PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Victor W Fazio

Publications and source records attributed to Victor W Fazio.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)--a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic sepsis is known to cause a detrimental outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study was to examine potential factors associated with failure in managing pelvic sepsis after IPAA. METHODS: We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis on 2518 IPAA patients between 1983 and 2005. Failure was defined as pouch failure, the need for a permanent ileostomy, or mortality as a result of sepsis. There were 157 patients (6.2%) with pelvic sepsis after IPAA. These involved anastomotic leak 34% (54/157) and fistula 25% (40/157). There were 5 mortalities related to sepsis. Mean age at surgery was 38.1 +/- 14.4 years and mean follow-up was 5.5 +/- 4.7 years. RESULTS: Pouches were saved in 75.8% patients. Univariate analysis identified early sepsis (P = .040), preoperative steroid use (P = .007), and need for percutaneous drainage (P = .004) as significant factors associated with treatment success. Factors associated with failure were hypertension (P = .026), hand-sewn anastomosis (P = .038), associated fistula (P = .0003), need for transanal drainage (P = .0002), need for laparotomy to control septic complications (P < .0001), delayed ileostomy closure (P = .0003), and need for a new diverting ileostomy (P < .0001). By using multivariate analysis with selected covariates, significant factors associated with failure were associated fistula (P = .0013), need for transanal drainage (P = .003), delayed ileostomy closure (P = .022), need for a new ileostomy diversion (P = .004), and hypertension (P = .039). We developed a predictive scoring system for failure to use in management plans and decision-making for the treatment of septic complications of IPAA. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic sepsis after IPAA has a significant impact on pouch failure. This predictive model for failure may play an important role in providing risk estimates for successful outcomes.

Abdominal Abscess↗
PubMed2006

Management of radiotherapy induced rectourethral fistula.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of men are being treated with BT or a combination of external beam radiation therapy and BT for localized prostate cancer. Although uncommon, the most severe complication following these procedures is RUF. We reviewed our recent experience with RUF following radiotherapy for prostate cancer to clarify treatment in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recently treated 22 men with RUF following primary radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate in 21 and adjuvant external beam radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy in 1. Time from the last radiation treatment to fistula presentation was 6 months to 20 years. RESULTS: Four patients underwent proctectomy with permanent fecal and urinary diversion. RUF repair in 5 patients was performed with preservation of fecal or urinary function. Six patients were candidates for reconstruction with preservation of urinary and rectal function, including 5 who underwent proctectomy, staged colo-anal pull-through and BMG repair of the urethral defect. The additional patient underwent primary closure of the rectum, BMG repair of the urethra and gracilis muscle interposition. Successful fistula closure was achieved in the 9 patients who underwent urethral reconstruction. All 8 candidates for rectal reconstruction showed radiological and clinical bowel integrity postoperatively with 2 awaiting final diverting stoma closure. CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing use of prostate BT the number of patients with severe rectal injury will likely continue to increase. Radiotherapy induced RUF carries significant morbidity and most patients are treated initially with fecal and urinary diversion. In properly selected patients good outcomes can be expected following repair using BMG for the urethral defect along with colo-anal pull-through or primary rectal repair and gracilis muscle interposition.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Using meta-analytical techniques, the study compared postoperative adverse events and functional outcomes of stapled versus hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following restorative proctocolectomy. BACKGROUND: The choice of mucosectomy and hand-sewn versus stapled pouch-anal anastomosis has been a subject of debate with no clear consensus as to which method provides better functional results and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Comparative studies published between 1988 and 2003, of hand-sewn versus stapled IPAA were included. Endpoints were classified into postoperative complications and functional and physiologic outcomes measured at least 3 months following closure of ileostomy or surgery if no proximal diversion was used, quality of life following surgery, and neoplastic transformation within the anal transition zone. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies, consisting of 4183 patients (2699 hand-sewn and 1484 stapled IPAA) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The incidence of nocturnal seepage and pad usage favored the stapled IPAA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, P < 0.001 and OR = 4.12, P = 0.007, respectively). The frequency of defecation was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.562), nor was the use of antidiarrheal medication (OR = 1.27, P = 0.422). Anorectal physiologic measurements demonstrated a significant reduction in the resting and squeeze pressure in the hand-sewn IPAA group by 13.4 and 14.4 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.018). The stapled IPAA group showed a higher incidence of dysplasia in the anal transition zone that did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.42, P = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques had similar early postoperative outcomes; however, stapled IPAA offered improved nocturnal continence, which was reflected in higher anorectal physiologic measurements. A risk of increased incidence of dysplasia in the ATZ may exist in the stapled group that cannot be quantified by this study. We describe a decision algorithm for the choice of IPAA, based on the relative risk of long-term neoplastic transformation.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2006

