Biomedical subjects

V N Hansen

Publications and source records attributed to V N Hansen.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

The use of gel dosimetry for verification of electron and photon treatment plans in carcinoma of the scalp.

In recent years there has been a large amount of research into the potential use of radiation sensitive gels for three-dimensional verification of clinical radiotherapy doses. In this paper we report the use of a MAGIC gel dosimeter (Fong et al 2001 Phys. Med. Biol. 46 3105) for the verification of a specific patient's radiation therapy dose distribution. A 69-year-old male patient presented with a squamous cell carcinoma extending approximately 180 degrees across the top of the scalp (anterior to posterior) and from just over midline to 90 degrees left of the skull. The patient's treatment was commenced using two electron fields. For gel dosimetry, phantoms were produced in which the outer surface spatially corresponded to the outer contours of the patient's anatomy in the region of irradiation. The phantoms were treated with either electrons or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with photons. The results identified a hot spot between the matched electron fields and confirmed the more homogeneous dose distribution produced by the IMRT planning system. The IMRT plan was then clinically implemented. The application of a clinical dose to a phantom shaped to a specific patient as well as the ability to select a slice at will during phantom imaging means that gel dosimetry can no longer be considered to simply have potential alone, but is now in fact a useful dosimetric tool.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

An evaluation of Beam cath in the verification process for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

AIMS: As the trend towards more conformal treatment continues, the accuracy of treatment delivery becomes more important. Conventionally, treatment set-up for prostate cancer patients is verified in relation to the bony anatomy. However, there can be prostate movement independent of bony anatomy. This study tested the feasibility of using Beam cath to enable online correction of treatment set-up in relation to the prostate position, and to assess inter-fraction and intra-fraction prostate movement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beam cath is a urethral catheter containing radio-opaque markers, which can be seen on electronic portal imaging, enabling verification of prostate rather than bony anatomy position. The Beam cath was used for planning and treatment of a boost phase of 10 Gy in 5 fractions, delivered before the conventional conformal plan of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients were scanned by computed tomgography (CT), with and without the catheter, and a radio-opaque marker in the catheter was used as the isocentre of the boost phase to enable accurate and rapid pre-treatment isocentre adjustment. The set-up errors between the Beam Cath and bony images were compared to identify the magnitude of prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy. Post-treatment portal images were taken to assess intra-fraction prostate movement. RESULTS: Of 29 patients approached to take part in the study, 18 patients gave informed consent, but only five completed the intended 5 fractions of the boost phase using Beam cath. Pre- and post-treatment portal images were obtained for a total of 29 fractions in six patients. Inter-fraction prostate movement, independent of bony anatomy, was identified. The mean movements were 0.2 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the right left (RL), cranio-caudal (CC) and anterior posterior (AP) direction, respectively. The mean intra-fraction movement was 0.2 mm (SD 1.2 mm), 2.9 mm (SD 3.1 mm) and 0.7 mm (SD 2.3 mm) in the RL, CC and AP direction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although independent prostate movement was identified, the use of Beam cath was poorly tolerated. Alternative methods of identifying and correcting for prostate movement should be investigated.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

The delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy to the breast using multiple static fields.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To develop a method of using a multileaf collimator (MLC) to deliver intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for tangential breast fields, using an MLC to deliver a set of multiple static fields (MSFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is used to obtain thickness maps of medial and lateral tangential breast fields. From these IMRT deliveries are designed to minimize the volume of breast above 105% of prescribed dose. The deliveries are universally-wedged beams augmented with a set of low dose shaped irradiations. Dosimetric and planning QA of this method has been compared with the standard, wedged treatment and the corresponding treatment using physical compensators. Several options for delivering the MSF treatment are presented. RESULTS: The MSF technique was found to be superior to the standard technique (P value=0.002) and comparable with the compensated technique. Both IMRT methods reduced the volume of breast above 105% dose from a mean value of 12.0% of the total breast volume to approximately 2.8% of the total breast volume. CONCLUSIONS: This MSF method may be used to reduce the high dose volume in tangential breast irradiation significantly. This may have consequences for long-term side effects, particularly cosmesis.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Direct measurement and analytical modeling of scatter in portal imaging.

