PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

V P Joseph

Publications and source records attributed to V P Joseph.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Orthodontic microabrasive reproximation.

Reproximation (enamel stripping) is described in the literature as a clinical procedure for correction of tooth size deviations. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess, by means of scanning electron microscopy, (1) the differences exhibited on enamel with mechanical and chemical methods of stripping, and (2) the effect of a synthetic calcifying solution on the etched enamel. Part 1. Sixty human anterior teeth (10 complete sets) that were previously stored in 70% ethanol were subdivided into groups I and II. The teeth in group I were divided into five sets of six teeth mounted in a plaster block in the anterior arch form. Each set was stripped with one of the following mechanical abrasive methods: garnet disks, tungsten carbide and fine diamonds burs, coarse and fine diamond burs, diamond wheel and 3M strips, diamond-coated metal and 3M strips. The teeth in group II were similarly treated, except each set was subjected to a further microabrasive chemical stripping with 37% phosphoric acid used in conjunction with 3M strips. The teeth were then prepared for scanning electron microscopy, viewed, and photographed under magnification. Part 2. Ten human central incisor teeth were etched and used to study the effect of remineralization solutions at various time intervals. The results showed that teeth stripped by routine mechanical abrasive methods exhibited deep furrows and roughness. The teeth that received mechanical and chemical abrasive treatments showed a flattened, etched surface free of furrows. These etched surfaces showed marked crystal growth at 5 and 10 hours after remineralization suggesting the possibility of repair of the chemically altered enamel surface.

Acid Etching, Dental

Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets.

Anecdotal reports of bracket fracture and tooth damage associated with the use of certain esthetic orthodontic brackets have been reported in the literature. With the advent of new esthetic orthodontic brackets, the need has arisen to test the claims of the manufacturers. The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) shear peel bond strengths (SPBS) of various debonded orthodontic brackets, (2) SPBS of these rebonded esthetic brackets with and without use of silane, and (3) fracture sites of all groups examined. Seventy-five noncarious human premolar teeth were randomly divided into five groups (A through E). The teeth were cleaned, stored in 70% ethyl alcohol, and mounted for testing in the Instron machine. The following brackets were bonded to the teeth with Ortho-Concise bonding resin: (A) metal brackets, (B) Silkon brackets, (C) Transcend 2000 brackets, (D) debonded Transcend 2000 brackets, and (E) debonded silanized Transcend 2000 brackets. After wet storage at 37 degrees C for 7 days, the SPBS of brackets were recorded, and fracture sites observed. There were statistically significant differences between the SPBS of metal brackets when compared with the Transcend 2000 and the Silkon brackets. These groups exhibited clinically acceptable SPBS. Debonded silanized Transcend 2000 brackets showed clinically unacceptable SPBS. Fracture sites of metal and Transcend 2000 brackets were resin-bracket, whereas Silkon brackets fracture sites were predominantly resin-enamel.

Bicuspid

The shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with orthodontic composite resin and various fissure sealants.

Enamel decalcification (whitened areas) around orthodontic brackets during therapy is a well-recognized problem. If a fissure sealant could be used to isolate the enamel and yet withstand debonding of the bracket during therapy, this problem might be overcome. The objective of this in vitro study was to determine (1) the shear bond strengths of stainless steel orthodontic brackets bonded to teeth with an orthodontic bonding resin together with a primary coating of various fissure sealants and (2) the fracture sites of these debonded samples. Forty noncarious human canine teeth were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each. In group A, the brackets were bonded to the buccal surfaces of the prepared teeth with a macrofilled orthodontic composite resin only. In groups B, C, and D, the brackets were similarly bonded, except that the teeth were first treated with a fissure sealant--group B having a light-cured unfilled clear fissure sealant, group C having a light-cured microfilled fissure sealant, and group D having a chemically cured opaque fissure sealant. After storage at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the brackets were subjected to a shear force in an instron machine, and the fracture strengths were recorded, together with the sites of fracture.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Composite Resins

The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins.

Since the introduction of ceramic brackets to orthodontic therapy, a need has arisen to test the manufacturer's claims regarding these brackets. Forty-eight noncarious human canine teeth were divided equally into groups A to D. Brackets were bonded to these teeth with the use of the acid-etch technique and a composite resin according to the manufacturer's instructions. The combination within each group was as follows: A = stainless steel brackets and chemically cured resin; B = ceramic brackets and chemically cured resin; C = ceramic brackets and light-cured resin; D = stainless steel brackets and light-cured resin (via transillumination). After curing, the teeth were stored for 1 week in distilled water at 37 degrees C. The Instron machine was used to test the shear bond strengths of the brackets to the teeth. The brackets were individually tested to failure of the bond, which was recorded along with the site of fracture. The conclusions are as follows: (1) all combinations produced shear bond strengths that were greater than those that are considered clinically acceptable, (2) the ceramic groups exhibited a significantly higher bond strength than that of the stainless steel group, and (3) enamel fractures occurred among the B group in 40% of the samples tested in that group. It is thus apparent that a fracture of enamel is a real possibility during therapy or at debonding of the ceramic brackets, especially if the tooth is nonvital.

Analysis of Variance