PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Akerley

Publications and source records attributed to W Akerley.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Multiinstitutional phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Combined modality therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has produced promising results. A multiinstitutional phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy on patients with locally advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC entered onto a phase II study from March 1995 to December 1996. On an outpatient basis for 7 weeks, patients received paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 weekly over 1 hour; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2 weekly; and radiation therapy of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. After chemoradiation therapy, patients received an additional two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were eligible for the study. The survival rates at 12 months were 56.3%, and at 24 months, 38.3%, with a median overall survival of 20.5 months. The progression-free survival rates at 12 months were 43.6%, and at 24 months, 34.7%, with a median progression-free survival of 9.0 months. Two patients did not receive more than 2 weeks of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and were not assessable for toxicity and response. The overall response rate (partial plus complete response) of 37 assessable patients was 75.7%. The major toxicity was esophagitis. Seventeen patients (46%) developed grade 3 or 4 esophagitis. However, only two patients developed late esophageal toxicity with stricture at 3 and 6 months posttreatment. CONCLUSION: Combined modality therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation is a promising treatment for locally advanced NSCLC that has a high response rate and acceptable toxicity and survival rates. A randomized trial will be necessary to fully evaluate the usefulness of these findings.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

High-dose intravenous methotrexate for patients with nonleukemic leptomeningeal cancer: is intrathecal chemotherapy necessary?

PURPOSE: Standard treatments for neoplastic meningitis are only modestly effective and are associated with significant morbidity. Isolated reports suggest that concurrent systemic and intrathecal (i.t.) therapy may be more effective than i.t. therapy alone. We present our experience, which includes CSF and serum pharmacokinetic data, on the use of high-dose (HD) intravenous (i.v.) methotrexate (MTX) as the sole treatment for neoplastic meningitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with solid-tumor neoplastic meningitis received one to four courses (mean, 2.3 courses) of HD (8 g/m2 over 4 hours) i.v. MTX and leucovorin rescue. Serum and CSF MTX concentrations were measured daily. Toxicity, response, and survival were retrospectively compared with a reference group of 15 patients treated with standard i.t. MTX during the same time interval. RESULTS: Peak methotrexate concentrations ranged from 3.7 to 55 micromol/L (mean, 17.1 micromol/L) in CSF and 178 to 1,700 micromol/L (mean, 779 micromol/L) in serum. Cytotoxic CSF and serum MTX concentrations were maintained much longer than with i.t. dosing. Toxicity was minimal. Cytologic clearing was seen in 81% of patients compared with 60% of patients treated intrathecally (P = .3). Median survival in the HD i.v. MTX group was 13.8 months versus 2.3 months in the i.t. MTX group (P = .003). CONCLUSION: HD i.v. MTX is easily administered and well tolerated. This regimen achieves prolonged cytotoxic serum MTX concentrations and CSF concentrations at least comparable to those achieved with standard i.t. therapy. Cytologic clearing and survival may be superior in patients treated with HD i.v. MTX. Prospective studies and a reconsideration of the use of i.t. chemotherapy for patients with neoplastic meningitis are warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Preclinically, the taxanes appear to potentiate radiation more effectively than do the platinum compounds. In our phase I trial (LUN-17) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, we defined the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of concomitant radiation and paclitaxel (Taxol). We then conducted a series of phase II clinical trials in patients with stage III A or stage III B non-small-cell lung cancer to explore the role of paclitaxel in a combined-modality approach; these trials were based on the very low paclitaxel concentrations needed to enhance radiation in the phase I trial and the relatively high response rate achieved. Our LUN-27 trial of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for 6 weeks with no adjuvant chemotherapy produced substantial response and survival rates with acceptable toxicity. LUN-56 added weekly carboplatin (Paraplatin) during the initial concurrent phase as well as two cycles of standard-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin. The ongoing LUN-63 phase II study delivers concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin with hyperfractionated radiation, followed by two cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin, to further improve local control and overall survival. We are currently extending the investigation of concurrent weekly paclitaxel plus radiation in a large-scale, three-arm, randomized phase II trial. To date, toxicity in all trials has been acceptable and compares favorably with other regimens. The major side effect, esophagitis, occurs predictably and is managed easily, abating shortly after therapy is completed. The rates of overall response and 1- and 2-year survival are very encouraging, and phase III evaluation is warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