Risk factors for clinical phenotypes of Crohn's disease of the ileal pouch.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch can occur in patients with colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) originally performed for a preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. The clinical presentations of CD of the pouch are inflammatory, fibrostenotic, and fistulizing. Risk factors for clinical phenotypes of CD of the pouch have not been characterized. METHODS: A total of 78 eligible patients with CD of the pouch together with 294 nonselected non-CD patients with IPAA seen in the Pouchitis Clinic were enrolled, including 28 with inflammatory CD, 18 with fibrostenotic CD, and 32 with fistulizing CD. The clinical phenotypes of CD were diagnosed based on a combined assessment of clinical, endoscopic, radiographic, and histologic features. Three separate analyses were performed, and for each analysis, the outcome of interest was having one of the phenotypes versus not having it. A stepwise selection multivariable logistic regression analysis was used. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, the risk factor for inflammatory CD was higher afferent-limb endoscopy scores (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-2.27); the risk factors for fibrostenotic CD were higher afferent-limb (95% CI 1.81-3.48, HR 2.51) and higher cuff (95% CI 1.01-1.84, HR 1.36) endoscopy scores; and for fistulizing CD the risk factors were younger age (95% CI 0.93-0.99, HR 0.96), female gender (95% CI 1.35-6.97, HR 3.07), a preoperative diagnosis of indeterminate colitis (95% CI 1.72-9.34, HR 4.00), and no use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (95% CI 1.31-8.25, HR 3.28). CONCLUSIONS: Each of the three phenotypes of CD of the pouch was associated with certain risk factors, suggesting that each of these diseases has a different etiology and disease process. The identification and management of some of the modifiable risk factors may reduce CD-related morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Recurrence after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer: should we be concerned?

PURPOSE: Transanal excision is an appealing treatment for low rectal cancers because of its low morbidity, mortality, and better functional results than transabdominal procedures. However, controversy exists about whether it compromises the potential for cure. Several, recent reports of high recurrence rates after local excision prompted us to review our results of transanal excision alone in patients with T1 rectal cancers. METHODS: All patients with T1 low rectal cancer undergoing local excision alone between 1980 through 1998 were reviewed for local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free interval, results of salvage surgery, and overall and disease-free survival. Demographics, tumor size, distance from anal verge, and preoperative endoluminal ultrasound results also were recorded. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors, perineural or lymphovascular invasion, or with mucinous component were excluded. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent transanal excision during the study period. Five-year recurrence was estimated to be 29.38 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15.39-43.48). For 52 patients, five-year, cancer-specific and overall survival rates were 89 and 75 percent respectively. Fourteen of 15 patients with recurrence underwent salvage treatment with 56.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 35.2-90) five-year survival rate. Gender, preoperative staging by endorectal ultrasound, distance from the anal verge, tumor size, location, and T1 status discovered after transanal excision of a villous adenoma did not influence local recurrence or tumor-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal excision for T1 rectal tumors with low-grade malignancy has a high rate of recurrence. Although overall cancer survival rates might be regarded as satisfactory, this high recurrence and low salvage rate raises the issue about the role of transanal excision alone for early rectal cancer and the possible need for adjuvant therapy or increased role of resective surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Colonic surgery in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome: a case series.

