PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Vincent Launay-Vacher

Publications and source records attributed to Vincent Launay-Vacher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) recommendations for the adjustment of dosing in elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency.

A SIOG taskforce was formed to discuss best clinical practice for elderly cancer patients with renal insufficiency. This manuscript outlines recommended dosing adjustments for cancer drugs in this population according to renal function. Dosing adjustments have been made for drugs in current use which have recommendations in renal insufficiency and the elderly, focusing on drugs which are renally eliminated or are known to be nephrotoxic. Recommendations are based on pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic data where available. The taskforce recommend that before initiating therapy, some form of geriatric assessment should be conducted that includes evaluation of comorbidities and polypharmacy, hydration status and renal function (using available formulae). Within each drug class, it is sensible to use agents which are less likely to be influenced by renal clearance. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of anticancer agents in the elderly are needed in order to maximise efficacy whilst avoiding unacceptable toxicity.

Aged↗

[Drud-induced nephrotoxicity: Bibliography from January 2003 to December 2005].

Drug-induced kidney injury is a major side effect in clinical practice. Renal injury associated with drugs may involve several components of the kidney: glomerulus, tubules, interstitium, and blood vessels. Acute renal failure may occur as a major reaction to many drugs. Moreover, therapeutic agents may induce an allergic reaction leading to interstitial inflammation and tubular damage. In this article, we present an updated version of the bibliography containing the case reports of nephrotoxicity published in the international literature from January 2003 to December 2005.

Humans↗

Renal tubular drug transporters.

The kidney plays an important role in the elimination of numerous hydrophilic xenobiotics, including drugs, toxins, and endogenous compounds. It has developed high-capacity transport systems to prevent urinary loss of filtered nutrients, as well as electrolytes, and simultaneously to facilitate tubular secretion of a wide range of organic ions. Transport systems for organic anions and cations are primarily involved in the secretion of drugs in renal tubules. The identification and characterization of organic anion and cation transporters have been progressing at the molecular level. To date, many members of the organic anion transporter, organic cation transporter, and organic anion-transporting polypeptide families have been found to mediate the transport of diverse organic ions. It has also been suggested that ATP-dependent primary active transporters such as MDR1/P-glycoprotein and the multidrug resistance-associated protein family function as efflux pumps of renal tubular cells for more hydrophobic molecules and anionic conjugates. Tubular reabsorption of peptide-like drugs such as beta-lactam antibiotics across the brush-border membranes appears to be mediated by two distinct H+/peptide cotransporters: PEPT1 and PEPT2. Renal disposition of drugs occurs through interaction with these diverse secretory and absorptive transporters in renal tubules. Studies of the functional characteristics, such as substrate specificity and transport mechanisms, and of the localization of drug transporters could provide information regarding the cellular network involved in renal handling of drugs. Detailed information concerning molecular and cellular aspects of drug transporters expressed in the kidney has facilitated studies of the mechanisms underlying renal disposition as well as transporter-mediated drug interactions.

Animals↗

Abnormal blood pressure circadian rhythm: a target organ damage?

Blood pressure (BP) varies according to cycles characterized by a reduction during sleep and an increase on awakening. The nighttime decrease is absent or blunted in some patients (termed "non-dippers"). Cross-sectional and prospective data have shown that non-dippers have more target organ damage than have dippers in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. We reviewed the English language literature regarding this association. A non-fortuitous association seems to exist between non-dipper status and cardiovascular risk such as stroke and cardiac events. Among diabetic patients, this phenomenon has been described to occur more often in individuals with autonomic neuropathy and with different degrees of diabetic nephropathy. In normoalbuminuric normotensive type I diabetic patients without any degree of autonomic dysfunction, according to traditional cardiovascular tests, diastolic BP (dBP) night/day ratio is associated with an increased glomerular filtration rate and an increased extracellular volume. The disruption of the circadian rhythm of sympathovagal activity in non-dipper patients was associated with higher levels in systolic BP (sBP) and dBP and with a reduced decline in sBP and dBP levels during the night. Therefore, the prognostic implications of the non-dipper status may be important since the overall 24-h blood pressure load is elevated in these individuals. These data suggest that patients in whom blood pressure decreases during the night incur less damage to their brain, kidneys, heart, and blood vessels than people with elevated nocturnal BP.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

[Statins in patients with kidney failure: efficacy, tolerance, and prescription guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease and renal transplant].

