PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W C Lam

Publications and source records attributed to W C Lam.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Errors in off-axis treatment planning for a 4-MeV machine.

Computer treatment planning systems allow dose computation in planes parallel to the central one (off-axis plans). The beam data may consist of, e.g., percentage depth doses along the central axis plus off-axis ratios (OAR) at several depths. In some systems, the calculation of an off-axis plan is based on the assumption that the OAR can be represented by a separable function: OAR(x,y) = f(x).g(y), where x and y are the symmetry axes perpendicular to the beam axis and the functions f and g are equal for a square open field. The errors of this assumption for a 4-MeV machine were measured for open fields and wedged fields at five different depths. The measured dose was compared with that predicted by the above equation for 50%, 75%, and 88% of the half field width from the beam axis. Maximum deviation of more than 10% was observed with the probable error of the measurement being 1%.

Humans↗

A model to generate beam profiles of the Varian Clinac 4 for three-dimensional dose calculation: open fields.

For the Clinac 4, open field profiles measured in the principal plane have higher intensity "horns" than those in off-axis planes. The maximum deviation occurs at 1-cm depth, where in the worst case of large field sizes and off-axis distances the deviation can be as high as 16% in the region near the horns. A model is proposed to generate open field beam profiles in off-axis planes, based on measured profiles in the transverse principal plane and in the largest field size diagonal plane of the machine. Within the central 90% portion of the field, the maximum deviation of the generated profiles from the measured ones at the same off-axis distance varies from about 3% at 1-cm depth to about 2% at 13-cm depth and then increases to less than 5% at 25-cm depth, even for very large field sizes and off-axis distances. Very little additional computer time and data storage are required for this procedure. Using these profiles, the Milan and Bentley method can be extended to three-dimensional treatment planning with good accuracy.

Models, Theoretical↗