PURPOSE: Juvenile polyposis syndrome is characterized by multiple hamartomatous polyps in the large intestine. When indicated, the surgical choices in symptomatic juvenile polyposis syndrome patients are colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or proctocolectomy with pouch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the surgical options in juvenile polyposis syndrome patients who present with symptomatic colonic polyps. METHODS: The charts of all juvenile polyposis syndrome patients who had had at least one colonic operation since 1953 in our institution were reviewed. The following data were abstracted: demographics, the number and site of the polyps, symptoms, the intervals and types of the colonic operation, follow-up, and the patients' current status. RESULTS: There were 13 patients (6 males) with a median age of 10 years (range, 1-50 years) at the time of diagnosis. Patients had colonic (n = 13), rectal (n = 12), and gastric (n = 6) polyps. Rectal bleeding (n = 11) was the most common presenting symptom. Three patients underwent proctectomy as the initial operation. Although a rectum-preserving operation was initially performed in ten patients, a subsequent proctectomy was required in five of them within a median of 9 years (range, 6-34 years). Therefore, eight patients had their rectum removed during the study period; five had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, one had a Koch pouch as a restorative surgery, and two had an end ileostomy. No relation was observed between the number of colonic and rectal polyps and the type of surgery or the need for proctectomy. Patients were followed up a median of 3 years (range, 2-24 years) after their ultimate operations. During this period, one patient (20 percent) who underwent restorative proctectomy and 4 patients (80 percent) whose rectums were preserved required multiple endoscopic polypectomies for recurrent polyps in the pouch (first patient) or their rectums (the other four patients). The patient who underwent the Koch procedure required surgery for recurrent polyps in her pouch. CONCLUSIONS: One-half of the patients who initially underwent rectal preservation required subsequent proctectomy. The number of colonic or rectal polyps does not influence the choice of the surgical procedure. Both restorative proctocolectomy and subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis need endoscopic follow-up because of the high recurrence rates of juvenile polyps in the remnant rectum or pouch.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗
PubMed2005

Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

PURPOSE: Routine use of a temporary loop ileostomy for diversion after restorative proctocolectomy is controversial because of reported morbidity associated with its creation and closure. This study intended to review our experience with loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy and determine the complication rates. In addition, complication rates between handsewn and stapled closures were compared. METHODS: Our Department Pelvic Pouch Database was queried and charts reviewed for all patients who had ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy from August 1983 to March 2002. RESULTS: A total of 1,504 patients underwent ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy during a 19-year period. The median length of hospitalization was three (range, 1-40) days and the overall complication rate was 11.4 percent. Complications included small-bowel obstruction (6.4 percent), wound infection (1.5 percent), abdominal septic complications (1 percent), and enterocutaneous fistulas (0.6 percent). Handsewn closure was performed in 1,278 patients (85 percent) and stapled closure in 226 (15 percent). No significant differences in complication rates and length of hospitalization were found between handsewn and stapled closure techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy can be achieved with a low morbidity and a short hospitalization stay. In addition, we found that complication rates and length of hospitalization were similar between handsewn and stapled closures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Quality of life, functional outcome, and complications of coloplasty pouch after low anterior resection.

PURPOSE: The colonic J-pouch has been used to improve bowel function in patients undergoing low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. However, a narrow pelvis, difficulties in reach, a long anal canal with prominent sphincters, or a fatty mesentery may turn this technique into a technically challenging procedure in certain patients. In these circumstances, "coloplasty" offers an alternative to a straight anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life, functional outcome, and complications between patients undergoing coloplasty, colonic J-pouch, or straight anastomosis. METHODS: Altogether, 162 patients who underwent coloanal or low colorectal anastomosis between 1998 and 2001 were studied. Data collected included demographics, length of follow-up, technique and type of anastomosis, complications, quality of life, and functional outcome. Results were analyzed according to use of a coloplasty (n = 69), colonic J-pouch (n = 43), or straight anastomosis (n = 50). The choice of the technique was based on the surgeon's preference. Usually coloplasty or straight anastomosis was favored in male patients with a narrow pelvis or when a handsewn anastomosis was used. RESULTS: Quality of life assessment with the short form-36 questionnaire revealed better scores in coloplasty and colonic J-pouch groups. The coloplasty (1.0 +/- 1.7) and colonic J-pouch (1.0 +/- 1.2) groups had fewer night bowel movements than the straight anastomosis group (1.5 +/- 2.0) (P < 0.05). The coloplasty group also had fewer bowel movements per day than the straight anastomosis group (3.8 +/- 2.9 vs. 4.8 +/- 3.6; P < 0.05); also, less clustering and less antidiarrheal medication use were observed than in the straight anastomosis group. Colonic J-pouch patients with handsewn anastomosis had a higher anastomotic leak rate (44 percent) than the patients in the coloplasty with handsewn anastomosis group (3.6 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Coloplasty seems to be a safe, effective technique for improving the outcome of low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. It is especially applicable when a colonic J-pouch anastomosis is technically difficult.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy.

