PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Venkatesh Srinivasa

Publications and source records attributed to Venkatesh Srinivasa.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Doxepin by topical application and intrathecal route in rats.

The tricyclic antidepressant, doxepin, has been reported to be a potent local anesthetic in rat sciatic nerve blockade. We hypothesized that topical doxepin has significantly longer antinociception compared with control and intrathecally compared with bupivacaine. Solutions of 0.3 mL of doxepin at 50, 75, and 100 mM and control (only the vehicle solution) were applied as a patch to the shaved dorsal skin of rats. After a 2-h contact interval, the patch was removed, and the rats were tested by three sets of six pinpricks. Inhibition of withdrawal to pain and cutaneous trunci muscle reflex were graded. In the second investigation, 60 muL of doxepin at 10, 20, and 50 mM was injected through intrathecal catheters implanted in the lumbar region of rats, which were evaluated for motor function, proprioception, and nociception. Topical doxepin at concentrations of 75 mM and 100 mM was significantly more effective than control (P < 0.05). Complete recovery for the 100-mM concentration occurred at 60 h, although two of five rats demonstrated erythema and scarring. Intrathecally, 20 mM of doxepin was not significantly different for motor and proprioceptive function from 23 mM (0.75%) bupivacaine; however, neurotoxicity (defined as persistent neurological deficit) commenced at 50 mM.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

Capnometry in the spontaneously breathing patient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Capnography has been used in the operating room by anesthesiologists for over a decade. Along with pulse oximetry, it has reduced anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, capnography has been used to confirm the placement of the endotracheal tube. This review looks into the literature for an update on the use of capnography in the spontaneously breathing patient. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies support the additional safety afforded by the use of capnography in patients undergoing sedation for procedures in various situations outside the operating room. Capnography has been used as an aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and sleep-related disorders, as a continuous monitor of metabolic status of pediatric patients with diabetic ketoacidosis and, along with pulse oximetry, in lung-function laboratories to estimate blood gases. SUMMARY: Capnography has become a mandatory or recommended monitoring tool in the practice of anesthesiology. It is making inroads into other medical specialties as a monitoring and diagnostic tool. The use of this technology by non-anesthesiologists will continue to increase. In the opinion of the authors capnography should be used in all cases requiring sedation either in or out of the operating room.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of differential blockade by amitriptyline and its N-methyl derivative in different species by different routes.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the duration of local anesthesia and/or creating greater differential blockade (i.e., selective block of pain-transmitting nerve fibers) has been attempted by modifying currently available agents. Most drugs show a different profile depending on the model or species studied. This study was designed to investigate the differential nerve-blocking properties of amitriptyline and its quaternary ammonium derivative in rats and sheep. METHODS: The Na+ channel-blocking properties of N-methyl amitriptyline were determined with the patch clamp technique in cultured GH(3) cells. Various functions (motor, nociception, proprioception-ataxia) were compared in rats (spinal and sciatic nerve blockade) and sheep (spinal blockade) with amitriptyline, N-methyl amitriptyline, lidocaine, and bupivacaine (partially from historical data). RESULTS: In vitro testing revealed N-methyl amitriptyline to be a potent Na+ channel blocker similar to amitriptyline but with a much longer duration of action. All drug concentrations tested in both the sciatic nerve model and the spinal block model produced no significant differential blockade in rats. Three of six rats in the 20-mM N-methyl amitriptyline group showed residual blockade 4 days after sciatic nerve injection. However, in the sheep spinal model, amitriptyline and in particular N-methyl amitriptyline displayed significant differential blockade at most time points. Sheep data for lidocaine and bupivacaine seemed to be more comparable to the clinical experience in humans than did rat data. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and N-methyl amitriptyline are potent Na+ channel blockers and show greater differential blockade in sheep than in rats. This differential blockade in sheep is greater than that produced by lidocaine or bupivacaine.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2003

Cutaneous analgesia after transdermal application of amitriptyline versus lidocaine in rats.

