PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

W D Payne

Publications and source records attributed to W D Payne.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression?

BACKGROUND: The most common surgical complication after a kidney transplant is likely related to the wound. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, wound complications (e.g., infections, hernias) in kidney recipients and to assess whether newer immunosuppressive drugs increase the risk for such complications. METHODS: Between January 1, 1984 and September 30, 1998, we performed 2013 adult kidney transplants. Of these 2013 recipients, 97 (4.8%) developed either a superficial or a deep wound infection. Additionally, 73 (3.6%) recipients developed either a fascial dehiscence or a hernia of the wound. We used univariate and multivariate techniques to determine significant risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Mean time to development of a superficial infection (defined as located above the fascia) was 11.9 days posttransplant; to development of a deep infection (defined as located below the fascia), 39.2 days; and to development of a hernia or fascial dehiscence, 12.8 months. By multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for a superficial or deep wound infection was obesity (defined as body mass index>30 kg/m2) (RR=4.4, P=0.0001). Other significant risk factors were a urine leak posttransplant, any reoperation through the transplant incision, diabetes, and the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=2.43, P=0.0001). Significant risk factors for a hernia or fascial dehiscence were any reoperation through the transplant incision, increased recipient age, obesity, and the use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) for maintenance immunosuppression (RR=3.54, P=0.0004). Use of antibody induction and treatment for acute rejection were not significant risk factors for either infections or hernias. Death-censored graft survival was lower in recipients who developed a wound infection (vs. those who did not); it was not lower in recipients who developed an incisional hernia or facial dehiscence (vs. those who did not). CONCLUSIONS: Despite immunosuppression including chronic steroids, the incidence of wound infections, incisional hernias, and fascial dehiscence is low in kidney recipients. As with other types of surgery, the main risk factors for postoperative complications are obesity, reoperation, and increased age. However, in kidney recipients, use of MMF (vs. azathioprine) is an additional risk factor -one that potentially could be altered, especially in high-risk recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Kidney retransplants after initial graft loss to vascular thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Vascular thrombosis early after a kidney transplant is an infrequent but devastating complication. Often, no cause is found. These recipients are generally felt to be good candidates for a retransplant. However, their ideal care at the time of the retransplant and their outcomes have not been well documented. We studied outcomes in 16 retransplant recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant (< 1 month) to vascular thrombosis. METHODS: Of 2,003 kidney transplants between I January 1984 and 30 September 1998, we identified 32 recipients who had lost their first graft early posttransplant to vascular thrombosis. Of these 32 recipients, 16 were subsequently retransplanted and detailed chart reviews were done. RESULTS: Of the 16 retransplant recipients, 12 lost their first graft to renal vein thrombosis and 4 to renal artery thrombosis. Thrombosis generally occurred early (mean, 3.6 d). Five recipients underwent a complete hematologic workup to rule out a thrombophilic disorder before their retransplant: 4 had a positive result (presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, n = 3; increased homocysteine levels, n = 1). These 4 recipients, along with 1 other recipient who had a strong family history of thrombosis, underwent thrombosis prophylaxis at the time of their retransplant. Prophylaxis consisted of low-dose heparin for the first 3-5 d posttransplant, followed by acetylsalicylic acid or Coumadin. Of the 16 retransplant recipients, none developed thrombosis. Of the 5 who underwent thrombosis prophylaxis, none had significant bleeding complications. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 yr, 10 (63%) recipients have functioning grafts. Causes of graft loss in the remaining 6 recipients were death with function (n = 5, 31%) and acute rejection (n = 1.6%). Graft and patient survival rates after these 16 retransplants were equivalent to results after primary transplants. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection was also no different (p = ns). CONCLUSION: Vascular thrombosis in the absence of obvious technical factors should prompt a workup for a thrombophilic disorder before a retransplant. Recipients with an identified disorder should undergo prophylaxis at the time of the retransplant. Results in these retransplant recipients are equivalent to those seen in primary transplant recipients.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2001

Kidney and pancreas transplantation without a crossmatch in select circumstances--it can be done.

