PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Vaia Lestou

Publications and source records attributed to Vaia Lestou.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex.

The way in which input noise perturbs the behavior of a system depends on the internal processing structure of the system. In visual psychophysics, there is a long tradition of using external noise methods (i.e., adding noise to visual stimuli) as tools for system identification. Here, we demonstrate that external noise affects processing of visual scenes at different cortical areas along the human ventral visual pathway, from retinotopic regions to higher occipitotemporal areas implicated in visual shape processing. We found that when the contrast of the stimulus was held constant, the further away from the retinal input a cortical area was the more its activity, as measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), depended on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the visual stimulus. A similar pattern of results was observed when trials with correct and incorrect responses were analyzed separately. We interpret these findings by extending signal detection theory to fMRI data analysis. This approach reveals the sequential ordering of decision stages in the cortex by exploiting the relation between fMRI response and stimulus SNR. In particular, our findings provide novel evidence that occipitotemporal areas in the ventral visual pathway form a cascade of decision stages with increasing degree of signal uncertainty and feature invariance.

Adult↗

Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion.

It is often claimed that point-light displays provide sufficient information to easily recognize properties of the actor and action being performed. We examined this claim by obtaining estimates of human efficiency in the categorization of movement. We began by recording a database of three-dimensional human arm movements from 13 males and 13 females that contained multiple repetitions of knocking, waving and lifting movements done both in an angry and a neutral style. Point-light displays of each individual for all of the six different combinations were presented to participants who were asked to judge the gender of the model in Experiment 1 and the affect in Experiment 2. To obtain estimates of efficiency, results of human performance were compared to the output of automatic pattern classifiers based on artificial neural networks designed and trained to perform the same classification task on the same movements. Efficiency was expressed as the squared ratio of human sensitivity (d') to neural network sensitivity (d'). Average results for gender recognition showed a proportion correct of 0.51 and an efficiency of 0.27%. Results for affect recognition showed a proportion correct of 0.71 and an efficiency of 32.5%. These results are discussed in the context of how different cues inform the recognition of movement style.

Affect↗