PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W A Ahroon

Publications and source records attributed to W A Ahroon.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1991

The energy spectrum of an impulse: its relation to hearing loss.

Permanent threshold shifts obtained from 242 chinchillas that were exposed to various impulse noise paradigms have been related to the energy spectra of the impulses. The impulses were generated by three different shock tubes that produced impulse noise spectra whose A-weighted energies showed peaks at 0.25, 1, and 2 kHz. The results show that there is an increasing susceptibility to NIPTS as the audiometric test frequency increases from 0.5 to 16 kHz. This increase in susceptibility to NIPTS is further accentuated by approximately 5 to 10 dB for impulses whose spectra peak at 2 kHz.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds.

On the basis of experimental data obtained from 420 noise-exposed animals (chinchilla), the amount of sensory cell loss has been quantitatively related to the amount of permanent threshold shift at eight audiometric test frequencies between 0.125 and 16 kHz. The noise exposures, which varied extensively in spectrum, intensity and duration, produced permanent threshold shifts that ranged from 0 to 70 dB across a broad range of test frequencies. These data show: (1) consistent outer hair cell losses with less than 5 dB permanent threshold shifts (PTS) across all the test frequencies; (2) the first approximately 30 dB of PTS is established by losses of primarily outer hair cells; (3) in regions of the cochlea that transduce frequencies higher than or equal to 2 kHz, the three rows of outer hair cells show the same degree of loss for a given PTS, while in the 0.5 to 1.0 kHz region of the cochlea, the third row of outer hair cells (OHC) consistently shows less loss than do rows one and two; (4) appreciable inner hair cell (IHC) loss does not begin to appear until PTS exceeds approximately 30 dB; (5) in the virtual absence of OHC, hearing thresholds are least sensitive to IHC loss in the octave band centered at 4 kHz, i.e., the 4 kHz region can be as functional as other areas of the cochlea in spite of a greater amount of damage. The quantitative relation between cell loss and PTS varies as a function of test frequency in an orderly fashion.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

The relation among hearing loss, sensory cell loss and tuning characteristics in the chinchilla.

Evoked-potential tuning curves were obtained on over 150 chinchillas before and after acoustic overstimulation in order to relate the effects of changes in frequency selectivity to sensory cell loss over a wide range of hearing loss. Pre- and post-exposure measures of auditory thresholds and masked thresholds (simultaneous tone-on-tone paradigm) were obtained in each animal at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 11.2 kHz, using the auditory evoked potential recorded from the inferior colliculus. Three tuning curve variables (Q10dB, low-frequency slope and high-frequency slope) were compared to the amount of noise-induced permanent threshold shift and to the percent sensory cell loss produced by a variety of noise exposures. Based upon large sample averages, frequencies showing permanent threshold shifts in excess of 10 dB also showed statistically significant differences between pre- and post-exposure measures of all three tuning curve variables. Shifts of less than 10 dB were not accompanied by statistically significant changes in the tuning curve variables. The percentage of outer hair cell loss, and percentage change in tuning curve characteristics showed systematic and parallel increases as threshold shifts increased at all probe tone frequencies except 8.0 and 11.2 kHz. In general, the results were consistent in showing that there is a systematic change in the variables which define the quality of tuning as hearing loss progressively increases and that these changes are clearly related to outer hair cell losses.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1989

Noise and vibration interactions: effects on hearing.

There is the suggestion in the literature that vibration may potentiate the effects of noise and may thus increase the risk of hearing loss in a variety of exposure situations. However, in human experimental studies, which, by necessity, are limited to low levels of exposure, the effects measured are relatively small. A very limited number of animal studies have also shown an enhanced noise-induced hearing loss in the presence of vibration, but the scope of these studies is limited. The animal studies (chinchilla) that form the basis of this report were performed using a 30-Hz, 3g rms and a 20-Hz, 1.3g rms cage vibration separately and in combination with continuous noise (95-dB, 0.5-kHz octave band) and impact noise (113, 119, or 125 dB peak SPL) exposure paradigms. All exposures lasted for 5 days. The impact noise exposures were designed to have approximately equal total energy. Temporary and permanent threshold shifts were measured using evoked potentials, and sensory cell loss was measured using surface preparation histology. The results obtained from some of the noise/vibration paradigms showed that such exposures can alter some of the dependent measures of hearing. This effect was statistically significant only for the stronger vibration exposure conditions and was evident primarily in the extent of the outer hair cell losses and in the shape of the PTS audiogram.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Threshold recovery functions following impulse noise trauma.

An analysis of the pure-tone threshold recovery functions obtained from 118 chinchillas exposed to high-level impulse noise showed that there are at least three distinctly different types of recovery function: type I--a recovery function for which the initial threshold shift recovers monotonically with increasing postexposure time; type II--a delayed recovery; i.e., for a period as long as 6 h following removal from noise, the pure-tone threshold remains elevated and stable before thresholds begin to follow a monotonic course of recovery; and type III--the growth function; i.e., over a period of at least 6 h following removal from the noise, pure-tone thresholds continue to get worse before they begin to follow a monotonic course of recovery. There is more permanent threshold shift (PTS), more sensory cell loss, and predictions of PTS and cell loss based upon initial measures of threshold shift are less accurate at those frequencies characterized by a type III recovery process than at those frequencies characterized by a type I recovery process.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1978

Auditory masking patterns in the goldfish (Carassius auratus): psychophysical tuning curves.

The masking effects of tones on the detection auditory signals were studied in goldfish using the psychophysical tuning-curve paradigm. For signals below 350 Hz, masking is an inverse function of the frequency separation between masker and signal; a finding consistent with previous masking studies on fishes, birds and mammals. For signals above 350 Hz, masking peaks occur both in the 350 Hz region and at the frequency of the signal. Quantitative comparisons with recent neural tuning curves for goldfish saccular neurones suggest that the filtering observed may be determined by mechanical frequency selectivity below 350 Hz, but by a neural analysis of temporal patterns above this range.

Animals↗
PubMed1976

Processing interaction between two dimensions of nonphonetic auditory signals.

In 1974 Wood proposed a hybrid serial-parallel model to account for the within-stimulus interactions between the acoustic cue of "pitch" and the phonetic cure of "place." Three of the five experiments in this paper replicate the Wood findings with analogous, clearly nonphonetic stimuli and thus refute Wood's implicit assumption of the involvement of any uniquely phonetic processes as factors in his results. The experiments in this paper demonstrate that the patterns of interaction found by Wood are independent of the experience of the subjects, the order of cue presentation, and whether the cues are presented simultaneously or sequentially. We conclude that the given patterns of interaction are general characteristics of the auditory system. These characteristics probably are not related to backward or forward "recognition" masking but may be a function of several other general factors.

Acoustic Stimulation↗