PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

V V Valkenburg

Publications and source records attributed to V V Valkenburg.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

The multiple tasks test. Strategies in Parkinson's disease.

The clinical balance tests presently used cannot predict falls in Parkinson's disease (PD), perhaps because they probe fairly isolated "components" of postural control. The Multiple Tasks Test (MTT) is a new balance test that simultaneously assesses multiple components of postural control. We investigated whether this MTT can detect postural abnormalities in PD patients. Fifty young controls (mean age 27.6 years), 20 elderly controls (mean age 62.5 years), and 20 PD patients (mean age 61.8 years, mean Hoehn and Yahr stage 2.2) participated. The MTT consisted of eight separate tasks of increasing complexity, which were executed sequentially. These tasks were composed of several motor components (standing up, walking, avoiding obstacles, touching the floor, turning around, and sitting down) and one cognitive component (answering serial questions). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing slippery shoes, and reduced illumination. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously or directly sequentially. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of the motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but we did measure the time taken to complete all tasks. The complete MTT was performed by all subjects, except for a subgroup of seven patients and seven elderly controls who performed a shortened version, with only three of the eight sequential tasks (simple, intermediate, and most difficult). The number of subjects that produced Hesitations or Blocks for the motor components differed between the three groups [two-way repeated measures MANOVA, F(2.7) = 20.56; P < 0.001], patients making more errors than young and elderly controls. Furthermore, the number of subjects that made motor errors increased as the tasks became more complex [F(2.7) = 6.69; P < 0.001]. This increase differed across the three groups [significant interaction effect; F(2.7) = 3.31; P < 0.001] because particularly patients produced motor errors during the more complex tasks. In both control groups, 62% performed all eight consecutive tasks without errors in the motor components. In contrast, only 8% of the patients completed all tasks without motor errors (log rank test, P < 0.0001). This difference between patients and controls disappeared if the cognitive component was also scored, because more controls made cognitive errors during complex tasks than patients. Controls apparently gave priority to execution of the motor components, which they performed significantly faster than the patients. Both patients and controls made more errors during the shortened MTT, suggesting that learning effects (gain in performance through practice) influenced performance on the complete test. The MTT is a new balance test that clearly discriminates between healthy subjects and PD patients. Unlike controls, PD patients lend less priority to motor tasks over cognitive tasks. In addition, impaired motor learning may partially explain the higher error rate in PD. Future studies must determine if impaired MTT performance can predict actual falls in daily life.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The Multiple Tasks Test: development and normal strategies.

Simultaneous challenge of posture and cognition ("dual tasks") may predict falls better than tests of isolated components of postural control. We describe a new balance test (the Multiple Tasks Test, MTT) which (1) is based upon simultaneous assessment of multiple (>2) postural components; (2) represents everyday situations; and (3) can be applied by clinicians. Relevant risk factors for falls and actual fall circumstances (identified from a prospective survey in Parkinson's disease) were used to design functional tests (or postural "components") that resembled everyday situations. We distinguished a "cognitive" component (answering serial questions) from largely "motor" components (standing up, sitting down, turning around, walking, avoiding obstacles, and touching the floor). Four additional components included carrying an empty or loaded tray, wearing shoes with slippery soles and reduced illumination. These components were combined to yield eight separate tasks of increasing complexity that were executed sequentially. The first and simplest task consisted of standing up, undisturbed walking, turning around and sitting down. For each of the next tasks, a new component was added to the earlier and otherwise identical task. All components within each task had to be performed simultaneously. Errors were defined as Hesitations (slowed performance) or Blocks (complete cessation), which were scored separately for execution of motor and cognitive components. Speed of performance was not stressed, but was measured for all tasks. The MTT was administered to 50 young healthy subjects (mean age 27.6 years) and 13 elderly subjects (mean age 62.0 years). To study learning effects, 20 different young subjects (mean age 21.0 years) received the MTT in order of gradually decreasing complexity. For subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty, 62% in both age groups performed all eight tasks without any Errors in the motor components. Among those making Errors, the proportion of subjects that made motor Errors increased significantly as the tasks became more complex (F(1,7)=2.66, P<0.05). This increase differed across the two groups (significant interaction of Group by Task; F(1,7)=3.07, P=0.01) because more elderly subjects produced motor Errors during the most complex tasks. Cognitive Errors increased even more than motor Errors with task complexity, and this increase was most pronounced in young subjects (significant interaction of Group by Error Type by Task; F(1,1,7)=3.85, P=0.001). Only eight young (16%) and four elderly subjects (30.8%) performed the MTT without any motor or cognitive Errors, again suggesting that more young subjects made cognitive Errors. Among subjects who received the MTT in reverse order, motor errors were more common than among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing complexity (F(1,7)=5.90, P<0.05), particularly during the two most difficult tasks. The elderly performed all tasks slower than the young subjects. We conclude that the MTT is a new balance test based upon a multiple task design that resembles everyday situations. Performance by healthy subjects revealed interesting insights into normal postural strategies. For complex postural tasks, healthy subjects favour execution of motor components over execution of a cognitive component ("posture first" strategy). Young subjects were more inclined than elderly subjects to use this strategy. Motor learning influenced performance among subjects who received the MTT in order of increasing difficulty. Further studies must determine whether the MTT can be used to evaluate balance disorders.

Accidental Falls↗