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is extremely common in adults, although often undiagnosed and thus untreated. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among patients with CKD and reducing its risk in this population is an important priority. Dyslipidemia is almost always present when proteinuria is above 3 gr/24 hours. Roughly two thirds of all patients with end-stage renal failure and kidney transplants suffer from dyslipidemia and should receive lipid-lowering therapy, as suggested by recent Afssaps (French drug agency) and NKF-K/DOQI (National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative) guidelines. We reviewed recent studies on efficacy, tolerability and prescription recommendations of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients. METHODS: We searched Medline, the international medical database, to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of statins in CKD and renal transplant patients and on specific recommendations for dosage adjustments in this population. RESULTS: The efficacy of statins in decreasing total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol levels in dialysis and renal transplant patients is similar to that in the general population. On the other hand, large-scale randomized clinical trials among CKD (4D) and renal transplant (ALERT) patients do not demonstrate that statins significantly decrease rates of cardiovascular disease. They have a beneficial effect on proteinuria and lower the rate of kidney function deterioration in patients with dyslipidemia. Early introduction of a statin in transplant patients did not lead to improved kidney function or prevent loss of the graft. Although most statins are not excreted by the kidneys, the dosage of some must be adapted in CKD patients because of pharmacokinetic modifications induced by renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Statins at appropriately adapted doses have the same efficacy in CKD patients as in subjects with normal kidney function, and tolerance is not a problem. Their effectiveness in cardiovascular prevention in this population has not been demonstrated to date. Results about statin-induced kidney protection are encouraging but further and more specific studies are needed.

Adult↗

Drug-induced glomerulopathies.

Normal renal function depends upon an intact glomerular apparatus. Many drugs and chemicals are capable of damaging the glomerulus, causing its increased permeability to large molecules. Glomerular lesions are usually responsible for proteinuria and the nephrotic syndrome. This also holds true for the drug-induced glomerulopathies, of which membranous glomerulo-nephritis is the most frequent type of lesion encountered. Apart from this, several cases of different glomerular changes such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and crescentic glomerulonephritis have also been reported. The drug-induced glomerulopathies are probably immune mediated. This is, for instance, reflected in the fact that patients with drug-induced nephritic syndrome frequently have the HLA-B8 and DR3 antigens. In depth information is provided for the previously mentioned disorders.

Glomerulonephritis, Membranous↗

[Drug-induced nephrotoxicity: bibliography from January 2003 to December 2004].

Drug-induced kidney injury is a major side effect in clinical practice. Renal injury associated with drugs may involve several components of the kidney: glomerulus, tubules, interstitium and blood vessels. Acute renal failure may occur as a major reaction to many drugs. Moreover, therapeutic agents may induce an allergic reaction leading to interstitial inflammation and tubular damage. In this article, we present an updated version of the bibliography containing the case reports of nephrotoxicity published in the international literature from January 2003 to December 2004.

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions↗

FHD: an index to evaluate drug elimination by hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: In hemodialyzed patients, physicians have to (1) adjust drug dosage for a creatinine clearance lower than 10-15 ml/min and (2) know whether or not the drug will be removed by the dialysis session to decide whether it may be administered before or after the session on dialysis days. However, of several indices being used to evaluate drug removal by dialysis none is appropriate and we suggest a novel index named F(HD), which reflects the role of hemodialysis clearance of a drug in its overall clearance during the session. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed to test the influence of dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of some drugs, whether F(HD) was considered or not, to determine when to administer the drug. F(HD) was then calculated for several drugs and its value compared with other indices. Five hemodialysis patients from our department for whom the time of drug administration was determined according to F(HD) were included in a small study and their drugs' trough concentrations were monitored. RESULTS: F(HD) emphasized that considering hemodialysis clearance alone may lead to false interpretations of the potential dialyzability of some drugs. In our patients, who received their treatment according to the 'F(HD) rule', monitoring of trough levels gave satisfactory results. CONCLUSION: The use of the 'F(HD) rule' should be tested on a long-term administration basis to confirm our conclusion. F(HD )could be the index of choice to determine when to administer a drug, before or after the session, in hemodialysis patients.

Adult↗

[Is dialysis efficient in the prevention of ionic contrast agent-induced nephropathy?].

UNLABELLED: A FREQUENT AND EXPENSIVE PROBLEM: Ninety percent of contrast media nephrotoxicity (CMN) occur in patients with pre-existing kidney failure. Its aggravation may require early chronic dialysis. PREVENTIVE MEASURES: CMN prophylaxis is important in these patients. Pre- and post-hydration, with infusion of isotonic saline solution or sodium bicarbonate, and reduction of contrast medium (CM) volume to the strict minimum are essential for preventing CM-induced kidney failure. THE INTEREST OF PROPHYLACTIC HEMODIALYSIS AND HEMOFILTRATION: An interesting approach in preventing CMN is the early elimination of the CM with dialysis techniques. Preventive hemodialysis does not reduce the risk of CMN, but hemofiltration has shown significant efficacy in a population of patients with kidney failure. THE INTEREST OF IMMEDIATE HEMODIALYSIS IN CHRONIC HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: Although nephrotoxicity is no longer a problem in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, CM, especially in high-dose injections, may be responsible for fluid and electrolyte abnormalities and/or volemic expansion. No data yet justify a conclusion that a hemodialysis session immediately after injection of a CM in chronic dialysis patients might be helpful.

Contrast Media↗

[Anticancer drug-induced nephrotoxicity].