PURPOSE: The benefits of early postoperative recovery, reduced postoperative pain, pulmonary dysfunction, and hospitalization after laparoscopic colectomy may improve outcome over open colectomy in obese patients. This case-matched study compares outcomes after open and laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: A total of 94 laparoscopic colectomy patients with a body mass index >30 (Jan 1999-June 2003) were identified from a prospective database and matched to open colectomy cases for age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, procedure, indication, and date of surgery. Operating time, length of stay, conversion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, reoperation, 30-day readmission rate, and costs were compared. Data are presented as means +/- standard deviations, and appropriate statistical tests were used. RESULTS: The two groups were matched for age (P = 0.06), gender (P = 1), American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.2), body mass index (P = 0.4), indication for surgery (P = 1), and procedure (P = 1). By using intention-to-treat-type analysis, there was no difference in median operating time (100 vs. 110 (mean, 123 vs. 112) minutes; P = 0.1), complications (21 vs. 24 percent; P = 0.74), readmission (17 vs. 10.6 percent; P = 0.3), reoperation rates (6.4 vs. 4.3 percent; P = 0.75), or direct costs (median, US. 3,368 dollars vs. US 3,552 dollars; mean, US 4,003 dollars vs. US 4,037 dollars; P = 0.14) between laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy; however, the median length of stay (3 vs. 5.5 (mean, 3.8 vs. 5.8) days; P = 0.0001) was significantly shorter after laparoscopic colectomy. Twenty-eight patients required conversion for adhesions (n = 11), bleeding (n = 3), obesity-hindering vision or dissection (n = 9), large phlegmon or tumor (n = 4), and ureteric injury (n = 1). The mean operating time for conversions was 142 minutes and length of stay was 6.4 days. Compared with laparoscopically completed cases, the median length of stay (5 vs. 2 (mean, 6.4 vs. 2.8) days; P = 0.0001) and median operating times (150 vs. 95 (mean, 142 vs. 115) minutes; P = 0.02) were significantly higher in the converted group, but there was no difference in the complication (P = 0.8), readmission (P = 1), or reoperation (P = 0.7) rates. Compared with open colectomy, the operating time (P = 0.02) was significantly higher in the converted group but there were no significant differences in the length of stay (P = 0.18), complication (P = 1), readmission (P = 0.35), or reoperative (P = 1) rates. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colectomy can be performed safely in obese patients, with shorter postoperative recovery than that with open colectomy. Although obesity is associated with a high conversion rate, outcome in these converted cases is comparable to the matched open cases.