We conducted a prospective Phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and 2-year survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. The weekly paclitaxel regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel. Thirty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer from six institutions were entered into the study between March 1994 and February 1995. Weekly i.v. paclitaxel (60 mg/m2; 3-h infusion) plus concurrent chest RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) was delivered for 6 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Three patients achieved a complete response (10%), and 22 patients (76%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 86% (95% confidence interval, 68-96%). One patient progressed during the therapy, and three patients had stable disease. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (37%). One patient died of pneumonia after completion of therapy. Additional grade > or =3 toxicities included pneumonitis (12%) and neutropenia (6%). One patient had a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. The median overall survival duration for all 33 patients who entered the study was 20 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 60.6%, 33.3%, and 18.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival duration for all 33 patients was 10.7 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 39.4%, 12.1%, and 6.1%, respectively. Weekly paclitaxel plus concurrent RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The survival outcome from this regimen is encouraging and seems to be at least equivalent to that of other chemotherapy/radiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/RT in Phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting and in combination with other cytotoxic agents.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent radiation (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or stomach were studied. The initial dose of paclitaxel was 30 mg/m2 by 3-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion repeated every week for 6 weeks with 50 Gy RT. Doses were escalated at 10-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicities at 60 mg/m2/wk were abdominal pain within the RT field, nausea, and anorexia. Of 23 patients with assessable disease, 11 (seven with gastric, four with pancreatic cancer) had objective responses for an overall response rate of 48%. CONCLUSION: Concurrent paclitaxel with upper abdominal RT is well tolerated at dosages that have substantial activity. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and RT at the MTD of 50 mg/m2/wk is underway.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced lung cancer: preliminary data from a phase II trial.

We conducted a phase II trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) delivered at a maximum tolerated dose of 175 mg/m2 on an extended weekly schedule. Patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were eligible if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, had received no previous chemotherapy, demonstrated normal hematologic and hepatic function, and could provide informed consent. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 was administered as an intravenous infusion weekly over 3 hours with standard premedication, for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle. Doses were modified for absolute neutrophil count less than 1.5 x 10(9)/L or neuropathy greater than grade I on the day of therapy. Patients without progressive disease received subsequent cycles at the same dose. To date, 30 patients have been enrolled; data are available for 25. The median age was 65 years (range, 38 to 78 years), 23 patients were performance status 0 or 1, and 14 had received prior radiation. Sites of disease included the lung (23 patients), central nervous system (11), bone (seven), liver (one), kidney (one), and soft tissue (eight). Eighty-three percent, 75%, 58%, and 50% of intended doses were delivered during cycles 1 though 4, respectively. Grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in nine patients, but improved in all nine following dose reduction. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 10 patients. Partial responses occurred in 14 of 25 patients (56%; 95% confidence interval, 46% to 66%). Median duration of response was 6.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 53%. The extended weekly paclitaxel schedule results in enhanced dose intensity, marked activity, and acceptable toxicity. Paclitaxel given weekly at maximum dose intensity may be more effective than conventional paclitaxel administration schedules.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Weekly high-dose paclitaxel in metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary report.

The optimal dose and schedule for paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer are not known. Based on our phase I study in non-small cell lung cancer, in which the dose intensity of paclitaxel was successfully escalated by using a weekly schedule, we initiated a phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Treatment consists of weekly paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week break. Doses are modified for neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/microL), bilirubin levels greater than 1.5 times normal, or greater than grade 1 neuropathy. Patients with MBC continue treatment until disease progression. Patients with LABC receive one to two cycles before proceeding to surgery if resectable. Thus far, 15 patients, eight with MBC and seven with LABC, are assessable for response and/or toxicity. Most patients have required dose modification, with median delivery of 75% (cycle 1) and 50% (cycle 2) of the planned dose of paclitaxel. Neutropenia has been the most common cause of dose reductions, although only one patient required treatment for neutropenic fever. Six patients have developed grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neuropathy, but with dose reductions many have continued treatment with stable or improving neurologic symptoms. Objective responses have been seen in 12 of 14 assessable patients, including six with MBC (one complete response, five partial responses) and six with LABC (two complete responses, four partial responses), for an overall response rate of 86% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 96%). All responding LABC patients have been rendered free from disease at surgery. These preliminary results are very encouraging. Accrual to the study continues.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Concurrent paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancers: a phase II study--preliminary results.

