Biomedical subjects

Von Bing Yap

Publications and source records attributed to Von Bing Yap.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Rooting a phylogenetic tree with nonreversible substitution models.

BACKGROUND: We compared two methods of rooting a phylogenetic tree: the stationary and the nonstationary substitution processes. These methods do not require an outgroup. METHODS: Given a multiple alignment and an unrooted tree, the maximum likelihood estimates of branch lengths and substitution parameters for each associated rooted tree are found; rooted trees are compared using their likelihood values. Site variation in substitution rates is handled by assigning sites into several classes before the analysis. RESULTS: In three test datasets where the trees are small and the roots are assumed known, the nonstationary process gets the correct estimate significantly more often, and fits data much better, than the stationary process. Both processes give biologically plausible root placements in a set of nine primate mitochondrial DNA sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The nonstationary process is simple to use and is much better than the stationary process at inferring the root. It could be useful for situations where an outgroup is unavailable.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Comparative immunopeptidomics of humans and their pathogens.

Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules present peptides of 8-10 residues to CD8+ T cells. We used 19 predicted proteomes to determine the influence of CD8+ T cell immune surveillance on protein evolution in humans and microbial pathogens by predicting immunopeptidomes, i.e., sets of class I binding peptides present in proteomes. We find that class I peptide binding specificities (i) have had little, if any, influence on the evolution of immunopeptidomes and (ii) do not take advantage of biases in amino acid distribution in proteins other than the concentration of hydrophobic residues in NH(2)-terminal leader sequences.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Modeling DNA base substitution in large genomic regions from two organisms.

We studied the substitution patterns in 7661 well-conserved human-mouse alignments corresponding to the intergenic regions of human chromosome 22. Alignments with a high average GC content tend to have a higher human GC content than mouse GC content, indicating a lack of stationarity. Segmenting the alignments into four groups of GC content and fitting the general reversible substitution model (REV) separately gave significantly better fits than the overall fit and the levels of fit are close to that expected under an REV model. In addition, most of the fitted rate matrices are not of the HKY type but are remarkably strand-symmetric, and we constructed a number of substitution matrices that should be useful for genomic DNA sequence alignment. We did not find obvious signs of temporal inhomogeneity in the substitution rates and concluded that the conserved intergenic regions in human chromosome 22 and mouse appear to have evolved from their common ancestors via a process that is approximately reversible and strand-symmetric, assuming site homogeneity and independence.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Identification of evolutionary hotspots in the rodent genomes.

We describe a whole-genome comparative analysis of the human, mouse, and rat genomes to describe the average substitution patterns of four genomic regions: ancient repeats, rodent-specific DNA, exons, and conserved (coding and noncoding) regions, and to identify rodent evolutionary hotspots. In all types of regions, except the rodent-specific DNA, the rat branch is slightly longer than the mouse branch. Moreover, the mouse-rat distance is longer in the rodent-specific DNA than in the ancient repeats. Analysis of individual conserved regions with different substitution models yielded the conclusion that the Jukes-Cantor model is inadequate, and the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model is almost as good as the REV model. Using human as an outgroup, we identified 5055 evolutionary hotspots, which are highly conserved subalignment blocks (each consisting of at least 100 aligned sites and a small fraction of gaps) with a large and statistically significant difference in the branch lengths of the rodent species. The cutoffs used to identify the hotspots are partially based on estimates of the average rates of substitution. The fractions of hotspots overlapping with the rodent RefSeq genes, RefSeq exons, and ESTs are all higher than expected. Still, more than half of the hotspots lie in noncoding regions of the mouse genome. We believe that the hotspots represent biologically interesting regions in the rodent genomes.

Animals↗