome of poor risk patients in which newer more aggressive treatments are needed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

New aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

New aromatase inhibitors are an exciting treatment option for postmenopausal women with hormone sensitive breast cancer. They have been shown to reduce tumors in a significant number of patients, and exhibit definite antitumor activity at a relatively low daily dose, and are highly potent, highly selective, and well-tolerated. Results from recent clinical phase III studies have confirmed their efficacy and the key role they have in the therapy for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The agents available for clinical use are: letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane. These drugs have demonstrated high activity in women failing tamoxifen in locally advanced or metastatic disease. This communication reviews the clinical use of aromatase inhibitors, particularly in second and first line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Anastrozole↗
PubMed2000

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: a phase II multicenter trial.

PURPOSE: We determined the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with inoperable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients with transitional cell carcinoma, measurable disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 or greater were enrolled in this multicenter phase II trial. Previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease was acceptable if it had been completed more than 1 year before study entry. Every 4 weeks patients received 1,000 mg./m.2 gemcitabine intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, and 70 mg./m.2 cisplatin intravenously on day 2. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Notably only 7 of the 54 patients (13%) previously received chemotherapy in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Overall we observed 26 objective responses (48%), of which 15% were complete. Median time to progression was 23 weeks and median survival was 54 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated. The main toxicities were leukopenia (grade 3 in 28% and grade 4 in 11% of patients), anemia (grade 3 in 34% and grade 4 in 6%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 14% and grade 4 in 6%). Other relevant side effects were nausea and vomiting in 20% of cases, fever in 24%, alopecia in 22%, renal failure in 7.4% and mucositis in 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Combined cisplatin plus gemcitabine is highly active in advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract with manageable toxicity. The response rate, time to treatment failure and overall survival appeared to be comparable to those achieved with combined methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin. Conversely toxicity appeared lower. Evaluation of this regimen in randomized studies with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin is strongly suggested.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Molecular mechanisms for the hepatic uptake of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

The mechanisms were investigated for the hepatic transport of 4 different gadolinium complexes used as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In basolateral rat hepatocyte plasma membrane vesicles, Gd-DTPA uptake was indistinguishable from non-specific binding to vesicles; Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA entered plasma membrane vesicles following a linear, concentration-dependent mechanism up to 1.5 mM of substrate. By contrast, Gd-B 20790 uptake followed a saturative kinetic with an apparent Km of 92 +/- 15 microM and a Vmax of 143 +/- 42 pmol/mg prot/15 sec, and it occurred into an osmotic-sensitive space. Sulfobromophthalein ant taurocholate, but not unconjugated bilirubin inhibited the uptake rate of Gd-B 20790 but not that of the other three compounds. Injection into Xenopus laevis oocytes of 5 ng of human OATP cRNA resulted, after 3 days, in a >/=2-fold stimulation (p < 0.001) of transport of Gd-B 20790 but not of Gd-BOPTA or Gd-EOB-DTPA. Collectively, these data indicate that the hepatic uptake of the MRI contrast agent Gd-B 20790 is a carrier-mediated mechanism operated by OATP while MRI compounds with other chemical structures enter the hepatocyte by other mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

KEYnet: a keywords database for biosequences functional organization.

KEYnet is a database where gene and protein names are hierarchically structured. Particular care has been devoted to the search and organisation of synonyms. The structuring is based on biological criteria in order to assist the user in the data search and to minimise the risk of loss of information. Links to the EMBL data library by the entry name and the accession number have been implemented. KEYnet is available through the World Wide Web at the following site: http://www.ba.cnr.it/keynet.html. Recently KEYnet has incorporated specific gene name classifications, which can be browsed starting from the above-mentioned KEYnet home page: the Mitochondrial Gene Names classification and the Rat Gene Names classification. KEYnet database has also been structured in a flatfile format and can be queried through SRS (http://bio-www.ba.cnr.t:8000/srs).

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and MR imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine: results of clinical pharmacologic and pilot imaging studies in nonpatient and patient volunteers.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase I single-blind studies were performed in 53 healthy volunteers, of whom 39 received gadobenate dimeglumine and 14 placebo. Another 106 patients with focal liver disease received gadobenate dimeglumine in parallel-group, open-label, phase II studies. The imaging potential of gadobenate dimeglumine was assessed in all 106 patients plus 11 healthy volunteers, whereas pharmacokinetics were determined for 42 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed for all subjects enrolled in the study. Imaging protocols for healthy volunteers were similar to those for patients and comprised predose T2-weighted sequences and pre- and postinjection T1-weighted spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences. RESULTS: Gadobenate dimeglumine was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients, with pharmacokinetics described adequately as a distribution phase and an elimination phase. Most of the injected dose of gadobenate was excreted unchanged in urine within 24 hours, although a fraction corresponding to 0.6%-4.0% of the injected dose was eliminated with the bile and recovered in the feces. The gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced signal intensity of liver parenchyma was dose-related and constant for 120 minutes. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging was superior to nonenhanced MR imaging in more than 50% of patient studies, with more lesions seen in 26%-38% of patients and smaller lesions in 21%-33% of patients. In general, image sets acquired 40-180 minutes after administration of a dose were preferred, whereas images acquired during the dynamic phase after administration were typical of those obtained with extracellular fluid contrast agents. CONCLUSION: Gadobenate dimeglumine is a safe and efficacious MR imaging contrast agent suitable for both delayed and dynamic imaging of the liver.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in animals of gadobenate ion, the magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancing component of gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance).

