PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

W Blankenburg

Publications and source records attributed to W Blankenburg.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[Suicidal behavior and "individual freedom"].

There are two conceptions of suicides: suicide as completion of a pathological development and suicide as a voluntary, well premeditated rational act. Between these poles we see a spectrum of various modes in the genesis of suicidal acts. In its conceptional framework this spectrum is placed on two different levels which are incommensurable to each other. Suicide as a pathological event and suicide as a free act (voluntary death) are two aspects, related to each other in a relationship of mutual concealment. Against the background of this ambiguity we discuss a discrepancy of two different aspects: The aspect of the suicide-statistics of private life-insurance-companies and the conception of suicide in psychiatry. There is stated a higher suicide-rate among insurants, which we attempt to interpret. Following reasons are to be discussed: 1. different areas of experience; 2. correlations between traits of the personality of insurants and traits of the personality of men or women who later on will commit suicide; 3. a preference of suicides by temptation to commit suicide in order to get money for the surviving family (we leave undecided wether primarily planned or secondarily promoted). There might be a broader interest in the second hypothesis (= people with a "Typus-melancholicus"-personality structure [Tellenbach] seem to become more often depressive than other people). This hypothesis should be examined in further research.

Expert Testimony

[Bases or projection theory. I].

In psycho(patho)logy the term "projection"marks both a series of characteristic phenomena and the model by which we interpret and explain them. The conglutination of describing and explaining may especially be observed in the psychoanalytic use of the notion. The present study does not perform a theory-suspending phenomenological analysis but receives the model of projection as a given one explicating its implications. Part I discussess its historical suppositions, while the following part II will expose the implications concluded within the model of projection as such. The purpose is to comprehend the possibility of projecting (e.g. as a mechanism of defence) within the dialectics (respective ambiguity) of the human I-world-relations.

Humans