PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Boelens

Publications and source records attributed to W Boelens.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

The human proteasomal subunit HsC8 induces ring formation of other alpha-type subunits.

The eukaryotic 20 S proteasome is a barrel-shaped protease complex, made up of four seven-membered rings. The outer and inner rings contain seven different alpha and beta-type subunits, respectively, each subunit located at a defined position. Recently, we have reported that the recombinant human alpha-type subunit C8 (HsC8) assembles into a heptameric ring-like structure by itself. In the present study we show that the two naturally neighboring alpha-type subunits of HsC8, HsPROS30 and HsPROS27, do not form ring-like complexes by themselves, but only dimers. This indicates that the propensity to form homo-oligomeric rings is not a general feature among human alpha-type subunits. However, coexpression of HsC8 and either of these neighbor alpha-type subunits results in the formation of hetero-oligomeric ring complexes, resembling the HsC8 ring-like structure. The ratio between the two types of subunits in the mixed complexes is surprisingly heterogeneous, varying from very high to very low HsC8 content. The three tested alpha-type subunits thus apparently lack binding sites that selectively interact with a specific neighboring subunit. This suggests that the correct positioning of the different alpha-type subunits in the eukaryotic 20 S proteasome is not dictated by the alpha-type subunits themselves, but rather by the interaction with specific beta-type subunits.

Cloning, Molecular↗
PubMed1998

Structure and assembly of the 20S proteasome.

The barrel-shaped 20S proteasome is one of the two components of a larger 26S particle, the multicatalytic 2000-kDa protease complex. The proteolytic sites are located in the inner chamber of the 20S particle and are only accessible via narrow entrances. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning proteasome formation, proteolytic activities, structural aspects and assembly. Eukaryotic proteasomes are made up by four rings each of which contains seven different subunits occurring at fixed positions. While the outer rings contain alpha-type subunits, the inner ones comprise beta-type subunits. The current assembly model for eukaryotic 20S proteasomes is based upon the detection of 13S and 16S intermediates, respectively, in addition to previous findings with archaebacterial and eubacterial proteasome assembly. The available data suggest a cooperative assembly of the alpha-type and beta-type subunits into half proteasome-like complexes followed by dimerization into proteasomes. During or after dimerization of half proteasomes, the beta-type subunits are processed. The prosequence of the beta-type subunits is essential for the assembly proves and prevents protease activity of immature proteasomes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1997

The human alpha-type proteasomal subunit HsC8 forms a double ringlike structure, but does not assemble into proteasome-like particles with the beta-type subunits HsDelta or HsBPROS26.

The eukaryotic proteasome is a barrel-shaped protease complex made up of four seven-membered rings of which the outer and inner rings may contain up to seven different alpha- and beta-type subunits, respectively. The assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome is not well understood. We cloned the cDNA for HsC8, which is one of the seven known human alpha-type subunits, and produced the protein in Escherichia coli. Recombinant HsC8 protein forms a complex of about 540 kDa consisting of double ringlike structures, each ring containing seven subunits. Such a structure has not earlier been reported for any eukaryotic proteasome subunit, but is similar to the complex formed by the recombinant alpha-subunit of the archaebacterium Thermoplasma acidophilum (Zwickl, P., Kleinz, J., and Baumeister, W. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 765-770). The ability of HsC8 to form alpha-rings suggests that these complexes may play an important role in the initiation of proteasome assembly in eukaryotes. To test this, we used two human beta-type subunits, HsBPROS26 and HsDelta. Both these beta-type subunits, either in the proprotein or in the mature form, exist in monomers up to tetramers. In contrast to the alpha- and beta-subunit of T. acidophilum, coexpression of the human beta-type subunits with HsC8 does not result in the formation of proteasome-like particles, which would be in agreement with the notion that proteasome assembly in eukaryotes is much more complex than in archaebacteria.

Cysteine Endopeptidases↗
PubMed1995

Molecular characterization of the spliceosomal proteins U1A and U2B" from higher plants.

In addition to their role in pre-mRNA splicing, the human spliceosomal proteins U1A and U2B" are important models of how RNP motif-containing proteins execute sequence-specific RNA binding. Genes encoding U1A and U2B" have been isolated from potato and thereby provide the only evolutionary comparison available for both proteins and represent the only full-length genes encoding plant spliceosomal proteins to have been cloned and characterized. In vitro RNA binding experiments revealed the ability of potato U2B" to interact with human U2A' to enhance sequence-specific binding and to distinguish cognate RNAs of either plant or animal origin. A comparison of the sequence of U1A and U2B" proteins indicated that multiple residues which could affect RNP motif conformation probably govern the specific distinction in RNA binding by these proteins. Since human U1A modulates polyadenylation in vertebrates, the possibility that plant U1A might be exploited in the characterization of this process in plants was examined. However, unlike vertebrate U1A, neither U1A from potato nor Arabidopsis bound their own mRNA and no evidence for binding to upstream efficiency elements in polyadenylation signals was obtained, suggesting that plant U1A is not involved in polyadenylation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Analysis of in vitro binding of U1-A protein mutants to U1 snRNA.

