Biomedical subjects

Vijayalakshmi Chelliah

Publications and source records attributed to Vijayalakshmi Chelliah.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Structural biology and bioinformatics in drug design: opportunities and challenges for target identification and lead discovery.

Impressive progress in genome sequencing, protein expression and high-throughput crystallography and NMR has radically transformed the opportunities to use protein three-dimensional structures to accelerate drug discovery, but the quantity and complexity of the data have ensured a central place for informatics. Structural biology and bioinformatics have assisted in lead optimization and target identification where they have well established roles; they can now contribute to lead discovery, exploiting high-throughput methods of structure determination that provide powerful approaches to screening of fragment binding.

Computational Biology↗

PubMed2006

Efficient restraints for protein-protein docking by comparison of observed amino acid substitution patterns with those predicted from local environment.

The discovery that the functions of most eukaryotic gene products are mediated through multi-protein complexes makes the prediction of protein interactions one of the most important current challenges in structural biology. Rigid-body docking methods can generate a large number of alternative candidates, but it is difficult to discriminate the near-native interactions from the large number of false positives. Many different scoring functions have been developed for this purpose, but in most cases, experimental and biological information is still required for accurate predictions. We explore here the use of evolutionary restraints in evaluating rigid-body docking geometries. In order to identify potential interface residues we identify functional residues based on the comparison of observed amino acid substitutions with those predicted from local environment. The interface residues identified by this method are correctly located in 85% of the cases. These predicted interface residues are used to define distance restraints that help to score rigid-body docking solutions. We have developed the pyDockRST software, which uses the percentage of satisfied distance restraints, together with the electrostatics and desolvation binding energy, to identify correct docking orientations. This methodology dramatically improves the docking results when compared to the use of energy criteria alone, and is able to find the correct orientation within the top 20 docking solutions in 80% of the cases.

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2005

Functional restraints on the patterns of amino acid substitutions: application to sequence-structure homology recognition.

Amino acid residues that are involved in functional interactions in proteins have strong evolutionary pressure to remain unchanged and consequently their substitution patterns are different from those that are noninteracting. To characterize and quantify the differences between amino acid substitution patterns due to structural restraints and those under functional restraints, we have made a comparative analysis of families of homologous proteins. Residues classified as having the same amino acid type, secondary structure, accessibility, and side-chain hydrogen bonds are shown to be better conserved if they are close to the active site. We have focused on enzyme families for this analysis since they have functional sites that are easily defined by their catalytic residues. We have derived new sets of environment-specific substitution tables, which we term function-dependent environment-specific substitution tables, where amino acid residues are classified according to their distance from the functional sites. The residues that are within a distance of 9 A from the active site have distinct amino acid substitution patterns when compared to the other sites. The function-dependent environment-specific substitution tables have been tested using the sequence-structure homology recognition program FUGUE and the results compared with the recognition performance obtained using the standard environment-specific substitution tables. Significant improvements are obtained in both recognition performance and alignment accuracy using the function-dependent environment-specific substitution tables (P-value = 0.02, according to the Wilcoxon signed rank test for alignment accuracy). The alignments near the active site are greatly improved with pronounced improvements at lower percentage identities (less than 30%).

Amino Acid Substitution↗

PubMed2004

Distinguishing structural and functional restraints in evolution in order to identify interaction sites.

Structural genomics projects are producing many three-dimensional structures of proteins that have been identified only from their gene sequences. It is therefore important to develop computational methods that will predict sites involved in productive intermolecular interactions that might give clues about functions. Techniques based on evolutionary conservation of amino acids have the advantage over physiochemical methods in that they are more general. However, the majority of techniques neither use all available structural and sequence information, nor are able to distinguish between evolutionary restraints that arise from the need to maintain structure and those that arise from function. Three methods to identify evolutionary restraints on protein sequence and structure are described here. The first identifies those residues that have a higher degree of conservation than expected: this is achieved by comparing for each amino acid position the sequence conservation observed in the homologous family of proteins with the degree of conservation predicted on the basis of amino acid type and local environment. The second uses information theory to identify those positions where environment-specific substitution tables make poor predictions of the overall amino acid substitution pattern. The third method identifies those residues that have highly conserved positions when three-dimensional structures of proteins in a homologous family are superposed. The scores derived from these methods are mapped onto the protein three-dimensional structures and contoured, allowing identification clusters of residues with strong evolutionary restraints that are sites of interaction in proteins involved in a variety of functions. Our method differs from other published techniques by making use of structural information to identify restraints that arise from the structure of the protein and differentiating these restraints from others that derive from intermolecular interactions that mediate functions in the whole organism.

Algorithms↗