PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

VG Tsirelson

Publications and source records attributed to VG Tsirelson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Extracting charge density distributions from diffraction data: a model study on urea

The quality of the extraction of electron density distributions by means of a multipole refinement method is investigated. Structure factors of the urea crystal have been obtained from an electron density distribution (EDD) resulting from a density function calculation with the CRYSTAL95 package. To account for the thermal motion of the atoms, the stockholder-partioned densities of the atoms have been convoluted with thermal smearing functions, which were obtained from a neutron diffraction experiment. A POP multipole refinement yielded a good fit, R = 0.6%. This disagreement factor is based on magnitudes only. Comparison with the original structure factors gave a disagreement of 0.8% owing to differences in magnitude and phase. The fitted EDD still showed all the characteristics of the interaction density. After random errors corresponding to the experimental situation were added to the structure factors, the refinement was repeated. The fit was R = 1.1%. This time the resulting interaction density was heavily deformed. Repetition with another set of random errors from the same distribution yielded a widely different interaction density distribution. The conclusion is that interaction densities cannot be obtained from X-ray diffraction data on non-centrosymmetric crystals.

Journal Article↗

Electron-density-based calculations of intermolecular energy: case of urea.

The intermolecular interaction energy in crystalline urea has been calculated both from diffraction data and from the Hartree-Fock crystalline electron-density distribution, using a modified atom-atom approximation scheme. The electrostatic part of this energy has been calculated from the atomic multipole moments, obtained by adjustment of the multipole model to experimental X-ray and to theoretical Hartree-Fock structure amplitudes. To obtain the induction energy, multipole moments were calculated from structure amplitudes for the crystalline electron density and from those that refer to the electron density of a superposition of isolated molecules. This worked well for the calculation of the interaction energy from Hartree-Fock data (6% difference from the sublimation-energy value), but not for the interaction energy from experimental data, where the moments of the superposition have to come from Hartree-Fock calculations: the two sets of multipole moments are far too different. The uncertainty of the phases of the structure amplitudes, combined with systematic errors in the theoretical data and noise in the experimental values, may account for the discrepancies. The nature of the different contributions to intermol-ecular interactions for urea is examined.

Journal Article↗