Given the constant flux in caseload and the number of personnel available in the OR, waiting for a final XM often prolongs organ preservation time (a room available at the time a XM is started is not available when the XM is completed). Longer preservation is associated with increased DGF and decreased graft survival. We have shown in a retrospective analysis that final XMs on 0% PRA recipients were always negative (Transplantation, 1999). We now describe a policy of: a) not doing screening XM and b) proceeding to the OR without a XM, in situations where the recipients's PRA has been documented to be 0% and when there have not been any interim transfusions (and the OR is ready before XM completion). Final XM is completed after the transplant. All patients send sera every 6 weeks for PRA (antiglobulin technique). If > o r=3 consecutive PRAs are 0%, no donor-specific screening XM is done prior to calling the patient in for tx (UNOS allocation algorithm used). If there have not been any interim transfusions, we have proceeded to tx prior to completion of the final XM. Between 1/1/98-12/31/99, we did 109 CAD kidney (K) and 79 simultaneous kidney pancreas (SPK) tx; 67 (61%) K and 56 (71%) SPK had 0% PRA. Of the 0% PRA, 25/67 (37%) K and 28/56 (50%) SPK had no pre-tx XM. For K with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (13.2+/-0.2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.01) and DGF less (12% vs. 24%, p=0.3); for SPK with no XM, cold ischemia was shorter (15.2+/-2 vs. 18+/-0.9 hrs, p=0.1); no diff in DGF. All post-XM were negative and there were no hyperacute rejections; there was no diff in acute rejection episodes. Actuarial 1 yr graft survival: no XM-K=87.5%, SKP=82%; Yes XM-K=88%, SKP=86% (NS). Our data suggests it is safe, in select circumstances, to proceed to the OR without a XM. Elimination of the screening XM for 0% PRA candidates saves money. Proceeding of the OR (if available) without a final XM shortens cold ischemia time.

Cadaver↗
PubMed2001

Heme protein-induced chronic renal inflammation: suppressive effect of induced heme oxygenase-1.

BACKGROUND: Heme oxygenase (HO) is the rate-limiting enzyme in the degradation of heme; its inducible isozyme, HO-1, protects against acute heme protein-induced nephrotoxicity and other forms of acute tissue injury. This study examines the induction of HO-1 in the kidney chronically inflamed by heme proteins and the functional significance of such an induction of HO-1. METHODS: Studies were undertaken in a patient with chronic tubulointerstitial disease in the setting of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), in a rat model of chronic tubulointerstitial nephropathy caused by repetitive exposure to heme proteins, and in genetically engineered mice deficient in HO-1 (HO-1 -/-) in which hemoglobin was repetitively administered. RESULTS: The kidney in PNH evinces robust induction of HO-1 in renal tubules in the setting of chronic inflammation. The heme protein-enriched urine from this patient, but not urine from a healthy control subject, induced expression of HO-1 in renal tubular epithelial cells (LLC-PK1 cells). A similar induction of HO-1 and related findings are recapitulated in a rat model of chronic inflammation induced by repetitive exposure to heme proteins. Additionally, in the rat, the administration of heme proteins induces monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1). The functional significance of HO-1 so induced was uncovered in the HO-1 knockout mouse: Repeated administration of hemoglobin to HO-1 +/+ and HO-1 -/- mice led to intense interstitial cellular inflammation in HO-1 -/- mice accompanied by striking up-regulation of MCP-1 and activation of one of its stimulators, nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). These findings were not observed in similarly treated HO-1 +/+ mice or in vehicle-treated HO-1 -/- and HO-1 +/+ mice. CONCLUSION: We conclude that up-regulation of HO-1 occurs in the kidney in humans and rats repetitively exposed to heme proteins. Such up-regulation represents an anti-inflammatory response since the genetic deficiency of HO-1 markedly increases activation of NF-kappaB, MCP-1 expression, and tubulointerstitial cellular inflammation.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Outcome of other organs recovered during in situ split-liver procurements.

