PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W Bosseau Murray

Publications and source records attributed to W Bosseau Murray.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Learning about new anesthetics using a model driven, full human simulator.

OBJECTIVE: New pharmacological agents are introduced into medical practice at an ever-increasing pace. Teaching how to use new medications in the clinical setting presents educational challenges and puts patients at risk. METHODS: Patients and clinical settings in which remifentanil might provide clinical advantages over existing anesthetics were identified. A simulator curriculum was developed to demonstrate the use of remifentanil in the sample cases. The simulation was designed to highlight the clinical advantages and potential side effects of remifentanil. A screen displaying the concentrations of remifentanil in plasma and in the hypothetical effector site was developed. A simulator was modified (addition of an infusion pump and a pharmacokinetic screen display) and transported to several cities in the U.S.A. An instructor guided small groups of anesthesiologists and anesthetists through a structured program that enabled participants to observe drug effects in simulated patients. RESULTS: There were 836 participants in the remifentanil program, which was offered in 58 cities in the U.S.A. Surveys were completed by 574 anesthesiologists. There was a significant difference in comfort level for using remifentanil after the session compared to before (Chi-square, p < 0.001.) The statement: "Clinical simulation experience is a means to learn about new agents like remifentanil" was rated as "excellent" by 81% and as "good" by 19% of participants. No participant found the experience to be "not useful." CONCLUSIONS: Patient simulation is a novel method of introducing new drugs to the medical community and is perceived by anesthesia providers as a valuable addition to available teaching methods.

Anesthesiology↗
PubMed2002

Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multiinstitutional study.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia simulators can generate reproducible, standardized clinical scenarios for instruction and evaluation purposes. Valid and reliable simulated scenarios and grading systems must be developed to use simulation for evaluation of anesthesia residents. METHODS: After obtaining Human Subjects approval at each of the 10 participating institutions, 99 anesthesia residents consented to be videotaped during their management of four simulated scenarios on MedSim or METI mannequin-based anesthesia simulators. Using two different grading forms, two evaluators at each department independently reviewed the videotapes of the subjects from their institution to score the residents' performance. A third evaluator, at an outside institution, reviewed the videotape again. Statistical analysis was performed for construct- and criterion-related validity, internal consistency, interrater reliability, and intersimulator reliability. A single evaluator reviewed all videotapes a fourth time to determine the frequency of certain management errors. RESULTS: Even advanced anesthesia residents nearing completion of their training made numerous management errors; however, construct-related validity of mannequin-based simulator assessment was supported by an overall improvement in simulator scores from CB and CA-1 to CA-2 and CA-3 levels of training. Subjects rated the simulator scenarios as realistic (3.47 out of possible 4), further supporting construct-related validity. Criterion-related validity was supported by moderate correlation of simulator scores with departmental faculty evaluations (0.37-0.41, P < 0.01), ABA written in-training scores (0.44-0.49, < 0.01), and departmental mock oral board scores (0.44-0.47, P < 0.01). Reliability of the simulator assessment was demonstrated by very good internal consistency (alpha = 0.71-0.76) and excellent interrater reliability (correlation = 0.94-0.96; P < 0.01; kappa = 0.81-0.90). There was no significant difference in METI versus MedSim scores for residents in the same year of training. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous management errors were identified in this study of anesthesia residents from 10 institutions. Further attention to these problems may benefit residency training since advanced residents continued to make these errors. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulators shows promise, adding a new dimension to current assessment methods. Further improvements are necessary in the simulation scenarios and grading criteria before mannequin-based simulation is used for accreditation purposes.

Anaphylaxis↗