In this study a direct measurement of scatter in portal imaging for various air gaps and scatterer thicknesses at a beam energy of 6 MV is presented. The experimental data are compared with results from a Monte Carlo (MC) scatter model. In the regime where the air gap is larger than 9.3 cm the MC and the experiment agree. Based on this MC model an analytical model is developed, which takes all important interaction processes into account. It comprises a rigorous treatment of first order scattering and an estimation of photons scattered more than once within the phantom. This estimation is based on the assumption that higher order scattering can be considered as isotropically distributed around a certain scatter origin located in the midplane of the phantom. It is found that relative deviations between the MC model and the analytical model are of 2% to 3% in regions where scattering is very large.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed1998

Practical implementation of compensators in breast radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A method of using electronic portal imaging to design compensators for tangential breast irradiation has been developed. We describe how this has been implemented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The compensator design method generates wedged and unwedged beam weights, in conjunction with templates for multiple lead-sheet compensators and pseudo-CT outlines. The latter describe the breast and lung profiles in a set of transverse slices. The layers of the compensator and pseudo-CT outlines are transferred to a treatment planning system for verification. The accuracy of the planning system for the high transmission blocks used to describe the compensators has been verified using a plotting tank system. Dose volume histogram data and transaxial and sagittal plan slices have been compared for both standard and compensated treatments for a sample set of five patients. RESULTS: The planning system predicted the dose at depths of 1.5 and 5 cm to within 2% for the compensators tested. The biggest source of discrepancy was a consequence of the planning system requiring blocks to have integer percentage transmission. For all patients studied, the compensated treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the percentage volume outside the 95-105% dose, with an average reduction of 10.2%. The percentage volume outside the 95-107% dose was also reduced by typically 3.4%. The implementation was found to yield a convenient automatic method of designing compensators using electronic portal imaging and verifying the results using a planning system. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that this method of implementation can be used in practice. The dosimetric accuracy of the treatment planning system is limited by the requirement that blocks should be of integer transmission, but this effect is small.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

Quality assurance of the dose delivered by small radiation segments.

The use of intensity modulation with multiple static fields has been suggested by many authors as a way to achieve highly conformal fields in radiotherapy. However, quality assurance of linear accelerators is generally done only for beam segments of 100 MU or higher, and by measuring beam profiles once the beam has stabilized. We propose a set of measurements to check the stability of dose delivery in small segments, and present measured data from three radiotherapy centres. The dose delivered per monitor unit, MU, was measured for various numbers of MU segments. The field flatness and symmetry were measured using either photographic films that are subsequently scanned by a densitometer, or by using a diode array. We performed the set of measurements at the three radiotherapy centres on a set of five different Philips SL accelerators with energies of 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. The dose per monitor unit over the range of 1 to 100 MU was found to be accurate to within +/-5% of the nominal dose per monitor unit as defined for the delivery of 100 MU for all the energies. For four out of the five accelerators the dose per monitor unit over the same range was even found to be accurate to within +/-2%. The flatness and symmetry were in some cases found to be larger for small segments by a maximum of 9% of the flatness/symmetry for large segments. The result of this study provides the dosimetric evidence that the delivery of small segment doses as top-up fields for beam intensity modulation is feasible. However, it should be stressed that linear accelerators have different characteristics for the delivery of small segments, hence this type of measurement should be performed for each machine before the delivery of small dose segments is approved. In some cases it may be advisable to use a low pulse repetition frequency (PRF) to obtain more accurate dose delivery of small segments.

Biophysical Phenomena↗

PubMed1998

The derivation of tissue-maximum ratio from percentage depth dose requires peak scatter factor to be considered a function of source-to-surface distance.

A formula for the calculation of tissue-maximum ratio (TMR) from percentage depth dose (PDD) and peak scatter factor (PSF) is derived from first principles using a simple geometric model for the case when the field size for PDD and PSF is defined at the surface. The derivation is carried out in two ways: (a) taking field size for PDD and PSF as defined at the depth of maximum dose and then applying a conversion factor, and (b) by a direct derivation. The first of these methods yields a formula which agrees with BJR Supplement 25, but the latter yields a result which differs from it. Numerically, this difference is insignificant, but it has implications for the theoretical basis of the conversion formulae. The difference arises due to the translation of field size from one depth to another when calculating PSF: two different values of source-to-surface distance (SSD) yield two apparently different PSFs for the same size of field at the depth of maximum dose. Disagreements of this type are prevalent throughout the standard conversion formulae given in BJR Supplement 25 when field size for PDD and PSF is defined at the surface rather than at the depth of dose maximum. These disagreements are illustrated here using the conversion of PDD from one SSD to another as an example. The difficulty is overcome by considering PSF to be a function of SSD as well as field size.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Dosimetric evaluation of compensation in radiotherapy of the breast: MLC intensity modulation and physical compensators.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electronic portal images may be used to design the compensation required to maximise dose uniformity in the breast from opposed tangential beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four methods of implementing the desired compensation have been studied: a simple wedge, a physical compensator in conjunction with a wedge; one open field plus four shaped multi-leaf-collimated (MLC) fields, and one wedged field in conjunction with three shaped MLC fields. Evaluation was performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed inside a phantom which was designed to mimic the human breast. The measured results are compared with both the prediction of the in-house compensation design software and with the dose predicted by the GE Target II planning system. The implications of each method for the time taken to plan and deliver treatment were analysed. RESULTS: The dose inhomogeneity, as measured at seven points in the central plane was greatest for the simple wedge (root mean square (rms) = 4.5%) compared to an open field plus four shaped MLC fields (rms = 2.2%), a wedged field plus three shaped MLC fields (rms = 3.3%), and the physical compensator (rms = 2.4%). The times required to plan and prepare these treatments varied considerably. The standard wedged treatment required under 15 min; both MLC-based and the physical compensator treatments required approximately 50 min. Differences of treatment delivery times were up to 8 min. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the dose inhomogeneity can be reduced by beam intensity modulation designed using EPIDs.

