Beyond inflammation: the residual burden as the next target in inflammatory bowel disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Biomedical subjects
Vipul Jairath
Publications and source records attributed to Vipul Jairath.
Day 3 Oxford criteria predict steroid non-response for acute severe ulcerative colitis in the post biologic era.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Outcomes of patients admitted with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) in the post biologic era are under explored, as well as the ability of scoring indices to predict early steroid non-response. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults hospitalized with ASUC (2010-2022) at London Health Sciences Centre, Canada. Steroid response, need for rescue therapy, colectomy during index hospitalization, and colectomy and hospitalization at 3- and 12-months following discharge was assessed. Logistic regression identified predictors of steroid non-response, defined as need for rescue therapy or colectomy during hospitalization. RESULTS: Of 261 adults hospitalized with ASUC (male: 51.7%, mean age: 40.6 years), 71.2% had extensive colitis. After intravenous corticosteroid therapy during index admission, 55.7% (n = 147) had a response, 37.9% (n = 99) received rescue therapy (infliximab: 98, tofacitinib: 1, and cyclosporine: 0), and 8% (21/261) underwent colectomy. Additionally, 11.6% (28/240) of patients discharged from hospital underwent colectomy within the first 12 months (8.3% at 3-months and 3.3% between 3 and 12 months). There was no difference between steroid responders and non-responders for colectomy (11% vs 12.6%) or hospitalization (33.5% vs 32.6%) at 12 months. The overall cumulative probabilities of colectomy for the entire cohort at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 13.5%, 16.1%, and 17.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Day 3 Oxford criteria was the only factor found to be statistically significant in predicting steroid non-response (odds ratio 4.70, 95%CI [1.06-20.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Day 3 Oxford criteria was an independent predictor of steroid non-response. The risk of colectomy remains substantial after discharge despite low in-hospital colectomy rates following an episode of ASUC. Initial steroid response did not affect long-term colectomy rate at 12 months.
Humans↗
Comparative Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors vs Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors vs tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF) antagonists in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). METHODS: Using an administrative claims database, we identified patients with IBD who were new users of either JAK inhibitors or TNF antagonists between 2016 and 2023 and had insurance coverage for at least 1 year before and after treatment initiation. We compared the risk of infections (overall and serious infections requiring hospitalization), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model accounting for disease characteristics, health care utilization, comorbidities, prior and concomitant medications, and competing risk of mortality. RESULTS: We included 856 patients treated with JAK inhibitors (age, 47 ± 17 years; 82% with ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 9422 patients treated with TNF antagonists (age, 45 ± 18 years; 44% with UC). JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risk of overall infections (incidence rate, 62.4 per 100 person-years [PY] vs 37.4 per 100 PY; hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.93), but not serious infections (4.9 vs 5.4; HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.66-1.44) compared with TNF antagonists. There was no difference in the risk of VTE (1.3 vs 1.2; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.57) and MACE (0.4 vs 0.7; HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.19-1.30). Findings were largely stable on subgroup analyses based on type of IBD, type of JAK inhibitors, age, prior biologic exposure, concomitant use of corticosteroids, and baseline risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In an observational study of patients with IBD, JAK inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of serious infections, VTE, or MACE compared with TNF antagonists, although the overall risk of infections was higher.
Humans↗
Efficacy of Advanced Therapies in Achieving Remission by Disease Location in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared the efficacy of different advanced therapies by disease location in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Through a systematic review, we identified 14 randomized controlled trials in 3139 patients with moderate-to-severe CD who were treated with different advanced therapies vs placebo, and reported efficacy in inducing clinical remission, stratified by disease location (isolated colonic vs ileal disease, excluding ileocolonic disease). We grouped advanced therapies based on the primary mechanism of action: anti-interleukins, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK inhibitors), anti-integrins, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. We calculated treatment efficacy (drug vs placebo), overall and by drug class, for colonic vs ileal disease. RESULTS: Overall treatment efficacy of advanced therapies vs placebo was higher in patients with colonic (odds ratio [OR], 4.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02-5.54) vs ileal CD (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.63; P < .001). By drug class, anti-interleukins demonstrated a higher efficacy in colonic disease (OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 2.77-6.64) vs ileal disease (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.44-3.70; P = .059), whereas no difference in efficacy was observed with anti-integrins (colonic vs ileal: OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.55-5.87 vs 2.10; 95% CI, 0.80-5.53; P = .84). For JAK inhibitors, efficacy was observed only in patients with isolated colonic disease (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 2.67-7.15), but not in ileal disease (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.54-1.89; P < .001). All analyses had minimal to moderate heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of efficacy of advanced therapies for ileal CD is generally lower compared with isolated colonic CD, with JAK inhibitors showing particularly limited efficacy for ileal disease. These results may help inform treatment selection.
Humans↗