Despite the great sequence similarity between U1A and U2B", both proteins do have a difference in RNA binding specificity and in the way they bind to their cognate RNAs. The U1A protein is able to bind in vitro U1 RNA independently of other factors. The U2B" protein binds specifically to U2 RNA in the presence of the U2A' protein only. We have compared the effect on RNA binding of multiple double point mutations at analogous positions in the U1A and U2B" protein. The results obtained show that amino acids at almost all of the analogous positions tested in U1A and U2B" have a comparable qualitative effect on RNA binding although the quantitative effect of mutations on U2B" is more severe than on U1A. Using U1A mutants with internal duplications a distinct area of the RNP motif of the U1A protein was identified which appears not to be directly involved in U1 RNA binding. In addition, roles of the highly conserved RNP1 and RNP2 sequences of the N-terminal RNP motif of the U1A protein, are investigated by replacing them with the analogous U1-70K sequences.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1991

Conserved amino acid residues within and outside of the N-terminal ribonucleoprotein motif of U1A small nuclear ribonucleoprotein involved in U1 RNA binding.

By the use of hybrids between a U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP: U1A) and a U2 snRNP (U2B") we have identified regions containing 29 U1A-specific amino acid residues scattered throughout the 117 N-terminal residues of the protein, which are involved in binding to U1 RNA. The U1A-specific amino acid residues have been arbitrarily divided into seven contiguous groups. None of these groups is sufficient for U1 binding when transferred singly into the U2B" context, and none of the groups is essential for U1 binding in U1A. Several different combinations of two or more groups can, however, confer the ability to bind U1 RNA to U2B", suggesting that most or all of the U1A-specific amino acid residues contribute incrementally to the strength of the specific binding interaction. Further evidence for the importance of the U1A-specific amino acid residues, some of which lie outside the region previously shown to be sufficient for U1 RNA binding, is obtained by comparison of the sequence of human and Xenopus laevis U1A cDNAs. These are extremely similar (94.4% identical) between amino acid residues 7 and 114 but much less conserved immediately upstream and downstream from this region.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

A weak interaction between the U2A' protein and U2 snRNA helps to stabilize their complex with the U2B" protein.

The U2 snRNP complex contains two specific proteins, U2B" and U2A'. We have analysed the interaction of U2A' with U2B" and with U2 RNA. U2A' can form an weak but detectable RNA-protein complex with U2 RNA and a stable protein complex with U2B". This protein-protein complex binds efficiently and specifically to U2 RNA. Binding experiments with mutant forms of U2A' shows that the region of U2A' essential for binding to U2B" is extensive, being located between amino acid position 1-164. The behaviour of the wild type U2A' protein, and in particular of a mutant version of the protein in which amino acids 3, 4 and 5 are mutated, suggests that U2A' forms a weak interaction with U2 RNA which helps to stabilize the U2A'-U2B"-U2 RNA complex. Mutants of U2 RNA were used to localize the region of U2 RNA important for interaction with U2A'. The results show that U2A' interacts with the stem of hairpin IV.

Cloning, Molecular↗
PubMed1990

Major determinants of the specificity of interaction between small nuclear ribonucleoproteins U1A and U2B'' and their cognate RNAs.

The basis of the specificity of interaction of U1 and U2 small nuclear (sn)RNAs and their cognate binding proteins, U1A and U2B'', has been examined. The U1A protein recognizes U1 snRNA on its own, whereas U2B'' binds specifically to U2 snRNA only in the presence of a second protein, U2A'. Exchange of two nucleotides between the two RNAs or of eight amino acids between the two proteins reverses binding specificity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1990

The U2B'' RNP motif as a site of protein-protein interaction.

The U2 snRNP contains two specific proteins, U2B'' and U2A'. Neither of these proteins, on its own, is capable of specific interactions with U2 RNA. Here, a complex between U2B'' and U2A' that forms in the absence of RNA is identified. Analysis of mutant forms of U2B'' shows that the smallest fragment able to bind specifically U2 RNA (amino acids 1-88) is also the minimal region required for complex formation with U2A', and implies that this region must be largely structurally intact for U2A' interaction. Although this truncated U2B'' fragment is capable of making specific protein--RNA and protein-protein interactions its structure, as measured by the ability to bind to U2A'', appears to depend on the rest of the protein. Hybrids between U2B'' and the closely related U1A protein are used to localize U2B'' specific amino acids involved in protein-protein interaction. These can be divided into two functional groups. U2A' interaction with U2B'' amino acids 37-46 permits binding to U2 RNA whereas interaction with U2B'' specific amino acids between positions 14 and 25 reduces non-specific binding to U1 RNA. These two proteins may serve as a general example of how RNA binding may be modulated by protein-protein interaction in the assembly of RNPs, particularly since the region of U2'' involved in interaction with U2A' consists mainly of a conserved RNP motif.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Identification of the RNA binding segment of human U1 A protein and definition of its binding site on U1 snRNA.