Split-liver transplantation is becoming a useful technique to expand the donor pool. Whether the split should be performed in situ or ex situ is not clear. One potential disadvantage of in situ splits is that prolonged surgical time and increased blood loss may negatively affect the function of other solid organs (kidneys, pancreas, and heart) procured from the same donor. Therefore, we studied the function of other organs posttransplantation. Between September 1, 1999, and March 31, 2000, we performed six in situ splits at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN). These six splits yielded six right-lobe liver grafts and six left-lobe liver grafts, which were transplanted into 12 adult-size recipients. Other grafts obtained from these six donors were as follows: kidney (n = 11), heart (n = 4), lungs (n = 1), pancreas (n = 2), and kidney-pancreas (n = 1). We then analyzed posttransplantation function of these grafts and the postoperative course of transplant recipients. All six donors were hemodynamically stable at the time of procurement. Mean donor age was 19.7 years. Mean surgical time for the procurement was 7.4 hours, with an average blood loss of 490 mL during in situ splitting of the liver. The 12 liver grafts showed good initial function with no primary nonfunction. The other organs also showed good function. Of 11 kidney recipients, only 1 patient developed delayed graft function, which resolved within 4 days. In addition, 1 kidney was lost early because of severe acute rejection. For the 10 recipients with functioning kidneys, mean creatinine level at hospital discharge was 2.0 mg/dL, and mean creatinine level after an average 9-month follow-up was 1.3 mg/dL. Of the 4 heart transplant recipients, 3 patients had good graft function immediately posttransplantation, with an ejection fraction greater than 60%, minimal inotropic requirements, and no surgical complications. The fourth heart transplant recipient, a critically ill status 1 patient, had poor initial function and a prolonged intensive care unit stay. At hospital discharge, pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplant recipients were all insulin free, with good urine amylase levels, no surgical or infectious complications, and no evidence of significant pancreatitis posttransplantation. The kidney of the pancreas-kidney transplant recipient functioned immediately; creatinine level after 7 months of follow-up was 1.2 mg/dL. Despite increased surgical time and blood loss, in situ splitting of liver grafts can be accomplished in stable donors without significant negative effects on other organs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To review a single center's experience and outcome with living donor transplants. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Outcome after living donor transplants is better than after cadaver donor transplants. Since the inception of the authors' program, they have performed 2,540 living donor transplants. For the most recent cohort of recipients, improvements in patient care and immunosuppressive protocols have improved outcome. In this review, the authors analyzed outcome in relation to protocol. METHODS: The authors studied patient and graft survival by decade. For those transplanted in the 1990s, the impact of immunosuppressive protocol, donor source, diabetes, and preemptive transplantation was analyzed. The incidence of rejection, posttransplant steroid-related complications, and return to work was determined. Finally, multivariate analysis was used to study risk factors for worse 1-year graft survival and, for those with graft function at 1 year, to study risk factors for worse long-term survival. RESULTS: For each decade since 1960, outcome has improved after living donor transplants. Compared with patients transplanted in the 1960s, those transplanted in the 1990s have better 8-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates. Death with function and chronic rejection have continued to be a major cause of graft loss, whereas acute rejection has become a rare cause of graft loss. Cardiovascular deaths have become a more predominant cause of patient death; infection has decreased. Donor source (e.g., ideally HLA-identical sibling) continues to be important. For living donor transplants, rejection and graft survival rates are related to donor source. The authors show that patients who had preemptive transplants or less than 1 year of dialysis have better 5-year graft survival and more frequently return to full-time employment. Readmission and complications remain problems; of patients transplanted in the 1990s, only 36% never required readmission. Similarly, steroid-related complications remain common. The authors' multivariate analysis shows that the major risk factor for worse 1-year graft survival was delayed graft function. For recipients with 1-year graft survival, risk factors for worse long-term outcome were pretransplant smoking, pretransplant peripheral vascular disease, pretransplant dialysis for more than 1 year, one or more acute rejection episodes, and donor age older than 55. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the outcome of living donor transplants has continued to improve. However, for living donors, donor source affects outcome. The authors also identify other major risk factors affecting both short- and long-term outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Increased incidence of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus disease.

