PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W D LeBar

Publications and source records attributed to W D LeBar.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Keeping up with new technology: new approaches to diagnosis of Chlamydia infection.

Chlamydia trachomatis infections are among the most common sexually transmitted infections in the US today. One of the keys to the prevention of C. trachomatis infection rests on the ability to make this diagnosis on the basis of accurate laboratory testing. For many years the standard for diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections has been isolation in tissue culture. Numerous nonculture methods, including enzyme immunoassay, have been used as an alternative to cell culture. The performance characteristics of these tests have all been compared with a standard, cell culture, which at best will detect 90% of positive specimens. Nucleic acid amplification techniques, including PCR and ligase chain reaction, have been recently introduced. The advantage of these tests is their ability to detect 10-20% more positive specimens when compared with culture or confirmed nonculture methods performed with a single specimen. The sensitivity of amplified tests also allows us to test specimens from multiple sites (endocervix, urethra, urine), which expands our standard from an infected sample to detection of an infected patient. Tests based on amplified nucleic acid technology have greatly improved our ability to diagnose urogenital C. trachomatis infection. The use of an expanded standard will help us accurately define the true performance and clinical utility of nonculture Chlamydia diagnostic tests.

Chlamydia Infections↗

Evaluation of two rapid tests for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections.

The performance of two new enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in a practice setting was compared. A consecutive series of 207 female patients seen at an inner-city sexually transmitted disease clinic were tested by cell culture, the Kodak SureCell (SC) and Abbott TestPack Chlamydia (TP) EIAs. In addition 210 male patients, selected by physicians on the basis of the fact that multiple urethral samples could be obtained, were tested by cell culture and SC. The prevalence of infection was 19% in the females and 12.5% in males. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the SC and TP were 88%, 95%, 81%, 97% and 59%, 99%, 95%, 91%, respectively, in the female population. The sensitivity of the SC was significantly greater than that of the TP (p less than or equal to 0.002). The performance values of the SC in men (in the same order) were 64%, 96%, 71% and 95%, respectively. The SC in male patients and the TP in female patients had low sensitivity. The sensitivity of the SC in female patients was significantly higher than that of the TP. However, the SC yielded more false positive results. To determine the utility of these tests in a practice setting further studies are required.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of a rapid latex agglutination assay and a fluorescent-antibody technique for the detection of herpes simplex antibody.

A total of 202 serum specimens was tested for the presence of herpes simplex virus antibody using a premarket latex agglutination kit (Wampole) and an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) technique (electronucleonics). Discrepant results between the two assays were resolved using an Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) procedure. The overall sensitivity of the latex was 99.2% with a specificity of 98.5%. The latex agglutination test evaluated is a viable alternative to indirect immunofluorescence for the detection of herpes simplex virus antibody in serum samples.

Agglutination Tests↗

Evaluation of latex agglutination and dot immunobinding assay for the detection of cytomegalovirus antibody.

The Virogen CMV Antibody Test and Difco CMV-Cube were compared with three other available methods, enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence and latex agglutination, for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody in 126 random sera submitted to the clinical laboratory. Based on concordance of three or more methods, 72% of the samples were positive for CMV antibody. The sensitivities and specificities of the assays were Virogen, 98% and 97%, and CMV-Cube 97% and 97%, respectively.

Antibodies, Viral↗