Biomedical subjects

W Beery

Publications and source records attributed to W Beery.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

Cost and outcomes of Medicare reimbursement for HMO preventive services.

Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO) were randomized to a preventive services benefit package for 2 years or to usual care. At 24- and 48-month follow-ups, the treatment group had completed more advance directives, participated in more exercise, and consumed less dietary fat than the control group. Unexpectedly, more deaths occurred in the treatment group. Surviving treatment-group enrollees reported higher satisfaction with health, less decline in self-rated health status, and fewer depressive symptoms than surviving control participants. Despite these changes, the intervention did not yield lower cost per quality-adjusted life year in this historically prevention-oriented HMO.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Implementation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: a process evaluation.

The Community Health Promotion Grants Program, sponsored by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, represents a major health initiative that established 11 community health promotion projects. Successful implementation was characterized by several critical factors: (1) intervention activities; (2) community activation; (3) success in obtaining external funding; and (4) institutionalization. Analysis of the program was based on data from several sources: program reports, key informant surveys, and a community coalition survey. Results indicate that school-based programs focusing on adolescent health problems were the most successful in reaching the populations they were targeting. The majority of the programs were able to attract external funding, thereby adding to their initial resource base. The programs were less successful in generating health promotion activities and in achieving meaningful institutionalization in their communities.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Activating communities for health promotion: a process evaluation method.

OBJECTIVES: To date, evaluations of community-based prevention programs have focused on assessing outcomes, not the process of organizing communities for health promotion. An approach was developed to analyze community organization efforts aimed at advancing community health objectives. These organizational processes are referred to as community activation. METHODS: Information was gathered from 762 informants through a key informant survey conducted in 28 western communities. The data collected included informant ratings of community activation and information about interorganizational activities analyzed through network analytic techniques. RESULTS: Activation levels, as measured by informant ratings, varied across communities. Program coordination, as measured by network analysis, occurred, on average, approximately 30% of the time. Higher income communities tended to be more activated than lower income communities. CONCLUSIONS: There is a widely recognized need for improved information about health-related community organization activities. It appears possible to gather such information through key informant surveys and to develop measures of community organization status that can be used in the evaluation of community health promotion programs.

Community Participation↗

PubMed1985

A review of hospital-based health promotion programs in Michigan non-governmental hospitals.

In 1983, the 217 hospitals of the Michigan Hospital Association (MHA) were surveyed to learn more about their efforts in health promotion programming. Eighty percent (174 hospitals) responded to the survey, with 48% reporting on 532 programs. Those programs included 216 in health promotion as defined by the survey instructions, 110 in disease management, 66 in first aid and safety, 87 screening, and 53 miscellaneous education programs. Further particulars about the programs are presented, including information regarding program audience, times offered per year, median enrollment, median participant hours, program age, number and type of educational methods used, follow-up methods, and fees charged. Hospital administrators' perceptions regarding health promotion programs were also surveyed. They indicated a higher level of interest in providing such programs because they viewed them as a needed community service. Conversely, they did not see them as a revenue generator. Seventy-two percent of the responding administrators indicated they currently offered health promotion programs, although only 48% submitted information regarding them. Seventy percent said they planned to begin new health promotion programs within the next 12 months, while only 6% planned to discontinue programs in the new year.

Data Collection↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Community activation and health promotion: identification of key organizations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify the kinds of community organizations community leaders consider important for community health promotion efforts. DESIGN: Key informants were identified by reputational sampling of organizations relevant to community health promotion. Key informants were asked to list organizations they considered important for community health promotion. Differences in identified organizations were compared across informants from seven urban, five suburban, seven rural, and three Native American communities, with significance evaluated by chi-square tests. SETTING: This survey was conducted in 22 Western U.S. communities comprising the intervention and control communities of the Community Health Promotion Grants Program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. SUBJECTS: Key informants (N = 184) from community organizations, identified using a reputational sampling technique beginning with the health department, were interviewed by telephone. MEASURES: Key informants listed organizations considered important for community health promotion in five areas: adolescent pregnancy, substance abuse, tobacco use, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: Informants frequently identified the health department (mentioned by 78% of informants overall), schools (72%), governmental agencies (55%), hospitals (47%), health clinics (42%), churches (33%), and newspapers (32%) as important. Organizations more prominent in urban and suburban areas than in rural and Native American areas included television stations, health-related private nonprofit organizations, substance abuse treatment centers, and colleges. Private physicians were frequently identified in rural areas (44% of informants).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Health Education↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Conference report: community-based health promotion--state of the art and recommendations for the future.

The evaluators of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program in the West and the Foundation brought together 21 researchers, funders, and community organizers with a variety of perspectives on community-based health promotion to share what has been learned to date and how that knowledge should be applied in the future. The two-day conference was divided into three sessions, covering conceptual, implementation, and evaluation issues. Specific topics were selected by the organizers with input from participants. Two papers were presented in each session, followed by comments from discussants and a general discussion involving the entire group. The dominant theme of the conference was the relationship between communities and outside institutions, focusing on problems with the current state of relations and how they might be improved in the future. All viewed building partnerships between communities and institutions as a desirable goal; however, the challenges involved in building effective partnerships are considerable and require a substantial investment to make them work. Recommendations that emerged from the discussions included explicitly acknowledging the diverse interests of the parties in community-based programs at the earliest stages of program planning; making a concerted effort to bridge the cultural gaps that exist among the parties; structuring funding to allow enough lead time for partnerships to develop or using social reconnaissance to identify strong existing partnerships; and integrating the evaluation more closely into the process of program development.

Community Participation↗