BACKGROUND: The transplant literature has not shown cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease to be a significant risk factor for posttransplant cardiac complications. A large number of nontransplant studies have, however, reported an association between coronary heart disease (CHD) and CMV disease. Pathology studies have demonstrated a high incidence of CMV in atheromatous plaques from the coronary circulation. METHODS: We performed multivariate analysis to determine if posttransplant CMV disease was a significant risk factor for cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. We also performed univariate analysis to determine which cardiac complications were more common in the recipients with CMV disease. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1984 and June 30, 1997, 1859 adults underwent kidney transplants at our institution. Of these, 377 developed one of the following cardiac complications posttransplant: myocardial infarction, angina, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and angiographic vessel occlusion. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for one of the above cardiac complications were recipient age >50 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.5, P=0.0001], diabetes (OR=1.99, P=0.0001), a history of cardiac disease pretransplant (OR= 1.34, P=0.04), and CMV disease (OR=1.5, P=0.01). Univariate analysis demonstrated that recipients with CMV disease had a higher overall incidence of cardiac complications. Arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and vessel occlusion were more common in those with CMV disease. The incidence of myocardial infarction, angina, and cardiac arrest did not differ between the two groups (recipients with versus without CMV disease). CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease is associated with an increased risk of cardiac complications in kidney transplant recipients. In our series, angiographic vessel occlusion was more common in recipients with CMV disease. This interesting finding may support the theory that CMV plays some role in the pathogenesis of CHD.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Clinical determinants of multiple acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recipients with multiple (more than one) acute rejection (AR) episodes have significantly lower graft survival rates than those with no AR or only one treated episode. However, fewer than 50% of recipients treated for one AR episode will have another episode. METHODS: We studied recipients with at least one AR episode to determine whether any clinical features could identify risk factors for multiple AR. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1984, and June 30, 1997, a total of 1793 recipients underwent a kidney transplant at our institution. Of these, 354 were treated for one AR episode, 307 for more than one. By multivariate analysis, recipients at highest risk for multiple AR episodes were those with initial delayed or slow graft function (relative risk=1.5, P=0.05), those with initially severe AR (as judged by vascular involvement or steroid resistance), and those with an initial early AR episode (<6 months posttransplant). The remaining variables tested were not significant. Graft survival in recipients with more than one AR episode was significantly lower than in those with only one AR episode. Graft survival at 5 years posttransplant was 52.5% in recipients with more than one AR episode and 85.1% in recipients with one AR episode (P=0.0001). Chronic rejection as a cause of graft loss was significantly more common in recipients with more than one vs. only one AR episode (34.8% vs. 8.9%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Clinical features may be used to identify recipients at higher risk for multiple AR episodes. These recipients can then be targeted with more aggressive or novel immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of another AR episode.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Living unrelated donors in kidney transplants: better long-term results than with non-HLA-identical living related donors?

BACKGROUND: Given the severe organ shortage and the documented superior results obtained with living (vs. cadaver) donor kidney transplants, we have adopted a very aggressive policy for the use of living donors. Currently, we make thorough attempts to locate a living related donor (LRD) or a living unrelated donor (LURD) before proceeding with a cadaver transplant. METHODS: We compared the results of our LURD versus LRD transplants to determine any significant difference in outcome. RESULTS: Between 1/1/84 and 6/30/98, we performed 711 adult kidney transplants with non-HLA-identical living donors. Of these, 595 procedures used LRDs and 116 used LURDs. Immunosuppression for both groups was cyclosporine-based, although LURD recipients received 5-7 days of induction therapy (antilymphocyte globulin or antithymocyte globulin), whereas LRD recipients did not. LURD recipients tended to be older, to have inferior HLA matching, and to have older donors than did the LRD recipients (all factors potentially associated with decreased graft survival). Short-term results, including initial graft function and incidence of acute rejection, were similar in the two groups. LURD recipients had a slightly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (P=NS). We found no difference in patient and graft survival rates. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection was significantly lower among LURD recipients (16.7% for LRD recipients and 10.0% for LURD recipients at 5 years posttransplant; P=0.05). LRD recipients also had a greater incidence of late (>6 months posttransplant) acute rejection episodes than did the LURD recipients (8.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.04). The exact reason for these findings is unknown. CONCLUSION: Although LURD recipients have poorer HLA matching and older donors, their patient and graft survival rates are equivalent to those of non-HLA-identical LRD recipients. The incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection is lower in LURD transplants. Given this finding and the superior results of living donor (vs. cadaver) transplants, a thorough search should be made for a living donor-LRD or LURD-before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Should I accept this kidney?

BACKGROUND: Transplant candidates frequently ask whether they should, based on information available at the time, accept a cadaver kidney or wait for a potentially better one. METHODS: We analyzed 937 first and second cadaver transplants done between January 1, 1984 and December 31, 1997 to determine if information available at the time an offer is made could be used to predict long-term graft survival. RESULTS: By Cox regression, risk factors for worse long-term graft survival were older donor age, cardiovascular or cerebrovascular cause of donor death, and delayed graft function (DGF). HLA-ABDR mismatch was marginally significant. Whether DGF will occur is not known at the time of an offer, but risk factors can be determined; we found these to be older donor age and > 10% panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) at transplantation (by Cox regression). Using these variables (PRA, ABDR mismatch, donor age, and donor cause of death) known at the time of an offer, we calculated the relative risk of worse long-term graft survival for each subgroup (Table 3 in manuscript). In general, older age and donor death from cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were associated with worse outcome. Kidneys from donors of < 50 yr had the best outcome, irrespective of match. CONCLUSION: The data provided can be used to help guide patients as to whether they are better off accepting an offered kidney or waiting for a potentially better one. If an offer is declined, the next kidney may have a potentially worse outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

5,000 kidney transplants--a single-center experience.

