PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Vittorio Calzolari

Publications and source records attributed to Vittorio Calzolari.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Anatomical and electrophysiological approach to atrial fibrillation ablation: technical limitations.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary vein (PV) disconnection by radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been reported to cure atrial fibrillation (AF). Different techniques have been proposed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical limitations of both anatomical and electrophysiological approaches. METHODS: A total of 110 PVs were ablated in 26 consecutive patients (23 male, 3 female, mean age 51 +/- 9.5 years) with paroxysmal (n = 19, 73%), persistent (n = 3, 12%) or permanent (n = 4, 15%) AF. Accurate reconstructions of the PV ostia were obtained using fluoroscopy, electrophysiology, and the CARTO mapping system. Electrophysiological mapping was attempted in all PVs by means of a decapolar circular catheter. RF ablation was performed in a single-blind fashion in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around each PV. Completeness of anatomically-guided, circumferential RF lesions around the PVs was established by the physician using the CARTO system, who was unaware of the decapolar circular catheter electrophysiological recordings of the PVs. If PV potentials persisted, RF delivery was targeted to the electrophysiological breakthroughs. RESULTS: All PV ostia were anatomically ablated by performing circumferential RF lesions. Among 110 PVs, 73 (66%) were fully mapped by use of circular catheters. After anatomical ablation, electrical disconnection was achieved in 44/73 PVs (60%). In the remaining 29 PVs (40%), a median of one RF pulse (mean 1.8 +/- 1.4) was necessary to achieve complete PV disconnection. Total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF delivery time were 232 +/- 29, 50 +/- 16 and 39 +/- 11 min, respectively. Pericardial effusion occurred in one patient after the procedure. After 10.5 +/- 6.4 months, 21 patients (81%) were in stable sinus rhythm and 13 of them (62%) discontinued all drugs after 6 months. Only 4 patients (15%) required two procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical PV disconnection cannot be achieved in many PVs by means of a pure anatomical approach. On the other hand, electrophysiological mapping cannot be performed in many PVs owing to anatomical variations. An integrated approach might overcome these limitations.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

Comparison between anatomical and integrated approaches to atrial fibrillation ablation: adjunctive role of electrical pulmonary vein disconnection.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anatomical pulmonary vein (PV) radiofrequency (RF) ablation with that of an integrated approach (anatomical with electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection). METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients affected by drug-refractory paroxysmal (39), persistent (13), and permanent (8) atrial fibrillation (AF) were assigned to an anatomical (group A: 30 patients; 25 male, 5 female, mean age: 55 +/- 7 years) or integrated approach (group B: 30 patients; 26 male, 4 female, mean age: 52 +/- 9 years). In all cases, RF ablation was performed by means of the Carto system in order to anatomically create circumferential lines around PVs. In group B, the persistence of PV potentials was then assessed with a multipolar circular catheter. If PV potentials persisted, RF pulses targeting the electrophysiological breakthroughs were delivered to disconnect PVs. RESULTS: Total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and RF delivery time were similar in both groups: 227 +/- 43, 50 +/- 23, and 43 +/- 16 minutes (group A); 232 +/- 32, 55 +/- 15, and 42 +/- 10 minutes (group B), respectively (ns). One asymptomatic PV stenosis and one pericardial effusion occurred in group A and B, respectively. After 15.4 +/- 7.4 months, 17 (57%) group A patients and 25 (83%) group B patients were in stable sinus rhythm (P = 0.02) (RR 1.78; 95% CI: 1.7-2.9). CONCLUSIONS: PV ablation by means of an integrated anatomical and electrophysiological approach seems more effective than a purely anatomical RF ablation approach. Electrophysiological confirmation of PV disconnection could be a useful marker of successful RF treatment of AF.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

Where is the lead?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Defibrillators, Implantable↗