UNLABELLED: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has potent local anesthetic properties. However, there is no report of cutaneous analgesic effects after transdermal application. We report here that transdermally applied amitriptyline is more potent than lidocaine in providing cutaneous analgesia in rats. Solutions of amitriptyline base in 50, 100, and 500 mM concentrations were applied as a patch to rats, and their effects were compared with those of lidocaine base at the same concentrations and of the vehicle alone (45% water, 45% isopropyl alcohol, and 10% glycerin). Rats in each test group developed a concentration-dependent cutaneous analgesic block in the areas to which the drugs were applied; however, amitriptyline produced a longer block than lidocaine at the same concentration. The development of amitriptyline as a longer-lasting topical analgesic may improve our ability to treat chronic pain, such as neuropathic pain and neuralgia, and to prevent pain in procedures such as venipuncture. IMPLICATIONS: The tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, often used perorally for the management of chronic pain, is shown here to be more potent than lidocaine in providing cutaneous analgesia when applied transdermally with an occlusive dressing in rats.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2003

The relative toxicity of amitriptyline, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine administered as rapid infusions in rats.

UNLABELLED: Intravascular injection of local anesthetics carries the risk of cardiovascular (CV) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic potency that is more than that of bupivacaine. In this study, we compared the CV and CNS toxicity of the local anesthetics bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with that of amitriptyline. Twenty-nine Sprague-Dawley rats had their right external jugular vein and carotid artery cannulated under general anesthesia. On Day 2, rats were sedated with midazolam (0.375 mg/kg intraperitoneally) and received rapid infusions of either 1) bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or amitriptyline at 2 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (5 mg/mL concentration) or 2) normal saline (400 micro L x kg(-1) x min(-1)) through an external jugular vein cannula. Electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure were measured until the dose to cause impending death was reached (heart rate 50 bpm/asystole or apnea for >30 s). The mean dose required to cause apnea and impending death was significantly larger for amitriptyline (74.0 +/- 21 mg/kg and 74.5 +/- 21 mg/kg, respectively) than for levobupivacaine (32.2 +/- 20 mg/kg and 33.9 +/- 22 mg/kg, respectively) or bupivacaine (21.5 +/- 7 mg/kg and 22.7 +/- 7 mg/kg, respectively) (P < 0.05). A significantly larger dose of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, is required to cause CV and CNS toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic properties and is more potent than bupivacaine. Significantly larger doses of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, are required to cause cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Topical amitriptyline in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The antidepressant amitriptyline is used as an adjuvant in the treatment of a variety of chronic pain conditions. This drug interacts with many receptors and ion channels, such as Na+ channels. In a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial, we investigated whether amitriptyline also is capable of providing cutaneous analgesia when applied topically in 14 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Amitriptyline hydrochloride was prepared as a 45% water/45% isopropanol/10% glycerin solution and titrated to pH 8.5 with sodium hydroxide. Four areas, 2 on each arm, of approximately 1 cm(2) each were marked on the ventral aspect of the upper arm. A piece of gauze, placed on each of the marked areas and affixed to the arm with an occlusive plastic dressing, was saturated via syringe with placebo and amitriptyline solutions (10 mmol/L, 50 mmol/L, and 100 mmol/L). After 1 hour, the dressings and gauze were removed. A 16-G blunt needle was used to grade the pain at the marked area once per hour (1 = complete analgesia, 10 = normal pain sensation). RESULTS: The analgesic effects of 50 mmol/L and 100 mmol/L solutions of amitriptyline were significantly higher than those of the placebo or the 10 mmol/L solution. However, no significant difference was found between the analgesia provided by the placebo solution versus the 10 mmol/L solution or between the 50 mmol/L versus the 100 mmol/L solution. The only side effect observed was a concentration-dependent redness of the skin. CONCLUSIONS: Topically applied amitriptyline is effective as an analgesic in humans. Different vehicles may improve its efficacy and decrease the skin redness observed.

Administration, Cutaneous↗