Between 6/1963 and 12/1998, 5,069 kidney transplants were done at the University of Minnesota. Of these, about half have been living donor, half cadaver. The majority (83%) have been primary transplants. Recipients were grouped in 6 eras based on changes in our immunosuppressive protocols--6/63-12/67 (n = 98); 1/68-7/79 (n = 1,188); 8/79-6/84 (n = 789); 7/84-9/90 (n = 1,006); 10/90-12/95 (n = 1,050; 1/96-12/98 (n = 718)--and their outcomes were compared. Recent eras contained a higher proportion of recipients aged > 50. Since the inception of the program, there has been a steady improvement in actuarial patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival. Short-term outcome for primary and retransplant recipients has been similar; however, long-term outcome seems worse for retransplant recipients. Importantly, acute rejection and infectious death have become rare causes of graft loss. Chronic rejection and death with function (most often due to a cardiovascular event) have become the predominant causes of graft loss. Recent changes in immunosuppressive protocols (Era VI) have included more aggressive attempts to maintain CsA levels > 150 ng/ml (by HPLC) in the first 3 months and the substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine. As a result, the incidence of acute and chronic rejection has decreased and graft survival has improved.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Immunologic factors: the major risk for decreased long-term renal allograft survival.

BACKGROUND: Both antigen-dependent (immunologic) and non-antigen-dependent (nonimmunologic) factors have been implicated in long-term renal allograft loss. Differentiating between these two factors is important because prevention strategies differ. METHODS: To isolate the importance of these 2 factors, we studied long-term actuarial graft survival in a cohort of adult kidney recipients who underwent transplants at a single institution between January 1, 1984 and October 31, 1998. Excluded were recipients with graft loss as a result of death with function, technical failure, primary nonfunction, and recurrent disease, leaving 1587 recipients (757 cadaver [CAD], 830 living donor [LD]) who would be at risk for graft loss secondary to both immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. These recipients were analyzed in the following 2 groups: those treated for a previous episode of acute rejection (AR) (Group1; n = 588; 328 CAD, 260 LD) and those with no AR (Group 2: n = 999; 429 CAD, 570 LD). Actuarial graft survival and causes of graft loss were determined for each group. Presumably, graft loss in Group 1 would be caused by immunologic and nonimmunologic factors; graft loss in Group 2 would be caused primarily by nonimmunologic factors. RESULTS: The 10-year graft survival rate (censored for death with function, technical failure, primary nonfunction, and recurrent disease) in Group 2 was 91%. In contrast, the 10-year graft survival rate in Group 1 was 45% (P<0.001 vs. Group 2). Causes of graft loss in Group 2 were chronic rejection in 1.8% (3.0% CAD, 0.9% LD), de novo disease, 0.4%; sepsis, 0.2%; discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy, 0.3%; and unknown, 0.6%. In contrast, 23.8% (29.9% CAD, 16.2% LD) of recipients in Group 1 had graft loss caused by chronic rejection (P = 0.001 vs. Group 2). CONCLUSIONS: This very low incidence of chronic rejection in recipients without previous AR suggests that immunologic factors are the main determinants of long-term kidney transplant outcome; nonimmunologic factors in isolation may have only a minimal impact on long-term graft survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Association between cytomegalovirus disease and chronic rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: It has long been suggested that cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease plays a role in the pathogenesis of chronic rejection (CR). However, its role has been difficult to prove, given the strong association between acute rejection and CMV, and the even stronger association between acute rejection and CR. To try to isolate the relative contribution of CMV infection in the pathogenesis of CR, we used multivariate techniques to examine risk factors for CR, including CMV disease. METHODS: Our study population consisted of adult recipients of a first kidney graft who underwent transplantation at a single center between 1/1/85 and 6/30/97 (n = 1339). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis using time to CR as the dependent variable demonstrated acute rejection to be the strongest risk factor (relative risk [RR] = 17.8, P = 0.0001), followed by older donor age (RR = 1.46, P = 0.01). The presence of CMV disease showed a trend toward increased risk for CR (RR = 1.30, P = 0.10), although the association was not as strong as with the other two variables. Comparing only those recipients with acute rejection and CMV disease versus those with acute rejection but no CMV disease, the relative risk of developing CR was 1.37 times higher in the former group. Recipients with acute rejection and CMV developed CR sooner and with a higher incidence versus those with acute rejection but no CMV (P = 0.002). It is interesting, however, that CMV disease was only a risk factor for CR in the presence of acute rejection. Recipients with no acute rejection and CMV disease did not have a higher incidence of CR versus those with no acute rejection and no CMV (P = NS). CONCLUSION: CMV disease seems to play some role in the pathogenesis of CR but only in the presence of acute rejection. Reasons may include (i) the inability to adequately treat acute rejection due to the presence of CMV disease or (ii) the increased virulence of latent CMV virus in recipients being treated for acute rejection. Our data may suggest a role for more aggressive prophylaxis against CMV disease, especially at the time of treatment for acute rejection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Decreased acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients is associated with decreased chronic rejection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a recent decrease in the rate of acute rejection after kidney transplantation was associated with a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Single-institution and multicenter retrospective analyses have identified acute rejection episodes as the major risk factor for chronic rejection after kidney transplantation. However, to date, no study has shown that a decrease in the rate of acute rejection leads to a decrease in the rate of chronic rejection. METHODS: The authors studied patient populations who underwent transplants at a single center during two eras (1984-1987 and 1991-1994) to determine the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection, the rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection, and the graft half-life. RESULTS: Recipients who underwent transplantation in era 2 had a decreased rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared with era 1 (p < 0.05). This decrease was associated with a decreased rate of biopsy-proven chronic rejection for both cadaver (p = 0.0001) and living donor (p = 0.08) recipients. A trend was observed toward increased graft half-life in era 2 (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Development of immunosuppressive protocols that decrease the rate of acute rejection should lower the rate of chronic rejection and improve long-term graft survival.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Donor iliac vein interposition during liver transplantation in a patient with a migrated transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are sometimes used to reduce the risk of variceal bleeding or treat intractable ascites before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). TIPS usually do not make OLT more difficult, but rarely, malposition of TIPS can significantly complicate OLT. METHOD AND RESULTS: The following report describes a patient in whom an initially well-placed Wallstent migrated to the confluence of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins. During liver transplantation, the portal vein containing the Wallstent was completely resected, and the portal vein was reconstructed with donor iliac vein. After sewing the iliac vein onto the portal remnant, the liver transplant was completed under portosystemic bypass. The patient had an uneventful recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Wallstents can migrate within the portal vein. An interposition graft of donor vein allows full resection of the portal vein containing a migrated stent and facilitates portosystemic bypass and portal anastomosis.

