Biomedical subjects

Vijay K Gombar

Publications and source records attributed to Vijay K Gombar.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Predicting P-glycoprotein substrates by a quantitative structure-activity relationship model.

A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model has been developed to predict whether a given compound is a P-glycoprotein (Pgp) substrate or not. The training set consisted of 95 compounds classified as substrates or non-substrates based on the results from in vitro monolayer efflux assays. The two-group linear discriminant model uses 27 statistically significant, information-rich structure quantifiers to compute the probability of a given structure to be a Pgp substrate. Analysis of the descriptors revealed that the ability to partition into membranes, molecular bulk, and the counts and electrotopological values of certain isolated and bonded hydrides are important structural attributes of substrates. The model fits the data with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90.6% in the jackknifed cross-validation test. A prediction accuracy of 86.2% was obtained on a test set of 58 compounds. Examination of the eight "mispredicted" compounds revealed two distinct categories. Five mispredictions were explained by experimental limitations of the efflux assay; these compounds had high permeability and/or were inhibitors of calcein-AM transport. Three mispredictions were due to limitations of the chemical space covered by the current model. The Pgp QSAR model provides an in silico screen to aid in compound selection and in vitro efflux assay prioritization.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2003

Development and validation of k-nearest-neighbor QSPR models of metabolic stability of drug candidates.

Computational ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) models may be used early in the drug discovery process in order to flag drug candidates with potentially problematic ADME profiles. We report the development, validation, and application of quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models of metabolic turnover rate for compounds in human S9 homogenate. Biological data were obtained from uniform bioassays of 631 diverse chemicals proprietary to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). The models were built with topological molecular descriptors such as molecular connectivity indices or atom pairs using the k-nearest neighbor variable selection optimization method developed at the University of North Carolina (Zheng, W.; Tropsha, A. A novel variable selection QSAR approach based on the k-nearest neighbor principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2000, 40, 185-194.). For the purpose of validation, the whole data set was divided into training and test sets. The training set QSPR models were characterized by high internal accuracy with leave-one-out cross-validated R(2) (q(2)) values ranging between 0.5 and 0.6. The test set compounds were correctly classified as stable or unstable in S9 assay with an accuracy above 85%. These models were additionally validated by in silico metabolic stability screening of 107 new chemicals under development in several drug discovery programs at GSK. One representative model generated with MolConnZ descriptors predicted 40 compounds to be metabolically stable (turnover rate less than 25%), and 33 of them were indeed found to be stable experimentally. This success (83% concordance) in correctly picking chemicals that are metabolically stable in the human S9 homogenate spells a rapid, computational screen for generating components of the ADME profile in a drug discovery process.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Role of ADME characteristics in drug discovery and their in silico evaluation: in silico screening of chemicals for their metabolic stability.

Drug discovery is a long, arduous process broadly grouped into disease target identification, target validation, high-throughput identification of "hits" and "leads", lead optimization, and pre-clinical and clinical evaluation. Each area is a vast discipline in itself. However, all but the first two stages involve, to varying degrees, the characterization of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, (ADME), and toxicity (T) of the molecules being pursued as potential drug candidates. Clinical failures of about 50% of the Investigational New Drug (IND) filings are attributed to their inadequate ADMET attributes. It is, therefore, no surprise that, in the current climate of social and regulatory pressure on healthcare costs, the pharmaceutical industry is searching for any means to minimize this attrition. Building mathematical models, called in silico screens, to reliably predict ADMET attributes solely from molecular structure is at the heart of this effort in reducing costs as well as development cycle times. This article reviews the emerging field of in silico evaluation of ADME characteristics. For different approaches that have been employed in this area, a critique of the scope and limitations of their descriptors, statistical methods, and reliability are presented. For instance, are geometry-based descriptors absolutely essential or is lower-level structure quantification equally good? What advantages, if any, do we have for methods like artificial neural networks over the least squares optimization methods with rigorous statistical diagnostics? Is any in silico screen worth application, let alone interpretation, if it is not adequately validated? Once deemed acceptable, what good is an in silico screen if it cannot be made available at the workbench of drug discovery teams distributed across the globe throughout multi-national pharmaceutical companies? These are not mere discussion points, rather this article embarks on the stepwise mechanics of developing a successful in silico screen. The process is exemplified by our efforts in developing one such screen for predicting metabolic stability of chemicals in a human S9 liver homogenate assay. A real-life use of this in silico screen in a variety of discovery projects at GlaxoSmithKline is presented, highlighting successes and limitations of such applications. Finally, we project some capabilities of in silico ADME tools for greater impact and contribution to successful, efficient drug discovery.

Computer-Aided Design↗