Radiotherapy or surgery alone for advanced head and neck cancer generally yields poor results. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin have both shown excellent radiosensitization through two discrete mechanisms, namely, blocking the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and inhibiting DNA repair. In an effort to improve locoregional control and survival, a prospective phase II study was initiated using paclitaxel 60 mg/ml and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 1), each given as a single dose weekly with concurrent conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into two groups: operable and inoperable/unresectable. The operable and inoperable groups received 5 weeks (45 Gy) and 8 weeks (72 Gy) of chemoradiotherapy, respectively. Patients in the operable group were evaluated with repeat biopsies from the primary site after 5 weeks. Those with a positive biopsy underwent surgery; those with a negative biopsy received 3 additional weeks of chemoradiotherapy. Thirty-four patients were entered in the operable group (28 men and six women; 40 to 71 years of age; 12 stage III and 22 stage IV). Of 26 evaluable patients, 19 (73%) had a complete clinical response (95% confidence interval [CI], 52% to 88%) and six (23%) had a partial response (95% CI, 9% to 44%), for a total clinical response rate of 96% (95% CI, 80% to 100%). A pathologic complete response at the primary site (two had an unknown primary site) occurred in 17 of 24 (71%) patients (95% CI, 49% to 87%). Of 20 patients with N1-3 nodes who underwent neck dissection, 17 (85%) had pathologically negative lymph nodes. Seven patients with residual tumor at the primary site were resected (oral cavity, three; maxilla, one; base of tongue, one; and larynx, two). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis were seen in 19 (73%) patients; mucositis was the most common and significant morbidity. Accrual for the inoperable group continues. Concomitant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and external beam radiotherapy yielded excellent clinical responses, but produced significant grade 3/4 toxicity. In the operable group, the majority of responders had a complete pathologic response. These preliminary findings will be assessed in terms of response duration, organ preservation, and long-term survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study of 5-fluoruracil leucovorin and azidothymidine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the response rate of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to combined therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and intravenous azidothymidine (AZT), a thymidine nucleoside analog. By itself, AZT has limited antineoplastic efficacy. However, experimental studies indicate that 5-FU enhances the antitumor activity of AZT by inhibiting synthesis of normal thymidine nucleotides with which AZT competes for incorporation into nucleic acids. A phase I study defined the maximum tolerated dose of AZT as 7 g/m2 with hypotension during the infusion being the dose-limiting toxicity. A phase II study was performed with oral leucovorin (100 mg p.o. hourly for 4 h prior to 5-FU and 4 h and 8 h after 5-FU), bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2) followed 1 h later by a 2-h infusion of AZT (7 g/m2). Treatment was given weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 1-week break, which constituted a cycle of therapy. Responses were evaluated after every two cycles. Patients continued on therapy as long as they tolerated treatment and did not have progressive disease. Of 15 evaluable patients who had received no chemotherapy there was 1 complete response and 4 partial responses (a 33% response rate), whereas only 1 of 6 patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy had a partial response (17%). An additional 10 patients had stable disease lasting 2-14 months. Therapy was well tolerated with the only one instance each of grade 3 nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, and hypotension. Approximately 50% of treatments were accompanied by mild hypotension, which was easily corrected by increasing the rate of normal saline infusion. There was no difficulty administering this regimen in the outpatient setting. While the overall response rate (29%) is comparable to that seen with combinations of 5-FU and leucovorin alone, in most reported series a considerably higher dose of 5-FU was utilized than in this study. Since patients in the present study experienced relatively little 5-FU toxicity, increasing the dose of 5-FU in this regimen would appear to be feasible and might result in a higher response rate.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Concurrent Paclitaxel and Radiation Therapy for Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Combination radiation and chemotherapy has an intuitive appeal for improving cancer treatment. Experimental results suggest that paclitaxel plus radiation might produce additive or synergistic effects. METHODS: A series of phase I and II trials to test tolerance and begin to evaluate effectiveness were performed on patients with non-small cell lung cancer, high-grade astrocytic brain tumors, and pancreatic and gastric cancers. RESULTS: Tolerance of the combined drug and radiation programs was generally good. Esophagitis was dose-limiting for the intrathoracic tumors. Hematologic toxicity was mild, but peripheral neuritis and cutaneous reactions were common. CONCLUSIONS: These trials show that paclitaxel plus concurrent radiation is feasible at the dose levels and schedules tested. Antitumor responses have been observed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of divalproex sodium prophylaxis in adults with newly diagnosed brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: Seizures occur after the diagnosis of brain tumors in up to 40% of patients. Prophylactic anticonvulsants are widely advocated despite a lack of convincing evidence of their efficacy in preventing first seizures. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the incidence of first seizures in divalproex sodium- and placebo-treated patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had not previously had a seizure were randomized within 14 days of diagnosis of their brain tumor to receive either divalproex sodium or placebo. All patients had at least one supratentorial brain lesion, a Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) > or = 50%, and no previous anticonvulsant use or other brain disease. Compliance and adequacy of dosing were assessed by pill counts and monthly blood levels. RESULTS: Seventy-four of 75 consecutive eligible patients were entered in this study. Median follow-up was 7 months. The drug and placebo groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, KPS, primary tumor type, number or location of brain lesions, frequency of brain surgery, or pretreatment EEG. Thirteen of 37 patients (35%) receiving divalproex sodium and 9 of 37 patients (24%) on placebo had seizures. The odds ratio for a seizure in the divalproex sodium arm relative to the placebo arm was 1.7 (95% CI 0.6 to 4.6; p = 0.3). The hypothesis that anticonvulsant prophylaxis provides a reduction in the frequency of first seizure as small as 30% was rejected (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis with divalproex sodium is not indicated for patients with brain tumors who have not had seizures.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1996

