PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Atkin

Publications and source records attributed to W Atkin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Development of a video assessment scoring method to determine the accuracy of endoscopist performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Variation in the adenoma detection rate (ADR) at flexible sigmoidoscopy screening has been shown to be due to variation in endoscopist performance. There are no objective methods for scoring an endoscopist's performance reliably, and the aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable objective scoring method using video footage of screening flexible sigmoidoscopies. METHODS: In a series of five experiments, experienced endoscopists (the scorers) independently scored a sample (n = 43) of the 40 000 flexible sigmoidoscopy extubations recorded as part of the United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial (UK FSST). The scoring system, the parameters scored, and their definitions evolved over the course of the five experiments. The initial visual analogue score (range 0-100) used in the first two experiments evolved into a five-point score that ranged from 1 (E, poor) to 5 (A, excellent) in the last three experiments. The final parameters scored were: time spent viewing the mucosa, re-examination of poorly viewed areas, suctioning of fluid pools, distension of the lumen, lower rectal examination, and overall quality of the examination. The first four experiments scored one individual case per endoscopist; in experiment 5, an overall score was awarded for five cases performed by each endoscopist being assessed. RESULTS: Scoring five cases examined by an individual endoscopist using the A-E grading system was the most reliable method (interclass correlation coefficient 0.89). Cluster analysis demonstrated that the endoscopists in the high-scoring ADR group (ADR 14.7-15.9 %) could be differentiated from those in the intermediate- and low-scoring ADR groups (ADR 8.6-12.6 %). CONCLUSIONS: An objective scoring system for assessing the accuracy of performance at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, based on video footage, is described. Endoscopists who might benefit from further training can be identified using this method.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2006

Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy are known to vary between endoscopists. Variability in the technique used and in the quality of bowel preparation may explain this. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is a relationship between the grading of bowel preparation and the ADR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between the ADR and assessment of bowel preparation was examined using the full United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial data set (n = 38 601). The consistency of the bowel preparation classification was then investigated by six experienced endoscopists (video scorers), who examined 260 flexible sigmoidoscopy cases - 20 from each of the 13 trial endoscopists. RESULTS: Overall, the ADR was significantly higher in flexible sigmoidoscopy examinations with excellent or good bowel preparation ( P = 0.02). However, endoscopists with a higher ADR coded a smaller proportion of their examinations as having excellent/good preparation ( P = 0.002). Video scorers agreed with the trial endoscopists' definition of bowel preparation in 48.9 % of the readings, but they scored the quality of preparation as poorer than the trial endoscopists in 36.4 % and 40.6 %, respectively, in the intermediate-performance group (10 % < ADR < 14 %) and lower-performance group (ADR </= 10 %) in comparison with only 12.9 % in the high-performance group (ADR > or =14 %). There was a significant linear trend between the proportion scored as having poor bowel preparation and the ADR ( P < 0.001), varying from 2.7 % in the higher-performance ADR group to 13.4 % in the lower-performance group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists with a higher ADR are more likely to be critical of the quality of bowel preparation. Training in judgement processes such as non-acceptance of suboptimal bowel preparation is required in order to ensure universally high standards in screening procedures.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2005