Body Mass Index↗
PubMed2005

Vaginal delivery after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a word of caution.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the impact of childbirth on anal sphincter integrity and function, functional outcome, and quality of life in females with restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: The patients who had at least one live birth after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were asked to return for a comprehensive assessment. They were asked to complete the following questionnaires: the Short Form-36, Cleveland Global Quality of Life scale, American Society of Colorectal Surgeons fecal incontinence severity index, and time trade-off method. Additionally, anal sphincter integrity (endosonography) and manometric pressures were measured by a medical physician blinded to the delivery technique. Anal sphincter physiology also was evaluated with electromyography and pudendal nerve function by nerve terminal motor latency technique. RESULTS: Of 110 eligible females who had at least one live birth after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 57 participated in the study by returning for clinical evaluation to the clinic and 25 others by returning the quality of life and functional outcome questionnaires. Patients were classified into two groups: patients who had only cesarean section delivery after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 62) and patients who had at least one vaginal delivery after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 20). The mean follow-up from the date of the most recent delivery was 4.9 years. The vaginal delivery group had significantly higher incidence of an anterior sphincter defect by anal endosonography (50 percent) vs. cesarean section delivery group (13 percent; P = 0.012). The mean squeeze anal pressure was significantly higher in the patients who had only cesarean section delivery (150 mmHg) after restorative proctocolectomy than patients who had at least one vaginal delivery (120 mmHg) after restorative proctocolectomy (P = 0.049). Quality of life evaluated by time trade-off method also was significantly better in the cesarean section delivery group (1) vs. vaginal delivery group (0.9; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of the sphincter injury and quality of life measured by time trade-off method are significantly worse after vaginal delivery compared with cesarean section in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In the short-term, this does not seem to substantially influence pouch function or quality of life; however, the long-term effects remain unknown, thus obstetric concern may not be the only factor dictating the type of delivery in this group of patients. A planned cesarean section may eliminate these potential and factual concerns in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to ascertain the preva lence and pattern of surgical and medical adverse events in patients undergoing Hartmann's reversal for diverticular dis ease. A comparison of postoperative outcomes is made be tween Hartmann's reversal and primary resection and anas tomosis. METHODS: Data were collected from patients who underwent successful Hartmann's reversal (Group 1 n=121) and primary resection and anastomosis (Group 2 n=731) for diverticular disease in a single center from January 1981 to May 2003. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare early postoperative mortality, medical and surgical complications and readmission rates between the two groups. RESULTS: Hartmann's reversal was associ ated with a higher prevalence of surgical or medical com plications compared with primary resection and anastomo sis (43.8 percent and 9.1 percent for Hartmann's reversal vs. 26.0 percent and 4.8 percent for primary resection and anastomosis). There was no difference in the readmissior rates (7.2 percent vs. 7.6 percent, respectively, P = 0.88) or early postoperative mortality (1.7 percent vs. 0.7 percent, P = 0.25) between Hartmann's reversal and primary resection and anastomosis. The need for reoperation, prolonged ileus respiratory tract infections, and renal failure were more common adverse events in the Hartmann's reversal group (P < 0.01). Having controlled for the number of comorbid conditions, extent of diverticular disease, severity of peri toneal contamination (Mannheim Peritonitis Index), and op erative urgency, patients who underwent Hartmann's rever sal were 2.1 times more likely to have adverse surgical events during their postoperative period (95 percent confidence interval for odds ratio = 1.3-3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Hartmann's reversal is a complex surgical procedure that is associated with a high prevalence of postoperative adverse events in comparison with primary resection and anastomosis. To minimize the prevalence of such adverse events, patients who undergo Hartmann's reversal need careful preoperative evaluation and close monitoring in their postoperative period.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal postoperative care regimens accelerate recovery after abdominal surgery. The benefit of thoracic epidural (TE) analgesia over patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) remains unproven when used with a fast-track postoperative care plan. METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing major intestinal resection, and on a fast-track postoperative care plan, were randomized to preemptive TE or PCA. Patients were evaluated at standard time points for pain score, quality of life (Short Form-36), and complications. Oral analgesia was substituted for TE and PCA on the second postoperative day. Discharge criteria were identical for both groups. RESULTS: Six patients (20.6%) had a failed epidural. There was no difference in length of stay (5.8 versus 6.2 days, TE versus PCA, P = .55), total length of stay (including readmissions), pain scores, quality of life, complications, or hospital costs at any time point. CONCLUSION: TE offers no advantage over PCA for patients undergoing major intestinal resections who are on a fast-track postoperative care plan using PCA.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Surgical outcome in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of restorative proctocolectomy in the setting of chronic ulcerative colitis complicated by primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is not clear. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical outcome, risk of dysplasia/cancer, morbidity/mortality, long-term results, and functional and quality of life results in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and PSC who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and compare them in a case-matched study. METHODS: Patients with PSC-associated IBD undergoing restorative proctocolectomy between 1983 and 2002 were included in the study. This study group was matched for age, gender, diagnosis, duration of disease, anastomosis technique, and proximal diversion to a cohort of IBD patients with no associated PSC who underwent restorative proctocolectomy during the same period of time. Postoperative morbidity, incidence of neoplasia/cancer in the resected specimen, pouchitis, pouch failure, long-term mortality, and 5-year survival rates were compared between the groups. The functional and quality of life records were prospectively collected and compared between the groups. For each group, matched Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also conducted comparing 5-year survival between the 2 cohorts, matching for diagnosis, duration of disease, age, gender, anastomosis type, and proximal diversion. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with PSC and IBD underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis during the study period. Two hundred sixty IBD patients with no associated PSC who matched with the outlined criteria comprised the control group. The follow-up period was 68 +/- 50 months for the PSC group and 102 +/- 62 months for the control group. A higher incidence of cancer (14% vs 5%, P = .02) and dysplasia in the resected specimen (40% vs 7%, P < .001), an associated increased risk of postoperative pelvic sepsis (14% vs 5%, P = .02), and higher long-term mortality (35% vs 4%, P < .001) were found in the PSC group compared with control group with no associated PSC. The majority, 13 of 23 (57%), of the deaths in the PSC group were a result of liver disease. Five-year survival for the PSC group was significantly poorer than the 5-year survival for the control group with no associated PSC. No significant differences were found in functional and quality of life results between the groups in the short- and long-term follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: PSC-associated IBD patients after restorative proctocolectomy have a higher risk of neoplasia/cancer in the resected specimen, postoperative pelvic sepsis, and higher long-term mortality. Functional and quality of life remains similar in IBD patients after restorative proctocolectomy with or without associated PSC in the follow-up. However, patients with IBD and PSC have a significantly poorer survival than patients with no associated PSC after restorative proctocolectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: We define the learning curve required to attain satisfactory training in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and identify possible differences in the learning curve for stapled and hand-sewn IPAA surgery. Various studies have addressed the differences in failure rate between stapled and hand-sewn IPAA, but there is no literature that evaluates the differences in attaining satisfactory training in each of these techniques. METHODS: Data were collected from 1965 patients undergoing IPAA surgery by 12 surgeons in a single center between 1983 and 2001. Using ileoanal pouch failure as the primary end point, a parametric survival model was used to adjust for case mix (patient comorbidity, preoperative diagnosis, manometric findings, and prior anal pathology). A risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used for monitoring outcomes in IPAA surgery. RESULTS: The 5-year ileal pouch survival was 95.6% (median patient follow-up of 4.2 years; range 0-19 years). Fifty percent of trainee staff demonstrated a learning curve in IPAA surgery. Having adjusted for case mix, trainee staff undertaking stapled IPAA surgery showed an improvement in the pouch failure rate following an initial training period of 23 cases versus 40 cases for senior staff. The learning curve for hand-sewn IPAA surgery was quantified only for senior staff who attained adequate results following an initial period of 31 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The CUSUM method was a useful tool for objectively measuring performance during the learning phase of IPAA surgery. With adequate training, supervision, and monitoring, the learning curve in IPAA surgery may be reduced even further.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. METHODS: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. RESULTS: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P<0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with increased sexual dysfunction in male patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: a predictive model.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on sexual function in patients undergoing oncologic resection for rectal cancer, and to develop a mathematical model for quantifying the risk of sexual dysfunction through time for this group of patients. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing proctosigmoidectomy (group 1: n = 101) or adjuvant radiotherapy (40-50 Gy) and resection (group 2: n = 100) for rectal cancer at a tertiary referral center between December 1998 and July 2004. Study end points were recorded at 7 time intervals (preoperatively, 4 months, 8 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 4 years after surgery) and included: 1) ability to have an erection, 2) maintain an erection, 3) attain orgasm, 4) dry orgasm, and 5) whether they were sexually active. Multilevel logistic regression analysis for repeated measures was used to identify factors associated with the sexual dysfunction. A predictive model was developed and internally validated by comparing observed and model-predicted outcomes. RESULTS: Radiotherapy had an adverse effect on the ability to get an erection, maintain an erection, attain orgasm, and being sexually active in comparison with patients undergoing surgery alone (7.4%, 12.6%, 16.2%, and 13.7% reduction 8 months after surgery respectively; P < 0.05). The effect of sexual dysfunction deteriorated with age (odds ratio for erectile function, 0.40 per 10-year increase in age; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.49; P < 0.001). A significant variability in sexual function was present among the 7 time points with a maximal deterioration occurring at 8 months after surgery with subsequent slow but not complete recovery (P < 0.001). The predictive model showed adequate discrimination on 4 of the 5 domains of sexual dysfunction (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy has an adverse effect on sexual function, the effect being maximal at 8 months after surgery. The risk of sexual dysfunction can be quantified preoperatively using the proposed index and can assist patients in making better informed choices on the type of treatment they receive.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Clinical approach to diseases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease or dysplasia. IPAA significantly improves quality of life in UC patients who require surgery. However, certain inflammatory and noninflammatory diseases can develop after the surgery, including pouchitis, Crohn's disease of the pouch, cuffitis, and irritable pouch syndrome. The etiology and pathogenesis of these disease conditions of IPAA are largely unknown. Accurate diagnosis and classification are important for appropriate management. Endoscopic evaluation is the most important tool for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