Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to V Narang.
India is the second most populous country in the world, with a population approaching 1 billion people. The development of emergency medicine is still in its earliest stages because the Medical Council of India (MCI) does not yet recogonize the specialty. Recent developments may cause the MCI to reconsider specialty status for emergency medicine as an academic discipline.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because 50% to 70% of geriatric patients have been shown to have nonproductive levels of tetanus antibodies, we postulated that this population might also have inadequate levels of diphtheria antibodies. Emergency physicians have the opportunity to immunize patients against tetanus and diphtheria. We sought to determine the seroprevalence of diphtheria antibodies in patients older than 65 years and to assess compliance with immunization guidelines in EDs. METHODS: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diphtheria antibodies was conducted in 58 outpatients of geriatric medical facility aged 65 years or older. We considered titers greater than .1 IU/mL protective. Eighteen ED personnel, ages 25 to 40 years, served as comparison subjects. The preparation used for immunization of injured patients--tetanus toxoid or tetanus and diphtheria toxoids adsorbed for adult use--was determined by means of a telephone survey of 64 New York City EDs. RESULTS: The mean age of our patients was 80 years (range, 65 to 95 years). Their mean diphtheria antibody titer was .17 IU/mL (range, .04 to .54 IU/mL). Thirty-three percent (19 of 58; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 21% to 54%) of patients had inadequate levels of diphtheria antibodies. We found no significant differences between protected and nonprotected patients with respect to age, sex, medical history, or military service. Patients with nonprotective levels of diphtheria antibodies were more likely to have inadequate tetanus antibody titers. Sixty-eight percent of patients without protection from diphtheria (13 of 19; 95% Cl, 48% to 88%) were also unprotected from tetanus, and 33% (13 of 39; 95% Cl, 19% to 47%) o those with adequate diphtheria antibodies had nonprotective levels of tetanus antibodies (P = .012). All 18 ED personnel had adequate diphtheria and tetanus antibodies. The telephone survey revealed that 30% (19 of 64) of EDs use only tetanus toxoid for immunization of injured patients. CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of geriatric patients have inadequate diphtheria antibodies. Emergency physicians must comply with immunization guidelines for injured patients to assure adequate protection from both tetanus and diphtheria.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Tetanus antibody levels have been shown to be inadequate in 50% of patients older than 65 years. Although immunization recommendations have been made for this age group, the efficacy of this intervention has not been well documented. We sought to determine the difference in tetanus antibody levels after the administration of one tetanus toxoid immunization to geriatric patients without adequate titers. METHODS: Thirty-five patients older than 65 years at a large urban comprehensive care geriatric center who were documented to have inadequate tetanus antibody titers were each given one tetanus toxoid immunization. Repeat titers were obtained at least 2 months after the immunization with the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Bindazyme kit; the Binding Site Corporation, Birmingham, England). We considered tetanus antibody levels greater than .17 IU/mL protective. RESULTS: The mean age was 79.4 years; 30 of 35 (86%) were female. Repeat tetanus antibody titers were obtained an average of 123 days (range, 63 to 204 days) after immunization with tetanus toxoid. The mean preimmunization antibody titer was .1 IU/mL (range, .04 to .16 IU/mL). After immunization, antibody titers increased a mean of .61 IU/mL (range, -.01 to 2.23 IU/mL; 95% confidence interval, .35 to .87 IU/mL). Thirty of the 35 patients who received a single injection of tetanus toxoid (86%) developed protective titers. We found no relationship between seroconversion and age, sex, or medical history; nor did we find a relationship between antibody level and time elapsed since immunization when repeat titers were obtained. CONCLUSION: Administration of one tetanus toxoid injection affords protective immunity in many geriatric patients.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acute segmental enteritis, also called "enteritis necroticans" is characterized by nonocclusive intestinal ischemia in the absence of any precipitating cause. We studied 30 such patients over a 5.5-year period. All patients had acute abdominal symptoms requiring emergency laparotomy, and in only 30% was a preoperative diagnosis of segmental enteritis proposed. The jejunum alone (63.3%), or with the ileum (26.7%), was the most common site of necrotic patches (86.7%), frank gangrene (50.0%), free perforation (36.7%), and circumferential dusky lesions (30.0%). Twenty-eight patients required resection of the affected bowel. Specimen angiography in two cases showed normal mesenteric vasculature. In 12 patients, a detailed microbiological profile from peritoneal fluid, intestinal contents, and intestinal wall was performed, but Clostridium welchii was isolated from none. The resected intestinal specimens showed mucosal ulceration, submucosal edema, mixed inflammatory infiltrate, and patchy necrosis of the muscularis propria. The intramural vessels were patent in all cases. Wound-related complications occurred in 14, pulmonary complications in 14, renal failure in eight, and fecal fistulas in five; 23.3% died.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The critical flicker fusion frequency and choice reaction times of 16 on-call anaesthetists were measured between 1400 and 1600, at 2300 and at 0200 hours. Critical flicker fusion decreased between the afternoon and 2300; there was no further change between 2300 and 0200. No significant differences in choice reaction times were found on any of these different occasions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.