Preliminary results of a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel infusion in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has a broad spectrum of activity, but the optimal schedule has not yet been determined. As a phase-specific agent, more frequent administration theoretically may be more effective. We have previously demonstrated that a weekly schedule of paclitaxel used as a radiation sensitizer is well tolerated by outpatients. We therefore conducted a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose of this alternative schedule. In all, 26 patients were entered into this study through six paclitaxel dose levels (100, 125, 135, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2/wk) administered weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. All patients had a performance status of 0 through 2, with a median age of 65 years (age range, 37 to 80 years). Sites of disease included lung, bone, liver, soft tissue, and brain. Of the 26 entered, 24 patients completed the first 8-week cycle and are evaluable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of neutropenia, occurred in four of six patients at 200 mg/m2/wk and in two of six at 175 mg/m2/wk. Only one evaluable patient required admission for febrile neutropenia. Other toxicities included rash, pulmonary infiltrate, myalgia, neuropathy, and alopecia. Nine (38%) of the 24 patients demonstrated objective responses. One patient with stable disease completed 48 weeks of therapy. Others remain in active treatment. We conclude that the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel administered for 6 consecutive weeks of an 8-week cycle is 175 mg/m2/wk and is limited principally by neutropenia. The response rate with this schedule is encouraging and merits further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase I/II trial of weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced lung cancer.

During previous phase I experience of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) used as a radiation sensitizer, decreased hematologic toxicity was noted. Therefore, an extended phase I/II trial of weekly paclitaxel in patients with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose and activity of this alternative schedule. Twenty-six patients entered this study through six dose levels of paclitaxel (100, 125, 135, 150, 175, and 200 mg/m2/wk) administered weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. Doses were escalated if more than 80% of the intended dose was administered in the preceding cohort without evidence of grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. All patients had a performance status of 0 to 2 and a median age of 63 years. Sites of disease included the lung, bone, liver, soft tissue, and brain. Twenty-four patients completed the first 8-week cycle and are evaluable for toxicity and response. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 200 mg/m2/wk and consisted primarily of neutropenia. Only one evaluable patient required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Other toxicities included rash, pulmonary infiltrate, myalgia, neuropathy, and alopecia. Nine of 24 patients (38%) demonstrated objective responses. We conclude that the maximum tolerated dose of weekly paclitaxel administered for 6 weeks in an 8-week cycle is 175 mg/m2/wk. The response rate is encouraging and this schedule merits further investigation.