The interaction between the U1 snRNP-specific U1 A protein and U1 snRNA has been analysed. The binding site for the protein on the RNA is shown to be in hairpin II, which extends from positions 48 to 91 in the RNA. Within this hairpin the evolutionarily conserved loop sequence is crucial for interaction with U1 A protein. U1 A protein can also bind the loop sequence when it is part of an artificial RNA which cannot form a stable hairpin structure. The region of the protein required to bind to U1 snRNA consists of a conserved 80 amino acid motif, previously identified in many ribonucleoprotein (RNP) proteins, together with (maximally) 11 N-terminal and 10 C-terminal flanking amino acids. Point mutations introduced into two of the most highly conserved regions of this motif abolish RNA binding. U1 snRNA mutants from which the U1 A binding site has been deleted are shown to be capable of assembly into RNP particles which are immunoprecipitable by patient antisera which recognize U1 A protein. The role of RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions in U snRNP assembly are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

The primary structure of the putative oncogene pim-1 shows extensive homology with protein kinases.

We have shown previously that the putative oncogene pim-1 is frequently activated by provirus insertion in murine leukemia virus-induced T cell lymphomas. Here we describe the structure of the pim-1 gene as determined by sequencing genomic and cDNA clones. The gene has an open reading frame, encoding a protein of 313 amino acids, extending over six exons and preceded and followed by stop codons in all reading frames. Proviruses always integrate outside the protein-encoding domain, showing a high preference for a small region in the 3'-terminal exon; integration in the 3' exon results in relatively high levels of pim-1 mRNA. Computer search reveals homology between pim-1 and protein kinases: all the domains characteristic of protein kinases are conserved in the pim-1 amino acid sequence. The highest homologies were observed with the protein-serine kinases.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1984

Generation of AKR mink cell focus-forming virus: nucleotide sequence of the 3' end of a somatically acquired AKR-MCF.

The 3' end of an AKR-MCF provirus (MCFr35) was cloned and found to be biologically active. Comparison of the nucleotide sequence of MCFr35 with the sequence of other MuLVs revealed that the MCFr35 was most likely derived from the same xenotropic and ecotropic parents, which were involved in the generation of AKR-MCF247. Ecotropic sequences are present around the XbaI site at position 7.9 on the genomic map, and in the long terminal repeat. Most of the T1 oligonucleotide sequences, characteristic for the leukemogenic "class I" MCFs, are also present in MCFr35, with the exception of T1 oligonucleotides 108 and 18. The MCFr35 LTR contains a duplicated enhancer sequence from a xenotropic-like provirus, which is present only once per haploid genome equivalent. The 3' end of MCFr35 consist predominantly of nonecotropic sequences, thereby delimiting the positions of recombination in various MCF viruses.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1984

Murine leukemia virus-induced T-cell lymphomagenesis: integration of proviruses in a distinct chromosomal region.

A number of mink cell focus-forming (MCF) proviruses was molecularly cloned from mouse lymphoma DNA. From each clone, flanking probes were prepared to detect common integration regions in other MuLV-induced lymphomas. One clone frequently revealed variations in the molecular structure of the corresponding region (Pim-1) in other lymphomas. The results show the following. Changes in the Pim region are seen in 24 out of 93 lymphomas tested. Over 50% of the early T-cell lymphomas show integration in the Pim-1 region. The alterations are seen in different mouse strains and with various MuLVs. The observed variations are caused by the integration of predominantly MCF genomes. All integrations occur in a region spanning less than 20 kb and are associated with the transcriptional activation of a distinct region within the Pim-1 domain. The activated region does not show any homology with 13 known and three putative oncogenes.

Animals↗
PubMed1984

Generation of AKR mink cell focus-forming viruses: a conserved single-copy xenotrope-like provirus provides recombinant long terminal repeat sequences.

AKV and AKR mink cell focus-forming virus-specific probes from the envelope and long terminal repeat (LTR) regions were prepared for study of the structure of recombinant proviruses in tumor tissues of AKR mice. The results showed that (i) all somatically acquired proviruses possessed, besides a recombinant gp70 gene, an altered U3 LTR; (ii) in a substantial portion of the somatically acquired AKR mink cell focus-forming proviruses, the LTR comprised sequences derived from the same xenotropic-like provirus; (iii) this U3 LTR donating parental provirus (Xeno-dL) was present only once per genome equivalent in several mouse strains; (iv) in the strains containing the Xeno-dL provirus, the provirus was present in the same chromosomal site; (v) restriction analysis of the Xeno-dL revealed that the mink cell focus-forming gp70 sequences were derived from a parental provirus, different from Xeno-dL. Therefore, at least two non-ecotropic parents participate in the generation of leukemogenic AKR mink cell focus-forming viruses: a xenotropic-like virus, Xeno-dL, donating U3 LTR sequences, and another xenotropic-like virus or viruses providing gp70 sequences.

AKR murine leukemia virus↗