Breast↗

PubMed1997

Extraction of primary signal from EPIDs using only forward convolution.

A model is presented in which the scatter signal in images obtained obtained by electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) is removed by a forward convolution method. The convolution kernel, kt(r) is a cylindrically symmetric kernel, generated by Monte Carlo, representing the scattered signal of a pencil beam at the image plane after the photons have gone through an object of thickness, t. A set of the kernels is presented and used to extract the primary signal. The signal from primary photons in the image, P(r), is extracted by an iterative method in which the essential assumption is that the scatter signal S(r) can be described by a superposition of the signal that would be obtained with the object removed from the beam, O(r), and the kernel kt(r). The thickness, t, that is used to choose the kernel, is directly related to P(r) by a simple exponential relationship; hence the thickness, t, of the object and the primary signal, P(r), are both iterated to better estimates through this procedure. The model is tested on Monte Carlo simulated data, where the extracted primary signal is compared with the "true" primary signal. Results are presented for a set of phantoms of uniform thicknesses up to 35 cm, and for field areas up to 320 cm(2), and for an inhomogeneous phantom containing a sphere of different density. The primary signal can be extracted to better than 1.5%, even when the original Scatter-to-Primary Ratio (SPR) is more than 25%. Finally, we have tested the model on EPID images, a nonuniform (breast) phantom is presented here. The breast phantom both have a curved external contour and contains a structure of a different density (lung). The radiological thickness of this breast phantom, as extracted using the above convolution model, was found to be within 2.8 mm (1 sd) of the true radiological thickness.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

The optimum intensities for multiple static multileaf collimator field compensation.

A method of determining the optimum beam intensities for compensation using multiple static multileaf collimator fields is presented. In this method a histogram of the number of beam pixels against beam intensity is generated for the intensity-modulated beam (IMB). The intensity of each beam to be used is chosen to minimize the mean square deviation between each bin in the histogram and the closest beam intensity. This method has been applied to sample IMBs possessing one maximum and two maxima. For both cases, the use of uniform beam intensity increments is shown to be close to optimal. In the case with two maxima, the efficacy of irradiating both peaks simultaneously, rather than separately, has been studied and shown to be of potential benefit. The optimum intensities for an IMB for breast radiotherapy are also presented.

Humans↗

PubMed1996

The application of transit dosimetry to precision radiotherapy.

A method of using electronic portal imaging (EPI) for transit dosimetry is described. In this method, a portal image of the treatment field is first aligned with a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) to geometrically relate the computed tomography (CT) scan, used to generate the DRR, with the EPI. Then the EPI is corrected for scatter within the patient to yield a map of primary fluence striking the detector. This is backprojected through the planning CT data set to yield a distribution of primary fluence within the patient. This distribution is then convolved with dose deposition kemels to yield a map of dose delivery within the patient. Such a distribution may be compared with the dose distribution resulting from the original treatment plan in order to evaluate the adequacy of the treatment. This method has been evaluated using a humanoid phantom. We find the transit dosimetry relative dose distribution when compared with film and thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements and compared with our planning system to agree within 2% in the pelvic region of a humanoid phantom.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed1995

Design of compensators for breast radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging.

A novel method of designing intensity modulated beams (IMBs) to achieve compensation in external beam radiotherapy of the breast, without the need for CT scans, is presented. The design method comprises three parts: (1) an electronic portal image is used to generate a map of radiological thickness; (2) this map is then used to obtain an estimate of the breast and lung outline; (3) a TMR-based dose calculation algorithm is then used to determine the optimum beam profile to achieve the best dose distribution. The dose distributions calculated for IMBs were compared with those calculated for the use of simple wedges. The results for two patients studied indicate that the dose inhomogeneity for IMBs is +/- 5%, compared with a value of +/- 10% for a wedged plan. The uncertainty in radiological thickness measurement corresponds to a dosimetric error of +/- 2%. Other errors associated with outline estimation are typically less than 2%, with a largest value of +5% for one of the patients who had a large and highly asymmetrical breast. The results for the two patients studied suggest that the uncertainties in the method are significantly smaller than the improvement in dose uniformity produced.

Algorithms↗