Review article: Population screening for colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a common cancer and common cause of death. The mortality rate from colorectal cancer can be reduced by identification and removal of cancer precursors, adenomas, or by detection of cancer at an earlier stage. Pilot screening programmes have demonstrated decreased colorectal cancer mortality; as a result many countries are developing colorectal cancer screening programmes. The most common modalities being evaluated are faecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Implementation of screening tests has been hampered by cost, invasiveness, availability of resources and patient acceptance. New technologies such at computed tomographic colonography and stool screening for molecular markers of neoplasia are in development as potential minimally invasive tools. This review considers who should be screened, which test to use and how often to screen.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Exon 3 beta-catenin mutations are specifically associated with colorectal carcinomas in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Activating beta-catenin mutations in exon 3 have been implicated in colorectal tumorigenesis. Although reports to the contrary exist, it has been suggested that beta-catenin mutations occur more often in microsatellite unstable (MSI+) colorectal carcinomas, including hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), as a consequence of defective DNA mismatch repair. We have analysed 337 colorectal carcinomas and adenomas, from both sporadic cases and HNPCC families, to provide an accurate assessment of beta-catenin mutation frequency in each tumour type. METHODS: Direct sequencing of exon 3 of beta-catenin. RESULTS: Mutations were rare in sporadic (1/83, 1.2%) and HNPCC adenomas (1/37, 2.7%). Most of the sporadic adenomas analysed (80%) were small (<1 cm), and our data therefore differ from a previous report of a much higher mutation frequency in small adenomas. No oncogenic beta-catenin mutations were identified in 34 MSI+ and 78 microsatellite stable (MSI-) sporadic colorectal cancers but a raised mutation frequency (8/44, 18.2%) was found in HNPCC cancers; this frequency was significantly higher than that in HNPCC adenomas (p=0.035) and in both MSI- (p<0.0001) and MSI+ (p=0.008) sporadic cancers. Mutations were more common in higher stage (Dukes' stages C and D) cancers (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Exon 3 beta-catenin mutations are associated specifically with malignant colorectal tumours in HNPCC; mutations appear not to result directly from deficient mismatch repair. Our data provide evidence that the genetic pathways of sporadic MSI+ and HNPCC cancers may be divergent, and indicate that mutations in the HNPCC pathway of colorectal tumorigenesis may be determined by selection, not simply by hypermutation.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2005

Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group.

BACKGROUND: Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is a complex technical procedure performed in a variety of settings, by examiners with diverse professional backgrounds, training, and experience. Potential variation in technical quality may have a profound impact on the effectiveness of FS on the early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. AIM: We propose a set of consensus and evidence based recommendations to assist the development of continuous quality improvement programmes around the delivery of FS for colorectal cancer screening. RECOMMENDATIONS: These recommendations address the intervals between FS examinations, documentation of results, training of endoscopists, decision making around referral for colonoscopy, policies for antibiotic prophylaxis and management of anticoagulation, insertion of the FS endoscope, bowel preparation, complications, the use of non-physicians as FS endoscopists, and FS endoscope reprocessing. For each of these areas, continuous quality improvement targets are recommended, and research questions are proposed.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2005

Gender differences in utilization of colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic and psychological mediators of gender differences in uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening for colorectal cancer. SETTING: A subsample (n=5462) from a large community trial of FS in the UK. METHODS: Men and women randomized to screening as part of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial were sent a postal questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes to screening six months before their screening appointment. Attendance at screening was recorded by the screening centres. RESULTS: More men than women attended screening (73% versus 67%). The higher male attendance was partially explained by their lower levels of socioeconomic deprivation, higher levels of marital status and lower perceived barriers to screening. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to expectations, men were more likely than women to attend FS screening. This was partially explained by socioeconomic and attitudinal differences to screening, but additional research is needed to understand the key aspects of FS screening that will maximize screening uptake in men and women.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2004

Review article: balancing the ideal versus the practical-considerations of colorectal cancer prevention and screening.

Colorectal cancer is responsible for over 500 000 deaths annually world-wide. Death from colorectal cancer is preventable, primarily through early diagnosis of disease that has not metastasized. The disease itself may be prevented by the detection and removal of colorectal adenomas, from which more than 95% of colorectal cancers arise. Currently there are several screening methods for the disease. These include faecal occult blood tests, sigmoidoscopy, barium enema and colonscopy as well as emerging methods of virtual colonoscopy and faecal DNA testing. While direct and indirect evidence support the efficacy of these tests they differ from each other in their sensitivity, specificity, cost, and safety. Various professional organizations in different geographical regions of the world have published recommendations on which screening methods to use and when in patients at average- or high-risk. The challenge in reducing the incidence and mortality of this disease lies in increasing accessibility to and compliance with screening and delivery within a quality assured programme.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed2003

Optimizing bowel preparation for multidetector row CT colonography: effect of Citramag and Picolax.