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic behavior of gadobenate dimeglumine, a new multipurpose parenteral contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics were evaluated in rats, rabbits, dogs and monkeys after intravenous injections of non-labelled gadobenate dimeglumine and, for biodistribution studies, 153Gd-labelled gadobenate dimeglumine. Assays were performed by high performance liquid chromatography, X-ray fluorescence and gamma spectrometry. The binding of gadobenate ion to animal and human serum albumin was studied by equilibrium dialysis. RESULTS: After intravenous injection gadobenate dimeglumine distributes into plasma and extracellular fluid as well as into the intrahepatocytic space. Gadobenate ion is cleared from plasma by renal and biliary excretion. It does not accumulate in specific tissues, except temporarily in tissues related to its elimination. Gadobenate ion is not metabolized. Its binding to plasma proteins is too weak to be detected by equilibrium dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Gadobenate dimeglumine combines the properties of an extracellular-fluid agent with those of a hepatobiliary agent. Its complete elimination and biological stability satisfy the requirements for its safe use in humans.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II randomized study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In a previous phase I study cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM), and vinorelbine (VNR) combination therapy was safe and very active in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was aimed at better defining the activity and toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven chemotherapy-naive patients, age < or = 70 years, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) were randomized to two treatment arms. Patients on arm A received CDDP 50 mg/m2, GEM 1,000 mg/m2, and VNR 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of an every-3-weeks cycle (57 patients). Patients on arm B received CDDP 80 mg/m2, epirubicin 80 mg/m2, and vindesine 3 mg/m2, all delivered on day 1 every 4 weeks, plus lonidamine orally 150 mg three times daily (54 patients). In December 1996, randomization was stopped early, and an additional 30 patients were treated with the experimental regimen to obtain a more accurate estimation of its activity rate. RESULTS: Among 87 patients who received the CDDP-GEM-VNR combination, four complete responses (CRs) and 46 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 68%). Two CRs and 18 PRs were recorded among 54 patients on arm B, giving a 37% activity rate (95% CI , 24% to 51%). After a median follow-up duration of 19 months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 32 and 50 weeks in arm A, and 18 and 33 weeks in arm B, respectively. World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 46% and 14% of patients in arm A and in 22% and 11% of those in arm B, respectively. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon in both arms. CONCLUSION: The CDDP-GEM-VNR combination is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and has a manageable toxicity. A phase III trial comparing this new combination with both CDDP-VNR and CDDP-GEM regimens is underway.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and paclitaxel in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Because both cisplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-gemcitabine combinations are generally considered to be among the most active regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, this study aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel when combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC patients and aimed to define the therapeutic activity of this new regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1996 to September 1998, 75 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC, who were either chemotherapy-naive (65 patients) or who had been pretreated (10 patients), received fixed doses of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) and escalating doses of paclitaxel in a 1-hour infusion, all on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Five different paclitaxel doses were tested, for a total of 275 cycles delivered. The escalation was stopped at the paclitaxel dose of 75 mg/m(2) in pretreated patients, whereas it continued to 150 mg/m(2) in chemotherapy-naive patients. A total of 65 chemotherapy-naive patients were treated. A paclitaxel dose of 125 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and a total of 39 patients were treated at this level, for a total of 158 cycles delivered. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Five patients were hospitalized because of sepsis, and packed RBC transfusion was required in 13 patients. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (11%) patients, respectively. Overall, 74 of the 75 patients were assessable for response. Four complete (CR) and 38 partial (PR) responses were recorded, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 57%. Three of the ten pretreated patients achieved a PR, compared with four CRs and 35 PRs in the 64 chemotherapy-naive patients (ORR, 61%). Thirty-eight of 39 patients included in phase II were assessable for response and quality of life (QOL) (one patient's disease was not measurable). Two CRs and 24 PRs were recorded in this group, for an ORR of 68% (95% confidence interval, 51% to 82%). The QOL score improved in 27 of 38 (71%) patients. The median survival time was 15 months in the 65 chemotherapy-naive patients, but it had not yet been reached in the 39 patients included in phase II, for whom the 1-year projected survival was 70%. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin-gemcitabine-paclitaxel combination is a feasible and well-tolerated approach in advanced NSCLC patients. Both a major response and a QOL improvement can be obtained in a high proportion of patients, with a median survival time exceeding 1 year. A phase III trial comparing this combination with other effective regimens is under way.

Adult↗