Biomedical subjects

W Brampton

Publications and source records attributed to W Brampton.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery catheterization was adopted about 30 years ago and widely disseminated without rigorous evaluation as to whether it benefited critically ill patients. The technique is used to measure cardiac output and pressures in the pulmonary circulation to guide diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians believe these data can improve patients' outcomes, even in the absence of consensus about the specific interpretation of the data. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on mortality and cost of care in adult intensive care patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006); MEDLINE (all records to April 2006); EMBASE (all records to April 2006); CINAHL (all records to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. We contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in adults, comparing management with and without a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and obtained the full text of studies of possible relevance for independent review. We determined the final results of the literature search by consensus between the authors. We did not contact study authors for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 12 studies. Mortality was reported as hospital, 28-day, 30-day, or intensive care unit. We considered studies of high-risk surgery patients (eight studies) and general intensive care patients (four studies) separately for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for the studies of general intensive care patients was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.26) and for the studies of high-risk surgery patients 0.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.24). Of the eight studies of high-risk surgery patients, five evaluated the effectiveness of pre-operative optimization but there was no difference in mortality when these studies were examined separately. Pulmonary artery catheterization did not affect intensive care unit (reported by 10 studies) or hospital (reported by nine studies) length of stay. Four studies, conducted in the United States, measured costs based on hospital charges billed to patients, which on average were higher in the PAC groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: To date, there have been two multi-centre trials of the effectiveness of PACs for managing critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, although only one was adequately powered. Efficacy studies are needed to determine optimal management protocols and patient groups who could benefit from management with a PAC.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

An evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in patient management in intensive care: a systematic review and a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managing critically ill patients in adult, general intensive care with or without pulmonary artery catheters (PACs). DESIGN: An open, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation (cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis). SETTING: The setting was general (mixed medical/surgical) intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK admitting adults. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients in participating ICUs deemed by the responsible treating clinician to require management with a PAC. INTERVENTIONS: These were insertion of a PAC and subsequent clinical management, at the discretion of the responsible treating clinicians, using data derived from the PAC. The control group were managed without a PAC but with the option of using alternative cardiac output monitoring devices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay in the ICU, length of stay in an acute hospital and organ-days of support in the ICU. For the economic evaluation, the main outcome measure was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the secondary outcome measure was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-five ICUs in the UK participated. Of these, 43 (66%) used alternative cardiac output monitoring devices in control group patients. A total of 1263 patients were identified as being eligible for the trial. Of these, 1041 (82.4%) were randomised and allocated to management with (n = 519) or without (n = 522) a PAC. There were no losses to follow-up. However, 27 patients (13 in the PAC group and 14 in the control group) were withdrawn from the trial because either the patient withdrew consent on recovering mental competency or the relatives withdrew agreement following randomisation. Data on 1014 patients were included in the analysis. Participants in the two groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was no difference in hospital mortality for patients managed with (68.4%) or without (65.7%) a PAC. The adjusted hazard ratio (PAC versus no PAC) was 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.27]. There was no difference in the median length of stay in ICU, the median length of stay in an acute hospital or mean organ-days of support in ICU between the two groups. The economic evaluation found that the expected cost per QALY gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 2985 pounds. The expected cost per life gained from the withdrawal of PAC was 22,038 pounds. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical management of critically ill patients with a PAC, as currently practised in the UK, neither improves hospital survival for adult, general intensive care patients nor reduces length of stay in hospital. The lack of demonstrable benefit from a device previously believed to be beneficial could be explained by statistical chance, by misinterpretation of PAC-derived data, by ineffective treatment strategies based on data correctly interpreted using the current paradigm or by subsequent inaction following insertion of the device. It is also possible that detailed data on haemodynamics, however used, cannot modify the disease process sufficiently to influence disease outcome. The economic evaluation, using decision analysis techniques rather than conventional hypothesis testing, suggests that the withdrawal of the PAC from routine clinical practice in the NHS would be considered cost-effective in the current decision-making climate, and might result in lives or life-years being saved at modest cost. With the declining use of PACs in the UK and the findings of this report indicating no overall benefit from management with a PAC, it should now be possible to examine protocolised management with a PAC in selected groups of critically ill patients against appropriate controls, something that was difficult while PACs were the considered standard of care.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of 2.5% phenylephrine and 10% phenylephrine during ophthalmic surgery.

PURPOSE: The recommended concentration of topical phenylephrine for mydriasis is still a matter of debate. Our purpose was to compare the cardiovascular effects of 10% and 2.5% topical aqueous phenylephrine. METHODS: We carried out a double-masked randomised study on 54 consecutive patients undergoing routine local anaesthetic cataract extraction, comparing the effects on blood pressure and heart rate of either 2.5% or 10% topical aqueous phenylephrine in combination with 1% topical aqueous tropicamide in those with no history of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: No difference was found in the rise in blood pressure produced by 2.5% and 10% topical aqueous phenylephrine. We also found no sustained changes in blood pressure or heart rate after instillation of either 2.5% or 10% topical aqueous phenylephrine. CONCLUSION: We recommend the routine use of 2.5% topical aqueous phenylephrine as a mydriatic agent during cataract surgery and acknowledge the role of 10% topical aqueous phenylephrine as an effective mydriatic agent in cases where 2.5% phenylephrine may not be so effective, such as in subjects with darkly pigmented irides.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Classification trees. A possible method for iso-resource grouping in intensive care.

Classification and grouping of clinical data into defined categories or hierarchies is difficult in intensive care practice. Diagnosis-related groups are used to categorise patients on the basis of diagnosis. However, this approach may not be applicable to intensive care where there is wide heterogeneity within diagnostic groups. Classification tree analysis uses selected independent variables to group patients according to a dependent variable in a way that reduces variation. In this study, the influence of three easily identified patient attributes on their length of intensive care unit stay was explored using classification analysis. Two thousand five hundred and forty-five critically ill patients from three hospitals were classified into groups so that the variation in length of stay within each group was minimised. In 23 out of 39 terminal groups, the interquartile range of the length of stay was < or = 3 days.

Critical Care↗

PubMed1995

Resuscitation skills amongst anaesthetists.

Resuscitation skills were assessed in a group of 24 anaesthetists of varying experience using 3 pre-determined scenarios. Seventy-nine percent of participants were found to be competent at resuscitation following the guidelines suggested by the Resuscitation Council (UK) in 1989. No one grade of anaesthetist was found to be consistently poor at resuscitation. Anaesthetists by the nature of their jobs may maintain the skills and knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation as well as other groups in the hospital.

Anesthesiology↗

PubMed1993

Lung volume, pressure, flow, and density relationships during constant-flow ventilation in dogs.

Lung volume changes during constant-flow ventilation (CFV) using cannulas in the main stem bronchi were examined in six beagle dogs. The increase in lung volume was found to depend mainly on the outflow resistance to gas flow in the trachea and tracheal tube. The resistance changed with gas flow, indicating that gas flow was transitional between laminar and turbulent flow (resistance varies; is directly proportional to flow1.5). There was a small pressure gradient between trachea and alveoli (1.1-1.3 cmH2O) that was independent of flow rate or gas velocity out of the CFV cannulas. This was attributed to momentum transfer from the gas jet from the CFV cannulas modified by friction between the gas jet and the airway wall.

Air Pressure↗