AIM: To compare the adequacy and acceptability of Picolax and Citramag bowel cleansing agents for CT colonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multidetector row CT colonography was performed in 124 subjects; 43 had been prepared with Picolax and 81 with Citramag. Datasets were assessed for retained fluid and solid residue, and overall adequacy of segmental visualization. Preparation acceptability was also assessed. RESULTS: There was significantly less retained fluid with Picolax. The odds of being in the next higher category for retained fluid when using Picolax were 0.33 (CI: 0.22-0.50, p<0.0001) when compared with Citramag, for all segments combined. However there was significantly more retained solid residue with Picolax. The odds of being in the next higher category for retained residue when using Picolax were 2.44 (CI: 1.41-4.24, p=0.002) when compared with Citramag, for all segments combined. There was no significant difference with respect to overall segmental visualization: the odds of a segment being adequately visualized when using Picolax were 1.52 (CI: 0.88-2.65, p=0.14) when compared with Citramag. There was no significant difference with respect to acceptability. CONCLUSION: Picolax results in a significantly drier colon than Citramag and associated with more retained residue. We found Picolax the more suitable preparation for CT colonography.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2003

Use of multidetector-row CT colonography for detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients referred via the Department of Health "2-Week-wait" initiative.

AIM: Patients referred under the Department of Health 2-week wait initiative with symptoms of colorectal cancer frequently undergo whole-colon examination. We investigated the use of computed tomography (CT) colonography as an alternative to colonoscopy in this scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients, referred via the 2-week wait initiative and scheduled for colonoscopy, consented to undergo multidetector CT colonography immediately before endoscopy. The site and morphology of any polyp or cancer detected by CT was noted and comparison made with subsequent colonoscopy. RESULTS: Colonoscopy detected polyps or cancer in 29 patients (53.7%). CT colonography prospectively detected 18 of 41 (44%) polyps of 1-5 mm, three of four (75%) polyps of 6-9 mm, four of four (100%) polyps 10 mm or larger, and five of six (83%) cancers. The missed cancer occurred early in the series and was a perceptive error. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT colonography for cancer and polyps 10 mm or greater on a per patient basis were 90, 100, 100 and 98%, respectively. CT detected one renal cancer and one colonic cancer, initially missed due to incomplete colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: CT colonography is a robust technique for investigation of symptomatic patients. The learning curve must be overcome for optimal performance.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Observer variation in the detection of colorectal neoplasia on double-contrast barium enema: implications for colorectal cancer screening and training.

AIM: To assess inter-observer error for the diagnosis of neoplasia on double contrast barium enema (DCBE) in the light of claims that no additional interpretative training would be needed for implementation in a national screening programme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 experts, 10 consultants, and 10 experienced trainees each reported 20 DCBE studies, of which two showed cancer, three showed large polyps, four showed small polyps, and 12 were normal. Inter-observer variation was compared using odds ratios with the trainee group as reference (baseline group). RESULTS: Experts were significantly more likely to correctly identify neoplasia on DCBE than trainees. The odds of a correct diagnosis for experts were 2.79 (95% CI 2.04, 3.81) for cancer, 2.36 (1.88, 2.97) for large polyps, and 3.50 (1.98, 6.18) for small polyps. While consultants were more likely to correctly diagnose a large polyp than trainees, 1.45 (1.15, 1.84), there was no significant difference between these two groups for the correct diagnosis of either cancer, 1.24 (0.52, 2.96), or small polyps, 1.26 (0.83, 1.90). A cancer was missed by 6 (60%) experts, 9 (90%) consultants, and 8 (80%) trainees. Large polyps were missed by 4 (40%) experts, 5 (50%) consultants, and 6 (60%) trainees. There was no significant difference between any group when false positive diagnoses were considered. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable inter-observer perceptive error for the diagnosis of neoplasia on DCBE. Experts performed significantly better than other observers but the overall standard of performance was poor, even amongst experts.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Options for screening for colorectal cancer.

