PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Verna Mai

Publications and source records attributed to Verna Mai.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a screened population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: A recent SEER study identified significant variations in the care of women with DCIS, yet several potential confounding variables were not included. We report a patterns of care study of women with DCIS to better understand the gap between evidence-based knowledge and the management of DCIS. METHODS: We studied all cases of DCIS diagnosed through the Ontario Breast Screening Program from 1991 to 2000. Data was obtained by database linkage and chart abstraction. A logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations to adjust for clustering was used. RESULTS: About 320,236 women were screened and 727 individuals were diagnosed with DCIS. The rate of mastectomy was 30% and was associated with multifocality (OR: 3.5 [1.7, 7.1], P = 0.0005), tumor size (OR: >2 cm vs. 1 cm (OR: 2.4 [1.3, 4.4], P = 0.006). Half of cases with margins <1 cm did not receive XRT. CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates previous reports on the persistent rates of mastectomy and axillary nodal dissection and the limited use of XRT in the treatment of DCIS.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2006

Performance measures from 10 years of breast screening in the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990/91 to 2000.

Performance measures for the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) by age group, time period and screening modality from 10 years of breast screening were evaluated. Data were available from routine information collected on 283,962 women aged 50 to 69 screened at 73 screening centres between 1 July 1990 and 31 December 2000. Although, initially, participation in the OBSP was low, this rate increased over time and the majority of women screened returned for subsequent screening. Abnormal call rates increased slightly over the time period, were higher in women aged 50 to 59, and for women with mammographic abnormalities. Detection rates of invasive cancer were higher and prognostic features of cancers were better for women age 60 to 69, and those referred by mammography. Along with the prognostic features of cancers, the benign to malignant surgical ratio and diagnostic interval improved over the time periods and for women aged 60 to 69. Greater proportions of women had shorter diagnostic intervals and were more likely to have a diagnosis of breast cancer after surgery if they were referred by both clinical breast examination and mammography. Although some enhancements of the programme are necessary, the OBSP met or exceeded Canadian targets for most performance measures.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Report of the 2003 pan-Canadian forum on cervical cancer prevention and control.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations on the delivery of cervical cancer screening, human papillomavirus (HPV) education, HPV testing, and the optimal tool for cervical cytology within the Canadian health system. PARTICIPANTS: Leading up to a forum held in Ottawa on November 21 and 22, 2003, 254 registrants reviewed position papers through a Web-based discussion group. Experts in program management, clinical practice, epidemiology, public health, economics, and women's health, representing 48 organizations, then participated in the 2-day forum to develop consensus recommendations. EVIDENCE: Writing groups prepared position papers on optimal methods for cervical cytology; education concerning HPV; HPV testing in primary screening; HPV testing as a triage tool in cytopathology; and delivery mechanisms for cervical screening. Systematic reviews were the primary source of evidence supplemented by literature searches. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Feedback from Web-based discussions was incorporated into consecutive drafts of position papers. At the forum, recommendations and supporting evidence were presented, further debated in small-group sessions, and discussed in a plenary session. Despite divergent professional mandates and opinions, consensus was achieved on 15 recommendations across all areas. Final recommendations were posted to the Web for further input and circulated for written consensus by participants. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations cover the use of new evidence and technologies in cervical cancer prevention in Canada and provide a framework for provision of HPV education, planning the implementation of new cervical screening technologies in Canada, the development of evaluation plans, and new research areas.

Canada↗
PubMed2003

Socioeconomic status & returning for a second screen in the Ontario breast screening program.

In a retrospective cohort study involving 57902 women initially screened between January 1, 1995 and December 31 1997 by the Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP), we examined the relationship between geographically derived socioeconomic status (SES) and returning for a second screen. We controlled for age, rurality, preferred language, initial mammography results, previous mammography history, and referral by a health professional. Although SES was related to returning, rurality was an effect modifier of this relationship, a finding not previously reported. Compared to women in the highest ('richest') quintile, urban women in the first and second quintile were less likely to return; this relationship was not found in rural women. Low SES women, particularly in urban areas, should be specifically targeted to increase their likelihood of re-attendance for breast cancer screening within an organized program.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of papanicolaou (Pap) test rates across Ontario and factors associated with cervical screening.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains a significant yet preventable disease despite the widespread availability of Pap test screening, which detects cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. The aims of this study were to: i) estimate and compare age- and hysterectomy-adjusted Pap test rates across the 37 Ontario public health units (PHUs), and ii) explore the association between several factors and Pap test rates (at the ecological level). METHODS: Cytobase, an Ontario Pap test registry, captures more than 80% of all Pap tests in Ontario. Cytobase was used to determine Pap test rates adjusted for age, hysterectomy and Cytobase coverage for the year 2001. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between Pap test rates and various factors at an ecological level, RESULTS: Age-, hysterectomy- and Cytobase-adjusted one-year Pap rates ranged from 11.6% to 73.9% among PHUs. The overall rate for Ontario was 40.7%. Multivariate analyses indicated that the presence of a teaching hospital was associated with higher Pap test rates. CONCLUSION: One-year Pap test rates varied greatly across the 37 public health units in Ontario. Pap test rates determined using Cytobase were lower than self-reported rates obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey, possibly due to "over-reporting". In general, women were not screened as frequently as recommended by the Ontario Cervical Screening Program. A positive association was observed between Pap test rates and the presence of a teaching hospital. Data quality issues limit the ability to monitor cervical screening. A provincial registry would address these issues.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of screening result on waiting times to assessment and breast cancer diagnosis: results from the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: The effect of severity of screening result on delays to diagnosis has primarily been examined for mammographic abnormalities. This study will examine delays to assessment and diagnosis for women with an abnormal mammogram compared to women with an abnormal clinical breast examination (CBE) or abnormal CBE and mammogram. METHODS: Using data routinely collected by Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP), 12,675 women aged 50 to 69 with an abnormal screening result between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000 were followed prospectively to the completion of their assessment process. Median waiting times from abnormal screen to first assessment procedure and diagnosis were compared by modality of referral and among women with a breast cancer diagnosis by prognostic features. RESULTS: The median waiting time to first assessment and to diagnosis was significantly longer for women with only a clinical abnormality compared to women with a mammographic abnormality. In addition, women diagnosed with cancers of larger size had longer delays when the abnormality was detected only clinically. However, women referred by both modalities had significantly shorter waiting times to first assessment procedure and to diagnosis of poor prognosis cancers compared to women referred by mammography alone. INTERPRETATION: Women with an abnormal CBE and mammogram are assessed more promptly and have shorter diagnostic times. However, women with only a CBE abnormality had delays to diagnosis as a result of longer waiting times to first assessment procedure. Integration of the OBSP with assessment centres should improve times to diagnosis irrespective of modality of referral.

Aged↗