PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Victor T Chang

Publications and source records attributed to Victor T Chang.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Clinical relevance of fatigue levels in cancer patients at a Veterans Administration Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: The correlation of fatigue levels with functional interference, symptom distress, and quality of life may help determine clinically significant fatigue levels. METHODS: One hundred eighty consecutive patients with cancer completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) General and Fatigue subscales (FACT-G and FACT-F, respectively), the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), the Depression Scale (Zung), and the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). The Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was determined for each patient. Multivariate analyses of variance were performed to compare fatigue models with different cut-off points to categorize fatigue levels. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the association between fatigue severity and survival. RESULTS: Increased fatigue levels were associated with greater symptom distress and decreased quality of life. A model with usual fatigue cut-off points of 0 (no fatigue), 1-2 (mild fatigue), 3-6 (moderate fatigue), and 7-10 (severe fatigue) was optimal in relation to functional interference items (Wilks lambda, 0.36; F = 11.61; P < 0.0001), symptom distress scores (Wilks lambda, 0.52; F = 10.41; P < 0.0001), and quality-of-life scores (Wilks lambda, 0.50; F = 0.50; P < 0.0001). Fatigue severity predicted survival in univariate analysis (chi-square test, 25.42; P < 0.0001). The KPS, stage of disease, and number of symptoms independently predicted survival in patients with fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant fatigue levels are correlated with symptom and quality-of-life measurements. Patients with a usual fatigue severity > 3 or a worst fatigue severity > 4 on a 1-10 scale may require further assessment.

Adult↗

Dynamic cancer pain management outcomes: the relationship between pain severity, pain relief, functional interference, satisfaction and global quality of life over time.

To examine the relationship between different cancer pain management outcomes over time, 74 patients with the worst cancer related pain rated as four or greater on an 11-point numeric scale were followed weekly with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the satisfaction questionnaire and global visual analogue scale quality of life (VASQOL) for 3 weeks. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed at weekly time points. The analyses indicated that pain outcomes can be categorized into separate QOL and satisfaction paths linked by the worst pain severity. In the QOL path, the worst pain severity predicted a pain interference score, which consistently predicted VASQOL. For the satisfaction path, independent predictors were pain relief at Week 1, and worst pain severity and changes in worst pain severity at Week 2. No variables predicted satisfaction at Week 3. The data suggest that satisfaction and quality of life may be independent outcomes of pain management. The timing of assessment may itself be important.

Adult↗

Development of a cancer pain prognostic scale.

The purpose of this study was to develop a Cancer Pain Prognostic Scale (CPPS) which could predict the likelihood of pain relief within 2 weeks for cancer patients with moderate to severe pain. Seventy-four (74) consecutive patients who presented with cancer-related pain were managed in accordance with the guidelines for pain management developed by the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Patients were followed weekly using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and medications were recorded weekly for 3 weeks. Baseline scores from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G), Mental Health Inventory (MHI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) at initial interview served as explanatory variables in a logistic regression model. Pain relief > or = 80% at the end of weeks 1 and 2 were used as outcomes in this model. From this analysis, we developed a predictive formula, the CPPS, which includes the worst pain severity, FACT-G emotional well being, daily opioid dose, and pain characteristics. The rule yields a numerical score that ranges from 0-17. Higher scores correspond to a higher probability of good pain relief. The CPPS has the potential to rapidly identify patients with poor pain prognosis. It can be used as a research tool to characterize pain in cancer patients.

Adult↗

Longitudinal documentation of cancer pain management outcomes: a pilot study at a VA medical center.

We measured pain outcomes in a cohort of patients with cancer pain in a general hematology/oncology setting at a Veterans Administration Medical center (VA). The outcomes included pain relief, pain severity, changes in pain severity, interference scores, symptom distress, quality of life (QOL), and satisfaction. Seventy-four (74) consecutive patients with worst cancer-related pain equal to or greater than 4/10 were recruited. Cancer pain diagnoses were made and the cancer pain management guidelines of the United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research were followed. Patients were followed weekly using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), medication diary, satisfaction questionnaire, visual analogue quality of life scale (VASQOL) and record of side effects for 3 weeks. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) and Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF) were used at initial and final interviews. The mean initial worst pain severity was 8.3 (range 4-10) and mean pain relief was 40% (range 0-100). By week 1, the majority of patients achieved pain relief of >/=80%, with a corresponding decrease in worst pain severity and pain interference scores. Pain continued to decrease over three weeks. At week 3, there was a significant improvement in the MSAS-SF psychological symptom distress subscale (P = 0.02). The average number of opioid-related side effects was 5 and remained steady over time. Most patients felt "quite a bit" or "very much" satisfied at all weeks. There was a significant improvement in VASQOL (P < 0.005) and in FACTG SUMQOL scores (P = 0.007). This experience demonstrates that cancer pain management can result in measurable and significant changes in pain relief, pain severity, pain interference scores, psychological symptom distress, and QOL scores.

Adult↗

Neurokinin receptors: relevance to the emerging immune system.

The adult bone marrow (BM )is the major site of the emerging immune system. Hematopoiesis is the process whereby immune cells are generated from a finite number of hematopoietic stem cells. Hematopoiesis is regulated by soluble mediators and inter cellular interactions. A major regulatory mechanism of hematopoiesis involves bidirectional crosstalk with the neural system. This communication mainly occurs by the release of neurotransmitters from innervated fibers. The neurotransmitters interact with specific receptors on BM resident cells and release other hematopoietic regulators such as cytokines. Together, the neurotransmitters and cytokines form a complex network to regulate hematopoiesis. Among BM resident cells, the stromal cells are particularly relevant for two reasons:1) they represent non-neural sources of neurotransmitters, and 2) stromal cells express specific receptors for neurotransmitters. This review focuses on the hematopoietic effects of neurotransmitters belonging to the tachykinins. The two major tachykinins focused in this review are substance P and neurokinin (NK)-A,11 and 10 amino acid peptides. In BM, the tachykinins interact with two major NK receptors:NK-1 and NK-2. These two receptors appear to limit tachykinin-mediated effects on hematopoiesis. The central roles of NK receptors within a network comprising of cytokines and tachykinins are reviewed.

Animals↗

The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT) Appetite Scale in veteran cancer patients.

Anorexia and appetite assessment is an important priority in supportive oncology. A series of 156 veterans participating in a hematology oncology service completed the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy (FAACT), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scale, the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF), and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and were followed for survival. The FAACT score correlated well with Karnofsky performance status, quality of life, and symptom distress subscales. A single appetite distress item from the MSAS-SF correlated well with these measures. Both appetite measures correlated with the presence of other symptoms and with concurrently measured hemoglobin, serum sodium, albumin, and cholesterol levels. These self-reported appetite measures were univariate predictors of survival and contributed additional prognostic information to data related to weight-loss distress. In a smaller study, the FAACT score correlated with a visual analogue measure of appetite and with the North Center Cancer Treatment Group appetite instrument. These data support use of these tools for the evaluation of appetite concerns among patients with advanced cancer.

Adult↗