Unlike other types of cancer, there are several options for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). The most extensively examined method, faecal occult blood testing (FOBT), has been shown, in three large randomized trials, to reduce mortality from CRC by up to 20% if offered biennally and possibly more if offered every year. Recently published data from the US trial suggest that CRC incidence rates are also reduced by up to 20%, but only after 18 years. In this study, the number of positive slides was associated with the positive predictive value both for CRC and adenomas larger than 1 cm, suggesting that the reduction in CRC incidence was caused by the identification and removal of large adenomas. In this respect, this study supports the concept that removing adenomas prevents CRC. More efficient methods of detecting adenomas include the use of colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). Considerable evidence exists from case-control and uncontrolled cohort studies to suggest that endoscopic screening by sigmoidoscopy reduces incidence of distal colorectal cancer. However, in the absence of evidence from a randomized trial, several countries have been reluctant to introduce endoscopic screening. Three trialsare currently in progress (in the UK, Italy and the US) to address this issue. Two of these trials are examining the hypothesis that a single FS screen at around age 55-64 might be a cost-effective and acceptable method for reducing CRC incidence rates. Recruitment and screening are now complete in both studies and the first analysis of results on incidence rates is expected in 2004. Colonoscopy screening at 10-year intervals has recently been endorsed in the US on the basis that the reductions in incidence observed with distal CRC screening can be extrapolated to the proximal colon. However, data are lacking and a pilot study for a trial of the acceptability and efficacy of colonoscopy screening is in progress in the US. It has also been suggested that FOBT testing should be used to detect proximal CRC missed by sigmoidoscopy screening, but the small amount of published data suggest that supplementing FS with FOBT offers very little advantage over FS alone. Other forms of CRC screening are under investigation and represent exciting options for the future. Extraction of DNA from stool is now feasible and a number of research groups have shown high sensitivity for CRC using a panel of DNA markers including mutations in k-ras, APC, p53 and BAT26. Data so far indicate that, with the exception of k-ras, these markers are highly specific and therefore represent a significant improvement over FOBT. Whether these tests will replace or supplement existing methods of screening has yet to be determined. It has been suggested that BAT26, which is a marker of microsatellite instability, a feature of proximal sporadic CRC, might be a useful adjunct to sigmoidoscopy screening. Others have suggested that a test for occult blood should be included with the DNA markers to further increase sensitivity. It is not yet known how sensitive these markers are for adenomas--it is only by detecting adenomas that CRC incidence rates can be reduced. A final exciting new option for screening is virtual colonoscopy (VC), which by screening out people without neoplasia allows colonoscopy to be reserved for patients requiring a therapeutic intervention. The sensitivity of VC for large adenomas and CRC appears to be high, although results vary by centre and there is a steep learning curve. Sensitivity for small adenomas is low, but perhaps it is less essential to find such lesions. Some groups have suggested that virtual colonoscopy might be a useful option for investigating patients who test positive with stool-based screening tests. Whichever CRC screening method is finally chosen (and there is no reason why several methods should not ultimately be available), high quality endoscopy resources will always be required to investigate and treat neoplastic lesions detected.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2002

Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate socioeconomic variation in participation in flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening for colorectal cancer. DESIGN: A prospective study nested within a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of FS screening for the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer (the UK flexible sigmoidoscopy trial). SETTING: Glasgow, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 55-64 year old adults, registered with general practitioners participating in the FS trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening participation measured at three levels: questionnaire return; interest in screening; attendance at screening. RESULTS: Socioeconomic deprivation was a strong predictor of participation. Return of the screening questionnaire, expression of interest in screening, and attendance at the test, were all lower in more deprived groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the need to consider ways to reduce inequalities in screening uptake, in parallel with the introduction of any new screening programmes, to avoid exacerbating social gradients in cancer mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process.

Qualitative methods were used to investigate decision-making among a group of older adults who declined the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer. Interviews were conducted with 60 people (30 men and 30 women) who either had not responded to the screening letter or who responded saying that they were not interested in participating. The findings suggest that low perceived susceptibility to bowel cancer, in terms of current health status, family history or absence of bowel symptoms. was an important factor in the decision to decline screening. Procedural barriers such as embarrassment, pain/discomfort and perceived unpleasantness of the test were reported as relatively minor, although the test was considered more physically intrusive than other screening tests. Avoidant attitudes emerged as an important theme and were reported by a third of respondents. Distinct patterns of decision-making were also observed and three groups emerged from accounts: (i) forgetting or avoiding making a decision about the test (ii) a confident rejection of the test based on a few salient factors, and (iii) a more careful consideration of the test focusing on issues of susceptibility. The findings are discussed in the context of models of health behaviour and bowel cancer screening participation research.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