Alopecia↗
PubMed1996

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Previously untreated patients with stages IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer entered this phase II study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin and concurrent radiation. Patients received paclitaxel 50 mg/m2/wk as a 1-hour infusion and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 2/wk for 7 weeks with radiation to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (44 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (22 Gy). In addition, patients received two additional cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6) 3 weeks apart. From March 1995 to February 1996, 23 patients entered the study and their overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was 82%. The major toxicity was esophagitis. Nine patients (45%) had experienced grades 3 or 4 esophagitis by the end of the 7-week concurrent phase. Seven of the nine patients recovered from the esophagitis within 2 weeks and received the additional two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6). Only one patient (4%) had grade 4 pneumonitis; this patient also recovered within 2 weeks and received the final two doses of combined chemotherapy. Therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation is a promising treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; it has a high response rate and acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Weekly paclitaxel with and without concurrent radiation therapy: toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and response.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has shown in vitro and clinical activity against non-small cell lung cancer and astrocytic brain tumors, tumors traditionally thought of as relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Because of its ability to block dividing cells in the G2/M portion of the cell cycle (the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle), paclitaxel is also a potentially potent radiosensitizer. To exploit these and other properties of paclitaxel, we explored a weekly, outpatient administration schedule, with and without concurrent radiation therapy, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and astrocytic brain tumors. Our experience has shown that weekly outpatient administration is feasible, that remarkably high dose intensities can be achieved with acceptable toxicity, and that the specific dose-limiting toxicity appears to depend on administration schedule, type of concurrent radiotherapy, and certain patient characteristics. Preliminary response data are very encouraging. At the same time, pharmacokinetic studies have suggested possible reasons for our ability to use such exorbitant dose intensities safely, and also have shown that sustained plasma paclitaxel levels above the putative radiosensitizing threshold can be achieved continuously during a 6-week course of radiotherapy. Specific results, dosing recommendations, and plans for future studies are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Diagnosis, management, and survival of patients with leptomeningeal cancer based on cerebrospinal fluid-flow status.

BACKGROUND: The authors assessed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in patients with carcinomatous meningitis using technetium-99m-DTPA (Tc-99) ventriculography to determine the frequency of flow abnormalities, their reversibility with treatment, and the implications for successful therapy and survival. METHODS: Technetium-99m-DTPA flow studies were performed in 31 patients after placement of Ommaya reservoirs (Baxter, McGaw Park, IL). Two millicuries of Tc-99 were injected into the reservoir. Planar images of the head and entire spine were obtained after 10 and 30 minutes and after 1, 4, 6, and 24 hours. Follow-up studies were performed for 12 patients whose initial studies were abnormal or who developed complications of therapy. RESULTS: In 19 of the 31 patients (61%), ventricular-outlet, spinal, or convexity blocks were identified. In 11 of these 19 patients, focal radiotherapy to the site of the block restored normal flow. Survival among patients with initially normal, abnormal but correctable, and abnormal but uncorrectable CSF flow differed significantly (6.9, 13.0, and 0.7 months respectively; P < 0.001). Some patients who were treated intrathecally despite abnormal CSF flow experienced drug-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebrospinal fluid-flow blocks are common in patients with carcinomatous meningitis and may occur at the skull base, in the spinal canal, and over the convexities. These flow abnormalities often can be corrected with appropriately directed radiotherapy. If untreated, CSF tumor progression (protected site effect), neurotoxicity (high concentration effect), and systemic toxicity (reservoir effect) can occur, resulting in shortened survival and treatment-related morbidity. Therefore, intrathecal chemotherapy should be preceded by a radionuclide flow study and should be delayed if abnormal flow is documented until appropriate radiotherapy reestablishes normal flow.

Adolescent↗