PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Victor J Marder

Publications and source records attributed to Victor J Marder.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

History of hypertension and enhanced thrombogenic activity in postinfarction patients.

Hypertension is a risk factor for coronary thrombosis and death in cardiac patients mediated in part by endothelial damage or dysfunction and increased thrombogenicity. However, there are no data regarding the association between hypertension and thrombogenic activity in stable patients after myocardial infarction and limited data about the prognostic significance of thrombogenic factors in hypertensive patients after infarction. Therefore, levels of thrombogenic, lipid, and inflammatory factors were measured 2 months after an acute myocardial infarction in 461 hypertensive and 582 nonhypertensive patients. Thrombogenic factors included d-dimer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, von Willebrand factor, factor VII, and factor VIIa. Lipid variables included cholesterol (total, HDL, LDL), triglyceride, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein-A1, and apolipoprotein-B. The prognostic significance of these factors for predicting cardiac events during a 2-year follow-up was evaluated in hypertensive and nonhypertensive patients. In comparison with nonhypertensive patients, those with hypertension had higher levels of d-dimer (607 versus 453 mg/L, P<0.001), fibrinogen (3.64 versus 3.43 g/L, P<0.001), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (29.7 versus 27.3 ng/mL, P=0.01), von Willebrand factor (159 versus 141 IU/dL; P<0.001), and higher levels of inflammatory markers (hsCRP and SAA). In multivariate analysis after adjustment for clinical covariates, elevated d-dimer was the only factor independently associated with a history of hypertension (OR, 1.38, P=0.05). d-Dimer was associated with an increased risk of recurrent cardiac events in both hypertensive (hazard ratio=3.02, P=0.005) and nonhypertensive (hazard ratio=2.42, P=0.02) patients. Thus, patients after infarction with a history of hypertension have enhanced thrombogenic activity, which predisposes them to recurrent cardiac events.

Apolipoproteins↗
PubMed2002

Distinct dose-dependent effects of plasmin and TPA on coagulation and hemorrhage.

All thrombolytic agents in current clinical usage are plasminogen activators. Although effective, plasminogen activators uniformly increase the risk of bleeding complications, especially intracranial hemorrhage, and no laboratory test is applicable to avoid such bleeding. We report results of a randomized, blinded, dose-ranging comparison of tissue-type plasminogen activator (TPA) with a direct-acting thrombolytic agent, plasmin, in an animal model of fibrinolytic hemorrhage. This study focuses on the role of plasma coagulation factors in hemostatic competence. Plasmin at 4-fold, 6-fold, and 8-fold the thrombolytic dose (1 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent effect on coagulation, depleting antiplasmin activity completely, then degrading fibrinogen and factor VIII. However, even with complete consumption of antiplasmin and decreases in fibrinogen and factor VIII to 20% of initial activity, excessive bleeding did not occur. Bleeding occurred only at 8-fold the thrombolytic dose, on complete depletion of fibrinogen and factor VIII, manifest as prolonged primary bleeding, but with minimal effect on stable hemostatic sites. Although TPA had minimal effect on coagulation, hemostasis was disrupted in a dose-dependent manner, even at 25% of the thrombolytic dose (1 mg/kg), manifest as rebleeding from hemostatically stable ear puncture sites. Plasmin degrades plasma fibrinogen and factor VIII in a dose-dependent manner, but it does not disrupt hemostasis until clotting factors are completely depleted, at an 8-fold higher dose than is needed for thrombolysis. Plasmin has a 6-fold margin of safety, in contrast with TPA, which causes hemorrhage at thrombolytic dosages.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Use of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: effects of gender and age on treatment rates.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been efforts to increase the utilization of thrombolytic therapy, there are still many patients who might benefit from this treatment who do not receive it. Women and the elderly have been particularly undertreated, despite evidence that their survival can be improved with thrombolysis. This study was undertaken to determine the relative rates of treatment of women vs. men and the elderly vs. younger subjects and to examine factors that might explain differences in treatment frequency. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective study of patients who presented to the Emergency Departments of four local hospitals in 1993 and 1994 with evidence for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Demographic data, past medical history, information on co-morbid illnesses, and times to hospital arrival, first electrocardiogram, physician notification, and thrombolytic therapy were recorded as was survival to hospital discharge. Data for patients who did or did not receive thrombolytic therapy were compared. Men were treated more frequently in both tertiary and community hospitals. Women were older, but within each age bracket, men were treated more often. The time of arrival was similar for men and women, but men who arrived within 6 hours or 6-12 hours after pain onset were treated at a higher rate than women. For patients without contraindications, treatment was not affected by gender or age. However, treatment rates decreased with increased prevalence of exclusionary factors, and since both women and the elderly tended to have more such factors, elderly women were treated at a markedly lower rate. The single clinical factor that increased thrombolytic usage in women compared to men was a history of prior myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Despite convincing evidence that thrombolytic therapy is beneficial in women and the elderly, these groups have been relatively neglected unless attention is called to clinical risk, for example, by history of prior myocardial infarction.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2002

Towards safer thrombolytic therapy.

Plasminogen activators (PA) are unique agents that are currently applied as thrombolytic therapy to achieve rapid vascular reperfusion. Regimens of PA plus anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs have attained a high degree of sophistication and predictable rates of positive clinical outcomes for acute myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and thrombosed catheters. Included in the repertoire are newly approved mutants of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), which have biochemical advantages that allow for bolus administration. Yet, despite tremendous effort devoted to enormous trials to establish the clinical efficacy of these agents in acute MI, mortality results are not superior to those with native TPA or streptokinase (SK). Furthermore, all PAs have the potential for hemorrhagic complication, most critically intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), occurring in 0.9% of patients treated with native or mutant TPA. It is possible that a limit of clinical effectiveness has been reached, beyond which more potent PAs do not achieve greater benefit without a serious increase in risk of bleeding. A breakthrough is possible, however, if the risk of ICH could be avoided. One solution is the application of the direct-acting thrombolytic enzyme, plasmin. While intravenous plasmin is not effective when administered systemically, regional infusion to a thrombus induces local thrombolysis. Unlike the PAs, plasmin treatment should not cause hemorrhage from vascular trauma sites, as it is neutralized by antiplasmin in the blood. Animal studies are fully consistent with this approach, which offers potential for achieving a truly regional thrombolytic treatment.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