Foreign-Body Migration↗
PubMed1998

Venous thromboembolic complications after kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation: a multivariate analysis.

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the incidence of and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in our population of kidney (KTx) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SPK) recipients. METHODS: Information was collected retrospectively from a database on 1833 KTx and 276 SPK recipients who underwent transplant surgery between January 1985 and August 1995. RESULTS: The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was 6.2% (n= 132), with significantly higher rates after SPK (18.1%) vs. KTx (4.5%) (P < 0.001). The number of DVT episodes was highest in the first month; 17.5% occurred during this time. For KTx recipients, early thrombotic events were more common on the side of the graft (P=0.03); however, after 1 month, no correlation existed between the side of the graft and the side of DVT. For SPK recipients, DVT tended to be more common on the side of the pancreas (57%) vs. the kidney (43%) (P=0.10). By multivariate analysis, risk factors for DVT were: age > 40 years (odds ratio [OR]=2.2, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR=2.0, P=0.002), previous DVT (OR=4.4, P=0.001), and SPK transplant (OR=2.8, P < 0.001). Pulmonary embolus (PE) was identified in 44 recipients (incidence, 2.1%) and was fatal in 13 (30%). The incidence was significantly higher in SPK (4.71%) vs. KTx recipients (1.69%) (P < 0.01). The risk of death from PE was 0.5% in KTx recipients and 1.37% in SPK recipients (P=0.08). Risk factors for PE included DM (OR=2.6, P=0.005) and recent DVT (OR=8.9, P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on risk and extrapolating from the general surgical literature, our recommendations for prophylaxis against DVT are use of graduated compression stockings for all recipients and, in addition, low-dose heparin for moderate and high-risk recipients (previous DVT, SPK, age > 40 years, DM).

Adult↗