Nephrotoxicity is an inherent adverse effect of certain anticancer drugs. Anti neoplasic drugs have a narrow therapeutic index and the amount of drug necessary to produce a significant reduction in tumour burden usually produces significant nephrotoxicity. The dosage used in clinical trials represents often the maximum tolerated doses determined during phase I drug evaluation. Greater toxicity is acceptable during curative therapy than during palliative therapy. But cancer patients often exhibit excretory reduced organ function. Modulation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs in cancer patients is therefore necessary in order to improve tolerance. Patients with malignancies are particularly vulnerable to development of renal abnormalities. Conversely, patients with renal abnormalities who have undergone kidney transplantation are at high risk for malignancy. Clinical syndromes of renal involvement are diverse and sometimes insidious. Despite the recent advances in understanding the mechanism of anticancer drug nephrotoxicity, prevention still relies on drug dosage decrease and active screening for renal abnormalities as part of the usual biological work up in patients treated with anticancer drugs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Statins' dosage in patients with renal failure and cyclosporine drug-drug interactions in transplant recipient patients.

Dyslipidemia is frequent in patients with renal failure and in transplant recipient patients. This lead to a wide use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in patients with impaired renal function or in patients treated with cyclosporine as post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. As a result, it is crucial for those patients' physicians to be aware of how to handle these drugs when renal function is impaired and/or when cyclosporine is co-administered. Most statins have an extensive hepatic elimination and the renal route is usually a minor elimination pathway. However, pharmacokinetic alterations have been described for some of these drugs in patients with renal insufficiency. Cyclosporine is a widely used immunosuppresive therapy in solid organ transplant patients and drug-drug interactions are likely to occur when statins and cyclosporine are administered together. Those interactions may theoretically result in increased statins and/or cyclosporine serum levels with potential muscle and/or renal toxicity. As a result, caution is warranted if concurrent administration is performed. In this review, we synthesized the data from the literature on (1) the pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin in patients with renal failure and (2) the potential drug-drug interactions between these drugs and cyclosporine in transplant recipient patients.

Cyclosporine↗

Renal tubular transporters and antiviral drugs: an update.

Systemic disposition of antiviral drugs partly depends on renal handling of these compounds. There are some known, functionally characterized anionic and cationic transporters with varying substrate specificities for those drugs: human organic anion transporter (OAT) family (hOAT1-3) and human organic cation transporter (OCT) family (hOCT1-3), which mediate the intracellular flux, and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) binding cassette transporter family (P-glycoprotein, MRP2-5), which mediate the cellular efflux of antiviral drugs. The peptide transporter (PEPT1-2) mediate bi-directional facilitated diffusion of valacyclovir. All these transporters are expressed in the kidney. Organic anion and cation transporters primarily localize to the basolateral membrane of renal epithelial cells while ATP-binding cassette transporters primarily localize to the apical membrane. These transporters work in concert to mediate renal intracellular concentration of occurring antiviral drugs. Along with drug-metabolizing enzymes, these transporters are important determinants of drug effectiveness and toxicity. This review examines the role that these transporters play in renal disposition of antiviral drugs.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B↗

Long-term renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Data from a double-blind randomized active-controlled multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) was developed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, controlled data are sparse on the long-term renal tolerability of TDF at the currently approved daily dose of 300 mg in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Over 144 weeks, this 600 patient, multicentre randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial compared stavudine (301 patients) and TDF (299 patients), both administered in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive patients. TDF or placebo and stavudine or placebo were administered in an open-label fashion. All medications were taken orally. At screening, all patients had serum creatinines <1.5 mg/dl, calculated creatinine clearances > or =60 ml/min and a serum phosphorus > or =2.2 mg/dl. RESULTS: The incidences of grades 1 (> or =0.5 mg/dl increase from baseline), 2 (2.1-3.0 mg/dl) and 3 (3.1-6.0 mg/dl) serum creatinine elevations at week 144 were 4, <1 and 0%, respectively, in the TDF group and 2, 0 and <1% in the stavudine control group (P = NS). There were no grade 4 (>6 mg/dl) serum creatinine elevations. At week 144, there was no change from baseline in the mean (0.83 mg/dl) serum creatinine in the TDF group compared with a 0.1 mg/dl decrease from baseline (0.83 mg/dl) in the stavudine control group. The incidences of grades 1 (2.0-2.2 mg/dl), 2 (1.5-1.9 mg/dl) and 3 (1.0-1.4 mg/dl) hypophosphataemia at week 144 were 4, 3 and <1%, respectively, in the TDF group and 4, 2 and <1% in the control group (P = NS). No patient experienced grade 4 (<1.0 mg/dl) hypophosphataemia. At week 144, the decrease (Delta) of mean serum phosphorus levels from baseline in both groups was similar (Delta 0.2 from 3.6 mg/dl for the TDF group, and 0.1 from 3.5 mg/dl for the stavudine control group). No patient developed Fanconi's syndrome or proximal renal tubular dysfunction during the study. CONCLUSION: Through 144 weeks, TDF and stavudine, each administered in combination with efavirenz and lamivudine, had similar renal safety profiles in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients with normal renal function at baseline.

Adenine↗