Biomedical subjects

Vincenzo Squadrone

Publications and source records attributed to Vincenzo Squadrone.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Transtracheal open ventilation in acute respiratory failure secondary to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.

RATIONALE: Patients who fail noninvasive ventilation are generally intubated and are then subjected to complications of invasive mechanical ventilation. With transtracheal open ventilation, ventilator support is delivered through an uncuffed small bore minitracheostomy tube, which eliminates pooling of secretions above the cuff and thus reduces the risk of tracheobronchial microbial colonization. OBJECTIVE: To compare transtracheal open ventilation (treatment group) with conventional invasive ventilation (control group) in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who initially failed noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive trans-tracheal open ventilation (n=19) or conventional invasive ventilation (n=20). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in arterial blood gases after 1 and 30 h between the two groups. Two patients receiving transtracheal open ventilation and 13 undergoing conventional ventilation had complications (p<0.0001). Compared with conventional ventilation, transtracheal open ventilation significantly decreased both the duration of mechanical ventilation (7.6+/-4.7 vs. 18.6+/-10.6 d, p<0.0001) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (10.2+/-4.5 vs. 21.3+/-9.7 d, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Transtracheal open ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in maintaining adequate gas exchange and reducing complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit length of stay.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Hypoxemia complicates the recovery of 30% to 50% of patients after abdominal surgery; endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation may be required in 8% to 10% of cases, increasing morbidity and mortality and prolonging intensive care unit and hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure compared with standard treatment in preventing the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients who develop acute hypoxemia after elective major abdominal surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, controlled, unblinded study with concealed allocation conducted between June 2002 and November 2003 at 15 intensive care units of the Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network in Italy. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients who developed severe hypoxemia after major elective abdominal surgery. The trial was stopped for efficacy after 209 patients had been enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oxygen (n = 104) or oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure (n = 105). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was incidence of endotracheal intubation; secondary end points were intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, incidence of pneumonia, infection and sepsis, and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients who received oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure had a lower intubation rate (1% vs 10%; P = .005; relative risk [RR], 0.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.76) and had a lower occurrence rate of pneumonia (2% vs 10%, RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.88; P = .02), infection (3% vs 10%, RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; P = .03), and sepsis (2% vs 9%; RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04-0.99; P = .03) than did patients treated with oxygen alone. Patients who received oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure also spent fewer mean (SD) days in the intensive care unit (1.4 [1.6] vs 2.6 [4.2], P = .09) than patients treated with oxygen alone. The treatments did not affect the mean (SD) days that patients spent in the hospital (15 [13] vs 17 [15], respectively; P = .10). None of those treated with oxygen plus continuous positive airway pressure died in the hospital while 3 deaths occurred among those treated with oxygen alone (P = .12). CONCLUSION: Continuous positive airway pressure may decrease the incidence of endotracheal intubation and other severe complications in patients who develop hypoxemia after elective major abdominal surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Patient-ventilator interaction during the triggering phase.

Partial patient-controlled mechanical support mode ventilators provide positive pressure assistance whenever a patient's inspiratory effort decreases pressure or flow in the ventilator circuit below the sensitivity set by clinicians; these modes minimize disuse atrophy of the respiratory muscles, can facilitate the weaning process, and usually require lower ventilator pressures. The capability of restoring gas exchange, unloading respiratory muscles, and relieving the patient's dyspnea with partial patient-controlled mechanical support modes depends on matching between the ventilator setting and the patient's ventilatory demand (ie, patient-ventilator interactions).

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2004

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using a helmet in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) with a facemask (FM) is effective in patients with acute exacerbation of their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Whether it is feasible to treat these patients with NPPV delivered by a helmet is not known. METHODS: Over a 4-month period, the authors studied 33 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbation who were admitted to four intensive care units and treated with helmet NPPV. The patients were compared with 33 historical controls treated with FM NPPV, matched for simplified acute physiologic score (SAPS II), age, PaCO2, pH, and PaO2:fractional inspired oxygen tension. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, improvement of gas exchange, and need for intubation. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Ten patients in the helmet group and 14 in the FM group (P = 0.22) were intubated. In the helmet group, no patients were unable to tolerate NPPV, whereas five patients required intubation in the FM group (P = 0.047). After 1 h of treatment, both groups had a significant reduction of PaCO2 with improvement of pH; PaCO2 decreased less in the helmet group (P = 0.01). On discontinuing support, PaCO2 was higher (P = 0.002) and pH lower (P = 0.02) in the helmet group than in the control group. One patient in the helmet group, and 12 in the FM group, developed complications related to NPPV (P < 0.001). Length of intensive care unit stay, intensive care unit, and hospital mortality were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Helmet NPPV is feasible and can be used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute exacerbation, but it does not improve carbon dioxide elimination as efficiently as does FM NPPV.

Acidosis, Respiratory↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation when comparing a prototype face mask (PM) and conventional face masks (CMs) during non-invasive ventilation. SETTING AND DESIGN: Eight centers (intensive or intermediate care units). Multicenter randomized study. POPULATIONS: Patients with acute respiratory failure of different etiologies. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to CMs or PM when ventilation was expected to last at least 12 consecutive hours a day for two consecutive days. Patient comfort, skin breakdown and eye irritation, assessed by means of standardized scoring systems, were measured after 24 and 48 h and before discontinuing ventilation. RESULTS: Hundred ninety-four patients were randomized. Forty-seven patients were finally enrolled: PM (24) and CMs (23). Ventilator settings were similar in the two groups at the beginning of the treatment and after 24 and 48 h. Skin breakdown was significantly higher in the CMs group over the study period ( p<0.001). Patient comfort was higher in the PM group after 24 and 48 h ( p=0.008 and p<0.001, respectively). Eye irritation was absent in both groups after 24 h and did not differ significantly after 48 h (p=0.539). Before ventilation was discontinued skin breakdown and patient comfort were significantly higher in the CMs group, when compared to the PM group ( p<0.001 and p=0.003, respectively). Eye irritation was slightly higher in the PM versus CMs group ( p=0.21). The time on ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups ( p=0.830). CONCLUSION: The PM significantly reduced skin breakdown while improving patient comfort, compared to the CMs.

APACHE↗